Articles | Volume 21, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4637-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4637-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Global methane budget and trend, 2010–2017: complementarity of inverse analyses using in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH4 ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) observations
Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Daniel J. Jacob
Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Yuzhong Zhang
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang
Province, China
Institute of Advanced Technology, Westlake Institute for Advanced
Study, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
Joannes D. Maasakkers
SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Utrecht, the
Netherlands
Melissa P. Sulprizio
Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Lu Shen
Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Tia R. Scarpelli
Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Hannah Nesser
Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Robert M. Yantosca
Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Jianxiong Sheng
Center for Global Change Science, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
Arlyn Andrews
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Earth System Research
Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
Robert J. Parker
National Centre for Earth Observation, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Earth Observation Science, Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Hartmut Boesch
National Centre for Earth Observation, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Earth Observation Science, Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
A. Anthony Bloom
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, CA, USA
Shuang Ma
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, CA, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 6,839 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Sep 2020)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4,912 | 1,866 | 61 | 6,839 | 252 | 72 | 95 |
- HTML: 4,912
- PDF: 1,866
- XML: 61
- Total: 6,839
- Supplement: 252
- BibTeX: 72
- EndNote: 95
Total article views: 5,725 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Mar 2021)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4,243 | 1,432 | 50 | 5,725 | 252 | 62 | 83 |
- HTML: 4,243
- PDF: 1,432
- XML: 50
- Total: 5,725
- Supplement: 252
- BibTeX: 62
- EndNote: 83
Total article views: 1,114 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Sep 2020)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
669 | 434 | 11 | 1,114 | 10 | 12 |
- HTML: 669
- PDF: 434
- XML: 11
- Total: 1,114
- BibTeX: 10
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 6,839 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 6,614 with geography defined
and 225 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,725 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,600 with geography defined
and 125 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,114 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,014 with geography defined
and 100 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
65 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Simulation evaluation of a single-photon laser methane remote sensor for leakage rate monitoring S. Zhu et al. 10.1364/OE.513894
- Urban methane emission monitoring across North America using TROPOMI data: an analytical inversion approach M. Hemati et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-58995-8
- Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI 1.0): a user-friendly, cloud-based facility for inferring high-resolution methane emissions from TROPOMI satellite observations D. Varon et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-5787-2022
- Estimation of Anthropogenic CH4 and CO2 Emissions in Taiyuan‐Jinzhong Region: One of the World's Largest Emission Hotspots C. Hu et al. 10.1029/2022JD037915
- Satellite quantification of oil and natural gas methane emissions in the US and Canada including contributions from individual basins L. Shen et al. 10.5194/acp-22-11203-2022
- Global observational coverage of onshore oil and gas methane sources with TROPOMI M. Gao et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-41914-8
- Methane emissions from China: a high-resolution inversion of TROPOMI satellite observations Z. Chen et al. 10.5194/acp-22-10809-2022
- Picoplanktonic methane production in eutrophic surface waters S. Tenorio & L. Farías 10.5194/bg-21-2029-2024
- Attribution of the 2020 surge in atmospheric methane by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations Z. Qu et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8754
- African rice cultivation linked to rising methane Z. Chen et al. 10.1038/s41558-023-01907-x
- Evaluation of wetland CH4in the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES) land surface model using satellite observations R. Parker et al. 10.5194/bg-19-5779-2022
- Estimating 2010–2015 anthropogenic and natural methane emissions in Canada using ECCC surface and GOSAT satellite observations S. Baray et al. 10.5194/acp-21-18101-2021
- Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane D. Jacob et al. 10.5194/acp-22-9617-2022
- Revealing Non-CO2 GHG Emissions in China’s Transportation Networks Z. Meng et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00832
- High-resolution assessment of coal mining methane emissions by satellite in Shanxi, China S. Peng et al. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108375
- High-resolution US methane emissions inferred from an inversion of 2019 TROPOMI satellite data: contributions from individual states, urban areas, and landfills H. Nesser et al. 10.5194/acp-24-5069-2024
- Methane emissions in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: evaluation of national methane emission inventories and 2010–2017 sectoral trends by inverse analysis of in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH<sub>4</sub> ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) atmospheric observations X. Lu et al. 10.5194/acp-22-395-2022
- Continuous weekly monitoring of methane emissions from the Permian Basin by inversion of TROPOMI satellite observations D. Varon et al. 10.5194/acp-23-7503-2023
- Quantifying methane emissions from United States landfills D. Cusworth et al. 10.1126/science.adi7735
- Observation-derived 2010-2019 trends in methane emissions and intensities from US oil and gas fields tied to activity metrics X. Lu et al. 10.1073/pnas.2217900120
- 煤炭行业甲烷排放卫星遥感研究进展与展望 秦. Qin Kai et al. 10.3788/AOS231293
- Updated Global Fuel Exploitation Inventory (GFEI) for methane emissions from the oil, gas, and coal sectors: evaluation with inversions of atmospheric methane observations T. Scarpelli et al. 10.5194/acp-22-3235-2022
- Where to place methane monitoring sites in China to better assist carbon management X. Zhang et al. 10.1038/s41612-023-00359-6
- Local and regional enhancements of CH4, CO, and CO2 inferred from TCCON column measurements K. Mottungan et al. 10.5194/amt-17-5861-2024
- Global distribution of methane emissions: a comparative inverse analysis of observations from the TROPOMI and GOSAT satellite instruments Z. Qu et al. 10.5194/acp-21-14159-2021
- Assimilation of GOSAT Methane in the Hemispheric CMAQ; Part II: Results Using Optimal Error Statistics S. Voshtani et al. 10.3390/rs14020375
- Assessing methane emissions from collapsing Venezuelan oil production using TROPOMI B. Nathan et al. 10.5194/acp-24-6845-2024
- The NASA Carbon Monitoring System Phase 2 synthesis: scope, findings, gaps and recommended next steps G. Hurtt et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac7407
- Global warming will largely increase waste treatment CH4 emissions in Chinese megacities: insight from the first city-scale CH4 concentration observation network in Hangzhou, China C. Hu et al. 10.5194/acp-23-4501-2023
- A high-resolution satellite-based map of global methane emissions reveals missing wetland, fossil fuel, and monsoon sources X. Yu et al. 10.5194/acp-23-3325-2023
- China's methane emissions derived from the inversion of GOSAT observations with a CMAQ and EnKS-based regional data assimilation system X. Kou et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2024.102333
- China's pathways to synchronize the emission reductions of air pollutants and greenhouse gases: Pros and cons R. Feng & X. Fang 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106392
- Numerical analysis of CH4 concentration distributions over East Asia with a regional chemical transport model L. Qin et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120207
- Recent Slowdown of Anthropogenic Methane Emissions in China Driven by Stabilized Coal Production G. Liu et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00463
- Estimates of the spatially complete, observational-data-driven planetary boundary layer height over the contiguous United States Z. Ayazpour et al. 10.5194/amt-16-563-2023
- Satellite quantification of methane emissions and oil–gas methane intensities from individual countries in the Middle East and North Africa: implications for climate action Z. Chen et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5945-2023
- Geospatial Analysis of Alaskan Lakes Indicates Wetland Fraction and Surface Water Area Are Useful Predictors of Methane Ebullition M. Savignano et al. 10.1080/24694452.2023.2277817
- Observed changes in China’s methane emissions linked to policy drivers Y. Zhang et al. 10.1073/pnas.2202742119
- Metal–organic frameworks as catalysts and biocatalysts for methane oxidation: The current state of the art L. Andrade et al. 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215042
- Methane retrieval from MethaneAIR using the CO2 proxy approach: a demonstration for the upcoming MethaneSAT mission C. Chan Miller et al. 10.5194/amt-17-5429-2024
- An integrated analysis of contemporary methane emissions and concentration trends over China using in situ and satellite observations and model simulations H. Tan et al. 10.5194/acp-22-1229-2022
- Merging TROPOMI and eddy covariance observations to quantify 5-years of daily CH4 emissions over coal-mine dominated region W. Hu et al. 10.1007/s40789-024-00700-1
- Inverse modeling of 2010–2022 satellite observations shows that inundation of the wet tropics drove the 2020–2022 methane surge Z. Qu et al. 10.1073/pnas.2402730121
- Attribution of individual methane and carbon dioxide emission sources using EMIT observations from space A. Thorpe et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adh2391
- CHEEREIO 1.0: a versatile and user-friendly ensemble-based chemical data assimilation and emissions inversion platform for the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model D. Pendergrass et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-4793-2023
- Decadal Methane Emission Trend Inferred from Proxy GOSAT XCH4 Retrievals: Impacts of Transport Model Spatial Resolution S. Zhu et al. 10.1007/s00376-022-1434-6
- Satellite Constraints on the Latitudinal Distribution and Temperature Sensitivity of Wetland Methane Emissions S. Ma et al. 10.1029/2021AV000408
- National quantifications of methane emissions from fuel exploitation using high resolution inversions of satellite observations L. Shen et al. 10.1038/s41467-023-40671-6
- Revisiting the quantification of power plant CO2 emissions in the United States and China from satellite: A comparative study using three top-down approaches C. He et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2024.114192
- A New Divergence Method to Quantify Methane Emissions Using Observations of Sentinel‐5P TROPOMI M. Liu et al. 10.1029/2021GL094151
- Decreasing methane emissions from China’s coal mining with rebounded coal production J. Gao et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac38d8
- East Asian methane emissions inferred from high-resolution inversions of GOSAT and TROPOMI observations: a comparative and evaluative analysis R. Liang et al. 10.5194/acp-23-8039-2023
- Country-level methane emissions and their sectoral trends during 2009–2020 estimated by high-resolution inversion of GOSAT and surface observations R. Janardanan et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad2436
- Decreasing seasonal cycle amplitude of methane in the northern high latitudes being driven by lower-latitude changes in emissions and transport E. Dowd et al. 10.5194/acp-23-7363-2023
- Forecasting short-term methane based on corrected numerical weather prediction outputs S. Zhao et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142500
- Methane Retrieval Algorithms Based on Satellite: A Review Y. Jiang et al. 10.3390/atmos15040449
- A gridded inventory of Canada’s anthropogenic methane emissions T. Scarpelli et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac40b1
- Simulation and Error Analysis of Methane Detection Globally Using Spaceborne IPDA Lidar X. Zhang et al. 10.3390/rs15133239
- Assimilation of GOSAT Methane in the Hemispheric CMAQ; Part I: Design of the Assimilation System S. Voshtani et al. 10.3390/rs14020371
- The 2019 methane budget and uncertainties at 1° resolution and each country through Bayesian integration Of GOSAT total column methane data and a priori inventory estimates J. Worden et al. 10.5194/acp-22-6811-2022
- Methane emission and influencing factors of China's oil and natural gas sector in 2020–2060: A source level analysis S. Sun et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167116
- Slowdown in China's methane emission growth M. Zhao et al. 10.1093/nsr/nwae223
- Investigation of the renewed methane growth post-2007 with high-resolution 3-D variational inverse modeling and isotopic constraints J. Thanwerdas et al. 10.5194/acp-24-2129-2024
- A decade of GOSAT Proxy satellite CH<sub>4</sub> observations R. Parker et al. 10.5194/essd-12-3383-2020
- Attribution of the accelerating increase in atmospheric methane during 2010–2018 by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations Y. Zhang et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3643-2021
63 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Simulation evaluation of a single-photon laser methane remote sensor for leakage rate monitoring S. Zhu et al. 10.1364/OE.513894
- Urban methane emission monitoring across North America using TROPOMI data: an analytical inversion approach M. Hemati et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-58995-8
- Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI 1.0): a user-friendly, cloud-based facility for inferring high-resolution methane emissions from TROPOMI satellite observations D. Varon et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-5787-2022
- Estimation of Anthropogenic CH4 and CO2 Emissions in Taiyuan‐Jinzhong Region: One of the World's Largest Emission Hotspots C. Hu et al. 10.1029/2022JD037915
- Satellite quantification of oil and natural gas methane emissions in the US and Canada including contributions from individual basins L. Shen et al. 10.5194/acp-22-11203-2022
- Global observational coverage of onshore oil and gas methane sources with TROPOMI M. Gao et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-41914-8
- Methane emissions from China: a high-resolution inversion of TROPOMI satellite observations Z. Chen et al. 10.5194/acp-22-10809-2022
- Picoplanktonic methane production in eutrophic surface waters S. Tenorio & L. Farías 10.5194/bg-21-2029-2024
- Attribution of the 2020 surge in atmospheric methane by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations Z. Qu et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8754
- African rice cultivation linked to rising methane Z. Chen et al. 10.1038/s41558-023-01907-x
- Evaluation of wetland CH4in the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES) land surface model using satellite observations R. Parker et al. 10.5194/bg-19-5779-2022
- Estimating 2010–2015 anthropogenic and natural methane emissions in Canada using ECCC surface and GOSAT satellite observations S. Baray et al. 10.5194/acp-21-18101-2021
- Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane D. Jacob et al. 10.5194/acp-22-9617-2022
- Revealing Non-CO2 GHG Emissions in China’s Transportation Networks Z. Meng et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00832
- High-resolution assessment of coal mining methane emissions by satellite in Shanxi, China S. Peng et al. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108375
- High-resolution US methane emissions inferred from an inversion of 2019 TROPOMI satellite data: contributions from individual states, urban areas, and landfills H. Nesser et al. 10.5194/acp-24-5069-2024
- Methane emissions in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: evaluation of national methane emission inventories and 2010–2017 sectoral trends by inverse analysis of in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH<sub>4</sub> ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) atmospheric observations X. Lu et al. 10.5194/acp-22-395-2022
- Continuous weekly monitoring of methane emissions from the Permian Basin by inversion of TROPOMI satellite observations D. Varon et al. 10.5194/acp-23-7503-2023
- Quantifying methane emissions from United States landfills D. Cusworth et al. 10.1126/science.adi7735
- Observation-derived 2010-2019 trends in methane emissions and intensities from US oil and gas fields tied to activity metrics X. Lu et al. 10.1073/pnas.2217900120
- 煤炭行业甲烷排放卫星遥感研究进展与展望 秦. Qin Kai et al. 10.3788/AOS231293
- Updated Global Fuel Exploitation Inventory (GFEI) for methane emissions from the oil, gas, and coal sectors: evaluation with inversions of atmospheric methane observations T. Scarpelli et al. 10.5194/acp-22-3235-2022
- Where to place methane monitoring sites in China to better assist carbon management X. Zhang et al. 10.1038/s41612-023-00359-6
- Local and regional enhancements of CH4, CO, and CO2 inferred from TCCON column measurements K. Mottungan et al. 10.5194/amt-17-5861-2024
- Global distribution of methane emissions: a comparative inverse analysis of observations from the TROPOMI and GOSAT satellite instruments Z. Qu et al. 10.5194/acp-21-14159-2021
- Assimilation of GOSAT Methane in the Hemispheric CMAQ; Part II: Results Using Optimal Error Statistics S. Voshtani et al. 10.3390/rs14020375
- Assessing methane emissions from collapsing Venezuelan oil production using TROPOMI B. Nathan et al. 10.5194/acp-24-6845-2024
- The NASA Carbon Monitoring System Phase 2 synthesis: scope, findings, gaps and recommended next steps G. Hurtt et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac7407
- Global warming will largely increase waste treatment CH4 emissions in Chinese megacities: insight from the first city-scale CH4 concentration observation network in Hangzhou, China C. Hu et al. 10.5194/acp-23-4501-2023
- A high-resolution satellite-based map of global methane emissions reveals missing wetland, fossil fuel, and monsoon sources X. Yu et al. 10.5194/acp-23-3325-2023
- China's methane emissions derived from the inversion of GOSAT observations with a CMAQ and EnKS-based regional data assimilation system X. Kou et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2024.102333
- China's pathways to synchronize the emission reductions of air pollutants and greenhouse gases: Pros and cons R. Feng & X. Fang 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106392
- Numerical analysis of CH4 concentration distributions over East Asia with a regional chemical transport model L. Qin et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120207
- Recent Slowdown of Anthropogenic Methane Emissions in China Driven by Stabilized Coal Production G. Liu et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00463
- Estimates of the spatially complete, observational-data-driven planetary boundary layer height over the contiguous United States Z. Ayazpour et al. 10.5194/amt-16-563-2023
- Satellite quantification of methane emissions and oil–gas methane intensities from individual countries in the Middle East and North Africa: implications for climate action Z. Chen et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5945-2023
- Geospatial Analysis of Alaskan Lakes Indicates Wetland Fraction and Surface Water Area Are Useful Predictors of Methane Ebullition M. Savignano et al. 10.1080/24694452.2023.2277817
- Observed changes in China’s methane emissions linked to policy drivers Y. Zhang et al. 10.1073/pnas.2202742119
- Metal–organic frameworks as catalysts and biocatalysts for methane oxidation: The current state of the art L. Andrade et al. 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215042
- Methane retrieval from MethaneAIR using the CO2 proxy approach: a demonstration for the upcoming MethaneSAT mission C. Chan Miller et al. 10.5194/amt-17-5429-2024
- An integrated analysis of contemporary methane emissions and concentration trends over China using in situ and satellite observations and model simulations H. Tan et al. 10.5194/acp-22-1229-2022
- Merging TROPOMI and eddy covariance observations to quantify 5-years of daily CH4 emissions over coal-mine dominated region W. Hu et al. 10.1007/s40789-024-00700-1
- Inverse modeling of 2010–2022 satellite observations shows that inundation of the wet tropics drove the 2020–2022 methane surge Z. Qu et al. 10.1073/pnas.2402730121
- Attribution of individual methane and carbon dioxide emission sources using EMIT observations from space A. Thorpe et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adh2391
- CHEEREIO 1.0: a versatile and user-friendly ensemble-based chemical data assimilation and emissions inversion platform for the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model D. Pendergrass et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-4793-2023
- Decadal Methane Emission Trend Inferred from Proxy GOSAT XCH4 Retrievals: Impacts of Transport Model Spatial Resolution S. Zhu et al. 10.1007/s00376-022-1434-6
- Satellite Constraints on the Latitudinal Distribution and Temperature Sensitivity of Wetland Methane Emissions S. Ma et al. 10.1029/2021AV000408
- National quantifications of methane emissions from fuel exploitation using high resolution inversions of satellite observations L. Shen et al. 10.1038/s41467-023-40671-6
- Revisiting the quantification of power plant CO2 emissions in the United States and China from satellite: A comparative study using three top-down approaches C. He et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2024.114192
- A New Divergence Method to Quantify Methane Emissions Using Observations of Sentinel‐5P TROPOMI M. Liu et al. 10.1029/2021GL094151
- Decreasing methane emissions from China’s coal mining with rebounded coal production J. Gao et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac38d8
- East Asian methane emissions inferred from high-resolution inversions of GOSAT and TROPOMI observations: a comparative and evaluative analysis R. Liang et al. 10.5194/acp-23-8039-2023
- Country-level methane emissions and their sectoral trends during 2009–2020 estimated by high-resolution inversion of GOSAT and surface observations R. Janardanan et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad2436
- Decreasing seasonal cycle amplitude of methane in the northern high latitudes being driven by lower-latitude changes in emissions and transport E. Dowd et al. 10.5194/acp-23-7363-2023
- Forecasting short-term methane based on corrected numerical weather prediction outputs S. Zhao et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142500
- Methane Retrieval Algorithms Based on Satellite: A Review Y. Jiang et al. 10.3390/atmos15040449
- A gridded inventory of Canada’s anthropogenic methane emissions T. Scarpelli et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac40b1
- Simulation and Error Analysis of Methane Detection Globally Using Spaceborne IPDA Lidar X. Zhang et al. 10.3390/rs15133239
- Assimilation of GOSAT Methane in the Hemispheric CMAQ; Part I: Design of the Assimilation System S. Voshtani et al. 10.3390/rs14020371
- The 2019 methane budget and uncertainties at 1° resolution and each country through Bayesian integration Of GOSAT total column methane data and a priori inventory estimates J. Worden et al. 10.5194/acp-22-6811-2022
- Methane emission and influencing factors of China's oil and natural gas sector in 2020–2060: A source level analysis S. Sun et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167116
- Slowdown in China's methane emission growth M. Zhao et al. 10.1093/nsr/nwae223
- Investigation of the renewed methane growth post-2007 with high-resolution 3-D variational inverse modeling and isotopic constraints J. Thanwerdas et al. 10.5194/acp-24-2129-2024
2 citations as recorded by crossref.
Latest update: 05 Dec 2024
Short summary
We use an analytical solution to the Bayesian inverse problem to quantitatively compare and combine the information from satellite and in situ observations, and to estimate global methane budget and their trends over the 2010–2017 period. We find that satellite and in situ observations are to a large extent complementary in the inversion for estimating global methane budget, and reveal consistent corrections of regional anthropogenic and wetland methane emissions relative to the prior inventory.
We use an analytical solution to the Bayesian inverse problem to quantitatively compare and...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint