Articles | Volume 21, issue 6
Research article
19 Mar 2021
Research article |  | 19 Mar 2021

Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

Ben Kravitz, Douglas G. MacMartin, Daniele Visioni, Olivier Boucher, Jason N. S. Cole, Jim Haywood, Andy Jones, Thibaut Lurton, Pierre Nabat, Ulrike Niemeier, Alan Robock, Roland Séférian, and Simone Tilmes


Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Ben Kravitz on behalf of the Authors (27 Dec 2020)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (02 Jan 2021) by Xiaohong Liu
RR by Ralph Kahn (05 Jan 2021)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (29 Jan 2021) by Xiaohong Liu
AR by Ben Kravitz on behalf of the Authors (04 Feb 2021)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (14 Feb 2021) by Xiaohong Liu
Short summary
This study investigates multi-model response to idealized geoengineering (high CO2 with solar reduction) across two different generations of climate models. We find that, with the exception of a few cases, the results are unchanged between the different generations. This gives us confidence that broad conclusions about the response to idealized geoengineering are robust.
Final-revised paper