Articles | Volume 21, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4231-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4231-2021
Research article
 | 
19 Mar 2021
Research article |  | 19 Mar 2021

Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

Ben Kravitz, Douglas G. MacMartin, Daniele Visioni, Olivier Boucher, Jason N. S. Cole, Jim Haywood, Andy Jones, Thibaut Lurton, Pierre Nabat, Ulrike Niemeier, Alan Robock, Roland Séférian, and Simone Tilmes

Viewed

Total article views: 3,715 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,881 795 39 3,715 52 52
  • HTML: 2,881
  • PDF: 795
  • XML: 39
  • Total: 3,715
  • BibTeX: 52
  • EndNote: 52
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Aug 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Aug 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,715 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,857 with geography defined and -142 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 28 Feb 2024
Download
Short summary
This study investigates multi-model response to idealized geoengineering (high CO2 with solar reduction) across two different generations of climate models. We find that, with the exception of a few cases, the results are unchanged between the different generations. This gives us confidence that broad conclusions about the response to idealized geoengineering are robust.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint