Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 21, issue 6
Articles | Volume 21, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4231-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4231-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 21, issue 6
Research article
 | 
19 Mar 2021
Research article |  | 19 Mar 2021

Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

Ben Kravitz, Douglas G. MacMartin, Daniele Visioni, Olivier Boucher, Jason N. S. Cole, Jim Haywood, Andy Jones, Thibaut Lurton, Pierre Nabat, Ulrike Niemeier, Alan Robock, Roland Séférian, and Simone Tilmes

Viewed

Total article views: 6,694 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
5,186 1,357 151 6,694 200 208
  • HTML: 5,186
  • PDF: 1,357
  • XML: 151
  • Total: 6,694
  • BibTeX: 200
  • EndNote: 208
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Aug 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Aug 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 6,694 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 6,694 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
This study investigates multi-model response to idealized geoengineering (high CO2 with solar reduction) across two different generations of climate models. We find that, with the exception of a few cases, the results are unchanged between the different generations. This gives us confidence that broad conclusions about the response to idealized geoengineering are robust.
Read more
Share
Special issue
Resolving uncertainties in solar geoengineering through multi-model...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint