Articles | Volume 20, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12939-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12939-2020
Research article
 | 
05 Nov 2020
Research article |  | 05 Nov 2020

Dependency of particle size distribution at dust emission on friction velocity and atmospheric boundary-layer stability

Yaping Shao, Jie Zhang, Masahide Ishizuka, Masao Mikami, John Leys, and Ning Huang

Related authors

Large-eddy-model closure and simulation of turbulent flux patterns over oasis surface
Bangjun Cao, Yaping Shao, Xianyu Yang, Xin Yin, and Shaofeng Liu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 275–285, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-275-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-275-2024, 2024
Short summary
On the importance of moisture conveyor belts from the tropical eastern Pacific for wetter conditions in the Atacama Desert during the mid-Pliocene
Mark Reyers, Stephanie Fiedler, Patrick Ludwig, Christoph Böhm, Volker Wennrich, and Yaping Shao
Clim. Past, 19, 517–532, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-517-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-517-2023, 2023
Short summary
Impact of turbulence on aeolian particle entrainment: results from wind-tunnel experiments
Jie Zhang, Guang Li, Li Shi, Ning Huang, and Yaping Shao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9525–9535, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9525-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9525-2022, 2022
Short summary
Large-eddy-simulation study on turbulent particle deposition and its dependence on atmospheric-boundary-layer stability
Xin Yin, Cong Jiang, Yaping Shao, Ning Huang, and Jie Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4509–4522, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4509-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4509-2022, 2022
Short summary
Linkage between dust cycle and loess of the Last Glacial Maximum in Europe
Erik Jan Schaffernicht, Patrick Ludwig, and Yaping Shao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4969–4986, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4969-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4969-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Warming effects of reduced sulfur emissions from shipping
Masaru Yoshioka, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Ben B. B. Booth, Colin P. Morice, and Ken S. Carslaw
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13681–13692, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13681-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13681-2024, 2024
Short summary
The key role of atmospheric absorption in the Asian summer monsoon response to dust emissions in CMIP6 models
Alcide Zhao, Laura J. Wilcox, and Claire L. Ryder
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13385–13402, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13385-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13385-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multi-model effective radiative forcing of the 2020 sulfur cap for shipping
Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Rachael Byrom, Øivind Hodnebrog, Caroline Jouan, and Gunnar Myhre
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13361–13370, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13361-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13361-2024, 2024
Short summary
Representation of iron aerosol size distributions of anthropogenic emissions is critical in evaluating atmospheric soluble iron input to the ocean
Mingxu Liu, Hitoshi Matsui, Douglas S. Hamilton, Sagar D. Rathod, Kara D. Lamb, and Natalie M. Mahowald
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13115–13127, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13115-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13115-2024, 2024
Short summary
Revealing dominant patterns of aerosol regimes in the lower troposphere and their evolution from preindustrial times to the future in global climate model simulations
Jingmin Li, Mattia Righi, Johannes Hendricks, Christof G. Beer, Ulrike Burkhardt, and Anja Schmidt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12727–12747, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12727-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12727-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Albani, S., Mahowald, N. M., Perry, A. T., Scanza, R. A., Zender, C. S., Heavens, N. G., Maggi, V., Kok, J. F., and Otto-Bliesner, B. L.: Improved dust representation in the Community Atmosphere Model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 6, 541–570, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000279, 2014. 
Alfaro, S. C., Gaudichet, A., Gomes, L., and Maille, M.: Modeling the size distribution of a soil aerosol produced by sandblasting. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 11239–11249, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00403, 1997. 
Astrom, J. A.: Statistical models of brittle fragmentation. Adv. Phys., 55, 247–278, https://doi.org/10.1080 /00018730600731907, 2006. 
Businger, J. A., Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, J., and Bradley, E. F.: Flux-Profile Relationships in the Atmospheric Surface Layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 181–189, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<0181:FPRITA>2.0.CO;2, 1971. 
Csanady, G. T.: Turbulent Diffusion of Heavy Particles in the Atmosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 20, 201–208, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0201:TDOHPI>2.0.CO;2, 1963. 
Download
Short summary
It has been recognized in earlier research that particle size distribution of dust at emission (dust PSD) is dependent on friction velocity. This recognition has been challenged in some recent papers. Based on the analysis of experimental data, we confirm that dust PSD is dependent on friction velocity and atmospheric boundary-layer stability. By theoretical and numerical analysis, we reveal the reasons for this dependency.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint