Articles | Volume 20, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11855-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11855-2020
Research article
 | 
22 Oct 2020
Research article |  | 22 Oct 2020

Errors in top-down estimates of emissions using a known source

Wayne M. Angevine, Jeff Peischl, Alice Crawford, Christopher P. Loughner, Ilana B. Pollack, and Chelsea R. Thompson

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Wayne Angevine on behalf of the Authors (21 Aug 2020)  Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (01 Sep 2020) by Andreas Hofzumahaus
AR by Wayne Angevine on behalf of the Authors (02 Sep 2020)

Post-review adjustments

AA: Author's adjustment | EA: Editor approval
AA by Wayne Angevine on behalf of the Authors (21 Oct 2020)   Author's adjustment   Manuscript
EA: Adjustments approved (21 Oct 2020) by Andreas Hofzumahaus
Download
Short summary
Emissions of air pollutants must be known for a wide variety of applications. Different methods of estimating emissions often disagree substantially. In this study, we apply standard methods to a well-known source, a power plant. We explore the uncertainty implied by the different answers that come from the different methods, different samples taken over several years, and different pollutants. We find that the overall uncertainty of emissions estimates is about 30 %.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint