Dear authors,

Thank you for your revised version and the detailed reply. Generally, the reviewers are satisfied with your revision. Reviewer #3, however, raises some more minor points which should be addressed. In addition, I would like you to do the following minor changes:

- Please check throughout the manuscript that all acronyms are defined at first occurrence. This also applies separately for your very detailed supplement.

- Please revise carefully your figure captions. It should be precisely stated what is shown. For example, the caption of Fig 3 and 5 should be improved. A "correlation" is a statistical association and not a graphical representation. Although not mandatory, it also improves the readability if the acronyms are described in the caption once more. In an ideal case, the reader should understand the figure without searching the entire document again. Same accounts for Fig. 2, 6 and S3 (here the caption is an interpretation again).

Kind regards

Paul.

Dear Miram Elser,

Thank you for your revised manuscript. Although you state that you have revised your figure captions, I see no changes. For example, the caption of Fig. 3 is still the same (see my original comment). Have you uploaded the correct document? Please use track changes also for the figure captions.

Thanks and kind regards

Paul.

Dear Miriam, dear co-authors,

Thank you very much for the final corrections. Your manuscript is now ready to be published in ACP.

Kind regards,

Paul.