Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China
Meteorological Administration, Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast
and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information
Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Institute of Atmospheric Composition, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather & Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry of CMA, Chinese
Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China
Meteorological Administration, Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast
and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information
Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Institute of Urban Meteorology, China Meteorological
Administration, Beijing 100089, China
Wei Wang
China National Environmental
Monitoring Center, Beijing, 100012, China
Qing Hou
Institute of Atmospheric Composition, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather & Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry of CMA, Chinese
Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Zengyuan Guo
Institute of Atmospheric Composition, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather & Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry of CMA, Chinese
Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Chao Wang
Institute of Atmospheric Composition, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather & Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry of CMA, Chinese
Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Viewed
Total article views: 3,866 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,295
1,443
128
3,866
502
124
194
HTML: 2,295
PDF: 1,443
XML: 128
Total: 3,866
Supplement: 502
BibTeX: 124
EndNote: 194
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Nov 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Nov 2016)
Total article views: 2,666 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,692
889
85
2,666
270
101
140
HTML: 1,692
PDF: 889
XML: 85
Total: 2,666
Supplement: 270
BibTeX: 101
EndNote: 140
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 May 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 May 2018)
Total article views: 1,200 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
603
554
43
1,200
232
23
54
HTML: 603
PDF: 554
XML: 43
Total: 1,200
Supplement: 232
BibTeX: 23
EndNote: 54
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Nov 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Nov 2016)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,866 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,805 with geography defined
and 61 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,666 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,626 with geography defined
and 40 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,200 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,179 with geography defined
and 21 with unknown origin.
The GRAPES–CUACE aerosol adjoint model was developed and applied in detecting PM2.5 sources for haze events in eastern China (EC). The response time of Beijing PM2.5 pollution peaks to local and surrounding emissions is quantized for regional transport of air pollution over the EC. The adjoint results agreed well with the Models-3/CMAQ assessments. The adjoint method is powerful in simulating the receptor–source relationship and can be utilized in dynamic air quality control scheme design.
The GRAPES–CUACE aerosol adjoint model was developed and applied in detecting PM2.5 sources for...
