Articles | Volume 18, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12011-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
Research article
| 
22 Aug 2018
Research article |
| 22 Aug 2018
| 22 Aug 2018
A comparison of posterior atmospheric CO2 adjustments obtained from in situ and GOSAT constrained flux inversions
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 22 Aug 2018)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 10 Jan 2018)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
RC1: 'A comparison of atmospheric CO2 flux signals obtained from GEOS-Chem flux inversions constrained by in situ or GOSAT observations by Polavarapu et al.', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Mar 2018
-
AC1: 'Author reply to Reviewer 1 comments', Saroja Polavarapu, 01 Jun 2018
-
AC1: 'Author reply to Reviewer 1 comments', Saroja Polavarapu, 01 Jun 2018
-
RC2: 'Review of “A comparison of atmospheric CO2 flux signals obtained from GEOS-Chem flux inversions constrained by in situ or GOSAT observations”, by Polavarapu et al', Anonymous Referee #2, 23 Mar 2018
-
AC2: 'Author response to Reviewer 2 comments', Saroja Polavarapu, 01 Jun 2018
-
AC2: 'Author response to Reviewer 2 comments', Saroja Polavarapu, 01 Jun 2018
Peer-review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Saroja Polavarapu on behalf of the Authors (01 Jun 2018)
Author's response
Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (19 Jun 2018) by Rachel Law
AR by Saroja Polavarapu on behalf of the Authors (06 Jul 2018)
Author's response
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (25 Jul 2018) by Rachel Law
AR by Saroja Polavarapu on behalf of the Authors (26 Jul 2018)
