Articles | Volume 16, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3041-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3041-2016
Research article
 | 
09 Mar 2016
Research article |  | 09 Mar 2016

Simulating secondary organic aerosol in a regional air quality model using the statistical oxidation model – Part 2: Assessing the influence of vapor wall losses

Christopher D. Cappa, Shantanu H. Jathar, Michael J. Kleeman, Kenneth S. Docherty, Jose L. Jimenez, John H. Seinfeld, and Anthony S. Wexler

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Christopher Cappa on behalf of the Authors (29 Jan 2016)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (19 Feb 2016) by Kari Lehtinen
AR by Christopher Cappa on behalf of the Authors (23 Feb 2016)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Losses of vapors to walls of chambers can negatively bias SOA formation measurements, consequently leading to low predicted SOA concentrations in air quality models. Here, we show that accounting for such vapor losses leads to substantial increases in the predicted amount of SOA formed from VOCs and to notable increases in the O : C atomic ratio in two US regions. Comparison with a variety of observational data suggests generally improved model performance when vapor wall losses are accounted for.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint