Articles | Volume 14, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5415-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5415-2014
Research article
 | 
04 Jun 2014
Research article |  | 04 Jun 2014

Fine particulate matter source apportionment using a hybrid chemical transport and receptor model approach

Y. Hu, S. Balachandran, J. E. Pachon, J. Baek, C. Ivey, H. Holmes, M. T. Odman, J. A. Mulholland, and A. G. Russell

Related authors

FastCTM (v1.0): Atmospheric chemical transport modelling with a principle-informed neural network for air quality simulations
Baolei Lyu, Ran Huang, Xinlu Wang, Weiguo Wang, and Yongtao Hu
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-198,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-198, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Deep-learning spatial principles from deterministic chemical transport models for chemical reanalysis: an application in China for PM2.5
Baolei Lyu, Ran Huang, Xinlu Wang, Weiguo Wang, and Yongtao Hu
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1583–1594, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1583-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1583-2022, 2022
Short summary
Evaluation of Anthropogenic Emissions and Ozone Pollution in the North China Plain: Insights from the Air Chemistry Research in Asia (ARIAs) Campaign
Hao He, Xinrong Ren, Sarah E. Benish, Zhanqing Li, Fei Wang, Yuying Wang, Timothy P. Canty, Xiaobo Dong, Feng Lv, Yongtao Hu, Tong Zhu, and Russell R. Dickerson
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-248,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-248, 2019
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Development of PM2.5 source impact spatial fields using a hybrid source apportionment air quality model
C. E. Ivey, H. A. Holmes, Y. T. Hu, J. A. Mulholland, and A. G. Russell
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2153–2165, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2153-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2153-2015, 2015
Short summary
Downscaling a global climate model to simulate climate change over the US and the implication on regional and urban air quality
M. Trail, A. P. Tsimpidi, P. Liu, K. Tsigaridis, Y. Hu, A. Nenes, and A. G. Russell
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1429–1445, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1429-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1429-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Rapid oxidation of phenolic compounds by O3 and HO: effects of the air–water interface and mineral dust in tropospheric chemical processes
Yanru Huo, Mingxue Li, Xueyu Wang, Jianfei Sun, Yuxin Zhou, Yuhui Ma, and Maoxia He
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12409–12423, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12409-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12409-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modeling the contribution of leads to sea spray aerosol in the high Arctic
Rémy Lapere, Louis Marelle, Pierre Rampal, Laurent Brodeau, Christian Melsheimer, Gunnar Spreen, and Jennie L. Thomas
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12107–12132, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12107-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12107-2024, 2024
Short summary
Importance of aerosol composition and aerosol vertical profiles in global spatial variation in the relationship between PM2.5 and aerosol optical depth
Haihui Zhu, Randall V. Martin, Aaron van Donkelaar, Melanie S. Hammer, Chi Li, Jun Meng, Christopher R. Oxford, Xuan Liu, Yanshun Li, Dandan Zhang, Inderjeet Singh, and Alexei Lyapustin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11565–11584, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11565-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11565-2024, 2024
Short summary
The co-benefits of a low-carbon future for PM2.5 and O3 air pollution in Europe
Connor J. Clayton, Daniel R. Marsh, Steven T. Turnock, Ailish M. Graham, Kirsty J. Pringle, Carly L. Reddington, Rajesh Kumar, and James B. McQuaid
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10717–10740, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10717-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10717-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessing the effectiveness of SO2, NOx, and NH3 emission reductions in mitigating winter PM2.5 in Taiwan using CMAQ
Ping-Chieh Huang, Hui-Ming Hung, Hsin-Chih Lai, and Charles C.-K. Chou
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10759–10772, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10759-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10759-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Appel, K. W., Bhave, P. V., Gilliland, A. B., Sarwar, G., and Roselle, S. J.: Evaluation of the community multiscale air quality (CMAQ) model version 4.5: Sensitivities impacting model performance; Part II – particulate matter, Atmos. Environ., 42, 6057–6066, 2008.
Appel, K. W., Pouliot, G. A., Simon, H., Sarwar, G., Pye, H. O. T., Napelenok, S. L., Akhtar, F., and Roselle, S. J.: Evaluation of dust and trace metal estimates from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 883–899, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-883-2013, 2013.
Baek, J.: Improving aerosol simulations: Assessing and improving emissions and secondary organic aerosol formation in air quality modeling, 140 pp., Georgia Institute of Tecnology, Atlanta, GA, Ph.D. Dissertation, 2009.
Balachandran, S., Pachon, J. E., Hu, Y., Lee, D., Mulholland, J. A., and Russell, A. G.: Ensemble-trained source apportionment of fine particulate matter and method uncertainty analysis, Atmos. Environ., 61, 387–394, 2012.
Binkowski, F. S. and Roselle, S. J.: Models-3 Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) model aerosol component: 1. Model description, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4183, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001409, 2003.
Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint