Articles | Volume 25, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5159-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5159-2025
Research article
 | 
21 May 2025
Research article |  | 21 May 2025

High-resolution greenhouse gas flux inversions using a machine learning surrogate model for atmospheric transport

Nikhil Dadheech, Tai-Long He, and Alexander J. Turner

Related authors

FootNet v1.0: development of a machine learning emulator of atmospheric transport
Tai-Long He, Nikhil Dadheech, Tammy M. Thompson, and Alexander J. Turner
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1661–1671, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1661-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1661-2025, 2025
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Machine Learning | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Technical note: Towards atmospheric compound identification in chemical ionization mass spectrometry with pesticide standards and machine learning
Federica Bortolussi, Hilda Sandström, Fariba Partovi, Joona Mikkilä, Patrick Rinke, and Matti Rissanen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 685–704, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-685-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-685-2025, 2025
Short summary
Diagnosing ozone–NOx–VOC–aerosol sensitivity and uncovering causes of urban–nonurban discrepancies in Shandong, China, using transformer-based estimations
Chenliang Tao, Yanbo Peng, Qingzhu Zhang, Yuqiang Zhang, Bing Gong, Qiao Wang, and Wenxing Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4177–4192, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4177-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4177-2024, 2024
Short summary
A machine learning approach to downscale EMEP4UK: analysis of UK ozone variability and trends
Lily Gouldsbrough, Ryan Hossaini, Emma Eastoe, Paul J. Young, and Massimo Vieno
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3163–3196, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3163-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3163-2024, 2024
Short summary
Automated detection and monitoring of methane super-emitters using satellite data
Berend J. Schuit, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Pieter Bijl, Gourav Mahapatra, Anne-Wil van den Berg, Sudhanshu Pandey, Alba Lorente, Tobias Borsdorff, Sander Houweling, Daniel J. Varon, Jason McKeever, Dylan Jervis, Marianne Girard, Itziar Irakulis-Loitxate, Javier Gorroño, Luis Guanter, Daniel H. Cusworth, and Ilse Aben
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 9071–9098, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9071-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9071-2023, 2023
Short summary
Spatiotemporal modeling of air pollutant concentrations in Germany using machine learning
Vigneshkumar Balamurugan, Jia Chen, Adrian Wenzel, and Frank N. Keutsch
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10267–10285, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10267-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10267-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Asimow, N. G., Turner, A. J., and Cohen, R. C.: Sustained Reductions of Bay Area CO2 Emissions 2018–2022, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 6586–6594, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c09642, 2024. a
Bishop, C. M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, ISBN 978-0-387-31073-2, 2006. a
Bovensmann, H., Buchwitz, M., Burrows, J. P., Reuter, M., Krings, T., Gerilowski, K., Schneising, O., Heymann, J., Tretner, A., and Erzinger, J.: A remote sensing technique for global monitoring of power plant CO2 emissions from space and related applications, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 781–811, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-781-2010, 2010. a
Brandt, A. R., Heath, G. A., Kort, E. A., O'Sullivan, F., Pétron, G., Jordaan, S. M., Tans, P., Wilcox, J., Gopstein, A. M., Arent, D., Wofsy, S., Brown, N. J., Bradley, R., Stucky, G. D., Eardley, D., and Harriss, R.: Methane Leaks from North American Natural Gas Systems, Science, 343, 733–735, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1247045, 2014. a, b
Brecht, R., Bakels, L., Bihlo, A., and Stohl, A.: Improving trajectory calculations by FLEXPART 10.4+ using single-image super-resolution, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2181–2192, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2181-2023, 2023. a
Download
Short summary
We developed an efficient GHG (greenhouse gas) flux inversion framework using a machine-learning emulator (FootNet) as a surrogate for an atmospheric transport model, resulting in a 650 × speedup. Paradoxically, the flux inversion using the ML (machine-learning) model outperforms the full-physics model in our case study. We attribute this to the ML model mitigating transport errors in the GHG flux inversion.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint