Articles | Volume 23, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6011-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6011-2023
Peer-reviewed comment
 | 
01 Jun 2023
Peer-reviewed comment |  | 01 Jun 2023

Comment on “Climate consequences of hydrogen emissions” by Ocko and Hamburg (2022)

Lei Duan and Ken Caldeira

Viewed

Total article views: 7,317 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
6,149 1,017 151 7,317 336 189 172
  • HTML: 6,149
  • PDF: 1,017
  • XML: 151
  • Total: 7,317
  • Supplement: 336
  • BibTeX: 189
  • EndNote: 172
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Dec 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 7,317 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 7,317 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 18 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
Ocko and Hamburg (2022) emphasize the short-term climate impact of hydrogen, and we present an analysis that places greater focus on long-term outcomes. We have derived equations that describe the time-evolving impact of hydrogen and show that higher methane leakage is primarily responsible for the warming potential of blue hydrogen, while hydrogen leakage plays a less critical role. Fossil fuels show more prominent longer-term climate impacts than clean hydrogen under all emission scenarios.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint