Articles | Volume 22, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-93-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-93-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| Highlight paper
| 
04 Jan 2022
Research article | Highlight paper |
| 04 Jan 2022
| 04 Jan 2022
Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 1: Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol modules
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Atmospheric Research Centre of Eastern Finland, 70200 Kuopio, Finland
Ulrike Niemeier
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
Daniele Visioni
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA
Simone Tilmes
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USA
Harri Kokkola
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Atmospheric Research Centre of Eastern Finland, 70200 Kuopio, Finland
Viewed
Total article views: 7,139 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Jul 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5,942 | 1,093 | 104 | 7,139 | 384 | 127 | 115 |
- HTML: 5,942
- PDF: 1,093
- XML: 104
- Total: 7,139
- Supplement: 384
- BibTeX: 127
- EndNote: 115
Total article views: 6,178 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 04 Jan 2022)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5,308 | 786 | 84 | 6,178 | 246 | 119 | 107 |
- HTML: 5,308
- PDF: 786
- XML: 84
- Total: 6,178
- Supplement: 246
- BibTeX: 119
- EndNote: 107
Total article views: 961 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Jul 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 634 | 307 | 20 | 961 | 138 | 8 | 8 |
- HTML: 634
- PDF: 307
- XML: 20
- Total: 961
- Supplement: 138
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 8
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 7,139 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 7,139 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 6,178 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 6,178 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 961 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 961 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
19 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Injection strategy – a driver of atmospheric circulation and ozone response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering E. Bednarz et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13665-2023
- Regional Geoengineering Using Tiny Glass Bubbles Would Accelerate the Loss of Arctic Sea Ice M. Webster & S. Warren 10.1029/2022EF002815
- Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 2: How changes in the hydrological cycle depend on the injection rate and model used A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/esd-15-405-2024
- Key Gaps in Models' Physical Representation of Climate Intervention and Its Impacts S. Eastham et al. 10.1029/2024MS004872
- Analysis of the global atmospheric background sulfur budget in a multi-model framework C. Brodowsky et al. 10.5194/acp-24-5513-2024
- Validating a microphysical prognostic stratospheric aerosol implementation in E3SMv2 using observations after the Mount Pinatubo eruption H. Brown et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-5087-2024
- Impact of SO2 injection profiles on simulated volcanic forcing for the 2009 Sarychev eruptions – investigating the importance of using high-vertical-resolution methods when compiling SO2 data E. Axebrink et al. 10.5194/acp-25-2047-2025
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- Performance assessment for climate intervention (PACI): preliminary application to a stratospheric aerosol injection scenario L. Wheeler et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1205515
- The Choice of Baseline Period Influences the Assessments of the Outcomes of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection D. Visioni et al. 10.1029/2023EF003851
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-663-2023
- Optimizing Injection Locations Relaxes Altitude‐Lifetime Trade‐Off for Stratospheric Aerosol Injection H. Sun et al. 10.1029/2023GL105371
- Research criteria towards an interdisciplinary Stratospheric Aerosol Intervention assessment S. Tilmes et al. 10.1093/oxfclm/kgae010
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 2: Stratospheric and free-tropospheric response E. Bednarz et al. 10.5194/acp-23-687-2023
- Interactive stratospheric aerosol models' response to different amounts and altitudes of SO2 injection during the 1991 Pinatubo eruption I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-23-921-2023
- On Nucleation Pathways and Particle Size Distribution Evolutions in Stratospheric Aircraft Exhaust Plumes with H2SO4 Enhancement F. Yu et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c08408
- Importance of microphysical settings for climate forcing by stratospheric SO2 injections as modeled by SOCOL-AERv2 S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-4181-2024
- Particle number concentrations and size distributions in the stratosphere: implications of nucleation mechanisms and particle microphysics F. Yu et al. 10.5194/acp-23-1863-2023
- Limitations of assuming internal mixing between different aerosol species: a case study with sulfate geoengineering simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-22-1739-2022
19 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Injection strategy – a driver of atmospheric circulation and ozone response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering E. Bednarz et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13665-2023
- Regional Geoengineering Using Tiny Glass Bubbles Would Accelerate the Loss of Arctic Sea Ice M. Webster & S. Warren 10.1029/2022EF002815
- Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 2: How changes in the hydrological cycle depend on the injection rate and model used A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/esd-15-405-2024
- Key Gaps in Models' Physical Representation of Climate Intervention and Its Impacts S. Eastham et al. 10.1029/2024MS004872
- Analysis of the global atmospheric background sulfur budget in a multi-model framework C. Brodowsky et al. 10.5194/acp-24-5513-2024
- Validating a microphysical prognostic stratospheric aerosol implementation in E3SMv2 using observations after the Mount Pinatubo eruption H. Brown et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-5087-2024
- Impact of SO2 injection profiles on simulated volcanic forcing for the 2009 Sarychev eruptions – investigating the importance of using high-vertical-resolution methods when compiling SO2 data E. Axebrink et al. 10.5194/acp-25-2047-2025
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- Performance assessment for climate intervention (PACI): preliminary application to a stratospheric aerosol injection scenario L. Wheeler et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1205515
- The Choice of Baseline Period Influences the Assessments of the Outcomes of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection D. Visioni et al. 10.1029/2023EF003851
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-663-2023
- Optimizing Injection Locations Relaxes Altitude‐Lifetime Trade‐Off for Stratospheric Aerosol Injection H. Sun et al. 10.1029/2023GL105371
- Research criteria towards an interdisciplinary Stratospheric Aerosol Intervention assessment S. Tilmes et al. 10.1093/oxfclm/kgae010
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 2: Stratospheric and free-tropospheric response E. Bednarz et al. 10.5194/acp-23-687-2023
- Interactive stratospheric aerosol models' response to different amounts and altitudes of SO2 injection during the 1991 Pinatubo eruption I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-23-921-2023
- On Nucleation Pathways and Particle Size Distribution Evolutions in Stratospheric Aircraft Exhaust Plumes with H2SO4 Enhancement F. Yu et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c08408
- Importance of microphysical settings for climate forcing by stratospheric SO2 injections as modeled by SOCOL-AERv2 S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-4181-2024
- Particle number concentrations and size distributions in the stratosphere: implications of nucleation mechanisms and particle microphysics F. Yu et al. 10.5194/acp-23-1863-2023
- Limitations of assuming internal mixing between different aerosol species: a case study with sulfate geoengineering simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-22-1739-2022
Latest update: 10 Sep 2025
Short summary
The use of different spatio-temporal sulfur injection strategies with different magnitudes to create an artificial reflective aerosol layer to cool the climate is studied using sectional and modal aerosol schemes in a climate model. There are significant differences in the results depending on the aerosol microphysical module used. Different spatio-temporal injection strategies have a significant impact on the magnitude and zonal distribution of radiative forcing and atmospheric dynamics.
The use of different spatio-temporal sulfur injection strategies with different magnitudes to...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint