Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 22, issue 1
Articles | Volume 22, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-93-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-93-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 22, issue 1
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
04 Jan 2022
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 04 Jan 2022

Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 1: Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol modules

Anton Laakso, Ulrike Niemeier, Daniele Visioni, Simone Tilmes, and Harri Kokkola

Viewed

Total article views: 8,468 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
7,110 1,247 111 8,468 468 147 136
  • HTML: 7,110
  • PDF: 1,247
  • XML: 111
  • Total: 8,468
  • Supplement: 468
  • BibTeX: 147
  • EndNote: 136
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jul 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jul 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 8,468 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 8,468 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 09 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
The use of different spatio-temporal sulfur injection strategies with different magnitudes to create an artificial reflective aerosol layer to cool the climate is studied using sectional and modal aerosol schemes in a climate model. There are significant differences in the results depending on the aerosol microphysical module used. Different spatio-temporal injection strategies have a significant impact on the magnitude and zonal distribution of radiative forcing and atmospheric dynamics.
Read more
Share
Special issue
Resolving uncertainties in solar geoengineering through multi-model...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint