Articles | Volume 22, issue 1
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 93–118, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-93-2022

Special issue: Resolving uncertainties in solar geoengineering through multi-model...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 93–118, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-93-2022

Research article 04 Jan 2022

Research article | 04 Jan 2022

Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 1: Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol modules

Anton Laakso et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on acp-2021-526', Ben Kravitz, 27 Jul 2021
  • RC2: 'Comment on acp-2021-526', Peter Irvine, 30 Jul 2021

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Anton Laakso on behalf of the Authors (15 Oct 2021)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (19 Oct 2021) by Anja Schmidt
RR by Ben Kravitz (19 Oct 2021)
RR by Peter Irvine (27 Oct 2021)
ED: Publish as is (17 Nov 2021) by Anja Schmidt
Download
Short summary
The use of different spatio-temporal sulfur injection strategies with different magnitudes to create an artificial reflective aerosol layer to cool the climate is studied using sectional and modal aerosol schemes in a climate model. There are significant differences in the results depending on the aerosol microphysical module used. Different spatio-temporal injection strategies have a significant impact on the magnitude and zonal distribution of radiative forcing and atmospheric dynamics.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint