Articles | Volume 22, issue 12
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed underthe Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Chemical properties, sources and size-resolved hygroscopicity of submicron black-carbon-containing aerosols in urban Shanghai
- Final revised paper (published on 22 Jun 2022)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 06 Apr 2022)
- Supplement to the preprint
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor |
: Report abuse
- RC1: 'Comment on acp-2022-194', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Apr 2022
- RC2: 'Comment on acp-2022-194', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 May 2022
- AC1: 'Reply to comments on acp-2022-194', Xinlei Ge, 23 May 2022
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Xinlei Ge on behalf of the Authors (23 May 2022)  Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (25 May 2022) by Dantong Liu
AR by Xinlei Ge on behalf of the Authors (26 May 2022)  Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (02 Jun 2022) by Dantong Liu
Could the authors explain why the measurement was only conducted in winter season. The higher ozone concentrations and stronger light intensity could alternate the formation of particles. In addition, the wind direction and seasonal sources could be also contributed to the formation of the BC fractions.
Even the manuscript is satisfactory most presentation of the points, the language should be further polished by professional. Few non-scientific terms are being used.
More specific comments:
Line 243: Suggest change the presentation in format speech.
Line 267: Specify the timeline for rush hours
Line 275-284: The numbers and percentages should be given with the SD. Also check them out in the entire manuscript.
Line 428: It is not appropriate to us a non-scientific term. Please specify how is “big” defined.
Line 441: Do you mean the food ingredients? Replace “itself”
Line 447: Please specify “some” here. If that is the case, how could this inference the accuracy of the results of this study.
Line 488: Would SOR be changed while the RH is further lower? There is no comparison among a wider range of RHs.
Why was no OH radical correlation determined when the secondary formation is discussed?
Line 619: Pleas use 24-h time scale.
Line 703: November 3rd to 5th
Line 718: SD?
Line 764: Replace “of course”
Line 766: how do you define the contributions were low? Please specify.
Line 767: the lowest