Articles | Volume 22, issue 1
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed underthe Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Assimilating spaceborne lidar dust extinction can improve dust forecasts
- Final revised paper (published on 14 Jan 2022)
- Preprint (discussion started on 09 Jun 2021)
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor |
: Report abuse
- RC1: 'Comment on acp-2021-442', Julie Letertre-Danczak, 05 Jul 2021
- RC2: 'Comment on acp-2021-442', Anonymous Referee #2, 30 Sep 2021
- AC1: 'Comment on acp-2021-442', Jeronimo Escribano, 11 Nov 2021
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Jeronimo Escribano on behalf of the Authors (11 Nov 2021) Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (23 Nov 2021) by Yves Balkanski
AR by Jeronimo Escribano on behalf of the Authors (26 Nov 2021)
Well done for this really good article either for the quality of the work and the quality of writing.
Please find here few comments which I would like to be considerate (it is only typo and colour scales issue).
L72: can you precise here the model used for the spheroidal-shape dust?
Figure1: The figure should be placed after the section 2.1.2 as it makes no sense and questioning why the deep blue is here as it is not mentioned in the text yet.
L152: Section A should be replaced by Appendix A
Figure 5: the colour scale is difficult to read.
Figure 7: Section A should be replaced by Appendix A
L 367: Section A should be replaced by Appendix A
Figure 8: the colour scale is difficult to read.
L404: LIVAS was were assimilated, you should choose between were and was.