Articles | Volume 22, issue 3
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1757–1760, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1757-2022
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1757–1760, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1757-2022

Peer-reviewed comment 04 Feb 2022

Peer-reviewed comment | 04 Feb 2022

Comment on “Short-cut transport path for Asian dust directly to the Arctic: a case Study” by Huang et al. (2015) in Environ. Res. Lett.​​​​​​​

Keyvan Ranjbar et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on acp-2021-652', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Oct 2021

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Keyvan Ranjbar on behalf of the Authors (07 Jan 2022)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (13 Jan 2022) by Ken Carslaw
AR by Keyvan Ranjbar on behalf of the Authors (16 Jan 2022)  Author's response    Manuscript
Short summary
We argue that the illustration employed by Huang et al. (2015) to demonstrate the transport of Asian dust to the high Arctic was, in fact, largely a cloud event and that the actual impact of Asian dust was measurable but much weaker than what they proposed and had occurred a day earlier (in agreement with the transport model they had employed to predict the transport path to the high Arctic).
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint