Articles | Volume 22, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1757-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1757-2022
Peer-reviewed comment
 | 
04 Feb 2022
Peer-reviewed comment |  | 04 Feb 2022

Comment on “Short-cut transport path for Asian dust directly to the Arctic: a case Study” by Huang et al. (2015) in Environ. Res. Lett.​​​​​​​

Keyvan Ranjbar, Norm T. O'Neill, and Yasmin Aboel-Fetouh

Viewed

Total article views: 5,502 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
5,080 374 48 5,502 29 35
  • HTML: 5,080
  • PDF: 374
  • XML: 48
  • Total: 5,502
  • BibTeX: 29
  • EndNote: 35
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Oct 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Oct 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,502 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,775 with geography defined and -273 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 26 May 2024
Short summary
We argue that the illustration employed by Huang et al. (2015) to demonstrate the transport of Asian dust to the high Arctic was, in fact, largely a cloud event and that the actual impact of Asian dust was measurable but much weaker than what they proposed and had occurred a day earlier (in agreement with the transport model they had employed to predict the transport path to the high Arctic).
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint