Articles | Volume 22, issue 3
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1757–1760, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1757-2022
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1757–1760, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1757-2022
Peer-reviewed comment
04 Feb 2022
Peer-reviewed comment | 04 Feb 2022

Comment on “Short-cut transport path for Asian dust directly to the Arctic: a case Study” by Huang et al. (2015) in Environ. Res. Lett.​​​​​​​

Keyvan Ranjbar et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,994 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,764 205 25 1,994 11 14
  • HTML: 1,764
  • PDF: 205
  • XML: 25
  • Total: 1,994
  • BibTeX: 11
  • EndNote: 14
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Oct 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Oct 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,158 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,158 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 08 Aug 2022
Short summary
We argue that the illustration employed by Huang et al. (2015) to demonstrate the transport of Asian dust to the high Arctic was, in fact, largely a cloud event and that the actual impact of Asian dust was measurable but much weaker than what they proposed and had occurred a day earlier (in agreement with the transport model they had employed to predict the transport path to the high Arctic).
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint