Hi author, co-authors, Finally have found the time to carefully check out again the reviews as well as your reply and revised version of your paper on analysis of the long-term and multiple height OH reactivity measurements at the ATTO site. Overall I see that you have properly addressed the comments/feedback provided by the two reviewers and will accept this paper for publication in ACP after you might have handled two last minor Editors comments that came up reading all files:

1) You propose this parameterization of OH reactivity using Temperature as the main dependent parameter rather than PAR; this feature is also brought up by the reviewers and have carefully read your response; you indicate that there is also a whole range of significant OH reactivity measurements at night when PAR=0 and which seems to result in a less strong correlation between OH reactivity and PAR than between reactivity and T. If was though wondering if you actually considered, also based on some of the known causal links here between OH reactivity and PAR to only use the daytime data on PAR and OH reactivity and split this from the nocturnal OH reactivity data and how these correlate with T?

2) Reading over the discussion about the connection between OH reactivity and the role of rain but also that nocturnal measurements indicate a generally a profile on OH reactivity expressing the potentially important role of in-canopy deposition, I checked out about including a reference to the study by Yanez Serrano, ACP, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3403-2018 on analysis of seasonal and diurnal cycles in monoterpenes at the ATTO site. This paper also discusses about the potentially important role of in-canopy removal of these monoterpenes also as a function of canopy wetness, etc. Some of those findings seem to directly connected to the study you present in your paper.

Laurens Ganzeveld