Compositions and mixing states of aerosol particles by aircraft observations in the Arctic springtime, 2018
Aerosol particles were collected at various altitudes in the Arctic during the Polar Airborne Measurements and Arctic Regional Climate Model Simulation Project 2018 (PAMARCMiP 2018) conducted in the early spring of 2018. The composition, size, number fraction, and mixing state of individual aerosol particles were analyzed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and their sources and transport were evaluated by numerical model simulations. We found that sulfate, sea-salt, mineral-dust, K-bearing, and carbonaceous particles were the major aerosol constituents. Many particles were composed of two or more compositions that had coagulated and were coated with sulfate, organic materials, or both. The number fraction of mineral-dust and sea-salt particles decreased with increasing altitude. The K-bearing particles increased within a biomass burning (BB) plume at altitudes > 3900 m, which originated from Siberia. Chlorine in sea-salt particles was replaced with sulfate at high altitudes. These results suggest that the sources, transport, and aging of Arctic aerosols largely vary depending on the altitude and air-mass history. We also provide the occurrences of solid-particle inclusions (soot, fly-ash, and Fe-aggregate particles), some of which are light-absorbing particles. They were mainly emitted from anthropogenic and biomass burning sources and were embedded within other relatively large host particles. Our TEM measurements revealed the detailed mixing state of individual particles at various altitudes in the Arctic. This information facilitates the accurate evaluation of the aerosol influences on Arctic haze, radiation balance, cloud formation, and snow/ice albedo when deposited.
The Arctic is sensitive to climate change. The surface air temperature in this region is rising more rapidly than the global average, resulting in decreases in seasonal sea ice coverage and thickness (Stroeve et al., 2012). Aerosol particles are an important factor influencing the Arctic climate (Abbatt et al., 2019). They scatter and absorb solar radiation and affect cloud formation. Light-absorbing aerosol particles decrease the snow albedo when deposited on snow surfaces (Hansen and Nazarenko et al., 2004). Hence, understanding their chemical and physical properties, such as size, abundance, composition, and mixing state, is required to accurately evaluate the influence of aerosol particles on the climate in this region.
The sources of the aerosol particles within the Arctic region include anthropogenic activities, the ocean, glaciers, and ground surfaces. In general, the local anthropogenic sources within the Arctic are limited because of the limited human activities. However, air pollution over the Arctic, named “Arctic haze”, due to long-range transport (LRT) aerosols from midlatitudes and low latitudes has been observed in winter and spring (Stone et al., 2014; Shaw, 1995; Law et al., 2014; Law and Stohl, 2007). These LRT aerosol particles originate from, for example, anthropogenic emissions from urban cities in East Asia, North America, and Europe, biomass burning (BB) from Siberia and North America, and desert areas (Abbatt et al., 2019; Lathem et al., 2013; Hecobian et al., 2011).
In the Arctic, the near-surface air temperature is low at lower altitudes, resulting in a temperature inversion, thereby forming a polar dome with little vertical mixing and removal of aerosols (Law et al., 2014; Arnold et al., 2016; Shaw, 1995). LRT particles travel along several pathways from their source regions to altitudes above the polar dome (Law et al., 2014; Schulz et al., 2019). As a result, LRT particles are difficult to monitor via ground measurements. Thus, aircraft observations have been conducted over the Arctic during field observation campaigns such as the Arctic Research of the Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites (ARCTAS), Aerosol, Radiation, and Cloud Processes affecting Arctic Climate (ARCPAC), Arctic Study of Tropospheric Aerosol, Clouds and Radiation (ASTAR), and Network on Climate and Aerosols: Addressing Key Uncertainties in Remote Canadian Environments (NETCARE) (Law et al., 2014; Arnold et al., 2016; Brock et al., 2011; Yamanouchi et al., 2005; McNaughton et al., 2011; Willis et al., 2019; Wendisch et al., 2019; Jacob et al., 2010).
LRT particles are subject to mixing processes with other aerosol particles or gas condensation processes during transport. The composition and mixing state of individual particles largely differ from their original ones. These differences influence their optical and hygroscopic properties, thus altering their climate effects. For example, soot particles coated with sulfate or organic matter exhibit an enhanced light absorption by the focusing of incoming light on the soot core, and the coatings may change them into efficient cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) (Bond et al., 2013). Information on the soot mixing state is also essential in climate models to accurately evaluate their atmospheric lifetime (i.e., their removal or transport efficiency) and, in turn, their direct radiative effects (Matsui and Moteki, 2020; Moteki et al., 2019).
These mixing processes occur on the surfaces of individual particles with size ranges of hundreds of nanometers. Single-particle mass spectrometry (PALMS; Murphy et al., 2006; Brock et al., 2011) and microscopy measurements have been performed to examine the composition and mixing state of individual aerosol particles in the Arctic. Brock et al. (2011) investigated the individual aerosol composition in the Arctic during the ARCPAC aircraft campaign using PALMS. In addition, various microscopy measurements of Arctic aerosol particles have been conducted using samples collected during ground observations (e.g., Anderson et al., 1992; Geng et al., 2010; Chi et al., 2015). However, electron microscopy measurements at various altitudes using an airplane have been absent during recent campaigns except that performed by Hara et al. (2003) during the ASTAR 2000 campaign. The concentration of black carbon (BC) or sulfate in the Arctic atmosphere has changed over the past decades (Geng et al., 2010), and sea ice melting is accelerating (Stroeve et al., 2012). Thus, knowledge of the individual particles in the current Arctic atmosphere is essential to better understand the influence of aerosol particles on the Arctic climate.
We used transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for single-particle analysis of aerosol particles at various altitudes in the Arctic. TEM is an offline technique and requires aerosol particle samples collected with TEM grids, thus resulting in a low time resolution and loss of volatile materials. On the other hand, TEM directly measures the shape, composition, mixing state, and inclusions within host particles. TEM also directly identifies solid particles consisting of soot, metals, or dust, which potentially become ice-nucleating particles (INPs; Krämer et al., 2017).
The current study was conducted as part of the Polar Airborne Measurements and Arctic Regional Climate Model Simulation Project 2018 (PAMARCMiP 2018) in the early spring of 2018. The overall goal of this campaign is to better understand and quantify the interaction between atmospheric aerosols, surface optical properties, and clouds in the central Arctic. In this campaign, Yoshida et al. (2020) measured the size, abundance, and mixing state of BC and Fe-oxide (FeOx) particles using a single-particle soot photometer (SP2). Hartmann et al. (2020) also reported that particles from marine sources exhibit enhanced INP activities and characterized the aerosol particles within high-INP activity samples using TEM. The current study focused on TEM analysis and measured the composition and mixing state of aerosol particles at various altitudes. The goal of this study is to investigate the detailed individual-particle composition and mixing state to better understand aerosol climate influences, aging, and LRT in the Arctic.
2.1 Campaign and TEM sampling
The PAMARCMiP 2018 campaign was conducted from 23 March to 4 April 2018 using the Polar 5 research aircraft (Wesche et al., 2016) to observe aerosols, sea ice, and clouds. The aircraft was based at the Villum Research Station ( N, ) at Station Nord in Greenland. A total of 14 flights were executed during the campaign above the Arctic Ocean and the Fram Strait at various altitudes up to ∼ 5200 m (Fig. 1).
TEM samples were collected using an aerosol sampler (AS-16W, Arios Inc., Tokyo, Japan) with two impactor stages. The airflow was 1.0 L min−1 with 0.5 and 1.0 mm nozzle sizes for the fine and coarse modes, respectively. The sampled particle sizes are ∼ 0.1–0.7 µm in aerodynamic diameter (50 % cutoff size) at the fine stage and > 0.7 µm at the coarse stage. The sampler mounted 16 TEM grids under both the fine and coarse modes during each research flight. TEM 200-mesh Cu grids with a formvar carbon substrate (U1007, EM-Japan, Tokyo, Japan) were applied for sample collection. The sampling time was 19 min during regular flights and 29 min during long flights (3 and 4 April) with a 1 min pause between each sampling. In total, we collected 139 TEM samples during the campaign. The samples were sealed after each flight and stored under dry conditions at room temperature.
2.2 TEM measurements
We recorded ∼ 30 TEM images per each grid from all TEM samples under the fine mode and selected 26 TEM samples from eight research flights to cover the various altitudes and periods of interest for detailed composition and mixing state analysis (Table S1). A transmission electron microscope (JEM-1400, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS; X-Max 80 mm, Oxford Instruments, Tokyo, Japan) was used for both TEM- and scanning TEM (STEM)-mode analyses. A semiautomatic particle measurement system using the STEM-EDS measured the particle size and composition at an acceleration voltage of 120 kV and a 20 s acquisition time. More than 200 particles around the center parts under the jet nozzle were analyzed for each sample. As the particle number concentration in the sampled air was low, the collected particles were dispersed and hardly overlapped on the substrates. The particle size was measured based on the area-equivalent diameter (AED), which was obtained from the particle area identified by making binary images using appropriate thresholds to distinguish them from the substrate in the STEM image. The AED may be larger than the aerodynamic diameter for particles with a flat shape or low density. Elemental mapping images of representative particles were also acquired using STEM-EDS. Details of the STEM-EDS analysis have been provided elsewhere (Adachi et al., 2019, 2020).
The STEM-EDS analysis normalizes the elemental composition to 100 % among the selected elements (C, N, O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, S, Cl, K, Ca, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Zn, and Pb). The detection limits of each element are determined based on 1σ of the peak intensity and calculated with EDS software (INCA Energy version 5.02, Oxford Instruments, Tokyo, Japan). The EDS technique has a limitation for the quantifications of light elements because of their relatively high self-absorption of the outgoing X-ray, and the uncertainties of the EDS measurements for C, N, O, and S were evaluated within ∼ 5 wt % (Adachi et al., 2019). This study considers only nonvolatile materials such as mineral-dust, sea-salt, K-bearing, sulfate, and non- or low-volatile carbonaceous particles (e.g., soot and tarballs). Volatile materials such as volatile organic compounds, nitrate, and water are lost after sampling and in the TEM chamber and are thus not considered.
2.3 Particle classifications
Aerosol particles and their inclusions, if any, are classified into each particle type. First, we classified each major aerosol particle type based on its composition and measured their AED. Then, if the particles embed or attach inclusions (soot, fly-ash, and Fe-oxide aggregate), we classified them based on their compositions and shapes.
2.3.1 Major types
We categorize the analyzed particles into six particle types based on their composition, i.e., (1) mineral-dust particles (both Al and Fe > 0.2 wt %), (2) sea-salt particles (Na > 1 wt %), (3) K-bearing particles (K > 2 wt %), (4) sulfate particles (S > 2 wt %), (5) carbonaceous particles (C + O > 90 wt %), and (6) other particles. The workflow of particle classification is shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplement. When a particle agrees with multiple particle-type definitions, the particle is classified in the upper categories. This classification may underestimate the secondary particles in the lower categories in the flow chart, such as sulfate and carbonaceous particles, which partially coat or are attached to other particles. We thus consider the occurrences of secondary particles using elemental mapping images.
In addition to the major particle-type category based on the composition, we identified the inclusions embedded within the particles. Soot, fly-ash, and Fe-oxide aggregate (hereafter Fe-aggregate) particles were identified as inclusions based on their shape and composition. Soot particles consist of aggregates of ∼ 40 nm nanospheres possessing structures of concentrically wrapped, graphene-like layers. They have been defined as nanosphere soot when analyzed using TEM (Buseck et al., 2014). We adopt the definition of nanosphere soot for our soot particles and employ the term soot for simplicity. We also use the term “BC” instead of “soot” in the model simulations and for the results from those instruments that measure BC by assuming that soot and BC are qualitatively the same material. An individual Fe-aggregate particle usually consists of more than two spherical Fe-oxide (magnetite) particles (Moteki et al., 2017; Yoshida et al., 2018; Ohata et al., 2018; Kurisu et al.; 2019; Li et al., 2017). Fe-aggregate particles mainly originate from anthropogenic sources (Moteki et al., 2017). Fly-ash particles exhibit spherical shapes and occur as either single particles or aggregates. They mainly consist of Si, Al, and Fe and originate from anthropogenic combustion sources. Non-aggregated Fe particles were categorized as fly-ash particles.
2.4 Model simulations
We applied the Meteorological Research Institute Earth System Model version 2 (MRI-ESM2; Yukimoto et al., 2019; Oshima et al., 2020) to estimate the possible source regions and transport pathways of the mineral-dust, sea-salt, and soot particles sampled by the aircraft. The model configurations are basically the same as those in Adachi et al. (2020) except for the simulation period and the classification of the BC sources. In the current study, the simulation period was extended to 2018 (from January 2008 to December 2018), and the BC concentrations were further divided into those originating from anthropogenic and BB sources. We used an atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) with land processes (MRI-AGCM3.5) and the Model of Aerosol Species in the Global Atmosphere mark-2 (MASINGAR mk-2) as atmospheric and aerosol component models, respectively. The model calculates mass mixing ratios of non-sea-salt sulfate, BC, organic carbon, sea salt, mineral dust, and aerosol precursor gases. The size distributions of sea salt and mineral dust are divided into 10 discrete bins, while the other aerosol components are represented by lognormal size distributions. The model uses a horizontal resolution with an approximately 120 km grid (TL159) and 80 vertical layers from the surface to the model top at 0.01 hPa in a hybrid sigma–pressure coordinate system. The horizontal wind fields were nudged toward the 6-hourly Japanese 55-year reanalysis data (Kobayashi et al., 2015) to reproduce realistic meteorological fields in the simulations. We used the daily BB emissions from the global fire assimilation system dataset of Kaiser et al. (2012) and the monthly anthropogenic emissions dataset of Lamarque et al. (2010). In addition to the baseline simulation, we performed a model sensitivity simulation without BC emissions from BB sources (i.e., anthropogenic BC). The BC concentration from BB sources (hereafter referred to as BB BC) was estimated by subtracting the anthropogenic BC concentration (the sensitivity simulation) from the total BC concentration (the baseline simulation). The emissions of mineral dust and sea salt were calculated based on the meteorological conditions in the simulations (Tanaka and Chiba, 2005; Yumimoto et al., 2017).
3.1 Number fraction and size of the major aerosol types
The aerosol particles in our samples mainly consist of sulfate, sea-salt, mineral-dust, K-bearing, and carbonaceous particles. They are mixed at the single-particle scale and sometimes contain inclusions. We measured the particle-size distribution and particle number fraction of each aerosol type (Figs. 2 and 3). We classified the samples based on the sampling altitude below 1000 m and above 1000 m. The aerosol particles above 1000 m (above the polar dome) were more influenced by LRT than those below 1000 m.
The median diameter of all particles is 470 nm (σ=410) in the AED (Fig. 2). The sulfate, K-bearing, and carbonaceous particles exhibit similar size distributions (the median AEDs are 470, 450, and 400 nm, respectively), whereas the carbonaceous particles demonstrate a sharper peak than do the others. The mineral-dust and sea-salt particles attain larger and broader size distributions than do the others with median diameters of 680 and 740 nm, respectively. Samples above 1000 m had smaller size distributions for all particle types except mineral-dust particles than those below 1000 m (Fig. 2). This result is consistent with that by Yamanouchi et al. (2005), who showed decreases of larger particles (200–1000 nm) at a higher altitude, whereas small particles (100–200 nm) did not largely show an altitude dependency. An explanation is that large particles are neither transported for long distances nor uplifted toward high altitudes.
Sulfate particles are the most abundant in all samples except the sample collected on 31 March, 14:40 UTC, which predominantly contains sea-salt particles. The sulfate number fraction ranges from 29 % to 86 % (59 % on average) (Table S1; Fig. 3). The second most dominant particle types are sea-salt and carbonaceous particles for the samples collected at < 1000 and > 1000 m, respectively. Potassium-bearing particles are relatively abundant (accounting for > 10 % of the number fraction) in three samples collected at > 3900 m on 2, 3, and 4 April (Figs. 4 and 5). Based on the TEM observations and model simulations, we found that the above K-bearing particle-rich samples were collected from air masses influenced by BB, and we denoted them as BB samples (please refer to Sect. 3.2 for the transport of the BB plume).
The size-dependent number fractions (Fig. 3) indicate that sulfate particles dominate the < 1 µm particles in the samples collected below 1000 m. In the samples collected above 1000 m, sulfate particles dominate all bin sizes except the largest size bin (> 2 µm), which only contains 12 particles and attains a low statistical significance (Fig. 3b). The fraction of mineral-dust particles increases with increasing particle size. The number fractions of the sea-salt and carbonaceous particles increase with increasing and decreasing particle size, respectively. In contrast to the negligible contributions of the K-bearing particles in the samples collected below 1000 m, their number fraction in the samples collected above 1000 m is ∼ 10 % in all size bins except the largest one.
The number fraction of the aerosol types varies depending on the sampling altitude. The mineral-dust and sea-salt number fractions decrease with increasing sampling altitude (Fig. 4). The K-bearing particle fraction is high in the BB samples collected above 3900 m. The number fractions of the sulfate and carbonaceous particles did not show a clear altitude dependency in this study, although other studies have demonstrated that their absolute number concentrations depend on the altitude (e.g., Brock et al., 2011).
3.2 K-bearing particles and biomass burning plume
K-bearing particles are the second dominant type (11 %–37 % in number fraction) in the BB samples (Fig. 5 and Table S1). The K-bearing particles mainly occur as potassium sulfate mixed with organic matter, soot, or both (Fig. 6). Other than in the K-bearing particles, K is detected as a minor component in approximately half of all particles and 76 % of the soot-bearing particles.
BB smoke contains a large amount of K in addition to other aerosols, such as organic matter and soot particles (Reid et al., 2005), and K can be used as a tracer element of BB. The occurrences of the K-bearing particles in the BB samples (Fig. 6) are similar to those from BB in other areas (e.g., Li et al., 2003).
We used the modeled BB BC to identify the transport pathways of the BB samples (Fig. 7). The BB BC emissions in the model simulations show that the BB source is southeast Siberia (Fig. S2), where forest BB frequently occurs (Brock et al., 2011; Warneke et al., 2009; Schulz et al., 2019). During the campaign, BB started on approximately 20 March in the area and persisted for several months. On 28 March, the emitted BB BC plume was driven toward the northeast by a low-pressure system. Thereafter, the BB plume was lifted and subsequently transported toward the North Pole until 1 April (Fig. S2). On 2, 3, and 4 April, a part of the BB plume approached the Fram Strait at ∼ 600 hPa (∼ 4000 m), where we conducted the sampling. Although the model simulations estimated the BB contributions only for the BC concentrations, we interpret that the K-bearing particles and other BB emissions were also transported along with BC as seen in the TEM results (Figs. 5 and 6). In terms of the BB samples, the sampling points were > 4600 km away from the BB sources, and the samples had aged for a week or more (Figs. 7 and S2).
3.3 Sea-salt particles
Sea-salt particles are globally abundant, especially over oceans, and considerably influence the climate as CCN and via sunlight scattering (Lewis and Schwartz, 2004). They are formed from seawater film droplets over the open ocean and local leads in the Arctic. When the sea freezes, sea-salt particles form on frost flowers over sea ice (Hara et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2016) and from blowing snow (Huang and Jaeglé, 2017). Our samples could originate from these sources as our research flights flew over both open water (near the Svalbard islands) and sea ice (near Greenland) (Fig. 1). Original sea-salt particles mainly consist of sodium chloride as well as other inorganic salts (e.g., Mg, Ca, and K as chlorides or sulfates). In the atmosphere, the composition of sea-salt particles is altered through the reactions with acidic gases, thus forming sodium sulfate or nitrate (Adachi and Buseck, 2015; Gard et al., 1998; Yoshizue et al., 2019), and with organic matter (Laskin et al., 2012; Chi et al., 2015).
In our samples, the sea-salt particles are complex mixtures of, for example, sodium chloride, sodium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, Mg-C-O, calcium sulfate, and others (Figs. 8 and S3). The sea-salt occurrences are similar to those found at a ground site in Svalbard (Chi et al., 2015). Although nitrate can react with sea-salt particles, N was rarely detected in our sea-salt particles, possibly because the nitrate fraction relative to that of sulfate is limited in spring (Brock et al., 2011; Fenger et al., 2013). It is also possible that the measured particle sizes are too small for nitrate to retain as a particle phase and that nitrates are lost from the TEM samples after sampling because of their high volatility.
Some Mg occurs around NaCl cores (Fig. 8a–b). These mixtures may form either in the atmosphere or on the substrate when liquid particles change into solid phases after sampling. Such Mg occurs with C and O as an amorphous phase, suggesting that they constitute organic matter. Similar organic Mg-C coatings on sea-salt particles have been observed over California by Laskin et al. (2012) and in the Arctic (Chi et al., 2015). As Mg salts exhibit a high hygroscopicity, it is possible that they are liquid in the atmosphere and absorb organic matter either from anthropogenic or marine sources (Shaw et al., 2010). Some sea-salt particles demonstrate homogeneous distributions of Mg, S, and Na (Figs. 8c and S3e–f). These particles commonly attach soot particles, and Cl is replaced with sulfate, suggesting that they are well aged in the atmosphere.
Most Cl in the sea-salt particles was replaced with sulfate in the samples collected above 1000 m (Fig. S4). Such Cl loss in NaCl at high altitudes in the Arctic has also been observed by Hara et al. (2002). Mg and Ca are correlated with Na in all samples, although their weight percent is lower in the samples collected above 1000 m than those collected below 1000 m (Fig. 9). This result suggests that most Mg, Ca, and Na originate from sea-salt particles and that their weight percent within the individual particles decreases with increasing sampling altitudes because of the condensation and coagulation of sulfate or other materials on the sea-salt particles.
In the model simulations, the sea-salt concentrations near the sea surface are high (Fig. S5). On 30 and 31 March, the sea-salt particle concentrations are higher than those on the other sampling days based on the TEM analysis (Table S1), and the model simulation indicates that the sea-salt particles are transported from the north.
3.4 Mineral-dust particles
Certain types of mineral-dust particles (e.g., feldspar) act as INPs (Krämer et al., 2017) and have a climatological impact on the Arctic (Fan, 2013). In our samples, the number fraction of the mineral-dust particles increases with increasing particle size (Fig. 3) and decreasing altitude (Fig. 4). They mainly consist of Si, Al, or both and include Na, Mg, K, Ca, and Fe as minor components or small grains (e.g., Fe) (Fig. 10). They exhibit irregular shapes with crystalline structures. The mineral-dust particles are commonly mixed with sea-salt (Figs. 10a and S6) and sulfate particles (Fig. 10c), both of which change the mineral-dust particles from hydrophobic to hydrophilic. Such mixtures have also been observed in low-latitude regions (e.g., the Amazon basin) in other studies (Adachi et al., 2020), suggesting that mixtures of mineral-dust and hygroscopic particles (e.g., sea salt and sulfate) occur globally. The Na and Cl weight percent within the mineral-dust particles increases in the samples collected below 1000 m (Fig. S6), indicating that mineral-dust and sea-salt particle mixing occurs near the surface. These results suggest that the mineral-dust particles originate from local ground surfaces. However, although mineral-dust particles may have local sources in summer, such as glacial outwash planes (Tobo et al., 2019) and bare ground surfaces, the ground surfaces in Greenland or the Svalbard islands were mostly, if not completely, covered by snow and ice during the sampling period (March and April). Our model simulation does not include mineral-dust emissions in the Arctic during the sampling period because of the snow coverage and yields only a small amount of LRT mineral dust above ∼ 700 hPa in the sampling area (Fig. S7). McNaughton et al. (2011) measured the dust mass concentration over the western Arctic in spring during the ARCTAS/ARCPAC 2008 campaigns and demonstrated that the mineral-dust concentration was high at > 4 km in altitude, where an Asian dust plume possibly had an influence. They also showed that mineral-dust particles decrease toward the surface, although the sea-salt mass vertical distributions were consistent with our results. On the one hand, long-term ground observations of the aerosol composition at Station Nord have indicated small contributions from soil particles in the early spring, although they exhibit peaks in summer (Nguyen et al., 2013; Heidam et al., 1999). Groot Zwaaftink et al. (2016) also showed a simulation result of substantial contributions of mineral dust from Eurasia and North America > 60∘ N to the surface dust concentrations in the Arctic region during early spring. Their studies agree with our observations, suggesting that the mineral-dust particles originate from the Arctic sources. As the number fractions of the mineral-dust particles are non-negligible (4 % on average), further observations are necessary to identify their exact sources.
3.5 Sulfate particles
Sulfate particles are one of the most dominant aerosol species in the Arctic (Brock et al., 2011; Hara et al., 2003; Matsui et al., 2011). This study also showed that sulfate particles were the most dominant species (∼ 60 %) in their number fraction (Fig. 3). The sulfate particle number fractions are not well correlated with the altitude (R2=0.16), suggesting that the detected sulfate particles and their precursors originate from both marine surface sources (Willis et al., 2017) and LRT at high altitudes. Sulfate commonly mixes with other species, and S is detected in almost all sampled particles. Sulfate particles generally exhibit various chemical forms, including ammonium sulfate, sodium sulfate, potassium sulfate, and calcium sulfate (Figs. 6 and 10; Fig. S3). The sulfate particles commonly have satellite structures around their rims in the TEM images (Fig. 11), suggesting that sulfuric acid and ammonium bisulfate contribute to the sulfate particles (Kojima et al., 2005). This result is consistent with other measurements in the Arctic that show contributions of acidic sulfate (Brock et al., 2011; Hara et al., 2003; Fisher et al., 2011). In addition, Yu et al. (2019) reported similar satellite structures from samples collected at an Arctic ground site (Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard) during late summer and showed sulfate (32S− and 16O−) as well as 12C14N− signals as a proxy of organic matter on the satellites. Although our TEM measurements did not detect C and N on the satellites, a trace amount of organic matter may be possible in the Arctic sulfates.
3.6 Carbonaceous particles
Carbonaceous particles primarily consist of C and O and include secondary and primary organic aerosols, soot particles, and tarballs. Secondary organic aerosols coat or embed other species and are mostly classified into the categories of their host species. Volatile organic compounds are likely lost before the analysis, and thus their number fraction may be underestimated over the mass fraction measured using online instruments. Tarballs or tarball-like particles are spherical organic particles originating from BB (Pósfai et al., 2004) (Fig. 12) and are a major aerosol type originating from BB as brown carbon (Chakrabarty et al., 2010; Sedlacek et al., 2018). As a result, they potentially influence the climate, although their detailed occurrences, including their removal processes, remain unknown. In the BB samples, we encountered a small number of tarball particles (< 1 % in number fractions). These tarballs mainly consist of C and O and include some N and K (Fig. 12). Their main composition is similar to that of particles from young BB smoke plumes (e.g., Pósfai et al., 2004; Adachi and Buseck, 2011), but, different from the young ones, some had sulfate coatings (Fig. 12). Moroni et al. (2017, 2020) also found tarballs with K-bearing particles using scanning electron microscopy in ground observations on the Svalbard islands in the summer of 2015. Tarballs from Siberia BB were also found over the northwestern Pacific in 2016, showing a transport of tarballs toward the Arctic region (Yoshizue et al., 2020). In contrast to the smooth spherical shapes of fresh and several-day-aged tarballs (e.g., Li et al., 2003; Yoshizue et al., 2020), the surfaces of our tarballs are not smooth and contain sulfates (Fig. 12), suggesting that they reacted with sulfate during LRT. The tarballs having sulfate are removed more efficiently from the atmosphere by precipitation than the original ones as the sulfate absorbs water. As the mass fraction of tarballs in fresh BB smoke may reach ∼ 40 % (Sedlaeck et al., 2018), which is much higher than that in our samples, most tarballs could have been removed from the atmosphere during LRT. This tarball removal process has been proposed by Pósfai et al. (2004) when they first characterized tarballs, and our study provides evidence of the above-hypothesized processes.
Soot particles were also commonly found in our samples. However, only 13 % of the carbonaceous particles consisted of soot with thin or no coating, i.e., external mixtures. They were mainly embedded within or attached to other particles (internal mixtures) and were classified as a part of their host species.
3.7 Soot, fly-ash, and Fe-aggregate inclusions
Inclusions are particles embedded within or attached to host particles. Independent from the classifications of their host particles, inclusions were identified based on both their composition and shape determined from the TEM images after the removal of beam-sensitive materials (e.g., sulfate) by exposure to an electron beam during the STEM-EDS analysis (Figs. 13 and S8). When they overlap with non-beam-sensitive materials (e.g., mineral dust and sea salt), it is difficult to detect inclusions in the TEM images. Thus, the actual number fraction of the inclusions may be larger than that reported in this study. On the other hand, this technique has the advantage of identifying small inclusions (e.g., < 50 nm), which are difficult to detect using other methods. Although we observed several metal particles as inclusions (e.g., Zn and Pb), we focused on the occurrences of soot, fly-ash, and Fe-aggregate particles in this study.
3.7.1 Soot inclusions
Soot particles absorb solar radiation and exert a positive radiative forcing (Bond et al., 2013). When they are coated by or embedded within other species (e.g., sulfate and organic matter), their light absorption is enhanced by the focusing of light on the soot core (Bond et al., 2006; Oshima et al., 2009). Studies involving Arctic BC observations have shown a 54 % increase in BC light absorption due to its coating (Zanatta et al., 2018) or an approximately 20 % increase in the direct radiative effect due to the different BC mixing state assumptions (Kodros et al., 2018). In addition, although soot particles are initially hydrophobic, such coatings commonly make them hydrophilic. The degrees of the soot mixing states with hygroscopic materials influence their atmospheric lifetime in models, resulting in uncertainty in the simulated atmospheric BC concentrations in the Arctic (Eckhardt et al., 2015). Thus, the mixing states of soot particles are of interest regarding their climate influences (Fierce et al., 2020).
In our samples, soot particles were found in ∼ 17 % of all measured particles (Fig. S9 and Table S1). The number fraction of the externally mixed soot particles, which are those without any apparent coatings, was only ∼ 1 % of all soot particles. The relatively low number fractions of the externally mixed soot particles are similar to the background conditions observed by Hara et al. (2003) and indicate that most LRT soot particles were internally mixed in the Arctic.
Soot particles were observed within all aerosol types, and the sampling altitude was not clearly correlated with the soot particle fraction (R2=0.13). On the other hand, more soot particles were found in large host particles than in small ones; i.e., the size distributions of the soot-bearing particles (host particles) were larger than those of all particles (Fig. S10). This result is consistent with those in other areas (Adachi and Buseck, 2008; Adachi et al., 2014). A possible explanation is that the coagulation process of soot particles with large host particles occurs more efficiently than that with small particles.
BB is one of the major sources of BC in the Arctic atmosphere and snow (Spackman et al., 2010; Hegg et al., 2010). In our BB samples, ∼ 93 % of the soot-bearing particles contained K, showing substantial BC contributions from BB. In comparison, the ratio was 74 % for the non-BB samples. However, there was no apparent enhancement of the soot particle number fraction measured by TEM in the BB samples (Table S1). This inconsistency may be explained by the fact that we measured the number fraction and that the other species, such as the K-bearing salts, sulfates, and organic matter, also increased within the BB plume, resulting in relatively lower soot number fractions in the BB samples. A comparison with number concentrations of BC by SP2 will be discussed in Sect. 3.7.3.
3.7.2 Fly-ash and Fe-aggregate inclusions
The fly-ash particles and primary particles of Fe aggregates commonly exhibited spherical shapes, which indicated that they formed through rapid cooling after melting or evaporation at high temperatures during emission. The shape and composition of the Fe aggregates are consistent with those observed near sources in East Asia (Moteki et al., 2017). Moteki et al., showed that Fe-aggregate particles consist of magnetite, which absorbs light and imposes warming effects on the climate. Yoshida et al. (2020) also demonstrated light-absorbing FeOx particles using SP2 during this campaign. Thus, we suggest that our Fe-aggregate particles also exhibit light-absorbing properties.
The number fractions of the particles containing fly-ash or Fe-aggregate particles are 1.4 % and 0.5 %, respectively (Fig. S9 and Table S1). Although these particles are commonly found in polluted areas from anthropogenic sources such as stationary combustion sources and vehicles (Li et al., 2016), there are almost no such local anthropogenic sources in the Arctic area. Instead, the fly-ash and Fe-aggregate particles attain better relations with the soot number fraction (R2=0.35 and 0.24 for the fly-ash and Fe aggregates, respectively; Fig. S11), and soot, fly-ash, and Fe-aggregate particles are often found in the same particles (Figs. 13 and S8). The positive relations between soot, fly-ash, and Fe-aggregate particles measured by TEM agree with the SP2 observations of Yoshida et al. (2020), who also found correlations among BC and FeOx during this campaign. These results indicate that the soot, fly-ash, and Fe-aggregate particles originated from anthropogenic sources through LRT.
3.7.3 Comparison between TEM and SP2 data for soot/BC and Fe-bearing particles/FeOx
We further compared the TEM results with SP2 data reported by Yoshida et al. (2020). The TEM and SP2 measurements for soot/BC and Fe-bearing particles/FeOx reasonably correlate for non-BB samples (Fig. S12). The R2 values of non-BB samples for soot/BC and Fe-bearing particles/FeOx are 0.45 and 0.33, respectively. The latter has a weaker correlation possibly because of their small number in the Arctic atmosphere. Although TEM and SP2 utilize different particle properties, i.e., composition/shapes and optical properties, respectively, their correlations assure these techniques. The BB samples, on the other hand, showed outliers from the relations, especially for the soot/BC. A possible reason is that BB samples have higher total particle number concentrations than non-BB samples, resulting in smaller number fractions in the TEM samples than SP2.
3.8 Implications for particle aging and the climate
In the Arctic, although there are few anthropogenic sources and vegetation, we found that many aerosol particles originated from anthropogenic and BB sources. The soot and Fe-aggregate particles have light-absorbing properties, and the mineral-dust particles demonstrate water-insoluble, crystalline structures with hygroscopic attachments. These optical and physical properties influence their radiative forcing by scattering and absorbing solar radiation and their cloud modification by serving as CCN and INPs. When these light-absorbing particles are deposited on snow or ice surfaces, they reduce the surface albedo, resulting in snow/ice melting acceleration (Law and Stohl, 2007). BC has commonly been detected at various concentrations in the snow (Mori et al., 2019; Kinease et al., 2020) and ice cores (McConnell et al., 2007) in polar regions. Their deposition process from the atmosphere onto snow/ice is important to better understand their contributions to snowmelt and albedo changes. As most soot particles are embedded with or attached to other species, mostly hygroscopic ones, they will be more easily removed from the atmosphere than those without coatings.
Soot, tarballs, and Fe-aggregate particles have been intensively investigated near their sources, such as urban areas and BB smoke. This study shows the composition and shape of aged particles traveled > 1 week based on our model calculations. We observed that the soot and Fe-aggregate particles still exhibit fractal structures, especially the small particles (less than several tens of primary particles; Figs. 13 and S8), similar to those found in source regions such as East Asia (Adachi et al., 2016). This observation is inconsistent with the result showing highly compacted soot particles at a remote marine free-troposphere site (China et al., 2015). Whether soot particles become core-shell structures as they age in the atmosphere is of interest for the accurate evaluation of soot climate effects (Cappa et al., 2012; Adachi et al., 2010). Our observation implies that the soot particles in the Arctic cannot be simply assumed to be spherical particles but should be treated as fractal particles when calculating their optical properties. One explanation is that soot particles consisting of several tens or fewer primary particles hardly attain highly compact shapes because of the insufficient monomer numbers to turn them into spherical aggregates. On the other hand, most soot particles were coated with sulfate or other materials, suggesting that they possess enhanced light absorption. The overall effect of soot shapes and coatings observed in this study is a mixture of positive and negative impacts in its radiative forcing.
This study reveals that the aerosol particles in the Arctic troposphere exhibit various composition, shape, and mixing state depending on the sampling altitude and air-mass history. Sulfate is the dominant aerosol type, and sea-salt, mineral-dust, K-bearing, and carbonaceous particles are also observed as major aerosol species. The aerosol particles are commonly mixtures of several components, resulting in different optical and hygroscopic properties than the original particles. In addition to the main components, they also include soot, fly-ash, and Fe-aggregate particles, all of which are solid, primary particles originating from anthropogenic or BB sources. The aerosol particles that include soot and Fe-aggregate particles may exhibit light-absorbing properties and contribute to Arctic warming and snow/ice melting when deposited on the surface. BB is an important source of aerosol particles in the Arctic area. In the BB samples, we find K-bearing and tarball particles, both of which are tracers of BB emissions. Our model simulations indicated the BB contributions from Siberia. Tarballs could have traveled for a week or more after their emission and have reacted with sulfate. Many mineral-dust particles are mixed with sea salt and are relatively abundant in the samples collected near the surface. The mineral-dust occurrence suggests that they originated from the Arctic local sources but not from LRT. The ability of solid particles, such as mineral-dust, soot, fly-ash, and Fe-aggregate particles, to function as INPs should be considered to evaluate their contributions to cloud formation. This study highlights a wide range of mixing states, and the mixing states of aerosol particles after LRT should be accounted for to accurately evaluate their climate influences.
The TEM and simulation data used in this publication are available upon request (firstname.lastname@example.org). Access to the MRI-ESM2 code is available under a collaboration framework with the MRI.
The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3607-2021-supplement.
KA conducted the TEM analysis and data processing. SO, AY, and MK executed the TEM sampling and field observations. KA and NM set up the TEM sampler. MK supervised the TEM sampling. NO performed the model simulations and analyses. KA prepared the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
We are indebted to all the PAMARCMiP 2018 participants for their cooperation and support. The authors also acknowledge the Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) for both the support to conduct the PAMARCMiP 2018 campaign and the use of the Polar 5 research aircraft as well as the skill and safety exemplified by the pilots and flight staff.
This research has been supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (grant nos. JPMEERF20205001, JPMEERF20202003, JPMEERF20172003, and JPMEERF20165005) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan, the Global Environmental Research Coordination System of the Ministry of the Environment of Japan (grant no. MLIT1753), the Arctic Challenge for Sustainability (ArCS) project (grant no. JPMXD1300000000) and ArCS II (grant no. JPMXD1420318865) of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan, and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (grant nos. JP26701004, JP16K16188, JP16H01772, JP18H04134, JP18H03363, JP18H05292, JP19H01972, JP19H04236, JP19K21905, and JP19H04259).
This paper was edited by Alexander Laskin and reviewed by three anonymous referees.
Abbatt, J. P. D., Leaitch, W. R., Aliabadi, A. A., Bertram, A. K., Blanchet, J.-P., Boivin-Rioux, A., Bozem, H., Burkart, J., Chang, R. Y. W., Charette, J., Chaubey, J. P., Christensen, R. J., Cirisan, A., Collins, D. B., Croft, B., Dionne, J., Evans, G. J., Fletcher, C. G., Galí, M., Ghahremaninezhad, R., Girard, E., Gong, W., Gosselin, M., Gourdal, M., Hanna, S. J., Hayashida, H., Herber, A. B., Hesaraki, S., Hoor, P., Huang, L., Hussherr, R., Irish, V. E., Keita, S. A., Kodros, J. K., Köllner, F., Kolonjari, F., Kunkel, D., Ladino, L. A., Law, K., Levasseur, M., Libois, Q., Liggio, J., Lizotte, M., Macdonald, K. M., Mahmood, R., Martin, R. V., Mason, R. H., Miller, L. A., Moravek, A., Mortenson, E., Mungall, E. L., Murphy, J. G., Namazi, M., Norman, A.-L., O'Neill, N. T., Pierce, J. R., Russell, L. M., Schneider, J., Schulz, H., Sharma, S., Si, M., Staebler, R. M., Steiner, N. S., Thomas, J. L., von Salzen, K., Wentzell, J. J. B., Willis, M. D., Wentworth, G. R., Xu, J.-W., and Yakobi-Hancock, J. D.: Overview paper: New insights into aerosol and climate in the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2527–2560, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2527-2019, 2019.
Adachi, K. and Buseck, P. R.: Internally mixed soot, sulfates, and organic matter in aerosol particles from Mexico City, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6469–6481, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6469-2008, 2008.
Adachi, K. and Buseck, P. R.: Atmospheric tar balls from biomass burning in Mexico, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D05204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd015102, 2011.
Adachi, K. and Buseck, P. R.: Changes in shape and composition of sea-salt particles upon aging in an urban atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 100, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.036, 2015.
Adachi, K., Chung, S. H., and Buseck, P. R.: Shapes of soot aerosol particles and implications for their effects on climate, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D15206, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012868, 2010.
Adachi, K., Zaizen, Y., Kajino, M., and Igarashi, Y.: Mixing state of regionally transported soot particles and the coating effect on their size and shape at a mountain site in Japan, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 5386–5396, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jd020880, 2014.
Adachi, K., Moteki, N., Kondo, Y., and Igarashi, Y.: Mixing states of light-absorbing particles measured using a transmission electron microscope and a single-particle soot photometer in Tokyo, Japan, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 9153–9164, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025153, 2016.
Adachi, K., Sedlacek, A. J., Kleinman, L., Springston, S. R., Wang, J., Chand, D., Hubbe, J. M., Shilling, J. E., Onasch, T. B., Kinase, T., Sakata, K., Takahashi, Y., and Buseck, P. R.: Spherical tarball particles form through rapid chemical and physical changes of organic matter in biomass-burning smoke, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 19336–19341, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900129116, 2019.
Adachi, K., Oshima, N., Gong, Z., de Sá, S., Bateman, A. P., Martin, S. T., de Brito, J. F., Artaxo, P., Cirino, G. G., Sedlacek III, A. J., and Buseck, P. R.: Mixing states of Amazon basin aerosol particles transported over long distances using transmission electron microscopy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11923–11939, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11923-2020, 2020.
Anderson, J. R., Buseck, P. R., Saucy, D. A., and Pacyna, J. M.: Characterization of individual fine-fraction particles from the Arctic aerosol at Spitsbergen, May–June 1987, Atmos. Environ., 26, 1747–1762, 1992.
Arnold, S. R., Law, K. S., Brock, C. A., Thomas, J. L., Starkweather, S. M., von Salzen, K., Stohl, A., Sharma, S., Lund, M. T., Flanner, M. G., Petäjä, T., Tanimoto, H., Gamble, J., Dibb, J. E., Melamed, M., Johnson, N., Fidel, M., Tynkkynen, V. P., Baklanov, A., Eckhardt, S., Monks, S. A., Browse, J., and Bozem, H.: Arctic air pollution: Challenges and opportunities for the next decade, Elementa, 4, 000104, https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000104, 2016.
Bond, T. C., Habib, G., and Bergstrom, R. W.: Limitations in the enhancement of visible light absorption due to mixing state, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D20211, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007315, 2006.
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T., DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne, S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M., Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K., Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U., Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C. S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 5380–5552, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171, 2013.
Brock, C. A., Cozic, J., Bahreini, R., Froyd, K. D., Middlebrook, A. M., McComiskey, A., Brioude, J., Cooper, O. R., Stohl, A., Aikin, K. C., de Gouw, J. A., Fahey, D. W., Ferrare, R. A., Gao, R.-S., Gore, W., Holloway, J. S., Hübler, G., Jefferson, A., Lack, D. A., Lance, S., Moore, R. H., Murphy, D. M., Nenes, A., Novelli, P. C., Nowak, J. B., Ogren, J. A., Peischl, J., Pierce, R. B., Pilewskie, P., Quinn, P. K., Ryerson, T. B., Schmidt, K. S., Schwarz, J. P., Sodemann, H., Spackman, J. R., Stark, H., Thomson, D. S., Thornberry, T., Veres, P., Watts, L. A., Warneke, C., and Wollny, A. G.: Characteristics, sources, and transport of aerosols measured in spring 2008 during the aerosol, radiation, and cloud processes affecting Arctic Climate (ARCPAC) Project, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2423–2453, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2423-2011, 2011.
Buseck, P. R., Adachi, K., Gelencsér, A., Tompa, É., and Pósfai, M.: Ns-Soot: A material-based term for strongly light-absorbing carbonaceous particles, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 48, 777–788, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.919374, 2014.
Cappa, C. D., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Worsnop, D. R., Bates, T. S., Cross, E. S., Davidovits, P., Hakala, J., Hayden, K. L., Jobson, B. T., Kolesar, K. R., Lack, D. A., Lerner, B. M., Li, S. M., Mellon, D., Nuaaman, I., Olfert, J. S., Petaja, T., Quinn, P. K., Song, C., Subramanian, R., Williams, E. J., and Zaveri, R. A.: Radiative absorption enhancements due to the mixing state of atmospheric black carbon, Science, 337, 1078–1081, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223447, 2012.
Chakrabarty, R. K., Moosmüller, H., Chen, L.-W. A., Lewis, K., Arnott, W. P., Mazzoleni, C., Dubey, M. K., Wold, C. E., Hao, W. M., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Brown carbon in tar balls from smoldering biomass combustion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6363–6370, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6363-2010, 2010.
Chi, J. W., Li, W. J., Zhang, D. Z., Zhang, J. C., Lin, Y. T., Shen, X. J., Sun, J. Y., Chen, J. M., Zhang, X. Y., Zhang, Y. M., and Wang, W. X.: Sea salt aerosols as a reactive surface for inorganic and organic acidic gases in the Arctic troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11341–11353, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11341-2015, 2015.
China, S., Scarnato, B., Owen, R. C., Zhang, B., Ampadu, M. T., Kumar, S., Dzepina, K., Dziobak, M. P., Fialho, P., Perlinger, J. A., Hueber, J., Helmig, D., Mazzoleni, L. R., and Mazzoleni, C.: Morphology and mixing state of aged soot particles at a remote marine free troposphere site: Implications for optical properties, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 1243–1250, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl062404, 2015.
Eckhardt, S., Quennehen, B., Olivié, D. J. L., Berntsen, T. K., Cherian, R., Christensen, J. H., Collins, W., Crepinsek, S., Daskalakis, N., Flanner, M., Herber, A., Heyes, C., Hodnebrog, Ø., Huang, L., Kanakidou, M., Klimont, Z., Langner, J., Law, K. S., Lund, M. T., Mahmood, R., Massling, A., Myriokefalitakis, S., Nielsen, I. E., Nøjgaard, J. K., Quaas, J., Quinn, P. K., Raut, J.-C., Rumbold, S. T., Schulz, M., Sharma, S., Skeie, R. B., Skov, H., Uttal, T., von Salzen, K., and Stohl, A.: Current model capabilities for simulating black carbon and sulfate concentrations in the Arctic atmosphere: a multi-model evaluation using a comprehensive measurement data set, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9413–9433, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9413-2015, 2015.
Fan, S.-M.: Modeling of observed mineral dust aerosols in the arctic and the impact on winter season low-level clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 11161–111174, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50842, 2013.
Fenger, M., Sørensen, L. L., Kristensen, K., Jensen, B., Nguyen, Q. T., Nøjgaard, J. K., Massling, A., Skov, H., Becker, T., and Glasius, M.: Sources of anions in aerosols in northeast Greenland during late winter, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1569–1578, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1569-2013, 2013.
Fierce, L., Onasch, T. B., Cappa, C. D., Mazzoleni, C., China, S., Bhandari, J., Davidovits, P., Fischer, D. A., Helgestad, T., Lambe, A. T., Sedlacek, A. J., Smith, G. D., and Wolff, L.: Radiative absorption enhancements by black carbon controlled by particle-to-particle heterogeneity in composition, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 5196–5203, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919723117, 2020.
Fisher, J. A., Jacob, D. J., Wang, Q., Bahreini, R., Carouge, C. C., Cubison, M. J., Dibb, J. E., Diehl, T., Jimenez, J. L., Leibensperger, E. M., Lu, Z., Meinders, M. B. J., Pye, H. O. T., Quinn, P. K., Sharma, S., Streets, D. G., van Donkelaar, A., and Yantosca, R. M.: Sources, distribution, and acidity of sulfate-ammonium aerosol in the Arctic in winter–spring, Atmos. Environ., 45, 7301–7318, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.030, 2011.
Gard, E. E., Kleeman, M. J., Gross, D. S., Hughes, L. S., Allen, J. O., Morrical, B. D., Fergenson, D. P., Dienes, T. E., Gälli, M., Johnson, R. J., Cass, G. R., and Prather, K. A.: Direct observation of heterogeneous chemistry in the atmosphere, Science, 279, 1184–1187, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5354.1184, 1998.
Geng, H., Ryu, J. Y., Jung, H.-J., Chung, H., Ahn, K.-H., and Ro, C.-U.: Single-particle characterization of summertime arctic aerosols collected at Ny-Alesund, Svalbard, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 2348–2353, https://doi.org/10.1021/es903268j, 2010.
Groot Zwaaftink, C. D., Grythe, H., Skov, H., and Stohl, A.: Substantial contribution of northern high‐latitude sources to mineral dust in the Arctic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 13678–13697, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025482, 2016.
Hansen, J. and Nazarenko, L.: Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedos, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 423–428, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2237157100, 2004.
Hara, K., Yamagata, S., Yamanouchi, T., Sato, K., Herber, A., Iwasaka, Y., Nagatani, M., and Nakata H.: Mixing states of individual aerosol particles in spring Arctic troposphere during ASTAR 2000 campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4209, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002513, 2003.
Hara, K., Osada, K., Nishita, C., Yamagata, S., Yamanocuhi, T., Herber, A., Matsunaga, K., Iwasaka, Y., Nagatani, M., and Nakata, H.: Vertical variations of sea-salt modification in the boundary layer of spring Arctic during the ASTAR 2000 campaign, Tellus B, 54, 361–376, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v54i4.16671, 2002.
Hara, K., Matoba, S., Hirabayashi, M., and Yamasaki, T.: Frost flowers and sea-salt aerosols over seasonal sea-ice areas in northwestern Greenland during winter–spring, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8577–8598, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8577-2017, 2017.
Hartmann, M., Adachi, K., Eppers, O., Haas, C., Herber, A., Holzinger, R., Hünerbein, A., Jäkel, E., Jentzsch, C., Pinxteren, M., Wex, H., Willmes, S., and Stratmann, F.: Wintertime airborne measurements of ice nucleating particles in the high Arctic: A hint to a marine, biogenic source for ice nucleating particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL087770, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl087770, 2020.
Hecobian, A., Liu, Z., Hennigan, C. J., Huey, L. G., Jimenez, J. L., Cubison, M. J., Vay, S., Diskin, G. S., Sachse, G. W., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., Weinheimer, A. J., Liao, J., Knapp, D. J., Wennberg, P. O., Kürten, A., Crounse, J. D., Clair, J. St., Wang, Y., and Weber, R. J.: Comparison of chemical characteristics of 495 biomass burning plumes intercepted by the NASA DC-8 aircraft during the ARCTAS/CARB-2008 field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 13325–13337, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-13325-2011, 2011.
Hegg, D. A., Warren, S. G., Grenfell, T. C., Sarah J Doherty, and Clarke, A. D.: Sources of light-absorbing aerosol in arctic snow and their seasonal variation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10923–10938, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10923-2010, 2010.
Heidam, N. Z., Wåhlin, P., and Christensen, J. H.: Tropospheric gases and aerosols in northeast Greenland, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 261–278, 1999.
Huang, J. and Jaeglé, L.: Wintertime enhancements of sea salt aerosol in polar regions consistent with a sea ice source from blowing snow, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3699–3712, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3699-2017, 2017.
Jacob, D. J., Crawford, J. H., Maring, H., Clarke, A. D., Dibb, J. E., Emmons, L. K., Ferrare, R. A., Hostetler, C. A., Russell, P. B., Singh, H. B., Thompson, A. M., Shaw, G. E., McCauley, E., Pederson, J. R., and Fisher, J. A.: The Arctic Research of the Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites (ARCTAS) mission: design, execution, and first results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5191–5212, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5191-2010, 2010.
Kaiser, J. W., Heil, A., Andreae, M. O., Benedetti, A., Chubarova, N., Jones, L., Morcrette, J.-J., Razinger, M., Schultz, M. G., Suttie, M., and van der Werf, G. R.: Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power, Biogeosciences, 9, 527–554, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-527-2012, 2012.
Kinase, T., Adachi, K., Oshima, N., Goto-Azuma, K., Ogawa-Tsukagawa, Y., Kondo, Y., Moteki, N., Ohata, S., Mori, T., Hayashi, M., Hara, K., Kawashima, H., and Kita, K.: Concentrations and size distributions of black carbon in the surface snow of eastern Antarctica in 2011, J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2019JD030737, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd030737, 2020.
Kobayashi, S., Ota, Y., Harada, Y., Ebita, A., Moriya, M., Onoda, H., Onogi, K., Kamahori, H., Kobayashi, C., Endo, H., Miyaoka, K., and Takahashi, K.: The JRA-55 reanalysis: General specifications and basic characteristics, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 93, 5–48, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2015-001, 2015.
Kodros, J. K., Hanna, S. J., Bertram, A. K., Leaitch, W. R., Schulz, H., Herber, A. B., Zanatta, M., Burkart, J., Willis, M. D., Abbatt, J. P. D., and Pierce, J. R.: Size-resolved mixing state of black carbon in the Canadian high Arctic and implications for simulated direct radiative effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11345–11361, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11345-2018, 2018.
Kojima, T., Buseck, P. R., and Reeves, J. M.: Aerosol particles from tropical convective systems: 2. Cloud bases, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D09203, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005173, 2005.
Krämer, M., Cziczo, D. J., Burkert-Kohn, M., Boose, Y., Wex, H., Ladino, L. A., and Kanji, Z. A.: Overview of ice nucleating particles, Meteorol. Monogr., 58, 1–33, https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-16-0006.1, 2017.
Kurisu, M., Adachi, K., Sakata, K., and Takahashi, Y.: Stable isotope ratios of combustion iron produced by evaporation in a steel plant, ACS Earth Space Chem., 3, 588–598, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00171, 2019.
Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z., Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., Schultz, M. G., Shindell, D., Smith, S. J., Stehfest, E., Van Aardenne, J., Cooper, O. R., Kainuma, M., Mahowald, N., McConnell, J. R., Naik, V., Riahi, K., and van Vuuren, D. P.: Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7017–7039, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010, 2010.
Laskin, A., Moffet, R. C., Gilles, M. K., Fast, J. D., Zaveri, R. A., Wang, B., Nigge, P., and Shutthanandan, J.: Tropospheric chemistry of internally mixed sea salt and organic particles: Surprising reactivity of NaCl with weak organic acids, J. Geophysi. Res., 117, D15302, , https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd017743, 2012.
Lathem, T. L., Beyersdorf, A. J., Thornhill, K. L., Winstead, E. L., Cubison, M. J., Hecobian, A., Jimenez, J. L., Weber, R. J., Anderson, B. E., and Nenes, A.: Analysis of CCN activity of Arctic aerosol and Canadian biomass burning during summer 2008, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2735–2756, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2735-2013, 2013.
Law, K. S. and Stohl, A.: Arctic air pollution: Origins and impacts, Science, 315, 1537–1540, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137695, 2007.
Law, K. S., Stohl, A., Quinn, P. K., Brock, C. A., Burkhart, J. F., Paris, J.-D., Ancellet, G., Singh, H. B., Roiger, A., Schlager, H., Dibb, J., Jacob, D. J., Arnold, S. R., Pelon, J., and Thomas, J. L.: Arctic air Pollution: New insights from POLARCAT-IPY, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95, 1873–1895, https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-13-00017.1, 2014.
Lewis, E. R. and Schwartz, S. E.: Sea salt aerosol production: mechanisms, methods, measurements, and models – A critical review, Geophysical Monograph Series, vol. 152, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., USA, 2004.
Li, J., Pósfai, M., Hobbs, P. V., and Buseck, P. R.: Individual aerosol particles from biomass burning in southern Africa: 2, Compositions and aging of inorganic particles, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8484, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002310, 2003.
Li, W., Shao, L., Zhang, D., Ro, C.-U., Hu, M., Bi, X., Geng, H., Matsuki, A., Niu, H., and Chen, J.: A review of single aerosol particle studies in the atmosphere of East Asia: morphology, mixing state, source, and heterogeneous reactions, J. Clean. Prod., 112, 1330–1349, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.050, 2016.
Li, W., Xu, L., Liu, X., Zhang, J., Lin, Y., Yao, X., Gao, H., Zhang, D., Chen, J., Wang, W., Harrison, R. M., Zhang, X., Shao, L., Fu, P., Nenes, A., and Shi, Z.: Air pollution – aerosol interactions produce more bioavailable iron for ocean ecosystems, Sci. Adv., 3, e1601749, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601749, 2017.
Matsui, H. and Moteki, N.: High sensitivity of Arctic black carbon radiative effects to subgrid vertical velocity in aerosol activation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL088978,, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl088978, 2020.
Matsui, H., Kondo, Y., Moteki, N., Takegawa, N., Sahu, L. K., Koike, M., Zhao, Y., Fuelberg, H. E., Sessions, W. R., Diskin, G., Anderson, B. E., Blake, D. R., Wisthaler, A., Cubison, M. J., and Jimenez, J. L.: Accumulation-mode aerosol number concentrations in the Arctic during the ARCTAS aircraft campaign: Long-range transport of polluted and clean air from the Asian continent, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D20217, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016189, 2011.
McConnell, J. R., Edwards, R., Kok, G. L., Flanner, M. G., Zender, C. S., Saltzman, E. S., Banta, J. R., Pasteris, D. R., Carter, M. M., and Kahl, J. D. W.: 20th-century industrial black carbon emissions altered Arctic climate forcing, Science, 317, 1381–1384, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144856, 2007.
McNaughton, C. S., Clarke, A. D., Freitag, S., Kapustin, V. N., Kondo, Y., Moteki, N., Sahu, L., Takegawa, N., Schwarz, J. P., Spackman, J. R., Watts, L., Diskin, G., Podolske, J., Holloway, J. S., Wisthaler, A., Mikoviny, T., de Gouw, J., Warneke, C., Jimenez, J., Cubison, M., Howell, S. G., Middlebrook, A., Bahreini, R., Anderson, B. E., Winstead, E., Thornhill, K. L., Lack, D., Cozic, J., and Brock, C. A.: Absorbing aerosol in the troposphere of the Western Arctic during the 2008 ARCTAS/ARCPAC airborne field campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7561–7582, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7561-2011, 2011.
Mori, T., Goto-Azuma, K., Kondo, Y., Ogawa-Tsukagawa, Y., Miura, K., Hirabayashi, M., Oshima, N., Koike, M., Kupiainen, K., Moteki, N., Ohata, S., Sinha, P. R., Sugiura, K., Aoki, T., Schneebeli, M., Steffen, K., Sato, A., Tsushima, A., Makarov, V., Omiya, S., Sugimoto, A., Takano, S., and Nagatsuka, N.: Black carbon and inorganic aerosols in Arctic snowpack, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 13325–13356, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd030623, 2019.
Moroni, B., Cappelletti, D., Crocchianti, S., Becagli, S., Caiazzo, L., Traversi, R., Udisti, R., Mazzola, M., Markowicz, K., Ritter, C., and Zielinski, T.: Morphochemical characteristics and mixing state of long range transported wildfire particles at Ny-Ålesund (Svalbard Islands), Atmos. Environ., 156, 135–145, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.037, 2017.
Moroni, B., Ritter, C., Crocchianti, S., Markowicz, K., Mazzola, M., Becagli, S., Traversi, R., Krejci, R., Tunved, P., and Cappelletti, D.: Individual particle characteristics, optical properties and evolution of an extreme long-range transported biomass burning event in the European Arctic (Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard Islands), J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2019JD031535, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031535, 2020.
Moteki, N., Adachi, K., Ohata, S., Yoshida, A., Harigaya, T., Koike, M., and Kondo, Y.: Anthropogenic iron oxide aerosols enhance atmospheric heating, Nat. Commun., 8, 15329, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15329, 2017.
Moteki, N., Mori, T., Matsui, H., and Ohata, S.: Observational constraint of in-cloud supersaturation for simulations of aerosol rainout in atmospheric models, NPJ Clim. Atmos. Sci., 2, 6, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0063-y, 2019.
Murphy, D. M., Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hudson, P. K., Matthew, B. M., Middlebrook, A. M., Peltier, R. E., Sullivan, A., Thomson, D. S., and Weber, R. J.: Single-particle mass spectrometry of tropospheric aerosol particles, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D23S32,, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007340, 2006.
Nguyen, Q. T., Skov, H., Sørensen, L. L., Jensen, B. J., Grube, A. G., Massling, A., Glasius, M., and Nøjgaard, J. K.: Source apportionment of particles at Station Nord, North East Greenland during 2008–2010 using COPREM and PMF analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 35–49, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-35-2013, 2013.
Ohata, S., Yoshida, A., Moteki, N., Adachi, K., Takahashi, Y., Kurisu, M., and Koike, M.: Abundance of light-absorbing anthropogenic iron oxide aerosols in the urban atmosphere and their emission sources, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 8115–8134, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd028363, 2018.
Oshima, N., Koike, M., Zhang, Y., and Kondo Y.: Aging of black carbon in outflow from anthropogenic sources using a mixing state resolved model: 2. Aerosol optical properties and cloud condensation nuclei activities, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D18202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011681, 2009.
Oshima, N., Yukimoto, S., Deushi, M., Koshiro, T., Kawai, H., Tanaka, T. Y., and Yoshida, K.: Global and Arctic effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic gases and aerosols in MRI-ESM2.0, Prog. Earth Planet. Sci., 7, 38, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-020-00348-w, 2020.
Pósfai, M., Gelencsér, A., Simonics, R., Arató, K., Li, J., Hobbs, P. V., and Buseck, P. R.: Atmospheric tar balls: Particles from biomass and biofuel burning, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D06213, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004169, 2004.
Reid, J. S., Koppmann, R., Eck, T. F., and Eleuterio, D. P.: A review of biomass burning emissions part II: intensive physical properties of biomass burning particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 799–825, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-799-2005, 2005.
Schulz, H., Zanatta, M., Bozem, H., Leaitch, W. R., Herber, A. B., Burkart, J., Willis, M. D., Kunkel, D., Hoor, P. M., Abbatt, J. P. D., and Gerdes, R.: High Arctic aircraft measurements characterising black carbon vertical variability in spring and summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2361–2384, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2361-2019, 2019.
Sedlacek III, A. J., Buseck, P. R., Adachi, K., Onasch, T. B., Springston, S. R., and Kleinman, L.: Formation and evolution of tar balls from northwestern US wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11289–11301, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11289-2018, 2018.
Shaw, G. E.: The Arctic haze phenomenon, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 76, 2403–2414, 1995.
Shaw, P. M., Russell, L. M., Jefferson, A., and Quinn, P. K.: Arctic organic aerosol measurements show particles from mixed combustion in spring haze and from frost flowers in winter, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L10803, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl042831, 2010.
Spackman, J. R., Gao, R. S., Neff, W. D., Schwarz, J. P., Watts, L. A., Fahey, D. W., Holloway, J. S., Ryerson, T. B., Peischl, J., and Brock, C. A.: Aircraft observations of enhancement and depletion of black carbon mass in the springtime Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9667–9680, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9667-2010, 2010.
Stone, R. S., Sharma, S., Herber, A., Eleftheriadis, K., and Nelson, D. W.: A characterization of Arctic aerosols on the basis of aerosol optical depth and black carbon measurements, Elementa, 2, 000027, https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000027, 2014.
Stroeve, J. C., Serreze, M. C., Holland, M. M., Kay, J. E., Malanik, J., and Barrett, A. P.: The Arctic's rapidly shrinking sea ice cover: a research synthesis, Clim. Change, 110, 1005–1027, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0101-1, 2012.
Tanaka, T. Y. and Chiba, M.: Global simulation of dust aerosol with a chemical transport model, MASINGAR, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 83, 255–278, 2005.
Tobo, Y., Adachi, K., DeMott, P. J., Hill, T. C. J., Hamilton, D. S., Mahowald, N. M., Nagatsuka, N., Ohata, S., Uetake, J., Kondo, Y., and Koike, M.: Glacially sourced dust as a potentially significant source of ice nucleating particles, Nat. Geosci., 12, 253–258, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0314-x, 2019.
Warneke, C., Bahreini, R., Brioude, J., Brock, C. A., de Gouw, J. A., Fahey, D. W., Froyd, K. D., Holloway, J. S., Middlebrook, A., Miller, L., Montzka, S., Murphy, D. M., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., Schwarz, J. P., Spackman, J. R., and Veres, P.: Biomass burning in Siberia and Kazakhstan as an important source for haze over the Alaskan Arctic in April 2008, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L02813, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl036194, 2009.
Wendisch, M., Macke, A., Ehrlich, A., Lüpkes, C., Mech, M., Chechin, D., Dethloff, K., Velasco, C. B., Bozem, H., Brückner, M., Clemen, H.-C., Crewell, S., Donth, T., Dupuy, R., Ebell, K., Egerer, U., Engelmann, R., Engler, C., Eppers, O., Gehrmann, M., Gong, X., Gottschalk, M., Gourbeyre, C., Griesche, H., Hartmann, J., Hartmann, M., Heinold, B., Herber, A., Herrmann, H., Heygster, G., Hoor, P., Jafariserajehlou, S., Jäkel, E., Järvinen, E., Jourdan, O., Kästner, U., Kecorius, S., Knudsen, E. M., Köllner, F., Kretzschmar, J., Lelli, L., Leroy, D., Maturilli, M., Mei, L., Mertes, S., Mioche, G., Neuber, R., Nicolaus, M., Nomokonova, T., Notholt, J., Palm, M., van Pinxteren, M., Quaas, J., Richter, P., Ruiz-Donoso, E., Schäfer, M., Schmieder, K., Schnaiter, M., Schneider, J., Schwarzenböck, A., Seifert, P., Shupe, M. D., Siebert, H., Spreen, G., Stapf, J., Stratmann, F., Vogl, T., Welti, A., Wex, H., Wiedensohler, A., Zanatta, M., and Zeppenfeld, S.: The Arctic cloud puzzle: Using ACLOUD/PASCAL multiplatform observations to unravel the role of clouds and aerosol particles in Arctic amplification, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 841–871, https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-18-0072.1, 2019.
Wesche, C., Steinhage, D., and Nixdorf, U.: Polar aircraft Polar5 and Polar6 operated by the Alfred Wegener Institute, Journal of large-scale research facilities, 2, A87, , https://doi.org/10.17815/jlsrf-2-153, 2016.
Willis, M. D., Köllner, F., Burkart, J., Bozem, H., Thomas, J. L., Schneider, J., Aliabadi, A. A., Hoor, P. M., Schulz, H., Herber, A. B., Leaitch, W. R., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Evidence for marine biogenic influence on summertime Arctic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 6460–6470, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl073359, 2017.
Willis, M. D., Bozem, H., Kunkel, D., Lee, A. K. Y., Schulz, H., Burkart, J., Aliabadi, A. A., Herber, A. B., Leaitch, W. R., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Aircraft-based measurements of High Arctic springtime aerosol show evidence for vertically varying sources, transport and composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 57–76, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-57-2019, 2019.
Xu, L., Russell, L. M., and Burrows, S. M.: Potential sea salt aerosol sources from frost flowers in the pan-Arctic region, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 10840-10856, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024713, 2016.
Yamanouchi, T., Treffeisen, R., Herber, A., Shiobara, M., Yamagata, S., Hara, K., Sato, K., Yabuki, M., Tomikawa, Y., Rinke, A., Neuber, R., Schumachter, R., Kriews, M., Ström, J., Schrems, O., and Gernandt, H.: Arctic Study of Tropospheric Aerosol and Radiation (ASTAR) 2000: Arctic haze case study, Tellus B, 57, 141–152, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v57i2.16784, 2005.
Yoshida, A., Ohata, S., Moteki, N., Adachi, K., Mori, T., Koike, M., and Takami, A.: Abundance and emission flux of the anthropogenic iron oxide aerosols from the east Asian continental outflow, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 11194–111209, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd028665, 2018.
Yoshida, A., Moteki, N., Ohata, S., Mori, T., Koike, M., Kondo, Y., Matsui, H., Oshima, N., Takami, A., and Kita, K.: Abundances and microphysical properties of light-absorbing iron oxide and black carbon aerosols over East Asia and the Arctic, J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2019JD032301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd032301, 2020.
Yoshizue, M., Taketani, F., Adachi, K., Iwamoto, Y., Tohjima, Y., Mori, T., and Miura, K.: Detection of Aerosol Particles from Siberian Biomass Burning over the Western North Pacific, Atmosphere, 11, 1175, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11111175, 2020.
Yu, H., Li, W., Zhang, Y., Tunved, P., Dall'Osto, M., Shen, X., Sun, J., Zhang, X., Zhang, J., and Shi, Z.: Organic coating on sulfate and soot particles during late summer in the Svalbard Archipelago, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10433–10446, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10433-2019, 2019.
Yukimoto, S., Kawai, H., Koshiro, T., Oshima, N., Yoshida, K., Urakawa, S., Tsujino, H., Deushi, M., Tanaka, T., Hosaka, M., Yabu, S., Yoshimura, H., Shindo, E., Mizuta, R., Obata, A., Adachi, Y., and Ishii, M.: The Meteorological Research Institute earth system model version 2.0, MRI-ESM2.0: Description and basic evaluation of the physical component, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 97, 931–965, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2019-051, 2019.
Yumimoto, K., Tanaka, T. Y., Oshima, N., and Maki, T.: JRAero: the Japanese Reanalysis for Aerosol v1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3225–3253, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3225-2017, 2017.
Zanatta, M., Laj, P., Gysel, M., Baltensperger, U., Vratolis, S., Eleftheriadis, K., Kondo, Y., Dubuisson, P., Winiarek, V., Kazadzis, S., Tunved, P., and Jacobi, H.-W.: Effects of mixing state on optical and radiative properties of black carbon in the European Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14037–14057, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14037-2018, 2018.