Articles | Volume 20, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7231-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7231-2020
Research article
 | 
23 Jun 2020
Research article |  | 23 Jun 2020

Effects of a priori profile shape assumptions on comparisons between satellite NO2 columns and model simulations

Matthew J. Cooper, Randall V. Martin, Daven K. Henze, and Dylan B. A. Jones

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Matthew Cooper on behalf of the Authors (13 May 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (20 May 2020) by Ronald Cohen
AR by Matthew Cooper on behalf of the Authors (21 May 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
Comparisons between satellite-retrieved and model-simulated NO2 columns are affected by differences between the model vertical profile and the assumed profile used in the retrieval process. We examine how such differences impact NOx emission estimates from satellite observations. Larger differences between the simulated and assumed profile shape correspond to larger emission errors. This reveals the importance of using consistent profile information when comparing satellite columns to models.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint