55 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Locating and quantifying CH4 sources within a wastewater treatment plant based on mobile measurements J. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4571-2025
2. CH4 isotopic signatures of emissions from oil and gas extraction sites in Romania M. Menoud et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00092
3. Intercomparison of detection and quantification methods for methane emissions from the natural gas distribution network in Hamburg, Germany H. Maazallahi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5051-2023
4. Evaluating urban methane emissions and their attributes in a megacity, Osaka, Japan, via mobile and eddy covariance measurements M. Ueyama et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12513-2025
5. Low Methane Emissions from the Natural Gas Distribution System Indicated by Mobile Measurements in a Chinese Megacity Hangzhou S. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00068
6. Missing methane emissions from urban sewer networks J. Joo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123101
7. Estimating methane emissions from the waste sector in Southern Ontario using atmospheric measurements L. Gillespie et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2024.2435340
8. Source Category Attribution of Methane Emissions in Calgary Using Positive Matrix Factorization Z. Xing et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00323
9. Identification of Sources of Methane in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam C. Woolley Maisch et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00034
10. Methane (CH4) sources in Krakow, Poland: insights from isotope analysis M. Menoud et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13167-2021
11. Street-level methane emissions of Bucharest, Romania and the dominance of urban wastewater. J. Fernandez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100153
12. Four years of mobile monitoring show that urban waste is the primary source of large methane emissions hotspots in Montreal, Canada R. Gonzalez Moguel et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/adfdb4
13. Improving consistency in methane emission quantification from the natural gas distribution systems across measurement devices J. Tettenborn et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3569-2025
14. Methane emissions from the oil and gas supply chain: Characteristics and mitigation H. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynexs.2025.100087
15. Modeling temporal variability in the surface expression above a methane leak: The ESCAPE model S. Riddick et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104275
16. Theoretical model and experimental validation to investigation the biogas production by anaerobic process: Wastewater treatment plant and energy production M. Gomaa & F. Al-Atyiat https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2024.100912
17. Airborne in situ quantification of methane emissions from oil and gas production in Romania H. Maazallahi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1497-2025
18. Implementation of a Novel Natural Gas Distribution Screening Approach for High Flow Rate Below Ground Leaks Integrated with Company-Specific Emission Factors for Measurement-Informed Annual Emission Inventories E. Newton et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00026
19. An inter-comparison of inverse models for estimating European CH4 emissions E. Ioannidis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-167-2026
20. Transmission and Distribution Pipeline Leak Identification and Characterization by Walking Survey and Soil Flux Measurements E. Robinson & P. DeCarlo https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00109
21. A GC-IRMS method for measuring sulfur isotope ratios of carbonyl sulfide from small air samples S. Baartman et al. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.13875.2
22. Isotopic signatures of major methane sources in the coal seam gas fields and adjacent agricultural districts, Queensland, Australia X. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10527-2021
23. Study of spatiotemporal variation and annual emission of CH4 in Shaoxing Yangtze River Delta, China, Using a portable CH4 detector on the UAV X. Pang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2024.03.045
24. Methane emission mapping and quantification in two medium-sized cities in Germany: Heidelberg and Schwetzingen J. Wietzel & M. Schmidt https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2023.100228
25. Quantification of Urban Methane Emissions: A Combination of Stationary with Mobile Measurements F. Kohler et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101596
26. New contributions of measurements in Europe to the global inventory of the stable isotopic composition of methane M. Menoud et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4365-2022
27. Natural Gas and Biogenic CH4 Emissions from an Urban Center, Sakai, Japan, Based on Simultaneous Measurements of CH4 and C2H6 fluxes Based on the Eddy Covariance Method M. Ueyama et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c09629
28. Methane Emission Estimation of Oil and Gas Sector: A Review of Measurement Technologies, Data Analysis Methods and Uncertainty Estimation S. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413895
29. A review of methane emissions source types, characteristics, rates, and mitigation effectiveness across U.S. and Canadian cities C. Vollrath et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ade9e1
30. A System-Based Assessment of Methane Sources in an Eastern European Urban Environment (Cluj-Napoca, Romania) M. Hmoudah & C. Baciu https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17040351
31. Methane emissions from residential natural gas meter set assemblies C. Vollrath et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172857
32. Climate Impact Comparison of Electric and Gas‐Powered End‐User Appliances F. Dietrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002877
33. Investigating high methane emissions from urban areas detected by TROPOMI and their association with untreated wastewater B. de Foy et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acc118
34. Underestimation of Thermogenic Methane Emissions in New York City J. Pitt et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c10307
35. Advanced Leak Detection and Quantification of Methane Emissions Using sUAS D. Hollenbeck et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5040117
36. A GC-IRMS method for measuring sulfur isotope ratios of carbonyl sulfide from small air samples S. Baartman et al. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.13875.1
37. Quantification of methane emissions in Hamburg using a network of FTIR spectrometers and an inverse modeling approach A. Forstmaier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6897-2023
38. Missing wintertime methane emissions from New York City related to combustion L. Schiferl et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15683-2025
39. A regional study of the fugitive methane emissions from the gas distribution system in Iran by direct measurement H. Afshoun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104716
40. Ground-Based Mobile Measurements to Track Urban Methane Emissions from Natural Gas in 12 Cities across Eight Countries F. Vogel et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03160
41. High-resolution maps of carbon dioxide and moisture fluxes over an urban neighborhood E. Velasco et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EA00108J
42. Onshore methane emissions measurements from the oil and gas industry: a scoping review C. Vollrath et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad3129
43. Methane emission and influencing factors of China's oil and natural gas sector in 2020–2060: A source level analysis S. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167116
44. Estimating air methane and total hydrocarbon concentrations in Alberta, Canada using machine learning R. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2023.101984
45. Integrated mobile monitoring and atmospheric modeling for methane emission assessment in an industrial-agricultural hub: A case study of Binzhou, China Y. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2025.102801
46. Development and validation of a route planning methodology for vehicle-based remote measurements of methane and other emissions from oil and gas wells and facilities M. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2022.2113182
47. Experimental study and numerical analysis of biogas and energy production from sewage sludge M. Măcinic et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202560801010
48. Identification of natural gas leak sources using ethane/methane ratios and methane isotopic signatures Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2026.100434
49. Evaluation of Data Processing Strategies for Methane Isotopic Signatures Determined During Near-Source Measurements S. Defratyka et al. https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusb.1878
50. Measurement report: Mobile measurements to estimate urban methane emissions in Tokyo T. Umezawa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-18015-2025
51. Methane quantification of LNG gas-fired power plant in Seoul, South Korea J. Joo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-3019-2026
52. Global warming consequences of replacing natural gas with hydrogen in the domestic energy sectors of future low-carbon economies in the United Kingdom and the United States of America R. Field & R. Derwent https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.120
53. Intercomparison of commercial analyzers for atmospheric ethane and methane observations R. Commane et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1431-2023
54. Using carbon-14 and carbon-13 measurements for source attribution of atmospheric methane in the Athabasca oil sands region R. Gonzalez Moguel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2121-2022
55. Measurement report: Isotopic composition of CH4 emitted from gas exploration sites in the Transylvanian Basin, Romania T. Röckmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-723-2026