Congratulations on this much needed evaluation! It contains a wealth of useful data. Minor comments, all of which can be safely ignored:

P6L20: I presume you label this as R6 rather than R1 to be consistent with Figure 1. Would it make sense to specifically label the OH formation channel in Figure 1 with rate constant k6 (similar to k1, k2, k3… already used in the figure). Similar comment may apply or R7 going through dioxirane
P7L24: In principal, -> In principle,
P10L1: you could also cite the TUV model directly
https://www2.acom.ucar.edu/modeling/tropospheric-ultraviolet-and-visible-tuv-radiation-model
P11L25: I do not follow this area closely but my colleagues also had a paper on reaction with HNO3, where they suggested it could be fast enough to compete with reactions with water vapor (Foreman, E. S., K. M. Kapnas, and C. Murray (2016), Reactions between Criegee Intermediates and the Inorganic Acids HCl and HNO3: Kinetics and Atmospheric Implications, Angewandte Chemie-International Edition, 55(35), 10419-10422, doi:10.1002/anie.201604662.) Perhaps it could be mentioned.