Dear Martina
Many thanks for your careful revisions of your manuscript. As you can see in the submitted referee report, referee #2 agrees that you addressed all the major points of the reviews and suggest a few more minor changes. I ask you to please consider these suggestions before submitting the final version of your manuscript.
With best regards,
Heini

Dear Martina

Many thanks for your further revisions and for submitting the revised version. I am happy to accept your paper for publication in ACP, however, I recommend that you do some further technical corrections in order to facilitate the typesetting process.

1) I found a few language issues in the new paragraph:
L922: "are not considered IN this study"
L923: "to quantify IN/FROM lidar/radar products"
L925: "The color code represent" --> represents

2) Of course the general language level is fine, but there are several places where a native speaker should be able to make things even more elegant. Just an example, in L35 "inside of clouds": why not just "in clouds"? You have several native speaker co-authors - would one of them be ready to do some language corrections? My impression is that this would be worth the effort, given the outstanding dataset and science you present in your paper.

3) Please carefully check your list of references, for instance for Dinh et al., there is a 2016 version in ACP (instead of the 2015 ACPD); some journal names are written with capital letters (anyway, always use abbreviations); some journal names are just given as "JGR" (please correct); and some references are incomplete (e.g., Righi et al.).

Congratulations for this important paper and with best regards,
Heini