Articles | Volume 20, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11607-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11607-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
12 Oct 2020
Research article |
| 12 Oct 2020
| 12 Oct 2020
Differences in fine particle chemical composition on clear and cloudy days
Amy E. Christiansen
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
Barron H. Henderson
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Daniel L. Goldberg, M. Omar Nawaz, Congmeng Lyu, Jian He, Annmarie G. Carlton, Shobha Kondragunta, and Susan C. Anenberg
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1350, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1350, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This research investigates how air quality, specifically NO2 concentrations, is different under clear and cloudy skies. We find that in situ surface NO2 is, on average, +36 % larger during cloudy days versus clear sky days, with a wide distribution based on geographic region and roadway proximity: largest in the Northeast U.S. and smallest in the Southwest U.S. and near major roadways. This has implications for satellite data applications, which only use measurements in the absence of clouds.
Diego Guizzardi, Monica Crippa, Tim Butler, Terry Keating, Rosa Wu, Jacek W. Kamiński, Jeroen Kuenen, Junichi Kurokawa, Satoru Chatani, Tazuko Morikawa, George Pouliot, Jacinthe Racine, Michael D. Moran, Zbigniew Klimont, Patrick M. Manseau, Rabab Mashayekhi, Barron H. Henderson, Steven J. Smith, Rachel Hoesly, Marilena Muntean, Manjola Banja, Edwin Schaaf, Federico Pagani, Jung-Hun Woo, Jinseok Kim, Enrico Pisoni, Junhua Zhang, David Niemi, Mourad Sassi, Annie Duhamel, Tabish Ansari, Kristen Foley, Guannan Geng, Yifei Chen, and Qiang Zhang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-601, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-601, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
The global air pollution emission mosaic HTAP_v3.1 is the state-of-the-art database for addressing the evolution of a set of policy-relevant air pollutants over the past 2 decades. The inventory is made by the harmonization and blending of seven regional inventories, gapfilled using the most recent release of EDGAR (EDGARv8). By incorporating the best available local information, the HTAP_v3.1 mosaic inventory can be used for policy-relevant studies at both regional and global levels.
T. Nash Skipper, Christian Hogrefe, Barron H. Henderson, Rohit Mathur, Kristen M. Foley, and Armistead G. Russell
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8373–8397, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8373-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8373-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Chemical transport model simulations are combined with ozone observations to estimate the bias in ozone attributable to US anthropogenic sources and individual sources of US background ozone: natural sources, non-US anthropogenic sources, and stratospheric ozone. Results indicate a positive bias correlated with US anthropogenic emissions during summer in the eastern US and a negative bias correlated with stratospheric ozone during spring.
T. Nash Skipper, Emma L. D'Ambro, Forwood C. Wiser, V. Faye McNeill, Rebecca H. Schwantes, Barron H. Henderson, Ivan R. Piletic, Colleen B. Baublitz, Jesse O. Bash, Andrew R. Whitehill, Lukas C. Valin, Asher P. Mouat, Jennifer Kaiser, Glenn M. Wolfe, Jason M. St. Clair, Thomas F. Hanisco, Alan Fried, Bryan K. Place, and Havala O.T. Pye
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12903–12924, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12903-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12903-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We develop the Community Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Multiphase Mechanism (CRACMM) version 2 to improve predictions of formaldehyde in ambient air compared to satellite-, aircraft-, and ground-based observations. With the updated chemistry, we estimate the cancer risk from inhalation exposure to ambient formaldehyde across the contiguous USA and predict that 40 % of this risk is controllable through reductions in anthropogenic emissions of nitrogen oxides and reactive organic carbon.
Matthew J. Rowlinson, Mat J. Evans, Lucy J. Carpenter, Katie A. Read, Shalini Punjabi, Adedayo Adedeji, Luke Fakes, Ally Lewis, Ben Richmond, Neil Passant, Tim Murrells, Barron Henderson, Kelvin H. Bates, and Detlev Helmig
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 8317–8342, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8317-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8317-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ethane and propane are volatile organic compounds emitted from human activities which help to form ozone, a pollutant and greenhouse gas, and also affect the chemistry of the lower atmosphere. Atmospheric models tend to do a poor job of reproducing the abundance of these compounds in the atmosphere. By using regional estimates of their emissions, rather than globally consistent estimates, we can significantly improve the simulation of ethane in the model and make some improvement for propane.
Kelvin H. Bates, Mathew J. Evans, Barron H. Henderson, and Daniel J. Jacob
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1511–1524, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1511-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1511-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate representation of rates and products of chemical reactions in atmospheric models is crucial for simulating concentrations of pollutants and climate forcers. We update the widely used GEOS-Chem atmospheric chemistry model with reaction parameters from recent compilations of experimental data and demonstrate the implications for key atmospheric chemical species. The updates decrease tropospheric CO mixing ratios and increase stratospheric nitrogen oxide mixing ratios, among other changes.
Heather Simon, Christian Hogrefe, Andrew Whitehill, Kristen M. Foley, Jennifer Liljegren, Norm Possiel, Benjamin Wells, Barron H. Henderson, Lukas C. Valin, Gail Tonnesen, K. Wyat Appel, and Shannon Koplitz
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1855–1871, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1855-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1855-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We assess observed and modeled ozone weekend–weekday differences in the USA from 2002–2019. A subset of urban areas that were NOx-saturated at the beginning of the period transitioned to NOx-limited conditions. Multiple rural areas of California were NOx-limited for the entire period but become less influenced by local day-of-week emission patterns in more recent years. The model produces more NOx-saturated conditions than the observations but captures trends in weekend–weekday ozone patterns.
Christine Wiedinmyer, Yosuke Kimura, Elena C. McDonald-Buller, Louisa K. Emmons, Rebecca R. Buchholz, Wenfu Tang, Keenan Seto, Maxwell B. Joseph, Kelley C. Barsanti, Annmarie G. Carlton, and Robert Yokelson
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3873–3891, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3873-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3873-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN) provides daily global estimates of emissions from open fires based on satellite detections of hot spots. This version has been updated to apply MODIS and VIIRS satellite fire detection and better represents both large and small fires. FINNv2.5 generates more emissions than FINNv1 and is in general agreement with other fire emissions inventories. The new estimates are consistent with satellite observations, but uncertainties remain regionally and by pollutant.
Monica Crippa, Diego Guizzardi, Tim Butler, Terry Keating, Rosa Wu, Jacek Kaminski, Jeroen Kuenen, Junichi Kurokawa, Satoru Chatani, Tazuko Morikawa, George Pouliot, Jacinthe Racine, Michael D. Moran, Zbigniew Klimont, Patrick M. Manseau, Rabab Mashayekhi, Barron H. Henderson, Steven J. Smith, Harrison Suchyta, Marilena Muntean, Efisio Solazzo, Manjola Banja, Edwin Schaaf, Federico Pagani, Jung-Hun Woo, Jinseok Kim, Fabio Monforti-Ferrario, Enrico Pisoni, Junhua Zhang, David Niemi, Mourad Sassi, Tabish Ansari, and Kristen Foley
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2667–2694, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2667-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2667-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study responds to the global and regional atmospheric modelling community's need for a mosaic of air pollutant emissions with global coverage, long time series, spatially distributed data at a high time resolution, and a high sectoral resolution in order to enhance the understanding of transboundary air pollution. The mosaic approach to integrating official regional emission inventories with a global inventory based on a consistent methodology ensures policy-relevant results.
Qian Shu, Sergey L. Napelenok, William T. Hutzell, Kirk R. Baker, Barron H. Henderson, Benjamin N. Murphy, and Christian Hogrefe
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2303–2322, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2303-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2303-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Source attribution methods are generally used to determine culpability of precursor emission sources to ambient pollutant concentrations. However, source attribution of secondarily formed pollutants such as ozone and its precursors cannot be explicitly measured, making evaluation of source apportionment methods challenging. In this study, multiple apportionment approach comparisons show common features but still reveal wide variations in predicted sector contribution and species dependency.
James D. East, Barron H. Henderson, Sergey L. Napelenok, Shannon N. Koplitz, Golam Sarwar, Robert Gilliam, Allen Lenzen, Daniel Q. Tong, R. Bradley Pierce, and Fernando Garcia-Menendez
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15981–16001, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15981-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15981-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a framework that uses a computer model of air quality, along with air pollution data from satellite instruments, to estimate emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) across the Northern Hemisphere. The framework, which advances current methods to infer emissions from satellite observations, provides observationally constrained NOx estimates, including in regions of the world where emissions are highly uncertain, and can improve simulations of air pollutants relevant for health and policy.
Michael A. Battaglia Jr., Nicholas Balasus, Katherine Ball, Vanessa Caicedo, Ruben Delgado, Annmarie G. Carlton, and Christopher J. Hennigan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18271–18281, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18271-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18271-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study characterizes aerosol liquid water content and aerosol pH at a land–water transition site near Baltimore, Maryland. We characterize the effects of unique meteorology associated with the close proximity to the Chesapeake Bay and episodic NH3 events derived from industrial and agricultural sources on aerosol chemistry during the summer. We also examine two events where primary Bay emissions underwent aging in the polluted urban atmosphere.
Nicholas Balasus, Michael A. Battaglia Jr., Katherine Ball, Vanessa Caicedo, Ruben Delgado, Annmarie G. Carlton, and Christopher J. Hennigan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13051–13065, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13051-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13051-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Measurements of aerosol and gas composition were carried out at a land–water transition site near Baltimore, MD. Gas-phase ammonia concentrations were highly elevated compared to measurements at a nearby inland site. Our analysis reveals that NH2 was from both industrial and agricultural sources. This had a pronounced effect on aerosol chemical composition at the site, most notably contributing to episodic spikes of aerosol nitrate.
Qian Shu, Benjamin Murphy, Jonathan E. Pleim, Donna Schwede, Barron H. Henderson, Havala O.T. Pye, Keith Wyat Appel, Tanvir R. Khan, and Judith A. Perlinger
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-129, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-129, 2021
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
We have bridged the gap between dry deposition measurement and modeling by rigorous use of box and regional transport models and field measurements, but more efforts are needed. This study highlights that deviation among deposition schemes is most pronounced for small and large particles. This study better links model predictions to available real-world observations and incrementally reduces uncertainties in the magnitude of loss processes important for the lifecycle of air pollutants.
Cited articles
Aswini, A. R., Hegde, P., Nair, P. R., and Aryasree, S.:
Seasonal changes in carbonaceous aerosols over a tropical coastal location in response to meteorological processes,
Sci. Total Environ.,
656, 1261–1279, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.366, 2019.
Babila, J. E., Carlton, A. G., Hennigan, C. J., and Ghate, V. P.:
On Aerosol Liquid Water and Sulfate Associations: The Potential for Fine Particulate Matter Biases,
Atmosphere,
11, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11020194, 2020.
Bar-Or, R. Z., Koren, I., Altaratz, O., and Fredj, E.:
Radiative properties of humidified aerosols in cloudy environment,
Atmos. Res.,
118, 280–294, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.07.014, 2012.
Bray, C. D., Battye, W., Aneja, V. P., Tong, D., Lee, P., Tang, Y., and Nowak, J. B.:
Evaluating ammonia (NH3) predictions in the NOAA National Air Quality Forecast Capability (NAQFC) using in-situ aircraft and satellite measurements from the CalNex2010 campaign,
Atmos. Environ.,
163, 65–76, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.032, 2017.
Brock, C. A., Wagner, N. L., Anderson, B. E., Attwood, A. R., Beyersdorf, A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Carlton, A. G., Day, D. A., Diskin, G. S., Gordon, T. D., Jimenez, J. L., Lack, D. A., Liao, J., Markovic, M. Z., Middlebrook, A. M., Ng, N. L., Perring, A. E., Richardson, M. S., Schwarz, J. P., Washenfelder, R. A., Welti, A., Xu, L., Ziemba, L. D., and Murphy, D. M.: Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern United States in summer – Part 1: Hygroscopic growth, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4987–5007, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4987-2016, 2016.
Cao, J. J., Wu, F., Chow, J. C., Lee, S. C., Li, Y., Chen, S. W., An, Z. S., Fung, K. K., Watson, J. G., Zhu, C. S., and Liu, S. X.: Characterization and source apportionment of atmospheric organic and elemental carbon during fall and winter of 2003 in Xi'an, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3127–3137, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3127-2005, 2005.
Carlton, A. G. and Turpin, B. J.: Particle partitioning potential of organic compounds is highest in the Eastern US and driven by anthropogenic water, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10203–10214, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10203-2013, 2013.
Carlton, A. G., Turpin, B. J., Altieri, K. E., Seitzinger, S. P., Mathur, R., Roselle, S. J., and Weber, R. J.:
CMAQ Model Performance Enhanced When In-Cloud Secondary Organic Aerosol is Included: Comparisons of Organic Carbon Predictions with Measurements,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
42, 8798–8802, https://doi.org/10.1021/es801192n, 2008.
Carlton, A. G., Pye, H. O. T., Baker, K. R., and Hennigan, C. J.:
Additional Benefits of Federal Air-Quality Rules: Model Estimates of Controllable Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosol,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
52, 9254–9265, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01869, 2018a.
Carlton, A. G., de Gouw, J., Jimenez, J. L., Ambrose, J. L., Attwood, A. R., Brown, S., Baker, K. R., Brock, C., Cohen, R. C., Edgerton, S., Farkas, C. M., Farmer, D., Goldstein, A. H., Gratz, L., Guenther, A., Hunt, S., Jaeglé, L., Jaffe, D. A., Mak, J., McClure, C., Nenes, A., Nguyen, T. K., Pierce, J. R., de Sa, S., Selin, N. E., Shah, V., Shaw, S., Shepson, P. B., Song, S., Stutz, J., Surratt, J. D., Turpin, B. J., Warneke, C., Washenfelder, R. A., Wennberg, P. O., and Zhou, X.:
Synthesis of the Southeast Atmosphere Studies: Investigating Fundamental Atmospheric Chemistry Questions, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
99, 547–567, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0048.1, 2018b.
Carlton, A. G, Christiansen, A. E., Flesch, M. M., Hennigan, C. J., and Sareen, N.: Multiphase Atmospheric Chemistry in Liquid Water: Impacts and Controllability of Organic Aerosol, Accounts Chem. Res., 53, 1715–1723, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00301, 2020.
Chang, R. Y.-W., Slowik, J. G., Shantz, N. C., Vlasenko, A., Liggio, J., Sjostedt, S. J., Leaitch, W. R., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: The hygroscopicity parameter (κ) of ambient organic aerosol at a field site subject to biogenic and anthropogenic influences: relationship to degree of aerosol oxidation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5047–5064, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5047-2010, 2010.
Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Kuhns, H., Etyemezian, V., Lowenthal, D. H., Crow, D., Kohl, S. D., Engelbrecht, J. P., and Green, M. C.:
Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational study,
Chemosphere,
54, 185–208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.07.004, 2004.
Christiansen, A., Carlton, A. M. G., and Porter, W. C.:
The changing nature of organic carbon over the United States,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
54, 10524–10532, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02225, 2020.
Christiansen, A. E., Ghate, V. P., and Carlton, A. G.:
Aerosol Optical Thickness: Organic Composition, Associated Particle Water, and Aloft Extinction,
ACS Earth and Space Chemistry,
3, 403–412, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00163, 2019.
Christopher, S. A. and Gupta, P.:
Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality: The Cloud-Cover Problem,
JAPCA J. Air Waste Ma.,
60, 596–602, https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.60.5.596, 2010.
Crosbie, E., Youn, J.-S., Balch, B., Wonaschütz, A., Shingler, T., Wang, Z., Conant, W. C., Betterton, E. A., and Sorooshian, A.: On the competition among aerosol number, size and composition in predicting CCN variability: a multi-annual field study in an urbanized desert, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6943–6958, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6943-2015, 2015.
de Hoogh, K., Gulliver, J., Donkelaar, A. van, Martin, R. V., Marshall, J. D., Bechle, M. J., Cesaroni, G., Pradas, M. C., Dedele, A., Eeftens, M., Forsberg, B., Galassi, C., Heinrich, J., Hoffmann, B., Jacquemin, B., Katsouyanni, K., Korek, M., Künzli, N., Lindley, S. J., Lepeule, J., Meleux, F., de Nazelle, A., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Nystad, W., Raaschou-Nielsen, O., Peters, A., Peuch, V.-H., Rouil, L., Udvardy, O., Slama, R., Stempfelet, M., Stephanou, E. G., Tsai, M. Y., Yli-Tuomi, T., Weinmayr, G., Brunekreef, B., Vienneau, D., and Hoek, G.:
Development of West-European PM2.5 and NO2 land use regression models incorporating satellite-derived and chemical transport modelling data,
Environ. Res.,
151, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.07.005, 2016.
Donahue, N. M., Robinson, A. L., and Pandis, S. N.:
Atmospheric organic particulate matter: From smoke to secondary organic aerosol,
Atmos. Environ.,
43, 94–106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.055, 2009.
Duong, H. T., Sorooshian, A., Craven, J. S., Hersey, S. P., Metcalf, A. R., Zhang, X., Weber, R. J., Jonsson, H., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Water-soluble organic aerosol in the Los Angeles Basin and outflow regions: Airborne and ground measurements during the 2010 CalNex field campaign,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
116, D00V04, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016674, 2011.
Ervens, B., Sorooshian, A., Aldhaif, A. M., Shingler, T., Crosbie, E., Ziemba, L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., and Wisthaler, A.: Is there an aerosol signature of chemical cloud processing?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16099–16119, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16099-2018, 2018.
Fan, J., Wang, Y., Rosenfeld, D., and Liu, X.:
Review of Aerosol–Cloud Interactions: Mechanisms, Significance, and Challenges,
J. Atmos. Sci.,
73, 4221–4252, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0037.1, 2016.
Farkas, C. M., Moeller, M. D., Felder, F. A., Henderson, B. H., and Carlton, A. G.:
High Electricity Demand in the Northeast U.S.: PJM Reliability Network and Peaking Unit Impacts on Air Quality,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
50, 8375–8384, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01697, 2016.
Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for K+–Ca2+–Mg2+–NH4+–Na+–
Gasparini, R., Li, R., Collins, D. R., Ferrare, R. A., and Brackett, V. G.:
Application of aerosol hygroscopicity measured at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program's Southern Great Plains site to examine composition and evolution,
J. Geophys. Res.,
111, D05S12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005448, 2006.
Gentner, D. R., Jathar, S. H., Gordon, T. D., Bahreini, R., Day, D. A., El Haddad, I., Hayes, P. L., Pieber, S. M., Platt, S. M., de Gouw, J., Goldstein, A. H., Harley, R. A., Jimenez, J. L., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Robinson, A. L.:
Review of Urban Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Gasoline and Diesel Motor Vehicle Emissions,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
51, 1074–1093, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04509, 2017.
Guo, H., Xu, L., Bougiatioti, A., Cerully, K. M., Capps, S. L., Hite Jr., J. R., Carlton, A. G., Lee, S.-H., Bergin, M. H., Ng, N. L., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Fine-particle water and pH in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5211–5228, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5211-2015, 2015.
Guo, Y., Tang, Q., Gong, D.-Y., and Zhang, Z.:
Estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentrations in Beijing using a satellite-based geographically and temporally weighted regression model,
Remote Sens. Environ.,
198, 140–149, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.001, 2017.
Gupta, P., Christopher, S. A., Wang, J., Gehrig, R., Lee, Y., and Kumar, N.:
Satellite remote sensing of particulate matter and air quality assessment over global cities,
Atmos. Environ.,
40, 5880–5892, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.016, 2006.
Hand, J. L., Copeland, S. A., Day, D. E., Dillner, A. M., Indresand, H., Malm, W. C., McDad, C. E., Moore, Jr., C. T., Pitchford, M. L., Schichtel, B. A., and Watson, J. G.:
Spatial and Seasonal Patterns and Temporal Variability of Haze and its Constituents in the United States: Report V,
available at: http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/IMPROVE_V_FullReport.pdf (last access: 18 March 2018), 2011.
Hauser, A.:
NOAA AVHRR derived aerosol optical depth over land,
J. Geophys. Res.,
110, D08204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005439, 2005.
Hinks, M. L., Montoya-Aguilera, J., Ellison, L., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., Shiraiwa, M., Dabdub, D., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Effect of relative humidity on the composition of secondary organic aerosol from the oxidation of toluene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1643–1652, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1643-2018,
Hodas, N., Sullivan, A. P., Skog, K., Keutsch, F. N., Collett, J. L., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Carlton, A. G., Laaksonen, A., and Turpin, B. J.:
Aerosol Liquid Water Driven by Anthropogenic Nitrate: Implications for Lifetimes of Water-Soluble Organic Gases and Potential for Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
48, 11127–11136, https://doi.org/10.1021/es5025096, 2014.
Hsu, N. C., Tsay, S.-C., King, M. D., and Herman, J. R.:
Aerosol Properties Over Bright-Reflecting Source Regions,
IEEE T. Geosci. Remote,
42, 557–569, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.824067, 2004.
Hsu, N. C., Tsay, S.-C., King, M. D., and Herman, J. R.:
Deep Blue Retrievals of Asian Aerosol Properties During ACE-Asia,
IEEE T. Geosci. Remote,
44, 3180–3195, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.879540, 2006.
Hsu, N. C., Jeong, M.-J., Bettenhausen, C., Sayer, A. M., Hansell, R., Seftor, C. S., Huang, J., and Tsay, S.-C.:
Enhanced Deep Blue aerosol retrieval algorithm: The second generation,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 9296–9315, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50712, 2013.
IMPROVE Network:
Federal Land Manager Environmental Database,
available at: http://views.cira.colostate.edu/fed/DataWizard/Default.aspx (last access: 26 May 2016), 2019.
Jacob, D. J. and Winner, D. A.:
Effect of climate change on air quality,
Atmos. Environ.,
43, 51–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.051, 2009.
Jathar, S. H., Mahmud, A., Barsanti, K. C., Asher, W. E., Pankow, J. F., and Kleeman, M. J.:
Water uptake by organic aerosol and its influence on gas/particle partitioning of secondary organic aerosol in the United States,
Atmos. Environ.,
129, 142–154, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.001, 2016.
Jefferson, A., Hageman, D., Morrow, H., Mei, F., and Watson, T.:
Seven years of aerosol scattering hygroscopic growth measurements from SGP: Factors influencing water uptake: Aerosol Scattering Hygroscopic Growth,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
122, 9451–9466, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026804, 2017.
Jones, T. A. and Christopher, S. A.:
Satellite and Radar Remote Sensing of Southern Plains Grass Fires: A Case Study, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim.,
49, 2133–2146, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2472.1, 2010.
Ju, J. and Roy, D. P.:
The availability of cloud-free Landsat ETM+ data over the conterminous United States and globally,
Remote Sens. Environ.,
112, 1196–1211, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.08.011, 2008.
Kahn, R. A.:
Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) global aerosol optical depth validation based on 2 years of coincident Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) observations,
J. Geophys. Res.,
110, D10S04, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004706, 2005.
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.:
The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
77, 437–471, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO;2, 1996.
Kamens, R. M., Zhang, H., Chen, E. H., Zhou, Y., Parikh, H. M., Wilson, R. L., Galloway, K. E., and Rosen, E. P.:
Secondary organic aerosol formation from toluene in an atmospheric hydrocarbon mixture: Water and particle seed effects,
Atmos. Environ.,
45, 2324–2334, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.007, 2011.
Kawecki, S. and Steiner, A. L.:
The Influence of Aerosol Hygroscopicity on Precipitation Intensity During a Mesoscale Convective Event,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
123, 424–442, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026535, 2018.
Kawecki, S., Henebry, G. M., and Steiner, A. L.:
Effects of Urban Plume Aerosols on a Mesoscale Convective System,
J. Atmos. Sci.,
73, 4641–4660, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0084.1, 2016.
Kessner, A. L., Wang, J., Levy, R. C., and Colarco, P. R.:
Remote sensing of surface visibility from space: A look at the United States East Coast,
Atmos. Environ.,
81, 136–147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.050, 2013.
King, M. D., Platnick, S., Menzel, W. P., Ackerman, S. A., and Hubanks, P. A.:
Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Clouds Observed by MODIS Onboard the Terra and Aqua Satellites,
IEEE T. Geosci. Remote,
51, 3826–3852, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227333, 2013.
Kloog, I., Koutrakis, P., Coull, B. A., Lee, H. J., and Schwartz, J.:
Assessing temporally and spatially resolved PM2.5 exposures for epidemiological studies using satellite aerosol optical depth measurements,
Atmos. Environ.,
45, 6267–6275, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.066, 2011.
Kovalskyy, V. and Roy, D.:
A One Year Landsat 8 Conterminous United States Study of Cirrus and Non-Cirrus Clouds,
Remote Sens.-Basel,
7, 564–578, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70100564, 2015.
Kumar, N., Chu, A., and Foster, A.:
An empirical relationship between PM2.5 and aerosol optical depth in Delhi Metropolitan,
Atmos. Environ.,
41, 4492–4503, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.01.046, 2007.
Lamkaddam, H., Gratien, A., Pangui, E., Cazaunau, M., Picquet-Varrault, B., and Doussin, J.-F.:
High-NOx Photooxidation of n-Dodecane: Temperature Dependence of SOA Formation,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
51, 192–201, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03821, 2017.
Laothawornkitkul, J., Taylor, J. E., Paul, N. D., and Hewitt, C. N.:
Biogenic volatile organic compounds in the Earth system,
New Phytol.,
183, 27–51, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02859.x, 2009.
Li, L., Gong, J., and Zhou, J.:
Spatial Interpolation of Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Using the Shortest Wind-Field Path Distance,
edited by: Sun, Q.,
PLoS ONE,
9, e96111, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096111, 2014.
Liao, H. and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Global impacts of gas-phase chemistry-aerosol interactions on direct radiative forcing by anthropogenic aerosols and ozone,
J. Geophys. Res.,
110, D18208, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005907, 2005.
Lin, Y., Wang, Y., Pan, B., Hu, J., Liu, Y., and Zhang, R.:
Distinct Impacts of Aerosols on an Evolving Continental Cloud Complex during the RACORO Field Campaign,
J. Atmos. Sci.,
73, 3681–3700, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0361.1, 2016.
Liu, B., Ma, Y., Gong, W., Zhang, M., Wang, W., and Shi, Y.:
Comparison of AOD from CALIPSO, MODIS, and Sun Photometer under Different Conditions over Central China,
Sci. Rep.-UK,
8, 10066, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28417-7, 2018.
Liu, Y., Schichtel, B. A., and Koutrakis, P.:
Estimating Particle Sulfate Concentrations Using MISR Retrieved Aerosol Properties,
IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl.,
2, 176–184, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2009.2030153, 2009.
Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, J., Ferrare, R. A., Newsom, R. K., and Welton, E. J.:
The effect of aerosol vertical profiles on satellite-estimated surface particle sulfate concentrations,
Remote Sens. Environ.,
115, 508–513, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.09.019, 2011.
Malm, W. C., Sisler, J. F., Huffman, D., Eldred, R. A., and Cahill, T. A.:
Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States,
J. Geophys. Res.,
99, 1347, https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02916, 1994.
Malm, W. C., Schichtel, B. A., Hand, J. L., and Collett, J. L.:
Concurrent Temporal and Spatial Trends in Sulfate and Organic Mass Concentrations Measured in the IMPROVE Monitoring Program: Trends in Sulfate and Organic Mass,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
122, 10462–10476, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026865, 2017.
Martin, R. V.:
Satellite remote sensing of surface air quality,
Atmos. Environ.,
42, 7823–7843, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.018, 2008.
McKeen, S., Grell, G., Peckham, S., Wilczak, J., Djalalova, I., Hsie, E.-Y., Frost, G., Peischl, J., Schwarz, J., Spackman, R., Holloway, J., de Gouw, J., Warneke, C., Gong, W., Bouchet, V., Gaudreault, S., Racine, J., McHenry, J., McQueen, J., Lee, P., Tang, Y., Carmichael, G. R., and Mathur, R.:
An evaluation of real-time air quality forecasts and their urban emissions over eastern Texas during the summer of 2006 Second Texas Air Quality Study field study,
J. Geophys. Res.,
114, D00F11, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011697, 2009.
McKnight, P. E. and Najab, J.:
Mann–Whitney U Test,
in: The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology,
edited by: Weiner, I. B. and Craighead, W. E.,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010.
Meng, Z. and Seinfeld, J. H.:
On the Source of the Submicrometer Droplet Mode of Urban and Regional Aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Techn.,
20, 253–265, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829408959681, 1994.
Metzger, S., Abdelkader, M., Steil, B., and Klingmüller, K.: Aerosol water parameterization: long-term evaluation and importance for climate studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16747–16774, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16747-2018, 2018.
NASA Global Change Master Directory (GCMD): https://idn.ceos.org/, last access: 5 October 2020.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration:
Global Change Master Directory,
available at: https://gcmd.nasa.gov/ (last access: 20 May 2020), 2018.
Ng, N. L., Kroll, J. H., Chan, A. W. H., Chhabra, P. S., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from m-xylene, toluene, and benzene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3909–3922, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3909-2007, 2007.
Nguyen, T. K. V., Petters, M. D., Suda, S. R., Guo, H., Weber, R. J., and Carlton, A. G.: Trends in particle-phase liquid water during the Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10911–10930, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10911-2014, 2014.
Nguyen, T. K. V., Capps, S. L., and Carlton, A. G.:
Decreasing Aerosol Water Is Consistent with OC Trends in the Southeast U.S.,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
49, 7843–7850, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00828, 2015.
Nguyen, T. K. V., Ghate, V. P., and Carlton, A. G.:
Reconciling satellite aerosol optical thickness and surface fine particle mass through aerosol liquid water, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
43, 11903–11912, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070994, 2016a.
Nguyen, T. K. V., Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Pike, M., Carlton, A. G.:
Liquid Water: Ubiquitous Contributor to Aerosol Mass,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
3, 257–263, 2016b.
NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSL: https://psl.noaa.gov/, Boulder, Colorado, USA, last access: 24 October 2018.
Norris, J. R., Allen, R. J., Evan, A. T., Zelinka, M. D., O'Dell, C. W., and Klein, S. A.:
Evidence for climate change in the satellite cloud record,
Nature,
536, 72–75, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18273, 2016.
Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007, 2007.
Pitchford, M., Malm, W., Schichtel, B., Kumar, N., Lowenthal, D., and Hand, J.:
Revised Algorithm for Estimating Light Extinction from IMPROVE Particle Speciation Data,
JAPCA J. Air Waste Ma.,
57, 1326–1336, https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.57.11.1326, 2007.
Pratt, K. A., Fiddler, M. N., Shepson, P. B., Carlton, A. G., and Surratt, J. D.:
Organosulfates in cloud water above the Ozarks' isoprene source region,
Atmos. Environ.,
77, 231–238, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.011, 2013.
Pruppacher, H. R. and Klett, J. D.:
Microphysics of clouds and precipitation,
Springer, Dordrecht, New York, 2010.
R Core Team:
R: A language and environment for statistical computing,
R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria,
available at: http://www.R-project.org/ (last access: July 2020), 2013.
Rastak, N., Pajunoja, A., Acosta Navarro, J. C., Ma, J., Song, M., Partridge, D. G., Kirkevåg, A., Leong, Y., Hu, W. W., Taylor, N. F., Lambe, A., Cerully, K., Bougiatioti, A., Liu, P., Krejci, R., Petäjä, T., Percival, C., Davidovits, P., Worsnop, D. R., Ekman, A. M. L., Nenes, A., Martin, S., Jimenez, J. L., Collins, D. R., Topping, D. O., Bertram, A. K., Zuend, A., Virtanen, A., and Riipinen, I.:
Microphysical explanation of the RH-dependent water affinity of biogenic organic aerosol and its importance for climate,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
44, 5167–5177, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073056, 2017.
Remer, L. A., Mattoo, S., Levy, R. C., and Munchak, L. A.: MODIS 3 km aerosol product: algorithm and global perspective, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1829–1844, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1829-2013, 2013.
Ryerson, T. B., Andrews, A. E., Angevine, W. M., Bates, T. S., Brock, C. A., Cairns, B., Cohen, R. C., Cooper, O. R., de Gouw, J. A., Fehsenfeld, F. C., Ferrare, R. A., Fischer, M. L., Flagan, R. C., Goldstein, A. H., Hair, J. W., Hardesty, R. M., Hostetler, C. A., Jimenez, J. L., Langford, A. O., McCauley, E., McKeen, S. A., Molina, L. T., Nenes, A., Oltmans, S. J., Parrish, D. D., Pederson, J. R., Pierce, R. B., Prather, K., Quinn, P. K., Seinfeld, J. H., Senff, C. J., Sorooshian, A., Stutz, J., Surratt, J. D., Trainer, M., Volkamer, R., Williams, E. J., and Wofsy, S. C.:
The 2010 California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) field study,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 5830–5866, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50331, 2013.
Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Wiedinmyer, C., Helmig, D., Matsunaga, S., Potosnak, M., Milford, J., and Guenther, A.:
Monoterpene and Sesquiterpene Emission Estimates for the United States,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
42, 1623–1629, https://doi.org/10.1021/es702274e, 2008.
Schaap, M., Apituley, A., Timmermans, R. M. A., Koelemeijer, R. B. A., and de Leeuw, G.: Exploring the relation between aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 at Cabauw, the Netherlands, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 909–925, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-909-2009, 2009.
Sisterson, D. L., Peppler, R. A., Cress, T. S., Lamb, P. J., and Turner, D. D.:
The ARM Southern Great Plains (SGP) Site,
Meteor. Mon.,
57, 6.1–6.14, https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0004.1, 2016.
Song, W., Jia, H., Huang, J., and Zhang, Y.:
A satellite-based geographically weighted regression model for regional PM2.5 estimation over the Pearl River Delta region in China,
Remote Sens. Environ.,
154, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.08.008, 2014.
Sorek-Hamer, M., Just, A. C., and Kloog, I.:
Satellite remote sensing in epidemiological studies,
Curr. Opin. Pediatr.,
28, 228–234, https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000326, 2016.
Spracklen, D. V., Logan, J. A., Mickley, L. J., Park, R. J., Yevich, R., Westerling, A. L., and Jaffe, D. A.:
Wildfires drive interannual variability of organic carbon aerosol in the western U.S. in summer,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
34, L16816, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030037, 2007.
Tai, A. P. K., Mickley, L. J., and Jacob, D. J.:
Correlations between fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and meteorological variables in the United States: Implications for the sensitivity of PM2.5 to climate change,
Atmos. Environ.,
44, 3976–3984, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.06.060, 2010.
Tang, Y., Carmichael, G. R., Uno, I., Woo, J.-H., Kurata, G., Lefer, B., Shetter, R. E., Huang, H., Anderson, B. E., Avery, M. A., Clarke, A. D., and Blake, D. R.:
Impacts of aerosols and clouds on photolysis frequencies and photochemistry during TRACE-P: 2. Three-dimensional study using a regional chemical transport model,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
108, 8822, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003100, 2003.
Tian, D., Hu, Y., Wang, Y., Boylan, J. W., Zheng, M., and Russell, A. G.:
Assessment of Biomass Burning Emissions and Their Impacts on Urban and Regional PM2.5: A Georgia Case Study,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
43, 299–305, https://doi.org/10.1021/es801827s, 2009.
Tian, J. and Chen, D.:
A semi-empirical model for predicting hourly ground-level fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentration in southern Ontario from satellite remote sensing and ground-based meteorological measurements,
Remote Sens. Environ.,
114, 221–229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.09.011, 2010.
Toon, O. B., Maring, H., Dibb, J., Ferrare, R., Jacob, D. J., Jensen, E. J., Luo, Z. J., Mace, G. G., Pan, L. L., Pfister, L., Rosenlof, K. H., Redemann, J., Reid, J. S., Singh, H. B., Thompson, A. M., Yokelson, R., Minnis, P., Chen, G., Jucks, K. W., and Pszenny, A.:
Planning, implementation, and scientific goals of the Studies of Emissions and Atmospheric Composition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by Regional Surveys (SEAC4RS) field mission: Planning SEAC4RS,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
121, 4967–5009, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024297, 2016.
Twohy, C. H., Coakley, J. A., and Tahnk, W. R.:
Effect of changes in relative humidity on aerosol scattering near clouds,
J. Geophys. Res.,
114, D05205, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010991, 2009.
US Environmental Protection Agency:
Ambient Air Monitoring Strategy for State, Local, and Tribal Air Agencies,
available at: https://www3.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/monitorstrat/AAMS%20for%20SLTs%20%20-%20FINAL%20Dec%202008.pdf (last access: 1 June 2019), 2008.
van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Brauer, M., Kahn, R., Levy, R., Verduzco, C., and Villeneuve, P. J.:
Global Estimates of Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations from Satellite-Based Aerosol Optical Depth: Development and Application,
Environ. Health Persp.,
118, 847–855, https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901623, 2010.
van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Spurr, R. J. D., and Burnett, R. T.:
High-Resolution Satellite-Derived PM2.5 from Optimal Estimation and Geographically Weighted Regression over North America,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
49, 10482–10491, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02076, 2015a.
van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Brauer, M., and Boys, B. L.:
Use of Satellite Observations for Long-Term Exposure Assessment of Global Concentrations of Fine Particulate Matter,
Environ. Health Persp.,
123, 135–143, https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408646, 2015b.
Vogelmann, A. M., McFarquhar, G. M., Ogren, J. A., Turner, D. D., Comstock, J. M., Feingold, G., Long, C. N., Jonsson, H. H., Bucholtz, A., Collins, D. R., Diskin, G. S., Gerber, H., Lawson, R. P., Woods, R. K., Andrews, E., Yang, H.-J., Chiu, J. C., Hartsock, D., Hubbe, J. M., Lo, C., Marshak, A., Monroe, J. W., McFarlane, S. A., Schmid, B., Tomlinson, J. M., and Toto, T.:
Racoro Extended-Term Aircraft Observations of Boundary Layer Clouds,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
93, 861–878, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00189.1, 2012.
Wang, J. and Christopher, S. A.:
Intercomparison between satellite-derived aerosol optical thickness and PM2.5 mass: Implications for air quality studies,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
30, 2095, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018174, 2003.
Wang, J., Xu, X., Henze, D. K., Zeng, J., Ji, Q., Tsay, S.-C., and Huang, J.:
Top-down estimate of dust emissions through integration of MODIS and MISR aerosol retrievals with the GEOS-Chem adjoint model,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
39, L08802, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051136, 2012.
Wang, J. X. and Angell, J. K.:
Air stagnation climatology for the United States,
available at: https://www.arl.noaa.gov/documents/reports/atlas.pdf (last access: 4 April 2019), 1999.
Youn, J.-S., Wang, Z., Wonaschütz, A., Arellano, A., Betterton, E. A., and Sorooshian, A.:
Evidence of aqueous secondary organic aerosol formation from biogenic emissions in the North American Sonoran Desert,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
40, 3468–3472, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50644, 2013.
Zeng, T., Wang, Y., Yoshida, Y., Tian, D., Russell, A. G., and Barnard, W. R.:
Impacts of Prescribed Fires on Air Quality over the Southeastern United States in Spring Based on Modeling and Ground/Satellite Measurements,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
42, 8401–8406, https://doi.org/10.1021/es800363d, 2008.
Zhang, G., Rui, X., and Fan, Y.:
Critical Review of Methods to Estimate PM2.5 Concentrations within Specified Research Region,
ISPRS Int. Geo-Inf.,
7, 368, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7090368, 2018.
Zhang, H., Kondragunta, S., Laszlo, I., Liu, H., Remer, L. A., Huang, J., Superczynski, S., and Ciren, P.:
An enhanced VIIRS aerosol optical thickness (AOT) retrieval algorithm over land using a global surface reflectance ratio database,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
121, 10717–10738, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024859, 2016.
Zhou, S., Collier, S., Jaffe, D. A., and Zhang, Q.: Free tropospheric aerosols at the Mt. Bachelor Observatory: more oxidized and higher sulfate content compared to boundary layer aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1571–1585, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1571-2019, 2019.
Short summary
We quantify differences in surface-level fine particle mass (PM2.5) chemical composition in relation to satellite-derived cloud flags and find significant differences between clear-sky and cloud days. The work suggests that future analysis in this area is warranted.
We quantify differences in surface-level fine particle mass (PM2.5) chemical composition in...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint