Articles | Volume 20, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10441-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10441-2020
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
08 Sep 2020
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 08 Sep 2020

Comparing secondary organic aerosol (SOA) volatility distributions derived from isothermal SOA particle evaporation data and FIGAERO–CIMS measurements

Olli-Pekka Tikkanen, Angela Buchholz, Arttu Ylisirniö, Siegfried Schobesberger, Annele Virtanen, and Taina Yli-Juuti

Viewed

Total article views: 4,041 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,070 897 74 4,041 332 57 74
  • HTML: 3,070
  • PDF: 897
  • XML: 74
  • Total: 4,041
  • Supplement: 332
  • BibTeX: 57
  • EndNote: 74
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Nov 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Nov 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,041 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,945 with geography defined and 96 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
We compared the volatility distributions of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) constituents estimated from isothermal evaporation experiments from either particle size change data, by process modelling and global optimization, or from mass spectrometer data with positive matrix factorization analysis. Our results show that, despite the two very different estimation methods, the volatility distributions are comparable if uncertainties are taken into account.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint