Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.414
IF5.414
IF 5-year value: 5.958
IF 5-year
5.958
CiteScore value: 9.7
CiteScore
9.7
SNIP value: 1.517
SNIP1.517
IPP value: 5.61
IPP5.61
SJR value: 2.601
SJR2.601
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 191
Scimago H
index
191
h5-index value: 89
h5-index89
ACP | Articles | Volume 19, issue 12
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8243–8268, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8243-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8243–8268, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8243-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 26 Jun 2019

Research article | 26 Jun 2019

Evaluation and comparison of multiangle implementation of the atmospheric correction algorithm, Dark Target, and Deep Blue aerosol products over China

Ning Liu et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Bin Zou on behalf of the Authors (02 Apr 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (03 Apr 2019) by Jianping Huang
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (08 Apr 2019)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (22 Apr 2019)
RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (08 May 2019)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (10 May 2019) by Jianping Huang
AR by Bin Zou on behalf of the Authors (13 May 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (14 May 2019) by Jianping Huang
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The systematic validation and comparison of MAIAC, DT, and DB AOD products across China from 2000 to 2017 is presented. In this process, the overall accuracy, land type dependence, view geometry dependence, spatiotemporal retrieval accuracy, spatial variation pattern, and spatiotemporal completeness of the three products are analyzed in detail. In general, MAIAC achieves higher accuracy than DT and DB, but DT and DB may perform better than MAIAC under some specific land cover types or seasons.
The systematic validation and comparison of MAIAC, DT, and DB AOD products across China from...
Citation
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint