Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 19, issue 12
Articles | Volume 19, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8243-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8243-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 19, issue 12
Research article
 | 
26 Jun 2019
Research article |  | 26 Jun 2019

Evaluation and comparison of multiangle implementation of the atmospheric correction algorithm, Dark Target, and Deep Blue aerosol products over China

Ning Liu, Bin Zou, Huihui Feng, Wei Wang, Yuqi Tang, and Yu Liang

Viewed

Total article views: 4,145 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,538 1,521 86 4,145 106 139
  • HTML: 2,538
  • PDF: 1,521
  • XML: 86
  • Total: 4,145
  • BibTeX: 106
  • EndNote: 139
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Jan 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Jan 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,145 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,040 with geography defined and 105 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
The systematic validation and comparison of MAIAC, DT, and DB AOD products across China from 2000 to 2017 is presented. In this process, the overall accuracy, land type dependence, view geometry dependence, spatiotemporal retrieval accuracy, spatial variation pattern, and spatiotemporal completeness of the three products are analyzed in detail. In general, MAIAC achieves higher accuracy than DT and DB, but DT and DB may perform better than MAIAC under some specific land cover types or seasons.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint