Articles | Volume 19, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-603-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-603-2019
Research article
 | 
16 Jan 2019
Research article |  | 16 Jan 2019

Comparison of surface ozone simulation among selected regional models in MICS-Asia III – effects of chemistry and vertical transport for the causes of difference

Hajime Akimoto, Tatsuya Nagashima, Jie Li, Joshua S. Fu, Dongsheng Ji, Jiani Tan, and Zifa Wang

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Hajime Akimoto on behalf of the Authors (03 Dec 2018)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (17 Dec 2018) by Gregory R. Carmichael
AR by Hajime Akimoto on behalf of the Authors (21 Dec 2018)  Author's response   Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
The regional model intercomparison study called MICS-Asia III revealed that substantial discrepancy still exists for surface ozone simulation in East Asia, even though common emissions, meteorological field, and boundary conditions have been used among the models. Three factors have been identified as possible causes of such discrepancy, (1) chemistry sub-models, (2) heterogeneous reactions, and (3) vertical transport parameters, and each component has been discussed.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint