Articles | Volume 19, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-603-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-603-2019
Research article
 | 
16 Jan 2019
Research article |  | 16 Jan 2019

Comparison of surface ozone simulation among selected regional models in MICS-Asia III – effects of chemistry and vertical transport for the causes of difference

Hajime Akimoto, Tatsuya Nagashima, Jie Li, Joshua S. Fu, Dongsheng Ji, Jiani Tan, and Zifa Wang

Viewed

Total article views: 2,819 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,952 789 78 2,819 66 71
  • HTML: 1,952
  • PDF: 789
  • XML: 78
  • Total: 2,819
  • BibTeX: 66
  • EndNote: 71
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Aug 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Aug 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,819 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,697 with geography defined and 122 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
The regional model intercomparison study called MICS-Asia III revealed that substantial discrepancy still exists for surface ozone simulation in East Asia, even though common emissions, meteorological field, and boundary conditions have been used among the models. Three factors have been identified as possible causes of such discrepancy, (1) chemistry sub-models, (2) heterogeneous reactions, and (3) vertical transport parameters, and each component has been discussed.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint