Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 19, issue 1
Articles | Volume 19, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-603-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-603-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 19, issue 1
Research article
 | 
16 Jan 2019
Research article |  | 16 Jan 2019

Comparison of surface ozone simulation among selected regional models in MICS-Asia III – effects of chemistry and vertical transport for the causes of difference

Hajime Akimoto, Tatsuya Nagashima, Jie Li, Joshua S. Fu, Dongsheng Ji, Jiani Tan, and Zifa Wang

Viewed

Total article views: 3,357 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,337 926 94 3,357 99 136
  • HTML: 2,337
  • PDF: 926
  • XML: 94
  • Total: 3,357
  • BibTeX: 99
  • EndNote: 136
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Aug 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Aug 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,357 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,223 with geography defined and 134 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
The regional model intercomparison study called MICS-Asia III revealed that substantial discrepancy still exists for surface ozone simulation in East Asia, even though common emissions, meteorological field, and boundary conditions have been used among the models. Three factors have been identified as possible causes of such discrepancy, (1) chemistry sub-models, (2) heterogeneous reactions, and (3) vertical transport parameters, and each component has been discussed.
Read more
Share
Special issue
Regional assessment of air pollution and climate change over...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint