Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.414
IF5.414
IF 5-year value: 5.958
IF 5-year
5.958
CiteScore value: 9.7
CiteScore
9.7
SNIP value: 1.517
SNIP1.517
IPP value: 5.61
IPP5.61
SJR value: 2.601
SJR2.601
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 191
Scimago H
index
191
h5-index value: 89
h5-index89
ACP | Articles | Volume 19, issue 23
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15023–15048, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15023-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15023–15048, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15023-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 11 Dec 2019

Research article | 11 Dec 2019

How should we aggregate data? Methods accounting for the numerical distributions, with an assessment of aerosol optical depth

Andrew M. Sayer and Kirk D. Knobelspiesse

Data sets

AERONET data portal NASA AERONET team https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov

EarthData data portal NASA EarthData portal team https://earthdata.nasa.gov

Nature Run data portal NASA GMAO https://g5nr.nccs.nasa. gov/data/

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Data about the Earth are routinely obtained from satellite observations, model simulations, and ground-based or other measurements. These are at different space and timescales, and it is common to average them to reduce gaps and increase ease of use. The question of how the data should be averaged depends on the underlying distribution of the quantity. This study presents a method for determining how to appropriately aggregate data and applies it to data sets about atmospheric aerosol levels.
Data about the Earth are routinely obtained from satellite observations, model simulations, and...
Citation
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint