Articles | Volume 19, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11743-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11743-2019
Research article
 | 
23 Sep 2019
Research article |  | 23 Sep 2019

EARLINET evaluation of the CATS Level 2 aerosol backscatter coefficient product

Emmanouil Proestakis, Vassilis Amiridis, Eleni Marinou, Ioannis Binietoglou, Albert Ansmann, Ulla Wandinger, Julian Hofer, John Yorks, Edward Nowottnick, Abduvosit Makhmudov, Alexandros Papayannis, Aleksander Pietruczuk, Anna Gialitaki, Arnoud Apituley, Artur Szkop, Constantino Muñoz Porcar, Daniele Bortoli, Davide Dionisi, Dietrich Althausen, Dimitra Mamali, Dimitris Balis, Doina Nicolae, Eleni Tetoni, Gian Luigi Liberti, Holger Baars, Ina Mattis, Iwona Sylwia Stachlewska, Kalliopi Artemis Voudouri, Lucia Mona, Maria Mylonaki, Maria Rita Perrone, Maria João Costa, Michael Sicard, Nikolaos Papagiannopoulos, Nikolaos Siomos, Pasquale Burlizzi, Rebecca Pauly, Ronny Engelmann, Sabur Abdullaev, and Gelsomina Pappalardo

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Emmanouil Proestakis on behalf of the Authors (13 Jun 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (24 Jun 2019) by Eduardo Landulfo
RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (02 Jul 2019)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (12 Jul 2019)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (22 Jul 2019) by Eduardo Landulfo
AR by Emmanouil Proestakis on behalf of the Authors (01 Aug 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (14 Aug 2019) by Eduardo Landulfo
AR by Emmanouil Proestakis on behalf of the Authors (27 Aug 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
Download
Short summary
To increase accuracy and validate satellite-based products, comparison with ground-based reference observations is required. To do this, we present evaluation activity of EARLINET for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of NASA's CATS lidar operating aboard the International Space Station (ISS) while identified discrepancies are discussed. Better understanding CATS performance and limitations provides a valuable basis for scientific studies implementing the satellite-based lidar system.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint