Dear authors:
Your revised manuscript has been reviewed by two referees. Additional revisions are suggested by referee #2. Please improve your manuscript further by considering the suggestions of referee #2 and also following comments from me:
Page 5 line: Ssandradewi et al., 2008 is not given in the references list. A thorough check of citations is needed.
Page 6 line 9 and page 13 line 8: change "monsoons season" to "monsoon season".
Page 6 lines 11-15: I do not think you should give elevations and coordinates of that accurate, in particular on the glaciers.
Page 6 line 30: change "atmospheric gas" to "air".
Page 7 lines 2-3: "using a stable vacuum pump, which had a good quality and performance (e.g., running steadily with low noise level)." It is better to give pump's model and manufacturer information instead of these vague expressions.
Page 11 lines 7-10: What do you mean by "photochemical ability of OC" and "little material available for
external-coating of BC"?
Page 11 and lines 19-21: How can this happen?
Fig.2 and some other figures: there are obviously some data gaps. You should not fill the gaps with lines.
Figs. 9 and 10: displaying MAE data repeatedly in all plots is not necessary. If you are discussing the correlations of MAE with other quantities, it is better to show the data as scatter plots with regression results.
Sincerely,
Xiaobin Xu

Dear authors,
I am very pleased to inform you that your manuscript is accepted for publication in ACP. Congratulations! Thank you for your contribution to the ACP/AMT inter-journal special issue SOAR-TP.
Sincerely,
Xiaobin Xu