The authors have adequately answered the reviewer's comments.
If I interpret Figure 15 correctly the graph indicates that only 9 ensembles are necessary (instead of 11 indicated in the paper) to satisfy the condition of RMS error < 0.58 W m-2.
Please change the sentence:
"Over Southern Mexico, although changes of CDNC and LWP are of comparable magnitudes between Gulf of Mexico and the land region (Fig.8), relative changes of both items are much larger over Gulf of Mexico (Fig. S6) due to the smaller magnitudes of background CDNC and LWP here (Fig. S5), which tends to lead to a more sensitive response of SCRE."
to
"Over Southern Mexico, although changes of CDNC and LWP are of comparable magnitudes between Gulf of Mexico and the land region (Fig.8), relative changes of both qunatitites are much larger over Gulf of Mexico (Fig. S6) due to the smaller magnitudes of background CDNC and LWP over the region (Fig. S5), which tends to lead to a more sensitive response of SCRE."
Change:
"That’s why the maximum SCRE over Southern Mexico is more centered around Gulf of Mexico."
to
"That’s why the maximum SCRE over Southern Mexico is centered over Gulf of Mexico."

The second decimal is not warranted in the following sentence:
"“Strong negative shortwave cloud radiative effect (SCRE) covers almost the entire Southern Mexico with a 10-day regional mean value of -3.02 𝑊 𝑚−2."
Change to
"“Strong negative shortwave cloud radiative effect (SCRE) covers almost the entire Southern Mexico with a 10-day regional mean value of -3.0 𝑊 𝑚−2."
Change
"For the selected region and period in this study, larger scaler factors are needed to make simulated AOD in agreement with the NRL and MACC reanalysis data."
to
"For the selected region and period in this study, larger scaling factors are needed to make simulated AOD in agreement with the NRL and MACC reanalysis data."

Change
"Therefore, the conclusion of a scale factor from 1-3 to match observations still holds in Southern Mexico, but a much larger scale factor of about 10 is needed in the Central U.S."
to "Therefore, the conclusion of a scale factor from 1-3 to match observations still holds in Southern Mexico, but a much larger scaling factor of about 10 is needed in the Central U.S."
change
"However, a much larger scale factor might be needed in this case."
to
"However, a much larger scaling factor might be needed in this case."
and finally
"In the central U.S, despite moderate fire aerosol SDRE, a positive fire aerosol SCRE exceeding 2 𝑊𝑊 𝑚𝑚−2 appears in the north part of the region while a comparable negative SCRE appears in the south part of the region."
to
"In the central U.S, a positive fire aerosol SCRE exceeding 2 𝑊 𝑚−2 appears in the north part of the region while a comparable negative SCRE appears in the south part of the region."