Articles | Volume 17, issue 6
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3879–3889, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3879-2017

Special issue: The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP):...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3879–3889, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3879-2017

Review article 21 Mar 2017

Review article | 21 Mar 2017

Sulfate geoengineering: a review of the factors controlling the needed injection of sulfur dioxide

Daniele Visioni et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Daniele Visioni on behalf of the Authors (13 Jan 2017)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (16 Jan 2017) by Ben Kravitz
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (16 Feb 2017)
ED: Reconsider after minor revisions (Editor review) (21 Feb 2017) by Ben Kravitz
AR by Daniele Visioni on behalf of the Authors (23 Feb 2017)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (24 Feb 2017) by Ben Kravitz
Download
Short summary
This review paper summarizes the state-of-the-art knowledge of the direct and indirect side effects of sulfate geoengineering, that is, the injection of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere in order to offset the warming caused by the anthropic increase in greenhouse gasses. An overview of the various effects and their uncertainties, using results from published scientific articles, may help fine-tune the best amount of sulfate to be injected in an eventual realization of the experiment.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint