Articles | Volume 17, issue 6
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3879–3889, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3879-2017

Special issue: The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP):...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3879–3889, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3879-2017
Review article
21 Mar 2017
Review article | 21 Mar 2017

Sulfate geoengineering: a review of the factors controlling the needed injection of sulfur dioxide

Daniele Visioni et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 4,249 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,471 1,683 95 4,249 78 96
  • HTML: 2,471
  • PDF: 1,683
  • XML: 95
  • Total: 4,249
  • BibTeX: 78
  • EndNote: 96
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Nov 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Nov 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,249 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,291 with geography defined and -42 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Discussed (preprint)

Latest update: 08 Dec 2022
Download
Short summary
This review paper summarizes the state-of-the-art knowledge of the direct and indirect side effects of sulfate geoengineering, that is, the injection of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere in order to offset the warming caused by the anthropic increase in greenhouse gasses. An overview of the various effects and their uncertainties, using results from published scientific articles, may help fine-tune the best amount of sulfate to be injected in an eventual realization of the experiment.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint