A comparison of four receptor models used to quantify the boreal wildfire smoke contribution to surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Halifax, Nova Scotia during the BORTAS-B experiment

Gibson, M. D.; Haelssig, J.; Pierce, J. R.; Parrington, M.; Franklin, J. E.; Hopper, J. T.; Li, Z.; Ward, T. J.

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-815-2015

Articles | Volume 15, issue 2

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-815-2015

© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue:

Quantifying the impact of Boreal fires on tropospheric oxidants...

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-815-2015

© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Articles | Volume 15, issue 2

Research article

|

23 Jan 2015

Research article |

| 23 Jan 2015

A comparison of four receptor models used to quantify the boreal wildfire smoke contribution to surface PM_2.5 in Halifax, Nova Scotia during the BORTAS-B experiment

M. D. Gibson, J. Haelssig, J. R. Pierce, M. Parrington, J. E. Franklin, J. T. Hopper, Z. Li, and T. J. Ward

Download

Final revised paper (published on 23 Jan 2015)
Preprint (discussion started on 17 Sep 2014)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC C8203: 'Anonymous Review', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Oct 2014
- AC C9583: 'Authors response', Mark Gibson, 25 Nov 2014
RC C8243: 'Comments on Gibson et al. (submitted) A comparison of four receptor models used to quantify the boreal wildfire smoke contribution to surface PM2.5 in Halifax, Nova Scotia during the BORTAS-B experiment', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Oct 2014
- AC C9600: 'Authors response', Mark Gibson, 25 Nov 2014

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Mark Gibson on behalf of the Authors (26 Nov 2014) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (09 Dec 2014) by Stephan Matthiesen

AR by Mark Gibson on behalf of the Authors (09 Dec 2014)

Short summary

This paper presents a quantitative comparison of the four most commonly used receptor models, namely absolute principal component scores, pragmatic mass closure, chemical mass balance, and positive matrix factorization. The receptor models were used to predict the contributions of boreal wild-fire smoke and other sources to PM2.5 mass in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada during the BORTAS-B experiment. This paper also presents a new woodsmoke PM2.5 enrichment factor (levoglucosan x 52).

A comparison of four receptor models used to quantify the boreal wildfire smoke contribution to surface PM2.5 in Halifax, Nova Scotia during the BORTAS-B experiment

Download

Interactive discussion

Peer-review completion

A comparison of four receptor models used to quantify the boreal wildfire smoke contribution to surface PM_2.5 in Halifax, Nova Scotia during the BORTAS-B experiment