Articles | Volume 15, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11861-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11861-2015
Research article
 | 
26 Oct 2015
Research article |  | 26 Oct 2015

How consistent are top-down hydrocarbon emissions based on formaldehyde observations from GOME-2 and OMI?

T. Stavrakou, J.-F. Müller, M. Bauwens, I. De Smedt, M. Van Roozendael, M. De Mazière, C. Vigouroux, F. Hendrick, M. George, C. Clerbaux, P.-F. Coheur, and A. Guenther

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Trissevgeni Stavrakou on behalf of the Authors (09 Sep 2015)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (10 Sep 2015) by Chul Han Song
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (15 Sep 2015)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (02 Oct 2015)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (14 Oct 2015) by Chul Han Song
AR by Trissevgeni Stavrakou on behalf of the Authors (16 Oct 2015)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Formaldehyde columns from two space sensors, GOME-2 and OMI, constrain by inverse modeling the global emissions of HCHO precursors in 2010. The resulting biogenic and pyrogenic fluxes from both optimizations show a very good degree of consistency. The isoprene fluxes are reduced globally by ca. 10%, and emissions from fires decrease by ca. 35%, compared to the prior. Anthropogenic emissions are weakly constrained except over China. Sensitivity inversions show robustness of the inferred fluxes.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint