Articles | Volume 15, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11861-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11861-2015
Research article
 | 
26 Oct 2015
Research article |  | 26 Oct 2015

How consistent are top-down hydrocarbon emissions based on formaldehyde observations from GOME-2 and OMI?

T. Stavrakou, J.-F. Müller, M. Bauwens, I. De Smedt, M. Van Roozendael, M. De Mazière, C. Vigouroux, F. Hendrick, M. George, C. Clerbaux, P.-F. Coheur, and A. Guenther

Viewed

Total article views: 5,431 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,239 2,050 142 5,431 388 174 217
  • HTML: 3,239
  • PDF: 2,050
  • XML: 142
  • Total: 5,431
  • Supplement: 388
  • BibTeX: 174
  • EndNote: 217
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Apr 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Apr 2015)
Latest update: 18 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Formaldehyde columns from two space sensors, GOME-2 and OMI, constrain by inverse modeling the global emissions of HCHO precursors in 2010. The resulting biogenic and pyrogenic fluxes from both optimizations show a very good degree of consistency. The isoprene fluxes are reduced globally by ca. 10%, and emissions from fires decrease by ca. 35%, compared to the prior. Anthropogenic emissions are weakly constrained except over China. Sensitivity inversions show robustness of the inferred fluxes.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint