Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-721
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-721

  04 Sep 2018

04 Sep 2018

Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Diagnosis of dust- and haze pollution-impacted PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 aerosols observed at Gosan Climate Observatory

Xiaona Shang1, Meehye Lee1, Saehee Lim1, Örjan Gustafsson2, Gangwoong Lee3, and Limseok Chang4 Xiaona Shang et al.
  • 1Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
  • 2Department of Applied Environmental Science (ITM) and the Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden
  • 3Department of Environmental Science, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, South Korea
  • 4National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), Incheon, South Korea

Abstract. In East Asia, soil dust is a major component of aerosols and is mixed with various pollutants during transport, resulting in large uncertainty in climate and environmental impact assessment and relevant policymaking. To diagnose the influence of soil dust and anthropogenic pollution on bulk aerosol, we conducted long-term measurements of mass, water-soluble ions, and carbonaceous compounds of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 at Gosan Climate Observatory, South Korea, from August 2007 to February 2012. The principle component analyses of all measured species reveal that the impact of anthropogenic pollution, soil dust, and agricultural fertilizer accounts for 46 %, 16 %, and 9 % of the total variance, respectively. Particularly, the loadings of agricultural component were high in the warmer months with the least occurrence of high concentration events and have increased over time. In mode analysis of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 mass concentrations, the mean + σ was comparable to the 90th percentile and thus, suggested as a robust criterion that determines the substantial impact of soil dust and haze pollution on particulate matter. The results of this study imply that non-combustion sources such as soil dust will impose constraints to the reduction of PM2.5 as well as PM10 concentrations. In addition, questions are raised as to whether the yearly average concentration is suitable for environmental standard in northeast Asian region.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Xiaona Shang et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Xiaona Shang et al.

Xiaona Shang et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 736 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
529 187 20 736 21 22
  • HTML: 529
  • PDF: 187
  • XML: 20
  • Total: 736
  • BibTeX: 21
  • EndNote: 22
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Sep 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Sep 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 725 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 724 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Sep 2021
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Short summary
At Gosan Climate Observatory, the three main sources including anthropogenic pollution, soil dust, and agricultural fertilizer were distinguished for PM10, PM2.5, and PM1, which accounted for 71 % of the total variances for their mass and composition. The mass of mean + σ were comparable to the 90th percentile and the top 10 % implies the substantial impact of soil dust and haze pollution. In PM2.5, the contribution from non-combustion source such as soil dust should not be ignored.
Altmetrics