Articles | Volume 26, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7235-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7235-2026
Research article
 | 
27 May 2026
Research article |  | 27 May 2026

Marine carbohydrates and other sea spray aerosol constituents across altitudes in the lower troposphere of Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard

Sebastian Zeppenfeld, Jonas Schaefer, Christian Pilz, Kerstin Ebell, Moritz Zeising, Frank Stratmann, Holger Siebert, Birgit Wehner, Matthias Wietz, Astrid Bracher, and Manuela van Pinxteren
Abstract

Marine combined carbohydrates in aerosol particles (CCHOaer) have the potential to influence cloud formation and properties, but it remains unclear to what extent they reach altitudes relevant for cloud processes. Balloon-borne measurements of major sea spray aerosol (SSA) constituents, including sodium (Naaer+) and CCHOaer, were conducted in autumn 2021 and spring 2022 in Ny-Ålesund (Svalbard). Total suspended particles were collected at 321–1112 m, covering both the marine boundary layer and the free troposphere, with Naaer+ ranging 23–850 ng m−3 and CCHOaer 3.8–274 ng m−3. The chemical composition of balloon-borne aerosol samples was compared with synchronized ground level measurements at the balloon's winch (Naaer+: 35–3710 ng m−3; CCHOaer: 1.9–194 ng m−3), and at the Old Pier (Naaer+: 140–1470 ng m−3; CCHOaer: 1.6–10.0 ng m−3), where freshly emitted SSA particles were sampled. Surface seawater from the Kongsfjorden was analyzed to evaluate the sea-air transfer of marine CCHO. Air mass histories, atmospheric mixing, and cloud conditions were evaluated for three selected cases to explain vertical concentration patterns. A strong correlation (R=0.78, p<0.001) between combined xylose (< 0.2–14.1 ng m−3) in CCHOaer and oxalateaer (< 1–67 ng m−3) across all altitudes, suggests either coproduction or a connection through atmospheric processing. These results provide a first comprehensive picture of how local primary sea-air transfer of marine combined carbohydrates, long-range transport, in-situ formation, and atmospheric processing together shape their distribution.

Share
1 Introduction

Aerosol particles in the High Arctic atmosphere originate from a complex interplay of primary and secondary emissions from oceanic, terrestrial, cryospheric, and anthropogenic sources, followed by diverse atmospheric processes (Schmale et al., 2021). They play a crucial role in the radiation balance, directly by scattering and absorbing shortwave and longwave radiation, and indirectly by influencing cloud formation and phase state as cloud condensation nuclei and ice-nucleating particles (Lohmann and Feichter, 2005; Penner et al., 2001; Quinn et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2006). These effects are strongly governed by the particles' size distribution and chemical composition (Dusek et al., 2006; Farmer et al., 2015; Kanji et al., 2017; Pilinis et al., 1995).

The High Arctic predominantly consists of marine areas, characterized by a seasonally variable extent of sea ice cover and open waters. Consequently, sea spray aerosol (SSA) particles represent a key group of primary aerosol particles in this region (Heutte et al., 2025; Kang et al., 2025; Schmale et al., 2022). As Arctic sea ice coverage continues to decline due to global warming, enhanced by Arctic amplification (Cai et al., 2021; Francis and Wu, 2020; Wendisch et al., 2017, 2023), larger expanses of open ocean are anticipated to become significant sources of SSA emissions (Browse et al., 2014; Struthers et al., 2011). Although direct measurements remain sparse, Sharma et al. (2019) readily observed increasing sea salt aerosol production from sea spray over 34 years at the Arctic air chemistry observatory in Alert, Canada.

SSA particles are generated through wind-driven wave action, which causes bubbles at the sea surface to burst, ejecting film and jet droplets into the atmosphere (Veron, 2015). SSA particles primarily consist of inorganic sea salt ions, mainly sodium and chloride, along with organic matter (OM), including significant amounts of marine carbohydrates originating from the sea surface microlayer (SML) and the underlying bulk seawater (Müller et al., 2010; van Pinxteren et al., 2023; Quinn et al., 2015; Russell et al., 2010). In seawater, carbohydrates are produced by photoautotrophic organisms, predominantly as linear or branched oligo- and polysaccharides (Aluwihare et al., 1997; Borch and Kirchman, 1997; Engel and Händel, 2011; Khadem, 2012), collectively referred to as combined carbohydrates (CCHO). They also exist as monosaccharides, known as dissolved free carbohydrates. Both fractions are consumed or transformed by heterotrophic organisms, with turnover rates largely determined by their molecular structure and composition (Arnosti et al., 2021; Engel and Händel, 2011; Ittekkot et al., 1981; Kirchman et al., 2001).

Sodium in aerosol particles (Naaer+) is highly abundant in the marine boundary layer, with only minor terrestrial sources and greater atmospheric stability compared to chloride (Claer-) (Chi et al., 2015; Keene et al., 1986; Manders et al., 2010; Sander et al., 2003). This makes it a valuable conservative tracer for studying the sea-to-air transfer and atmospheric transformation of organic compounds, including marine carbohydrates, as well as other inorganic SSA constituents. Notably, the ratio of OM to Na+ is significantly higher in SSA particles than in seawater, reflecting not only the preferential enrichment of surface-active substances at the interface but also a more complex interplay of factors such as water solubility, biological activity within the ocean surface, and co-adsorption processes involving matrix constituents (Burrows et al., 2014; Gantt et al., 2011; Hasenecz et al., 2020, 2019; Hoffman and Duce, 1976; Jayarathne et al., 2016; van Pinxteren et al., 2017; Quinn et al., 2015; Russell et al., 2010; Schill et al., 2018). This enrichment is particularly pronounced in submicron particles compared to supermicron particles. Furthermore, following the sea-to-air transfer of OM and CCHO, recent laboratory (Hasenecz et al., 2020; Malfatti et al., 2019) and field (Zeppenfeld et al., 2021, 2023) observations suggest their molecular transformation or additional in-situ formation, driven by abiotic, microbial or enzymatic activities in the atmosphere.

SSA particles are known to function as both cloud condensation nuclei (Orellana et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2022) and ice-nucleating particles (Alpert et al., 2022; DeMott et al., 2016; Hill et al., 2023; Mirrielees et al., 2024), underscoring their important role in cloud microphysics, cloud formation, and precipitation processes. Recently, Hartmann et al. (2025) demonstrated, through a combination of lab and field data, that SSA particles' ice-nucleating activity is likely attributable to the polysaccharides they contain. Model simulations further indicated that the ice-nucleating activity of marine polysaccharides is particularly significant within the temperature range between 20 and 15 °C in remote oceanic regions, where contributions from terrestrial ice-nucleating particles are minimal or absent. Furthermore, Rocchi et al. (2024) demonstrated that the presence of glucose-rich CCHO, in combination with sea salt, significantly enhances SSA production in eastern Arctic waters. This finding may improve the predictability of SSA emissions in marine models.

In the field, marine combined carbohydrates in aerosol particles (CCHOaer) have been predominantly measured at ship-based or coastal locations, which are in close proximity to local marine emission sources both horizontally and vertically (Leck et al., 2013; van Pinxteren et al., 2023; Zeppenfeld et al., 2021, 2023). In contrast, only a few studies have investigated CCHOaer (Karl et al., 2019; Yttri et al., 2024) at an elevated mountain site in a marine-influenced setting, aiming to assess atmospheric concentrations at higher altitudes. Vertically resolved field data comparing ground-level and elevated altitudes using mobile platforms for marine CCHOaer have, however, been lacking to date. This is due to several methodological challenges, most fundamentally the absence of suitable high-resolution online detection techniques for CCHOaer, reflecting the inherent analytical difficulty of this compound class. As a consequence, current approaches rely on offline analyses, which are further constrained by low atmospheric concentrations that approach their detection limits. In addition, lightweight yet powerful high-flow pumps remain technically challenging to realize for mobile airborne platforms (e.g., drones or balloon-based systems), where payload and power constraints limit the collection of sufficient aerosol mass during short sampling periods. As a result, it remains unclear to what extent and under which conditions CCHOaer reach the upper marine boundary layer and the free troposphere, leaving high uncertainty about the broader relevance of these biomolecules for cloud formation and glaciation beyond controlled laboratory conditions.

Previous airborne measurements around Svalbard (Hara et al., 2003; Simon et al., 2025) and the Canadian Arctic (Köllner et al., 2017) demonstrated that SSA particles, identified by Na+ and Cl, are present in higher altitudes of the lower troposphere, and, to a lesser extent, reach the middle free troposphere (3–6 km a.s.l.). Some of these aerosol particles showed signs of atmospheric aging, such as the replacement of chloride with nitrate and sulfate in the SSA particles. While vertically resolved data exists for major inorganic SSA constituents, such extended information is lacking for marine CCHOaer.

Recent methodological advances now allow for a more detailed investigation of the transport mechanisms and atmospheric chemical fate of marine carbohydrates. In this study, we present atmospheric concentrations of these biomolecules alongside common inorganic SSA constituents. Measurements were conducted from ground level up to various altitudes within the boundary layer and lower free troposphere using a tethered helium balloon in Ny-Ålesund on Svalbard during autumn 2021 and spring 2022. For selected cases, we examined the influence of mixing state, meteorological conditions, and air mass history on the observed aerosol composition. Finally, this study addresses the potential atmospheric processing and transformation of marine carbohydrates, with a focus on their possible contribution to secondary aerosol formation and their implications for atmospheric chemistry and cloud-relevant processes.

2 Methods

This section summarizes the observational and modelling approaches used in this work. It covers the study area, field sampling, offline and online measurements, supporting datasets, model calculations, and statistical and visualization methods for data interpretation. An overview of all relevant parameters and methods is provided in Table 1.

Table 1Overview of parameters, methods and sample/media types used in this study.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

2.1 Study area: Ny-Ålesund as an atmospheric observation site

Ny-Ålesund, located at 78.9° N at the Kongsfjorden in Svalbard (Norway), belongs to the world's northernmost permanently inhabited settlements with a year-round accessibility. It serves as a key research site for studying Arctic climate change and Arctic amplification. Ny-Ålesund hosts long-term monitoring sites for aerosols and meteorology, such as the Zeppelin Observatory (Platt et al., 2022), Gruvebadet (Amore et al., 2022), and the AWIPEV Observatory (Maturilli et al., 2013, 2015). These, along with additional research stations operated by various international institutions, provide valuable data for both long-term atmospheric studies and short-term investigations like the present one.

However, Ny-Ålesund is not representative of the entire High Arctic. Its distinct topography, situated within a fjord and surrounded by high mountains up to 800 m, leads to complex atmospheric dynamics, including foehn-like effects (Shestakova et al., 2022). The local boundary layer is relatively shallow characterized by an average mixing layer height below 700 m and a strong influence by orographic effects (Chang et al., 2017; Dekhtyareva et al., 2018; Gierens et al., 2020). While free-tropospheric winds are predominantly westerly, surface winds result from an interplay of land-sea breeze circulations, southeasterly channeled winds along the fjord axis, and katabatic flows from the Zeppelin mountain range, the Broeggerbreen glacier, or the Kongsvegen glacier (Esau and Repina, 2012; Gierens et al., 2020). Additionally, large wind shear has been observed to generate turbulence, leading to frequent neutral stratification (Gierens et al., 2020). Furthermore, boundary layer mixing can occur even under a positive potential temperature gradient that would typically indicate stable stratification. During the present field campaign, we observed that near-surface winds often shift unpredictably, changing direction without a clear pattern, making airflow dynamics challenging to interpret.

From an oceanographic perspective, Svalbard is similarly exceptional. The region is influenced by the cold Arctic waters of the Spitsbergen Polar Current and the warm waters of the West Spitsbergen Current (Feltracco et al., 2021). Kongsfjorden, located on the western coast of Spitsbergen, lies at the interface of High Arctic and Atlantic influences, making it a dynamic and variable environment (Bischof et al., 2019).

Therefore, findings from Ny-Ålesund may not be fully transferable to atmospheric processes over sea ice or the open ocean in the High Arctic. However, in general, the representativeness of any single Arctic site is highly questionable, as Freud et al. (2017) found significant heterogeneity in aerosol particle size distribution across all Arctic sites in their study.

2.2 Field sampling

The field samples (aerosol particles, bulk seawater and SML) for this study were collected near Ny-Ålesund and from the adjacent Kongsfjorden during autumn 2021 and spring 2022.

2.2.1 Bulk seawater and SML sampling

In total, 11 bulk surface seawater and 11 SML samples were taken from a small boat at various dates and locations across the Kongsfjorden (Fig. 1, Table S1 in the Supplement). Bulk water samples were obtained from a depth of 1 m using low-density polyethylene (LDPE) bottles secured to a telescopic rod. The corresponding SML samples were collected using the glass plate technique (Cunliffe and Wurl, 2014; van Pinxteren et al., 2012). A glass plate measuring 50 cm × 20 cm × 0.5 cm, with an oval sampling area of 2000 cm2, was immersed vertically into the surface of the fjord seawater and withdrawn at a steady rate of 15 cm s−1. The SML film attached to the glass surface was drained into a precleaned wide-neck plastic bottle using a funnel and a framed Teflon wiper. Water samples were filtered through 0.2 µm polycarbonate filters (Whatman® Nuclepore™, 47 mm diameter) to separate dissolved and particulate fractions. The filtrate, filters and field blanks were preserved at 20 °C until chemical analyses (inorganic ions, carbohydrates). Sea surface temperature (SST) was measured directly from the boat at a depth of approximately 10 cm using a digital thermometer.

2.2.2 Aerosol particle sampling in the surroundings of Ny-Ålesund

Total suspended aerosol particles (TSP) were captured on polycarbonate filters (0.8 µm, Whatman® Nuclepore™, 47 mm diameter) at four locations (Fig. 1): (I) Near the Old Pier next to Kongsfjorden (8 samples), representing fresh SSA emissions; (II) near the balloon winch close to the AWIPEV Observatory (17 samples), representing ground measurements; (III) at high altitudes at the tethered balloon (14 samples); and (IV) at the Zeppelin Observatory (1 sample), serving as a reference for comparison. Table S2 provides details of individual aerosol particle samplings near the Old Pier (I), while Table S3 presents the sampling times, locations and heights of all the individual high-altitude aerosol samples (III and IV), along with the corresponding simultaneous ground-level samples (II) taken near the winch.

For sampling aerosol particles at the Old Pier (4 m a.s.l.), a filter holder with a polycarbonate filter attached to a pump was used. Sampling lasted between 4 and 7 d. Flow rates, measured at the beginning and the ending of the sampling with a flowmeter, ranged from 5 to 10 L min−1, with total air volumes between 44 and 82 m3. The estimated diameter-dependent collection efficiency of this TSP sampling setup, assuming a 90° aspiration angle, is shown in Fig. S1. To reduce the risk of pump failure due to cold temperatures or snow, the pumps were housed in a Zarges box for protection.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/7235/2026/acp-26-7235-2026-f01

Figure 1Map of the sampling locations. Aerosol particles were collected at: (I) the Old Pier, representing fresh SSA emissions; (II) the winch, representing ground measurements; (III) the tethered balloon at various altitudes; and (IV) the Zeppelin Observatory, serving as a reference for comparison. Bulk and SML samples were collected from different locations within Kongsfjorden. Orange squares (SS1–SS5) indicate autumn 2021 samples, while green squares (SS6–SS11) represent spring 2022 samples. Blue shading indicates water depth.

High-altitude TSP samples were collected using the helium-filled tethered balloon BELUGA, as described in detail by Pilz et al. (2023). The balloon's altitude was controlled using an electric winch located near the AWIPEV Observatory, with ascent and descent rates from 1 to 3 m s−1. The tethered balloon operated under various meteorological conditions, including both clear and cloudy skies. At a specified altitude, a HALFBAC (High-volume And Light-weight Filter sampler for BAlloon-borne appliCation) (Grawe et al., 2023) collected aerosol particles 2–3 m below the balloon. The HALFBAC is a custom-designed, lightweight aerosol particle sampler operating at a pump flow rate between 25 and 35 L min−1. It is capable of collecting sufficient aerosol mass on filters at high altitudes for subsequent offline chemical and microphysical analyses. Simultaneously, another HALFBAC collected ground-level aerosol particles near the electric winch (20 m above sea level). Additionally, one aerosol sample (Filter ID 62, sampling date: 10 May 2022) was collected at the Zeppelin Observatory, a permanent monitoring station located at 474 m a.s.l. on Zeppelinfjellet, using the HALFBAC. Synchronized aerosol particle sampling at the winch and the balloon typically lasted around 2 h, as detailed in Table S3. The collection efficiency for TSP sampling using HALFBAC is discussed in the Supplement S1 and Fig. S1.

2.3 Chemical analyses from offline aerosol particle filters and seawater

For the analysis of major cations, anions and marine carbohydrates in aerosol particles, the complete polycarbonate filters were extracted in 6–7 mL of ultrapure water (resistivity >18.2 MΩ) for 2 h followed by a filtration through a 0.45 µm syringe filter. Frozen seawater samples were thawed at 4 °C in a refrigerator 1 d before analysis.

2.3.1 Major cations and anions

Major inorganic ions, including sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), magnesium (Mg2+), calcium (Ca2+), chloride (Cl), sulfate (SO42-), and oxalate, were quantified in 0.45 µm filtered aqueous aerosol extracts, bulk seawater and SML samples using ion chromatography (Dionex ICS-6000, Thermo Scientific) as described by Zeppenfeld et al. (2021). For both cations and anions, the injection volume was 10 µL. Cations were separated isocratically using a 36 mM methanesulfonic acid eluent at a flow rate of 0.16 mL min−1 on a Dionex IonPac CS16 (2 mm × 250 mm) column with a CG16 guard column (2 mm × 50 mm). Anions were separated on a Dionex IonPac AS18 column (2 mm × 250 mm) with an AG18 guard column (2 mm × 50 mm), using a potassium hydroxide (KOH) gradient elution at 0.3 mL min−1. The gradient started at 4 mM KOH (0–4 min), increased to 20 mM (up to 8 min), then to 28 mM (up to 13.5 min), held at 28 mM until 17.4 min, increased to 40 mM (up to 21.5 min), followed by a step to 80 mM (up to 23.5 min), before returning to 4 mM KOH.

Both systems used suppressors (Dionex ADRS600 2 mm for anions and Dionex CDRS600 2 mm for cations). Analytical uncertainty for each ion was below 5 %. Aerosol extracts were measured undiluted, while bulk seawater and SML samples were analyzed at a 1 : 15 000 dilution.

2.3.2 Dissolved free and combined carbohydrates

Carbohydrates in seawater and aerosol particle extracts were measured according to the protocols outlined by Zeppenfeld et al. (2020, 2021), utilizing high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD). The system was equipped with a Dionex CarboPac PA20 analytical column (3 mm × 150 mm) and a Dionex CarboPac PA20 guard column (3 mm × 30 mm). The applied eluent gradient separated the following monosaccharide units: fucose (Fuc), rhamnose (Rha), arabinose (Ara), galactose (Gal), glucose (Glc), xylose (Xyl), mannose (Man), fructose (Fru), galactosamine (GalN), glucosamine (GlcN), muramic acid (MurAc), galacturonic acid (GalAc), and glucuronic acid (GlcAc). The analytical uncertainty for each monosaccharide was below 10 %. Dissolved free carbohydrates were measured without hydrolysis, whereas CCHO include those monosaccharides released by acid hydrolysis (0.8 M HCl, 100 °C, 20 h). For seawater samples, particulate combined carbohydrates (pCCHO, >0.2µm) were measured from 0.2 µm polycarbonate filters, while dissolved combined carbohydrates (dCCHO, <0.2µm) were measured from the filtrate after desalination via electrodialysis. Both fractions were later summed to represent the total CCHO. For the winch and balloon samples, the limited air volume and resulting low aerosol mass collected on the filters permitted quantification only of the major monosaccharides (typically Glc, Xyl, Gal, Ara), while minor monosaccharides remained largely below the instrumental detection limits. In contrast, samples from the Old Pier and surface seawater provided sufficient analyte mass to quantify the full suite of the CCHO monosaccharides.

2.4 Vertical profiles from online measurements

2.4.1 Size-resolved aerosol particles number concentrations

An optical particles size spectrometer (POPS, Handix), integrated into the Cubic Aerosol Measurement Platform (CAMP) as described by Pilz et al. (2022), provided the integrated total number concentrations (N150) for aerosol particles between 150 and 2900 nm at a temporal resolution of 1 s. On selected dates of HALFBAC sampling, CAMP was operated simultaneously 25 m below the balloon providing insight into the vertical profile of N150 during specific events. Vertical profiles are presented as rolling averages over 30 s.

2.4.2 Meteorological observations and calculations

Standard meteorological parameters, including altitude, ambient temperature (T), wind speed (U), wind direction (WD), air pressure (p), and relative humidity (RH), were measured for the elevated-altitude samples using a standard meteorology package positioned approximately 20 m below the balloon (Pilz et al., 2023). The potential temperature (θ) within the atmospheric column – as a measure of the static stability of the unsaturated atmosphere – was calculated using Eq. (1), where T is the ambient temperature (K), p is the atmospheric pressure (hPa), p0 is the reference pressure (1000 hPa), R is the specific gas constant (287 J kg−1 K−1) and cp is the specific heat capacity of dry air at constant pressure (1004 J kg−1 K−1).

(1) θ = T p 0 p R c p

Specific humidity (q) – remaining constant during adiabatic ascent or descent as long as no phase changes occur – was calculated using Eq. (2) from Egerer et al. (2021), where Rd/Rv (the ratio of specific gas constants for dry air and water vapor) is approximately 0.622, and es(T) represents the temperature-dependent saturation vapor pressure.

(2) q = R d / R v e s T RH p - 1 - R d / R v e S T RH

Meteorological data measured 2 m above the ground (13 m above sea level) at the AWIPEV Atmospheric Observatory (Maturilli, 2020), represented the weather conditions during aerosol sampling at the winch.

2.5 Supporting observations and model calculations

Major inorganic ions measured at the Zeppelin Observatory with 24 h resolution using a stationary aerosol sampler (Filter_3pack) were obtained from the EBAS database (Aas et al., 2022, 2023) for the study period. The measurements are part of the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (Tørseth et al., 2012) and were conducted by the Norwegian Polar Institute (NPI) and the Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU). The Filter_3pack data were utilized in two ways:

  1. Comparing sampling techniques: Data from the Filter_3pack were compared with one HALFBAC aerosol particle sample collected directly at the Zeppelin Observatory (Filter ID 62, 10 May 2022) to evaluate potential artifacts arising from differences in sampling techniques and filter media. Despite variations in time resolution and methods, sodium, potassium, chloride, and sulfate concentrations showed strong agreement (detailed in the Supplement S2 and Fig. S2).

  2. Comparison with balloon data: Sodium concentrations measured at the Zeppelin Observatory were directly compared with those obtained from the tethered balloon sampling.

Information on the occurrence of clouds and hydrometeor types at Ny-Ålesund were taken from the Cloudnet classification product (Illingworth et al., 2007; Nomokonova et al., 2019), which is based on a combination of ground-based cloud radar, ceilometer, and numerical weather prediction output. Vertically integrated ice water content (IWC), i.e. ice water path (IWP), has been calculated from the Cloudnet IWC product following Hogan et al. (2006). Vertically integrated cloud liquid water (liquid water path; LWP) and water vapor (IWV) were taken from zenith HATPRO microwave radiometer measurements (Nomokonova et al., 2019).

The 48 h back-trajectories for the aerosol sampling periods were generated using the NOAA HYSPLIT model (Stein et al., 2015). Trajectories were calculated hourly based on GDAS1 meteorological data (Global Data Assimilation System; 1° spatial resolution; 3 h intervals) for various arrival heights: 50 m (ground level), 474 m (Zeppelin Observatory), and the specific balloon sampling altitudes. Sea ice concentration data were obtained from the NOAA-maintained ERDDAP server (Environmental Research Division's Data Access Program). The back-trajectories were used to assess the relative influence of distant sources, such as the marginal ice zone, versus local ice-free oceanic emissions on the aerosol chemical composition. Given the rather short atmospheric residence time of supermicron SSA particles (Madry et al., 2011; Veron, 2015), which account for most of the SSA mass in TSP, and the increasing uncertainties associated with longer back-trajectory periods, we considered a 48 h back-trajectory length appropriate for this analysis.

Ocean surface concentrations for total chlorophyll a (TChl-a) and dissolved acidic polysaccharides were obtained by a coupled setup of the ocean sea ice biogeochemistry model FESOM2.1-REcoM3 (Gürses et al., 2023), to which additional state equations have been added to simulate dissolved and particulate organic carbon following Engel et al. (2004) and Schartau et al. (2007). The simulation was set up following Gürses et al. (2023) and using the Arctic-specific tuning of Oziel et al. (2022). The modelled dissolved acidic polysaccharides were used as a proxy for dCCHO. Although they represent only a fraction of dCCHO, their concentrations were shown to be within the same order of magnitude as field observations (Zeising et al., 2026). Monthly model output was obtained on an irregular grid with approximately 4.5 km resolution in the Arctic Ocean. This configuration has already been applied successfully in Leon-Marcos et al. (2025).

2.6 Statistics, data processing, visualization and text optimization

Statistical analyses, calculations and visualization were conducted using OriginPro 2024, Microsoft Excel, IDL, python3 and R version 4.2.1 with the ncdf4 (Pierce, 2023), openair (Carslaw and Ropkins, 2012), reshape2 (Wickham, 2007), scales (Wickham et al., 2023b), lubridate (Grolemund and Wickham, 2011), cmocean (Thyng et al., 2016), maps (Brownrigg, 2023), mapdata (Brownrigg, 2013), rgdal (Bivand et al., 2022), raster (Hijmans, 2023), RColorBrewer (Neuwirth, 2022), sp (Bivand et al., 2013), dplyr (Wickham et al., 2023a), ggplot2 (Wickham, 2016), and PlotSvalbard (Vihtakari, 2020) packages. Box-and-whisker plots illustrate the interquartile range (box), the median (horizontal line inside the box), the mean (open square), the minimum and maximum values (whiskers). Text and language were optimized using Open AI's ChatGPT-4 Turbo.

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 Chemical constituents in marine aerosol particles from their oceanic source to elevated altitudes

3.1.1 Sodium in aerosol particles (Naaer+)

Sodium, a dominant and chemically stable component of SSA, is commonly used as a tracer for tracking ocean-derived emissions in atmospheric studies (Manders et al., 2010; van Pinxteren et al., 2017; White, 2008). In this study, consistently high Naaer+ concentrations were observed on the TSP filters at the Old Pier next to Kongsfjorden in both autumn 2021 and spring 2022 (Fig. 2a), ranging from 140 to 1470 ng m−3 (median: 495 ng m−3; n=8). The area around Ny-Ålesund, especially the Old Pier, remained largely ice-free, indicating a negligible influence of local sea ice on SSA emissions.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/7235/2026/acp-26-7235-2026-f02

Figure 2Time-resolved atmospheric concentrations of (a) Naaer+ and (b) CCHOaer in aerosol particles (TSP) collected in autumn 2021 and spring 2022 in Ny-Ålesund at several heights (m a.s.l.) from four sites: Old Pier, winch near the AWIPEV Observatory, balloon and the Zeppelin Observatory. Dots represent the median height during the total sampling time and vertical error bars represent maximum and minimum height of the sampler during the active sampling. The x-axis ticks represent the start of each date at midnight. (c) Air temperature (2 m above ground) measured at the AWIPEV Observatory. (d) CCHO / Na+ ratios within the bulk seawater, the SML and in the aerosol particles at several heights. In panel (a), the label “Balloon (III)” appears twice because balloon sampling for sodium measurements occurred both below and above the fixed altitude of the Zeppelin Observatory.

Download

Naaer+ at the winch site, located further inland but still at ground level (35–3710 ng m−3; median: 155 ng m−3; n=17), and at the balloon (321–1112 m; 23–850 ng m−3; median: 124 ng m−3; n=15) was generally lower than at the Old Pier, though episodic high events occurred at all sites. This wide variability from low ng m−3 to a few µg m−3 agrees with observations from other marine environments and altitudes (Fomba et al., 2014; Li et al., 2024; Ooki et al., 2002; Theodosi et al., 2010; Triesch et al., 2021; Zeppenfeld et al., 2021, 2023).

Since winch and balloon sampling were always synchronized, direct comparisons were possible (Fig. 3). Several events showed nearly identical Naaer+ concentrations (winch vs. balloon), e.g., 30 September: 191 vs. 207 ng m−3; 2 October: 35 vs. 36 ng m−3; 9 October: 59 vs. 60 ng m−3; 12 November: 240 vs. 223 ng m−3. In contrast, other periods exhibited strong vertical gradients with higher ground-level concentrations (e.g., 27 September: 1840 vs. 23 ng m−3; 5 April: 84 vs. 54 ng m−3; 11 May: 496 vs. 125 ng m−3), while two cases showed higher values at the balloon (24 September: 47 vs. 99 ng m−3; 3 April: 77 vs. 194 ng m−3). These variations are likely driven by atmospheric processes, including dry and wet deposition (Farmer et al., 2021), dilution during vertical and horizontal transport from the emission region (Wong et al., 2019), vertical mixing (Pilz et al., 2024) and differing air mass histories (Willis et al., 2018), which will be examined in detail for three selected cases later in this study.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/7235/2026/acp-26-7235-2026-f03

Figure 3Scatter plot showing Naaer+ (black symbols) and CCHOaer (red symbols) concentrations in TSP measured at the winch, and balloon levels. Marker shapes and fill styles serve as identifiers linking corresponding Naaer+ and CCHOaer values from the same sample. Data points are categorized to indicate whether values were similar, higher at the balloon, or higher at the ground.

Download

Naaer+ at the Zeppelin Observatory largely agreed with the balloon measurements (56 %–213 % overall; 92 %–107 % in five events; Table S6), despite differences in time resolution (24 h vs. 1–2 h), sampling altitude, the horizontal distance between the sites, Svalbard's complex topography (Gierens et al., 2020; Shestakova et al., 2022), and the fact that meteorological conditions and atmospheric mixing states have not yet been considered.

Overall, Naaer+ was detectable up to 1100 m altitude, sometimes at levels comparable to those near the emission source, indicating effective vertical mixing or transport to cloud-relevant heights via advection. This vertical distribution is consistent with the aircraft-based SSA measurements reported by Hara et al. (2003) and Köllner et al. (2017). Longer atmospheric residence increases the exposure of SSA particles to processing, which can alter their impact on cloud formation. While Naaer+ is considered chemically stable, co-emitted OM including carbohydrates may undergo physical, chemical and microbial changes (Zeppenfeld et al., 2021, 2023). This aspect will be explored further in Sect. 3.3.

3.1.2 Combined carbohydrates in fresh SSA and surface seawater

Similar to sodium, CCHOaer were detected at all sites and altitudes (Fig. 2b). At the Old Pier, CCHOaer concentrations ranged from 1.6 to 10.0 ng m−3 (median: 5.0 ng m−3; n=8), showing a seasonal pattern with the highest values at the beginning (end of September 2021) and end (mid of May 2022) of the study period, and lower values in October 2021, coinciding with low air temperatures (Fig. 2c). No samples were collected between November and April, so winter trends remain unknown.

A seasonal trend was also observed for dCCHO in Kongsfjorden seawater. Concentrations peaked in late September/early October and were substantially lower in early to mid-May, averaging only about 50 % of the autumn values (Fig. 4). Most monosaccharides in bulk dCCHO showed a strong co-variation with SST (R2= 0.79–0.93; n=11). This relationship was weaker for xylose (RXyl–SST2=0.62) and glucose (RGlc–SST2=0.53) in bulk dCCHO, and generally more moderate in the SML for most monosaccharides (Fig. 4).

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/7235/2026/acp-26-7235-2026-f04

Figure 4Concentration of measured monosaccharide units in dCCHO from bulk and SML samples collected in Kongsfjorden during autumn 2021 and spring 2022, along with SST measurements taken from bulk samples at the time of sampling.

Download

In contrast, pCCHO as a whole showed no clear seasonal trend in seawater (Fig. S3). However, a few monosaccharides within bulk water pCCHO, in particular fucose, glucosamine, and galactosamine, displayed a moderate correlation with SST (RFuc–SST2=0.73; RGalN–SST2=0.39; RGlcN–SST2=0.69; n=11). While dCCHO in bulk water exhibited relatively low spatial and intra-seasonal variability, pCCHO and SML samples were considerably more variable, even among samples from the same season (Fig. S4). This likely reflects the rapid dynamics of pCCHO in relation to phytoplankton blooms (Becker et al., 2020; Engel et al., 2012; Fabiano et al., 1993), as well as the formation of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) from dCCHO in turbulent waters and vertical transport of pCCHO via sedimentation (e.g., as marine snow) or its accumulation in the SML depending on buoyancy (Burns et al., 2019; Engel, 2004; Robinson et al., 2019a, b; Wurl and Holmes, 2008). The SML, in particular, may be more sensitive to these dynamics than the bulk water, potentially explaining its greater fluctuations.

By comparison, dCCHO in bulk water, like dissolved organic carbon (Hansell, 2013; Keene et al., 2017), is likely dominated by recalcitrant and semi-recalcitrant compounds, while the labile fraction is rapidly consumed by heterotrophic bacteria (Goldberg et al., 2011). Notably, combined glucose showed high variability in both dCCHO and pCCHO, likely due to being the main constituent of abundant storage macromolecules such as laminarin (Becker et al., 2020), whose production and turnover may be enhanced during periods of photosynthetic overflow (Barthelmeß et al., 2025), as well as its relatively rapid microbial utilization (Kharbush et al., 2020).

The seasonal variation of CCHOaer at the Old Pier may be linked to the seasonal dynamics of marine CCHO in the surface waters of Kongsfjorden, the only local emission source of SSA. These dynamics are likely driven by seasonal shifts in primary production and phytoplankton composition (Assmy et al., 2023; Mayot et al., 2018; van de Poll et al., 2021).

Overall, CCHOaer and selected seawater dCCHO monosaccharides showed a broadly consistent seasonal tendency, with elevated values in late summer/early autumn. However, the spring conditions (May) deviate from this pattern, with CCHOaer showing a secondary maximum that is not reflected in seawater dCCHO, where concentrations remain substantially lower. This indicates that the seasonal coupling between (bulk) seawater CCHO and CCHOaer is strongest in late summer/early autumn, while additional processes such as SML enrichment or atmospheric processing may also contribute to the spring aerosol signal.

In conclusion, the seasonal variation of CCHOaer measured at the Old Pier is partly consistent with marine carbohydrates in Kongsfjorden seawater, suggesting that surface CCHO is an important but not exclusive source of freshly emitted CCHOaer.

3.1.3 CCHOaer at the winch and higher altitudes

CCHOaer at the winch site (1.9–194 ng m−3; median: 10.6 ng m−3; n=17) and at the balloon (3.8–274 ng m−3; median: 10.2 ng m−3; n=15), showed broader ranges and significantly higher median and maximum values than at the Old Pier (Fig. 2b), suggesting sources beyond primary sea-air transfer. No clear seasonal pattern (in contrast to the Old Pier) or altitude dependence was observed, likely due to the winch site's inland location, making it more sensitive to wind direction and changing weather. Also, the higher temporal resolution of the samples likely captured short-term fluctuations rather than integrated seasonal trends. In addition, atmospheric processing during transport and the lack of true winter samples may have further obscured any clear seasonal signal.

Similar to sodium, some events (Fig. 3) showed comparable CCHOaer at the winch and balloon (e.g., 30 September: 6.5 vs. 8.0 ng m−3; 2 October: 6.3 vs. 5.8 ng m−3; 8 November: 11.1 vs. 10.2 ng m−3), while on other dates, concentrations were markedly lower at higher altitudes (e.g., 27 September: 194 vs. 8.6 ng m−3; 11 May: 25 vs. 8.1 ng m−3), or conversely, higher aloft (e.g., 24 September: 10.2 vs. 136 ng m−3; 3 April: 15.9 vs. 275 ng m−3). In most cases, CCHOaer covaried with sodium except on 3 October, when Naaer+ was slightly higher at the ground (54 vs. 35 ng m−3), whereas CCHOaer was higher at the balloon (42 ng m−3) than at the winch (14 ng m−3).

To investigate oceanic emission and the atmospheric fate of marine CCHO, CCHO/Na+ ratios were calculated for all aerosol, bulk seawater and SML samples, representing the primary sources of the SSA particle constituents studied here (Fig. 2d). Bulk seawater showed the lowest ratios (2.0 × 10−6–6.0 × 10−6) with minimal variability, while the SML had slightly higher ratios (3.3 × 10−6–2.5 × 10−5) due to CCHO enrichment. Specifically, the enrichment factors (EFSML) ranged 1.3–4.1 for dCCHO and 0.9–6.8 for pCCHO (Fig. S4), which aligns well with previous studies (Engel and Galgani, 2016; Gao et al., 2012; Zäncker et al., 2021; Zeppenfeld et al., 2021, 2023).

At the Old Pier, where fresh SSA was sampled, the ratios were significantly higher (6.2 × 10−3–3.3 × 10−2) indicating the chemo-selective sea-air transfer that enriches surface-active organics relative to sodium in aerosol particles (Hasenecz et al., 2020, 2019; Jayarathne et al., 2016; Schill et al., 2018; Zeppenfeld et al., 2021, 2023). The enrichment effect is typically more pronounced in submicron particles, which have a higher relative contribution of organics than inorganic ions (Quinn et al., 2015). In contrast, supermicron particles are predominantly composed of sea salts, although organic substances are still notably enriched compared to the surface seawater. As total suspended particles were measured here, and most SSA mass resides in the supermicron range (Facchini et al., 2008; O'Dowd et al., 1997), our results primarily reflect supermicron aerosol composition.

At the winch sampling station, located at ground level but further inland, the CCHO/Na+ ratios in TSP ranged from 2.9 × 10−3 to 2.6 × 10−1, similar or slightly higher than at the Old Pier. In contrast, balloon samples from elevated altitudes showed higher ratios (3.9 × 10−2–1.4 × 100), likely due to depletion of salt-rich supermicron particles during dry and wet deposition (Croft et al., 2009; Hoppel et al., 2002; O'Dowd and de Leeuw, 2007), increasing the relative contribution of OM-dominated submicron particles. Furthermore, the increasing absolute concentration of CCHO at higher altitudes (Fig. 2b) suggests an atmospheric formation process contributing to the elevated CCHO/Na+ ratios, potentially linked to microbial activity in the atmosphere (see Sect. 3.3). However, because only the major monosaccharides (typically Glc, Xyl, Gal, Ara) could be quantified reliably in the winch and balloon samples, relative CCHO compositions were not assessed across the entire vertical sample set. Therefore, they were not used to further substantiate this conclusion, as it has been done in Zeppenfeld et al. (2021, 2023).

The CCHO/Na+ ratios observed at the Old Pier and the Winch closely align with ship-based measurements from the PASCAL cruise (May–July 2017) in the Fram Strait, Barents Sea, and central Arctic Ocean (Macke and Flores, 2018; Wendisch et al., 2018), where values ranged from 2 × 10−3 to 2 × 10−1 in PM10 based on summed Berner impactor stages (Zeppenfeld et al., 2023). In contrast, the very high CCHO/Na+ values (>1×100) observed at some elevated altitudes in this study were reported only occasionally for submicron particles (0.14–0.42 µm) during PASCAL. This may support the idea that supermicron particle deposition caused the shift in balloon sample ratios, though microbial contributions in the atmosphere are also possible. Moreover, these ratios far exceed those from the Southern Ocean near the western Antarctic Peninsula (8×10-4 to 7×10-3) (Zeppenfeld et al., 2021), likely due to differences in surface seawater productivity.

Overall, it can be concluded that both Naaer+ and CCHOaer are transported from the marine emission source to elevated heights within the lower troposphere. In the following section, we discuss the role of meteorological conditions and atmospheric mixing in linking ground-based and balloon-based samples.

3.2 Impact of meteorological conditions on SSA particle constituents in higher altitudes

To examine how meteorological conditions and atmospheric mixing influence Naaer+ and CCHOaer at high altitudes, three distinct cases with constant weather conditions were selected (Fig. 5). These conditions allow for a detailed interpretation of the observed chemical values.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/7235/2026/acp-26-7235-2026-f05

Figure 5Vertical profiles of three atmospheric cases showing mass concentrations of chemical constituents (inorganic ions, oxalate, total CCHOaer, and major monosaccharides within CCHOaer) in aerosol particles, measured on the ground (winch) and aloft (balloon) using offline filters. Vertical error bars indicate the range between minimal and maximal heights during active sampling at the balloon, while the symbols denote the median sampling heights. Data from the Zeppelin Observatory are also included when available and above detection limits, albeit with a 24 h resolution. Dotted lines are included to aid in reading the vertical distribution of individual chemical substances. These profiles are complemented by aerosol particle number concentrations of particles bigger than 150 nm (N150), potential temperature (θ), specific humidity (q), wind speed (U), and wind direction (WD) measured during the ascents (solid lines) and descents (dashed lines) of the balloon.

Download

To assess atmospheric stability and layering in these cases, vertical profiles of potential temperature were utilized. To further confirm aerosol mixing conditions, additional meteorological parameters (specific humidity, wind speed and direction), vertical aerosol particle number concentrations of particles larger than 150 nm (N150) (Fig. 5), cloud conditions (Fig. S5) and back-trajectory analyses (Fig. 6) were considered. The selected cases include (a) a cloud-free mixed boundary layer (12 November 2021), (b) a free troposphere decoupled from the ground (27 September 2021), and (c) a boundary layer capped by precipitating clouds (3 October 2021).

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/7235/2026/acp-26-7235-2026-f06

Figure 648 h back-trajectories calculated on an hourly basis for three arrival heights: orange (50 m, ground-level air masses), red (474 m, height of the Zeppelin Observatory), and purple (variable arrival height, high-altitude air masses sampled at tethered balloon). These are accompanied by daily sea ice concentration (SIC) maps (top) and height profiles (bottom) for three selected aerosol particle sampling cases.

3.2.1 Case I: Mixed boundary layer and no low-level clouds

On 12 November 2021, during the polar night, two HALFBACs were operated simultaneously at the ground and the balloon (median altitude of 428 m) for approximately 90 min. Ground-level conditions were 16.7 °C, 69 % RH, and 1.5 m s−1 wind mainly from the southwest. At the balloon, sampling occurred at a similar temperature (17.5 °C) and RH (72 %), but higher wind speeds (4.3 m s−1) from the northeast to southeast. With IWV <3 kg m−2, the atmosphere was very dry (Fig. S5a), and only a thin mixed-phase cloud layer at 4.5–5 km altitude was present, with negligible LWP and IWP (Fig. S5a), unlikely to affect aerosol chemistry within the boundary layer.

During the balloon's ascent, potential temperature increased from 255 to 258 K, with the strongest gradient near the ground. Using the wind speed profile and the Richardson number approach (Akansu et al., 2023), a very shallow surface mixing layer of ∼12 m was estimated, likely caused by recent surface cooling. Although this surface inversion and the slightly stable to near-neutral stratification above would limit instantaneous vertical mixing, surface mixing layer height reflects only momentary conditions, whereas aerosol and humidity profiles integrate mixing over longer timescales. The coupling state at the time of measurement is therefore not a reliable indicator of the effective boundary-layer mixing state. Furthermore, as noted in Sect. 2.1, Ny-Ålesund's complex orography can induce localized turbulent mixing even under stable stratification. In addition, a low-level jet observed during descent, with wind speeds at least 2 m s−1 higher than above and below, provided a significant additional source of turbulence and vertical mixing within the boundary layer (Egerer et al., 2023).

At the ground, N150 was around 60 cm−3, and gradually decreased to 45 cm−3 at the balloon's sampling height, indicating a fairly uniform aerosol distribution dominated by primary emissions. Combined with nearly constant specific humidity ( 0.7–0.8 g kg−1), a slight wind speed increase with altitude, the low-level jet during descent, and consistent wind direction (Fig. 4a), these suggest a largely well-mixed boundary layer. HALFBAC samples from ground and balloon showed similar concentrations of inorganic ions (Naaer+: 240 and 223, Claer-: 586 and 543, SO4aer2-: 336 and 330, Caaer2+: 87 and 92, Mgaer2+: 9.5 and 7.8, Kaer+: 34 and 30 ng m−3), oxalateaer (34 and 37 ng −3), and major CCHO-bound monosaccharides (GlcCCHO,aer: 17 and 9.1, XylCCHO,aer: 5.0 and 4.7, AraCCHO,aer: 1.2 and 0.9 ng m−3), supporting a well-mixed layer. Despite diverse sources (SSA, dust, anthropogenic, secondary), vertical aerosol composition remained uniform. Zeppelin Observatory 24 h measurements of Naaer+, Claer-, and SO42- showed slightly lower concentrations but agreed with balloon results.

Back-trajectory analysis revealed that air masses at ground level, the balloon, and Zeppelin Observatory (Fig. 6, Case I) followed the same path during the 48 h before sampling. Originating from the Arctic pack ice, they crossed the marginal ice zone with a short residence time before passing over the ice-free ocean and Kongsfjorden, where most SSA compounds were likely taken up. The back-trajectory heights indicate a vertical connection between the three air masses, confirming a similar transport history, influenced by the same emission sources.

This case demonstrates that major SSA constituents (Naaer+, Claer-, and CCHOaer) can mix effectively within the boundary layer, reaching altitudes relevant to cloud formation with concentrations nearly identical to ground level, and that such a mixing state can persist during temporarily decoupled conditions, provided there is no additional aerosol particle source at the ground or aloft.

3.2.2 Case II: Free troposphere decoupled from the ground

On 27 September 2021, balloon measurements were conducted at a median altitude of 1112 m, above both the Zeppelin Observatory and the altitude range of Case I, i.e. in the free troposphere above the boundary layer. A strong increase of the potential temperature between 700 m (θ≈274 K) and 900 m (θ≈280 K) indicates a pronounced inversion (Fig. 5b). N150 peaked near the ground, remained stable in the lowest 200 m, decreased up to ∼700 m, and slightly increased toward 1112 m, suggesting sources other than the ground. Specific humidity varied strongly (2.6–4 g kg−1), confirming a decoupled atmospheric layer.

During ground sampling, mean conditions were 0.4 °C, 83 % RH, and 0.7 m s−1 wind from the southwest (Table S5). At balloon altitude, air was colder (1.9 °C), with similar RH (87 %), and much windier (5.5 m s−1), primarily from the south and southwest (Table S4). IWV increased from 13 to ∼15 kg m−2 during sampling (Fig. S5b). A dense warm-front cloud layer (2–8 km) with mainly cloud ice (IWP up to 1.4 kg m−2) was present (Fig. S5b). Precipitation reached the balloon as snowfall only in the last 15 min of sampling.

On this date, we observed a strong vertical gradient in both Naaer+ and CCHOaer concentrations (Fig. 5b), starting from the winch (Naaer+: 1840 ng m−3, CCHOaer: 199 ng m−3), decreasing at the Zeppelin Observatory (Naaer+: 850 ng m−3), and dropping sharply at the balloon's altitude (Naaer+: 23 ng m−3, CCHOaer: 8.6 ng m−3). Similar declines occurred for SO4aer2- (580; 220; 76 ng m−3), Claer- (4230; 1500; 60 ng m−3), and Caaer2+ (165; 32; 28 ng m−3). This pronounced decrease with altitude indicates separation between ground-level and elevated air masses, making fresh local SSA from Kongsfjorden or the west coast of Svalbard an unlikely source for the substances detected at 1112 m.

This assumption is supported by back-trajectory analysis (Fig. 6b): air masses at 50 and 474 m arrival height originated from Arctic pack ice and crossed the ice-free Fram Strait, whereas the 1112 m air mass followed a different path over the Barents Sea near Franz Josef Land. After contact with the marine boundary layer and possibly the sea surface about 48 h before sampling, it remained mainly between 1000 and 1800 m. This indicates that the SSA observed at 1112 m in Ny-Ålesund likely originated from this distant source region.

In summary, Case II demonstrates that major SSA constituents (Naaer+, Caaer2+, Claer-, SO4aer2- and CCHOaer) can be present in the free troposphere and likely originate from a distant source. However, they appear at lower concentrations above the inversion than in the boundary layer below, where concentrations, as in Case I, are more similar to those at the ground.

3.2.3 Case III: Inside and below a drizzling cloud

On 3 October 2021, the ground temperature was 3 °C with a high relative humidity of 89 %. Winds were light, shifting between east, south, and west at 0.7 m s−1 during sampling. At the balloon's altitude of 666 m, the average temperature was 1.3 °C, the relative humidity 96 % and the wind speed 6.8 m s−1 from the east and northeast. The day was overcast, with continuous drizzle from a 2 km deep mixed-phase cloud layer with LWP values of up to 300 g m−2 and IWV of around 13 to 14 kg m−2. The balloon's altitude was close to the melting layer.

During the balloon's ascent and descent to 666 m, a positive gradient in potential temperature (272 K at the ground vs. 278 K at the balloon, Fig. 5c) indicated a stably stratified boundary layer. Specific humidity was uniform (3.2–3.8 g kg−1), while N150 was lower than in Case I (3–10 cm−3) with higher relative variability, likely influenced by low counting statistics at these low concentrations. Overall, mixing conditions in Case III were similar to Case I, but sampling occurred partly within or below a drizzling low-level cloud.

Back-trajectory analysis (Fig. 6, Case III) showed that air masses at the altitudes of ground, balloon, and Zeppelin Observatory followed the same 48 h path from the ice-free ocean south of Svalbard. Vertical trajectory heights indicate shared transport history and influence by the same emission sources, consistent with Case I.

In line with the lower aerosol number concentrations, offline measurements of chemical constituents were also generally lower than in the previous cases. Furthermore, major inorganic ions (Fig. 5c) were generally similar at the ground and balloon (Claer-: 289 and 252 ng m−3; SO4aer2-: 66 and 59 ng m−3; Kaer+: 23 and 20 ng m−3), with Naaer+ (53 and 35 ng m−3) somewhat higher at the ground. At the Zeppelin Observatory, only Naaer+ exceeded the detection limit, with a concentration of 38 ng m−3, very similar to the value observed at the balloon. This consistency indicates a rather mixed boundary layer. Creamean et al. (2021) analyzed three years of Arctic aerosol vertical distributions using a tethered balloon in Alaska and found that, when a uniform aerosol distribution below clouds was observed, it primarily occurred in autumn, aligning well with Case III.

Interestingly, despite the same levels of major inorganic ions, some chemical constituents exhibited increased concentrations at higher altitudes. These included major monosaccharides bound within CCHO (ground and balloon: GlcCCHO,aer: 12.6 and 34 ng m−3; XylCCHO,aer: 0.57 and 4.4 ng m−3; AraCCHO,aer: below detection limit and 0.97 ng m−3), as well as oxalateaer (5.5 and 24 ng m−3), Caaer2+ (47 and 187 ng m−3), and Mgaer2+ (0.97 and 2.6 ng m−3). These elevated concentrations cannot be explained by direct local sea spray emissions or remote source contributions alone, suggesting the involvement of cloud-related enrichment and transformation processes.

Soluble Caaer2+ and Mgaer2+ possibly derived from preexisting organic structures in SSA, becoming soluble and detectable after chemical aging. OM-bound Ca2+, as already found in Antarctic SSA (Su et al., 2023), may originate from SML-derived polysaccharide gels such as TEPs, and airborne algal cells or fragments, which can release Ca2+ and Mg2+ through gel dispersion or cell dissolution under the acidic conditions of chemically aged SSA aerosol particles (Aller et al., 2017; Angle et al., 2021; Orellana and Leck, 2015; van Pinxteren et al., 2022; Trainic et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2014). Since these particles were sampled in cloud water, which contains abundant TEP (van Pinxteren et al., 2022), this mechanism may also explain the elevated CCHO concentrations. Caaer2+ can form complexes with oxalateaer (Furukawa and Takahashi, 2011), and oxalic acid increases hygroscopicity, potentially accounting for the high values observed at the balloon in Case III. In addition, secondary in-situ atmospheric or microbial origins, particularly in the aqueous phase, may contribute to CCHOaer and oxalateaer and is discussed in the following section.

In summary, Case III demonstrates that certain SSA constituents can vary with altitude due to atmospheric processing following primary emissions and vertical transport.

Together, the three cases demonstrate that meteorological conditions can lead to similar, lower, or higher concentrations of the investigated chemical constituents across different altitudes. Porter et al. (2022) observed similar patterns for ice-nucleating particles at the North Pole. They combined their measurements with trajectory analyses and heat sensitivity tests to conclude on aerosol sources. While this effect-based approach gives insights into particle properties, direct chemical analyses, as performed in this study, can further enhance certainty about particle origin and composition relevant for cloud formation.

3.3 Factors affecting SSA constituents beyond local sea-air transfer

3.3.1 Long-range transport and size-dependent deposition

SSA particles originate from both local and remote marine regions. However, our sampling methods make it challenging to determine the relative contribution of long-range transported SSA constituents, particularly when a local marine source, such as the Kongsfjorden is adjacent to the sampling site and may dominate other marine emissions.

As demonstrated in Case II, long-range transport of SSA can become dominant when air masses at elevated altitudes are decoupled from those at the ground. In this case, vertical and horizontal trajectory analysis suggests that the measured SSA constituents may have been emitted and incorporated into the atmosphere approximately 48 h earlier over the Barents Sea, near Franz Josef Land. Typical removal processes of supermicron particles, such as dry and wet deposition or cloud droplet activation, likely reduced the atmospheric concentrations of major inorganic ions and CCHOaer by one to two orders of magnitude before the arrival of the air masses in Ny-Ålesund (Fig. 5b).

In several balloon-borne TSP filter samples, an elevated CCHOaer/Naaer+ ratio was observed, most notably on 24 September 2021; 3 October 2021 (Case III) and 3 April 2022 (see Fig. 2d). These values far exceeded both ground-based aerosol measurements from this study and previously reported values (Zeppenfeld et al., 2021, 2023), particularly for supermicron SSA particles that dominate the TSP mass. A slight increase of this ratio may be explained by a longer atmospheric residence time of these particles. This leads to a relative reduction of supermicron aerosol particles, typically dominated by sea salt (O'Dowd and de Leeuw, 2007), through deposition (Croft et al., 2009; Hoppel et al., 2002). In contrast, submicron aerosol particles, which are rich in surface-active CCHO, remain. This process could lead to a shift of the CCHOaer/Naaer+ ratios more characteristic of submicron than supermicron particles in the TSP samples of this study, as seen in Case II.

However, for the three cases with the most pronounced increases in CCHOaer/Naaer+ ratios in TSP at higher altitudes (24 September 2021; 3 October 2021; 3 April 2022), absolute CCHOaer concentrations were also elevated (compare Fig. 2b and d). Such increases in absolute concentrations cannot be explained by the selective removal of supermicron particles as hypothesized above. This raises the question of whether the observed CCHOaer concentrations could result from the long-range transport of SSA compounds from a distant marine source with significantly higher CCHO levels than the local Kongsfjorden.

Model simulations using FESOM2.1-REcoM3 (Gürses et al., 2023) (Fig. S6) and field data (Assmy et al., 2023; Feltracco et al., 2021; Grosse et al., 2021; Wietz et al., 2024) confirm that the eastern Fram Strait as well as coastal Svalbard waters are productive and polysaccharide-rich regions. While the FESOM2.1-REcoM3 model does not resolve the SML separately, previous studies have shown significant CCHO enrichment in this layer (Compiano et al., 1993; Engel and Galgani, 2016; Gao et al., 2012; Zäncker et al., 2021), particularly in the productive marginal ice zone (Zeppenfeld et al., 2023). However, in cases of high CCHOaer at higher altitudes in this study, air mass trajectories did not pass over any of these productive marine regions within 48 h before reaching Svalbard (Fig. S7). These findings suggest that long-range transport of SSA from more productive remote marine sources is unlikely to explain the elevated CCHOaer concentrations at elevated altitudes within the lower troposphere in Ny-Ålesund, further supporting a predominantly local source or atmospheric in-situ formation.

In summary, while long-range transport of SSA constituents at elevated altitudes appears relevant in cases of decoupled atmospheric layers such as in Case II, it may not explain the significantly higher CCHOaer concentrations at high altitudes compared to ground levels. Instead, in-situ formation of CCHOaer could be a more plausible explanation for these observations.

3.3.2 Atmospheric in-situ formation of marine CCHOaer

Bacteria can be transported into and persist in the Arctic atmosphere (Jensen et al., 2022; Šantl-Temkiv et al., 2018), with sources including terrestrial environments and surface seawater, particularly the SML (Aller et al., 2005). Our complementary microbiological sampling during our campaign supported such dynamics by detecting diverse marine bacteria in aerosol particles (Wietz et al., 2025). Some aerosolized taxa, for instance Polaribacter, encode multiple genes for CCHO metabolism (Avcı et al., 2020) and consistently occur in both Kongsfjorden seawater and atmosphere during the spring bloom (Feltracco et al., 2021). These observations might underpin microbial CCHO transformations in the atmosphere, for instance the production of polysaccharide-based gels as protection against temperature fluctuations, salinity changes, and desiccation (Aller et al., 2005; Ramasamy et al., 2023; Šantl-Temkiv et al., 2022). Under highly humid conditions, especially in the presence of liquid water (such as in Case III), airborne bacteria can become metabolically active (Ervens and Amato, 2020; Haddrell and Thomas, 2017). Atmospheric OM formation, including CCHO, through microbial activity has been documented for cloud water and aerosol particles (Bianco et al., 2019; Klein et al., 2016; Matulová et al., 2014). Although substantial uncertainties remain, Zeppenfeld et al. (2021) estimated, depending on parameter choice, residence times between 20 min and several hundred hours during which measurable microbial transformation of carbohydrates in the atmosphere may occur. Consequently, metabolically active bacteria in the atmosphere could explain the increased CCHOaer concentrations observed within or near drizzling clouds in Case III of this study.

3.3.3 CCHOaer versus oxalateaer: Co-production or atmospheric processing?

Since both combined glucose and combined xylose were consistently detected in CCHOaer of nearly all aerosol samples, we examined their correlation with other atmospheric chemical parameters. We observed a strong correlation between atmospheric xylose in CCHOaer and oxalateaer with an R=0.78 (p<0.001) across all sampling locations and heights (Fig. 7). Oxalate, the ionic form of oxalic acid, is the most abundant dicarboxylic acid in aerosol particles (Kerminen et al., 1999; Rinaldi et al., 2011), with atmospheric concentrations in this study between <1 and 67 ng m−3. The strong correlation raised the question of whether oxalic acid could be chemically linked to combined carbohydrates in aerosol particles.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/7235/2026/acp-26-7235-2026-f07

Figure 7Atmospheric oxalate as a function of xylose in CCHOaer (R=0.78; p<0.001) measured in TSP from the Old Pier (orange circles), the winch site (blue triangles) and at elevated altitudes (red squares).

Download

Oxalateaer is known to originate from several primary sources and secondary formation pathways in both terrestrial and anthropogenic environments (Kawamura and Bikkina, 2016; Yang et al., 2022). In remote marine environments, the atmospheric formation of oxalic acid was proposed by Warneck (2003) through the aqueous-phase oxidation of glyoxal and glycolaldehyde, a process also investigated by field measurements inside and above marine clouds (Crahan et al., 2004; Sorooshian et al., 2007) and modeling (Herrmann et al., 2005; Tilgner and Herrmann, 2010). The possible aqueous-phase formation was supported by Case III of this study, where higher oxalateaer concentrations were observed within and in vicinity of clouds compared to ground level. In contrast, in the drier conditions of Cases I and II, oxalateaer levels remained vertically uniform. Additionally, since overall oxalateaer levels at the Old Pier (1.1–10.1 ng m−3; mean =4.3±3.5 ng m−3) were relatively low compared to the more inland Winch (< 1–58 ng m−3; mean =19.8±16.2 ng m−3) and elevated altitudes samples (4.6–67 ng m−3; mean =29.6±17.8 ng m−3), direct primary oceanic emission was likely not its dominant source.

But what are the precursors of glyoxal and glycolaldehyde, the precursors of oxalic acid? While Warneck (2003) suggested that the anthropogenic volatile organic compounds acetylene and ethene can be transformed to atmospheric glyoxal, other studies suggest the photochemical degradation of marine OM (McNeill, 2015; Sinreich et al., 2010; Turekian et al., 2003; Zhou et al., 2014), with oligo- and polysaccharides representing a known subclass. Although not explicitly measured in this study, previous findings have shown that both CCHOaer (Leck et al., 2013; Zeppenfeld et al., 2021, 2023) and oxalateaer (Guo et al., 2016; Rinaldi et al., 2011; Turekian et al., 2003) are present across both the accumulation and coarse size modes. However, no consistently dominant size mode has been identified, which may support a common mechanism of formation or similar atmospheric processing pathways.

Here, based on known chemical reactions, we propose possible atmospheric pathways linking xylose-containing oligo-and polysaccharides as the precursors to oxalate as the final product (Fig. 8). The initial depolymerization of CCHO presumably occurs either via enzymatic degradation, e.g. by glycoside hydrolases, or acid hydrolysis (Panagiotopoulos and Sempéré, 2005), both of which are plausible in the atmospheric context. Active microbial enzymes have been detected in SSA, often exhibiting activities 1–2 orders of magnitude higher than in bulk seawater (Malfatti et al., 2019). Additionally, SSA particles are known for reaching very low pH levels within minutes after their emissions due to the uptake and reactions with acidic gases, as well as water loss (Angle et al., 2022, 2021). Furthermore, although not explicitly investigated in an atmospheric context, Zhu et al. (2023) observed rapid depolymerization of xylose-containing oligosaccharides into the monosaccharide xylose within minutes in a UV/H2O2 system, which generates hydroxyl radicals.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/7235/2026/acp-26-7235-2026-f08

Figure 8Possible pathways for the formation of atmospheric oxalate from xylose in combined carbohydrates in marine aerosol particles.

Download

With one exception, free xylose was never detected in any aerosol sample of this study. This suggests two possible explanations. First, xylose may have remained bound within the CCHOaer fraction and was not released into its free form. In this case, it would indicate co-emission without a chemical pathway leading to oxalate. Second, free xylose may have been rapidly processed in the atmosphere via reactions described below.

Two potential pathways may link monomeric xylose to precursors of Warneck's oxalate formation: (1) a follow-up reaction with hydroxyl radicals, where the pyranose ring of xylose is cleaved after the more susceptible glycosidic bonds have been readily broken. Zhu et al. (2023) observed glycolic acid and glyoxylic acid among other products following the UV/H2O2 treatment of xylooligosaccharides. (2) Bacterial metabolism via the Dahms pathway converting free xylose into pyruvate and glycolaldehyde (Dahms, 1974). However, only few bacteria encode this pathway; and it is highly questionable whether these occur in sufficient atmospheric concentrations for a measurable effect.

One indication that direct formation from xylose-containing oligo- and polysaccharides cannot be the sole source of atmospheric oxalate in the marine environment is the discrepancy in concentrations: atmospheric oxalate levels were seven times higher than those of combined xylose. This confirms the involvement of additional precursors or a co-production/co-emission of combined xylose with gaseous precursors, such as isoprene (Carlton et al., 2009; Kawamura and Bikkina, 2016), or other primary marine organic matter, such as phytoplankton-derived fatty acids (Kawamura et al., 1996a, b) undergoing photo-oxidation. Further targeted laboratory and modeling studies are needed for clarity.

4 Summary and Atmospheric Implications

In autumn 2021 and spring 2022, we performed balloon-borne measurements of major SSA constituents at Ny-Ålesund (Svalbard). Our evidence demonstrated that both sodium and marine CCHO reach elevated altitudes within the boundary layer, and even the free troposphere as part of aerosol particles. The relationship between ground-level and high-altitude measurements was strongly influenced by meteorological conditions and the mixing state of the lower atmosphere, as discussed in three representative cases. Long-range transport of Naaer+ and CCHOaer from remote marine sources is presumably relevant for high-altitude measurements, especially when the upper air masses were decoupled from the ground. However, in cases of a well-mixed lower atmosphere, the local marine source (here, the Kongsfjorden) was the dominant contributor for atmospheric Naaer+ and CCHOaer. Under very humid conditions particularly in the presence of liquid precipitating clouds, in-situ formation of CCHOaer was observed, possibly linked to microbial metabolism. To establish more generalizable patterns, we recommend further field studies using airborne platforms.

The significant correlation between combined xylose within CCHOaer, and oxalateaer suggests underlying pathways for oxalic acid formation from combined xylose and other monosaccharide units within CCHOaer; alternatively, a co-production of xylose-containing oligo- and polysaccharides alongside oxalate precursors.

Cloud condensation nuclei and ice-nucleating particles are key drivers in cloud formation, influencing radiative and precipitation properties and, consequently, climate processes. Considerable uncertainties remain regarding the origin and chemical composition of these particles, particularly in remote Arctic regions, which affects the accuracy of climate models. Since marine polysaccharides have been identified as relevant ice-nucleating molecules in the remote marine atmosphere (Hartmann et al., 2025), our findings have implications for cloud microphysics, especially given that these carbohydrates are transported to altitudes relevant for cloud formation. Furthermore, atmospheric processing, as observed here, may alter the ice-nucleating properties of these macromolecules, potentially creating new ice-nucleating particles in-situ or deactivating existing ones.

As the Arctic continues to change, expanding ice-free ocean areas will serve as emission sources for SSA particles, influencing cloud properties, and finally the radiative budget. Consequently, our findings contribute to an improved understanding of the complex interplay of environmental processes resulting in Arctic amplification.

Data availability

Chemical data from offline TSP filters are publicly available in PANGAEA for seawater (https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.982606, Zeppenfeld and Schmidt, 2025) and aerosol particles (https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.982703, Zeppenfeld et al., 2025). The microwave radiometer LWP and IWV data are available in PANGAEA (https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.943004, Ebell and Ritter, 2022). The Cloudnet classification and ice water content products (https://doi.org/10.60656/5598100185854c01, Ebell et al., 2025) can be downloaded via the ACTRIS Cloudnet data portal (https://cloudnet.fmi.fi, last access: 19 March 2025).

Supplement

The supplement related to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7235-2026-supplement.

Author contributions

SZ wrote the manuscript with input from all co-authors. SZ, JS, CP, HS, BW, MW, and MvP collected field samples in Ny-Ålesund. HS and BW served as principal investigators for balloon operations during the field campaign. SZ conducted the laboratory carbohydrate analyses and data processing. MZ and AB carried out the FESOM2.1-REcoM3 simulations. KE assessed cloud conditions for the case studies using remote sensing data. All co-authors reviewed and commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.

Disclaimer

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to Kings Bay and the AWIPEV staff, with special thanks to the station leader Grégory Tran, for their invaluable support to make this field study possible. We furthermore thank the AWIPEV station's scientific staff in ensuring the availability of high-quality meteorological data. In this context, we like to give special thanks to Fieke Rader and Marion Maturilli. The cloud observations were taken within the project AWIPEV_0016.

We also thank the scientific team at the Zeppelin Observatory from NILU and NPI, with special appreciation to Wenche Aas, for their dedicated work in monitoring aerosol data.

Furthermore, we acknowledge the entire BELUGA team for their contributions during both the autumn 2021 and spring 2022 campaigns, with special thanks to Thomas Conrath. We also thank Michel Michalkow for preprocessing the CAMP and standard meteorological data collected at BELUGA as part of his Master's thesis. We are grateful to René Rabe for preparing the campaign equipment and to Leon Schmidt for conducting the chemical analysis of inorganic ions. We thank Johannes Röttenbacher for his constructive feedback on the manuscript.

For the FESOM2.1-REcoM3 simulation for this research, the authors gratefully acknowledge the computing time granted by the Resource Allocation Board and provided on the supercomputer Lise and Emmy at NHR@ZIB and NHR@Göttingen as part of the NHR infrastructure. The calculations for this research were conducted with computing resources under the project hbk00084.

Financial support

This research has been supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation, project no. 268020496-TRR 172) within the Transregional Collaborative Research Center “ArctiC Amplification: Climate Relevant Atmospheric and SurfaCe Processes, and Feedback Mechanisms (AC)3” in subprojects A02, B04, C03 and E02. MW was supported by the DFG Priority Program SPP 1158 “Antarctic Research with comparative investigations in Arctic ice areas” (grant 522416631).

Review statement

This paper was edited by Chiara Giorio and reviewed by four anonymous referees.

References

Aas, W., Berglen, T. F., Eckhardt, S., Fiebig, M., Solberg, S., and Yttri, K. E.: Monitoring of long-range transported air pollutants in Norway – Annual Report 2021, NILU, ISBN 978-82-425-3088-2, 2022. 

Aas, W., Eckhardt, S., Solberg, S., and Yttri, K. E.: Monitoring of long-range transported air pollutants in Norway. Annual Report 2022, NILU, ISBN 978-82-425-3122-3, 2023. 

Akansu, E. F., Dahlke, S., Siebert, H., and Wendisch, M.: Evaluation of methods to determine the surface mixing layer height of the atmospheric boundary layer in the central Arctic during polar night and transition to polar day in cloudless and cloudy conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15473–15489, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15473-2023, 2023. 

Aller, J. Y., Kuznetsova, M. R., Jahns, C. J., and Kemp, P. F.: The sea surface microlayer as a source of viral and bacterial enrichment in marine aerosols, J. Aerosol. Sci., 36, 801–812, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.10.012, 2005. 

Aller, J. Y., Radway, J. C., Kilthau, W. P., Bothe, D. W., Wilson, T. W., Vaillancourt, R. D., Quinn, P. K., Coffman, D. J., Murray, B. J., and Knopf, D. A.: Size-resolved characterization of the polysaccharidic and proteinaceous components of sea spray aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 154, 331–347, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.053, 2017. 

Alpert, P. A., Kilthau, W. P., O'Brien, R. E., Moffet, R. C., Gilles, M. K., Wang, B., Laskin, A., Aller, J. Y., and Knopf, D. A.: Ice-nucleating agents in sea spray aerosol identified and quantified with a holistic multimodal freezing model, Sci. Adv., 8, eabq6842, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq6842, 2022. 

Aluwihare, L. I., Repeta, D. J., and Chen, R. F.: A major biopolymeric component to dissolved organic carbon in surface sea water, Nature, 387, 166–169, https://doi.org/10.1038/387166a0, 1997. 

Amore, A., Giardi, F., Becagli, S., Caiazzo, L., Mazzola, M., Severi, M., and Traversi, R.: Source apportionment of sulphate in the High Arctic by a 10 yr-long record from Gruvebadet Observatory (Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard Islands), Atmos. Environ., 270, 118890, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118890, 2022. 

Angle, K., Grassian, V. H., and Ault, A. P.: The rapid acidification of sea spray aerosols, Phys. Today, 75, 58–59, https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.4926, 2022. 

Angle, K. J., Crocker, D. R., Simpson, R. M. C., Mayer, K. J., Garofalo, L. A., Moore, A. N., Garcia, S. L. M., Or, V. W., Srinivasan, S., Farhan, M., Sauer, J. S., Lee, C., Pothier, M. A., Farmer, D. K., Martz, T. R., Bertram, T. H., Cappa, C. D., Prather, K. A., and Grassian, V. H.: Acidity across the interface from the ocean surface to sea spray aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 118, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2018397118, 2021. 

Arnosti, C., Wietz, M., Brinkhoff, T., Hehemann, J.-H., Probandt, D., Zeugner, L., and Amann, R.: The Biogeochemistry of Marine Polysaccharides: Sources, Inventories, and Bacterial Drivers of the Carbohydrate Cycle, Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci., 13, 81–108, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-032020-012810, 2021. 

Assmy, P., Cecilie Kvernvik, A., Hop, H., Hoppe, C. J. M., Chierici, M., David T., D., Duarte, P., Fransson, A., García, L. M., Patuła, W., Kwaśniewski, S., Maturilli, M., Pavlova, O., Tatarek, A., Wiktor, J. M., Wold, A., Wolf, K. K. E., and Bailey, A.: Seasonal plankton dynamics in Kongsfjorden during two years of contrasting environmental conditions, Prog. Oceanogr., 213, 102996, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2023.102996, 2023. 

Avcı, B., Krüger, K., Fuchs, B. M., Teeling, H., and Amann, R. I.: Polysaccharide niche partitioning of distinct Polaribacter clades during North Sea spring algal blooms, ISME J., 14, 1369–1383, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-0601-y, 2020. 

Barthelmeß, T., Cristi, A., Deppeler, S., Safi, K., Sellegri, K., Law, C. S., and Engel, A.: Pronounced Diel Cycling of Dissolved Carbohydrates and Amino Acids in the Surface Ocean and across Diverse Regimes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 59, 419–429, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c00491, 2025. 

Becker, S., Tebben, J., Coffinet, S., Wiltshire, K., Iversen, M. H., Harder, T., Hinrichs, K.-U., and Hehemann, J.-H.: Laminarin is a major molecule in the marine carbon cycle, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 117, 6599–6607, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1917001117, 2020. 

Bianco, A., Deguillaume, L., Chaumerliac, N., Vaïtilingom, M., Wang, M., Delort, A.-M., and Bridoux, M. C.: Effect of endogenous microbiota on the molecular composition of cloud water: a study by Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS), Sci. Rep., 9, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44149-8, 2019. 

Bischof, K., Convey, P., Duarte, P., Gattuso, J.-P., Granberg, M., Hop, H., Hoppe, C., Jiménez, C., Lisitsyn, L., Martinez, B., Roleda, M. Y., Thor, P., Wiktor, J. M., and Gabrielsen, G. W.: Kongsfjorden as Harbinger of the Future Arctic: Knowns, Unknowns and Research Priorities, in: The Ecosystem of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard, edited by: Hop, H. and Wiencke, C., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 537–562, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46425-1_14, 2019. 

Bivand, R., Pebesma, E., and Gomez-Rubio, V.: Applied spatial data analysis with R, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7618-4, 2013. 

Bivand, R., Keitt, T., and Rowlingson, B.: rgdal: Bindings for the “Geospatial” Data Abstraction Library, R package version 1.5-32, https://cran.r-project.org/package=rgdal (last access: 30 May 2023), 2022. 

Borch, N. H. and Kirchman, D. L.: Concentration and composition of dissolved combined neutral sugars (polysaccharides) in seawater determined by HPLC-PAD, Mar. Chem., 57, 85–95, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(97)00002-9, 1997. 

Brownrigg, M. R.: Package `mapdata', R package version 2.3.1, CRAN, https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.mapdata, 2013. 

Brownrigg, M. R.: maps: Draw Geographical Maps, R package version 3.4.2, CRAN, https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.maps, 2023. 

Browse, J., Carslaw, K. S., Mann, G. W., Birch, C. E., Arnold, S. R., and Leck, C.: The complex response of Arctic aerosol to sea-ice retreat, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7543–7557, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7543-2014, 2014. 

Burns, W. G., Marchetti, A., and Ziervogel, K.: Enhanced formation of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) under turbulence during phytoplankton growth, J. Plankton Res., 41, 349–361, https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbz018, 2019. 

Burrows, S. M., Ogunro, O., Frossard, A. A., Russell, L. M., Rasch, P. J., and Elliott, S. M.: A physically based framework for modeling the organic fractionation of sea spray aerosol from bubble film Langmuir equilibria, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13601–13629, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13601-2014, 2014. 

Cai, Q., Wang, J., Beletsky, D., Overland, J., Ikeda, M., and Wan, L.: Accelerated decline of summer Arctic sea ice during 1850–2017 and the amplified Arctic warming during the recent decades, Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 034015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abdb5f, 2021. 

Carlton, A. G., Wiedinmyer, C., and Kroll, J. H.: A review of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4987–5005, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009, 2009. 

Carslaw, D. C. and Ropkins, K.: openair – An R package for air quality data analysis, Environ. Modell. Softw., 27–28, 52–61, https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.openair, 2012. 

Chang, L., Song, S., Feng, G., Zhang, Y., and Gao, G.: Assessment of the Uncertainties in Arctic Low-Level Temperature Inversion Characteristics in Radio Occultation Observations, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 55, 1793–1803, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2633461, 2017. 

Chi, J. W., Li, W. J., Zhang, D. Z., Zhang, J. C., Lin, Y. T., Shen, X. J., Sun, J. Y., Chen, J. M., Zhang, X. Y., Zhang, Y. M., and Wang, W. X.: Sea salt aerosols as a reactive surface for inorganic and organic acidic gases in the Arctic troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11341–11353, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11341-2015, 2015. 

Compiano, A.-M., Romano, J.-C., Garabetian, F., Laborde, P., and de la Giraudièrea, I.: Monosaccharide composition of particulate hydrolysable sugar fraction in surface microlayers from brackish and marine waters, Mar. Chem., 42, 237–251, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(93)90015-G, 1993. 

Crahan, K. K., Hegg, D., Covert, D. S., and Jonsson, H.: An exploration of aqueous oxalic acid production in the coastal marine atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 38, 3757–3764, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.04.009, 2004. 

Creamean, J. M., de Boer, G., Telg, H., Mei, F., Dexheimer, D., Shupe, M. D., Solomon, A., and McComiskey, A.: Assessing the vertical structure of Arctic aerosols using balloon-borne measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1737–1757, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1737-2021, 2021. 

Croft, B., Lohmann, U., Martin, R. V., Stier, P., Wurzler, S., Feichter, J., Posselt, R., and Ferrachat, S.: Aerosol size-dependent below-cloud scavenging by rain and snow in the ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4653–4675, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4653-2009, 2009. 

Cunliffe, M. and Wurl, O.: Guide to best practices to study the ocean's surface, J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK, 118 pp., https://doi.org/10.25607/OBP-1512, 2014. 

Dahms, A. S.: 3-Deoxy-D-pentulosonic acid aldolase and its role in a new pathway of D-xylose degradation, Biochem. Bioph. Res. Co., 60, 1433–1439, https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(74)90358-1, 1974. 

Dekhtyareva, A., Holmén, K., Maturilli, M., Hermansen, O., and Graversen, R.: Effect of seasonal mesoscale and microscale meteorological conditions in Ny-Ålesund on results of monitoring of long-range transported pollution, Polar Res., 2018. 

DeMott, P. J., Hill, T. C. J., McCluskey, C. S., Prather, K. A., Collins, D. B., Sullivan, R. C., Ruppel, M. J., Mason, R. H., Irish, V. E., Lee, T., Hwang, C. Y., Rhee, T. S., Snider, J. R., McMeeking, G. R., Dhaniyala, S., Lewis, E. R., Wentzell, J. J. B., Abbatt, J., Lee, C., Sultana, C. M., Ault, A. P., Axson, J. L., Martinez, M. D., Venero, I., Santos-Figueroa, G., Stokes, M. D., Deane, G. B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Grassian, V. H., Bertram, T. H., Bertram, A. K., Moffett, B. F., and Franc, G. D.: Sea spray aerosol as a unique source of ice nucleating particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 113, 5797–5803, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514034112, 2016. 

Dusek, U., Frank, G. P., Hildebrandt, L., Curtius, J., Schneider, J., Walter, S., Chand, D., Drewnick, F., Hings, S., Jung, D., Borrmann, S., and Andreae, M. O.: Size Matters More Than Chemistry for Cloud-Nucleating Ability of Aerosol Particles, Science, 312, 1375–1378, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125261, 2006. 

Ebell, K. and Ritter, C.: HATPRO microwave radiometer measurements at AWIPEV, Ny-Ålesund (2019–2021), PANGAEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.943004, 2022. 

Ebell, K., Maturilli, M., Ritter, C., and O'Connor, E.: Custom collection of classification, and ice water content data from Ny-Ålesund between 27 Sep and 12 Nov 2021, ACTRIS Cloud Remote Sensing Data Centre Unit (CLU), https://doi.org/10.60656/5598100185854c01, 2025. 

Egerer, U., Ehrlich, A., Gottschalk, M., Griesche, H., Neggers, R. A. J., Siebert, H., and Wendisch, M.: Case study of a humidity layer above Arctic stratocumulus and potential turbulent coupling with the cloud top, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6347–6364, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6347-2021, 2021. 

Egerer, U., Siebert, H., Hellmuth, O., and Sørensen, L. L.: The role of a low-level jet for stirring the stable atmospheric surface layer in the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15365–15373, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15365-2023, 2023. 

Engel, A.: Distribution of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the northeast Atlantic Ocean and their potential significance for aggregation processes, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 51, 83–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2003.09.001, 2004. 

Engel, A. and Händel, N.: A novel protocol for determining the concentration and composition of sugars in particulate and in high molecular weight dissolved organic matter (HMW-DOM) in seawater, Mar. Chem., 127, 180–191, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2011.09.004, 2011. 

Engel, A. and Galgani, L.: The organic sea-surface microlayer in the upwelling region off the coast of Peru and potential implications for air–sea exchange processes, Biogeosciences, 13, 989–1007, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-989-2016, 2016. 

Engel, A., Thoms, S., Riebesell, U., Rochelle-Newall, E., and Zondervan, I.: Polysaccharide aggregation as a potential sink of marine dissolved organic carbon, Nature, 428, 929–932, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02453, 2004. 

Engel, A., Harlay, J., Piontek, J., and Chou, L.: Contribution of combined carbohydrates to dissolved and particulate organic carbon after the spring bloom in the northern Bay of Biscay (North-Eastern Atlantic Ocean), Cont. Shelf Res., 45, 42–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2012.05.016, 2012. 

Ervens, B. and Amato, P.: The global impact of bacterial processes on carbon mass, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1777–1794, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1777-2020, 2020. 

Esau, I. and Repina, I.: Wind Climate in Kongsfjorden, Svalbard, and Attribution of Leading Wind Driving Mechanisms through Turbulence-Resolving Simulations, Adv. Meteorol., 2012, 568454, https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/568454, 2012. 

Fabiano, M., Povero, P., and Danovaro, R.: Distribution and composition of particulate organic matter in the Ross Sea (Antarctica), Polar Biol., 13, 525–533, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236394, 1993. 

Facchini, M. C., Rinaldi, M., Decesari, S., Carbone, C., Finessi, E., Mircea, M., Fuzzi, S., Ceburnis, D., Flanagan, R., Nilsson, E. D., Leeuw, G. de, Martino, M., Woeltjen, J., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Primary submicron marine aerosol dominated by insoluble organic colloids and aggregates, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034210, 2008. 

Farmer, D. K., Cappa, C. D., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Atmospheric Processes and Their Controlling Influence on Cloud Condensation Nuclei Activity, Chem. Rev., 115, 4199–4217, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006292, 2015. 

Farmer, D. K., Boedicker, E. K., and DeBolt, H. M.: Dry Deposition of Atmospheric Aerosols: Approaches, Observations, and Mechanisms, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 72, 375–397, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-090519-034936, 2021. 

Feltracco, M., Barbaro, E., Hoppe, C. J. M., Wolf, K. K. E., Spolaor, A., Layton, R., Keuschnig, C., Barbante, C., Gambaro, A., and Larose, C.: Airborne bacteria and particulate chemistry capture Phytoplankton bloom dynamics in an Arctic fjord, Atmos. Environ., 256, 118458, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118458, 2021. 

Fomba, K. W., Müller, K., van Pinxteren, D., Poulain, L., van Pinxteren, M., and Herrmann, H.: Long-term chemical characterization of tropical and marine aerosols at the Cape Verde Atmospheric Observatory (CVAO) from 2007 to 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8883–8904, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8883-2014, 2014. 

Francis, J. A. and Wu, B.: Why has no new record-minimum Arctic sea-ice extent occurred since September 2012?, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 114034, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc047, 2020. 

Freud, E., Krejci, R., Tunved, P., Leaitch, R., Nguyen, Q. T., Massling, A., Skov, H., and Barrie, L.: Pan-Arctic aerosol number size distributions: seasonality and transport patterns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8101–8128, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8101-2017, 2017. 

Furukawa, T. and Takahashi, Y.: Oxalate metal complexes in aerosol particles: implications for the hygroscopicity of oxalate-containing particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4289–4301, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4289-2011, 2011. 

Gantt, B., Meskhidze, N., Facchini, M. C., Rinaldi, M., Ceburnis, D., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Wind speed dependent size-resolved parameterization for the organic mass fraction of sea spray aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8777–8790, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8777-2011, 2011. 

Gao, Q., Leck, C., Rauschenberg, C., and Matrai, P. A.: On the chemical dynamics of extracellular polysaccharides in the high Arctic surface microlayer, Ocean Sci., 8, 401–418, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-401-2012, 2012. 

Gierens, R., Kneifel, S., Shupe, M. D., Ebell, K., Maturilli, M., and Löhnert, U.: Low-level mixed-phase clouds in a complex Arctic environment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3459–3481, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3459-2020, 2020. 

Goldberg, S. J., Carlson, C. A., Brzezinski, M., Nelson, N. B., and Siegel, D. A.: Systematic removal of neutral sugars within dissolved organic matter across ocean basins, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048620, 2011. 

Grawe, S., Jentzsch, C., Schaefer, J., Wex, H., Mertes, S., and Stratmann, F.: Next-generation ice-nucleating particle sampling on board aircraft: characterization of the High-volume flow aERosol particle filter sAmpler (HERA), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 4551–4570, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4551-2023, 2023. 

Grolemund, G. and Wickham, H.: Dates and Times Made Easy with lubridate, J. Stat. Softw., 40, 1–25, 2011. 

Grosse, J., Nöthig, E.-M., Torres-Valdés, S., and Engel, A.: Summertime Amino Acid and Carbohydrate Patterns in Particulate and Dissolved Organic Carbon Across Fram Strait, Front. Mar. Sci., 8, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.684675, 2021. 

Guo, T., Li, K., Zhu, Y., Gao, H., and Yao, X.: Concentration and size distribution of particulate oxalate in marine and coastal atmospheres – Implication for the increased importance of oxalate in nanometer atmospheric particles, Atmos. Environ., 142, 19–31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.026, 2016. 

Gürses, Ö., Oziel, L., Karakuş, O., Sidorenko, D., Völker, C., Ye, Y., Zeising, M., Butzin, M., and Hauck, J.: Ocean biogeochemistry in the coupled ocean–sea ice–biogeochemistry model FESOM2.1–REcoM3, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4883–4936, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4883-2023, 2023. 

Haddrell, A. E. and Thomas, R. J.: Aerobiology: Experimental Considerations, Observations, and Future Tools, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 83, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00809-17, 2017. 

Hansell, D. A.: Recalcitrant Dissolved Organic Carbon Fractions, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 5, 421–445, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100757, 2013. 

Hara, K., Yamagata, S., Yamanouchi, T., Sato, K., Herber, A., Iwasaka, Y., Nagatani, M., and Nakata, H.: Mixing states of individual aerosol particles in spring Arctic troposphere during ASTAR 2000 campaign, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002513, 2003. 

Hartmann, S., Schrödner, R., Hassett, B. T., Hartmann, M., van Pinxteren, M., Fomba, K. W., Stratmann, F., Herrmann, H., Pöhlker, M., and Zeppenfeld, S.: Polysaccharides-Important Constituents of Ice-Nucleating Particles of Marine Origin, Environ. Sci. Technol., 59, 5098–5108, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c08014, 2025. 

Hasenecz, E., Jayarathne, T., Pendergraft, M. A., Santander, M. V., Mayer, K. J., Sauer, J., Lee, C., Gibson, W. S., Kruse, S. M., Malfatti, F., Prather, K. A., and Stone, E. A.: Marine bacteria affect saccharide enrichment in sea spray aerosol during a phytoplankton bloom, ACS Earth Space Chem., 4, 1638–1649, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00167, 2020. 

Hasenecz, E. S., Kaluarachchi, C. P., Lee, H. D., Tivanski, A. V., and Stone, E. A.: Saccharide Transfer to Sea Spray Aerosol Enhanced by Surface Activity, Calcium, and Protein Interactions, ACS Earth Space Chem., 3, 2539–2548, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00197, 2019. 

Herrmann, H., Tilgner, A., Barzaghi, P., Majdik, Z., Gligorovski, S., Poulain, L., and Monod, A.: Towards a more detailed description of tropospheric aqueous phase organic chemistry: CAPRAM 3.0, Atmos. Environ., 39, 4351–4363, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.02.016, 2005. 

Heutte, B., Bergner, N., Angot, H., Pernov, J. B., Dada, L., Mirrielees, J. A., Beck, I., Baccarini, A., Boyer, M., Creamean, J. M., Daellenbach, K. R., El Haddad, I., Frey, M. M., Henning, S., Laurila, T., Moschos, V., Petäjä, T., Pratt, K. A., Quéléver, L. L. J., Shupe, M. D., Zieger, P., Jokinen, T., and Schmale, J.: Observations of high-time-resolution and size-resolved aerosol chemical composition and microphysics in the central Arctic: implications for climate-relevant particle properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2207–2241, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2207-2025, 2025. 

Hijmans, R. J.: raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling, R package version 3.6-26, CRAN, https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.raster, 2023. 

Hill, T. C. J., Malfatti, F., McCluskey, C. S., Schill, G. P., Santander, M. V., Moore, K. A., Rauker, A. M., Perkins, R. J., Celussi, M., Levin, E. J. T., Suski, K. J., Cornwell, G. C., Lee, C., Negro, P. D., Kreidenweis, S. M., Prather, K. A., and DeMott, P. J.: Resolving the controls over the production and emission of ice-nucleating particles in sea spray, Environ. Sci.-Atmos., https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EA00154C, 2023. 

Hoffman, E. J. and Duce, R. A.: Factors influencing the organic carbon content of marine aerosols: A laboratory study, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 3667–3670, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC081i021p03667, 1976. 

Hogan, R. J., Mittermaier, M. P., and Illingworth, A. J.: The Retrieval of Ice Water Content from Radar Reflectivity Factor and Temperature and Its Use in Evaluating a Mesoscale Model, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 45, 301–317, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2340.1, 2006. 

Hoppel, W. A., Frick, G. M., and Fitzgerald, J. W.: Surface source function for sea-salt aerosol and aerosol dry deposition to the ocean surface, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, AAC 7-1–AAC 7-17, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD002014, 2002. 

Illingworth, A. J., Hogan, R. J., O'Connor, E. J., Bouniol, D., Brooks, M. E., Delanoé, J., Donovan, D. P., Eastment, J. D., Gaussiat, N., Goddard, J. W. F., Haeffelin, M., Baltink, H. K., Krasnov, O. A., Pelon, J., Piriou, J.-M., Protat, A., Russchenberg, H. W. J., Seifert, A., Tompkins, A. M., Zadelhoff, G.-J. van, Vinit, F., Willén, U., Wilson, D. R., and Wrench, C. L.: Cloudnet: Continuous Evaluation of Cloud Profiles in Seven Operational Models Using Ground-Based Observations, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 883–898, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-6-883, 2007. 

Ittekkot, V., Brockmann, U., Michaelis, W., and Degens, E. T.: Dissolved free and combined carbohydrates during a phytoplankton bloom in the northern North Sea, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 4, 299–305, 1981. 

Jayarathne, T., Sultana, C. M., Lee, C., Malfatti, F., Cox, J. L., Pendergraft, M. A., Moore, K. A., Azam, F., Tivanski, A. V., Cappa, C. D., Bertram, T. H., Grassian, V. H., Prather, K. A., and Stone, E. A.: Enrichment of Saccharides and Divalent Cations in Sea Spray Aerosol During Two Phytoplankton Blooms, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 11511–11520, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02988, 2016. 

Jensen, L. Z., Glasius, M., Gryning, S.-E., Massling, A., Finster, K., and Šantl-Temkiv, T.: Seasonal Variation of the Atmospheric Bacterial Community in the Greenlandic High Arctic Is Influenced by Weather Events and Local and Distant Sources, Front. Microbiol., 13, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.909980, 2022. 

Kang, H., Jung, C. H., Lee, B. Y., Krejci, R., Heslin-Rees, D., Aas, W., and Yoon, Y. J.: Aerosol hygroscopicity influenced by seasonal chemical composition variations in the Arctic region, J. Aerosol. Sci., 106551, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2025.106551, 2025. 

Kanji, Z. A., Ladino, L. A., Wex, H., Boose, Y., Burkert-Kohn, M., Cziczo, D. J., and Krämer, M.: Overview of Ice Nucleating Particles, Meteor. Mon., 58, 1.1–1.33, https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1, 2017. 

Karl, M., Leck, C., Rad, F. M., Bäcklund, A., Lopez-Aparicio, S., and Heintzenberg, J.: New insights in sources of the sub-micrometre aerosol at Mt. Zeppelin observatory (Spitsbergen) in the year 2015, Tellus B, 71, 1613143, https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2019.1613143, 2019. 

Kawamura, K. and Bikkina, S.: A review of dicarboxylic acids and related compounds in atmospheric aerosols: Molecular distributions, sources and transformation, Atmos. Res., 170, 140–160, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.11.018, 2016. 

Kawamura, K., Kasukabe, H., and Barrie, L. A.: Source and reaction pathways of dicarboxylic acids, ketoacids and dicarbonyls in arctic aerosols: One year of observations, Atmos. Environ., 30, 1709–1722, https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00395-9, 1996a. 

Kawamura, K., Sempéré, R., Imai, Y., Fujii, Y., and Hayashi, M.: Water soluble dicarboxylic acids and related compounds in Antarctic aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 18721–18728, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD01541, 1996b. 

Keene, W. C., Pszenny, A. A. P., Galloway, J. N., and Hawley, M. E.: Sea-salt corrections and interpretation of constituent ratios in marine precipitation, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 6647–6658, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD091iD06p06647, 1986. 

Keene, W. C., Long, M. S., Reid, J. S., Frossard, A. A., Kieber, D. J., Maben, J. R., Russell, L. M., Kinsey, J. D., Quinn, P. K., and Bates, T. S.: Factors That Modulate Properties of Primary Marine Aerosol Generated From Ambient Seawater on Ships at Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 11961–11990, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026872, 2017. 

Kerminen, V.-M., Teinilä, K., Hillamo, R., and Mäkelä, T.: Size-segregated chemistry of particulate dicarboxylic acids in the Arctic atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 33, 2089–2100, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00350-1, 1999. 

Khadem, H. E.: Carbohydrate Chemistry: Monosaccharides and Their Oligomers, Elsevier, 267 p., ISBN 978-0-12-236870-7, 2012. 

Kharbush, J. J., Close, H. G., Van Mooy, B. A. S., Arnosti, C., Smittenberg, R. H., Le Moigne, F. A. C., Mollenhauer, G., Scholz-Böttcher, B., Obreht, I., Koch, B. P., Becker, K., Iversen, M. H., and Mohr, W.: Particulate Organic Carbon Deconstructed: Molecular and Chemical Composition of Particulate Organic Carbon in the Ocean, Front. Mar. Sci., 7, 518, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00518, 2020. 

Kirchman, D. L., Meon, B., Ducklow, H. W., Carlson, C. A., Hansell, D. A., and Steward, G. F.: Glucose fluxes and concentrations of dissolved combined neutral sugars (polysaccharides) in the Ross Sea and Polar Front Zone, Antarctica, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 48, 4179–4197, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00085-6, 2001. 

Klein, A. M., Bohannan, B. J. M., Jaffe, D. A., Levin, D. A., and Green, J. L.: Molecular Evidence for Metabolically Active Bacteria in the Atmosphere, Front. Microbiol., 7, 772, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00772, 2016. 

Köllner, F., Schneider, J., Willis, M. D., Klimach, T., Helleis, F., Bozem, H., Kunkel, D., Hoor, P., Burkart, J., Leaitch, W. R., Aliabadi, A. A., Abbatt, J. P. D., Herber, A. B., and Borrmann, S.: Particulate trimethylamine in the summertime Canadian high Arctic lower troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13747–13766, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13747-2017, 2017. 

Leck, C., Gao, Q., Mashayekhy Rad, F., and Nilsson, U.: Size-resolved atmospheric particulate polysaccharides in the high summer Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12573–12588, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12573-2013, 2013. 

Leon-Marcos, A., Zeising, M., van Pinxteren, M., Zeppenfeld, S., Bracher, A., Barbaro, E., Engel, A., Feltracco, M., Tegen, I., and Heinold, B.: Modelling emission and transport of key components of primary marine organic aerosol using the global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3, Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4183–4213, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4183-2025, 2025. 

Li, J., Han, Z., Fu, P., Yao, X., and Liang, M.: Seasonal characteristics of emission, distribution, and radiative effect of marine organic aerosols over the western Pacific Ocean: an investigation with a coupled regional climate aerosol model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3129–3161, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3129-2024, 2024. 

Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005, 2005. 

Macke, A. and Flores, H.: The Expeditions PS106/1 and 2 of the Research Vessel POLARSTERN to the Arctic Ocean in 2017, Bremerhaven, Germany, 171, https://doi.org/10.2312/BzPM_0719_2018, 2018. 

Madry, W. L., Toon, O. B., and O'Dowd, C. D.: Modeled optical thickness of sea-salt aerosol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014691, 2011. 

Malfatti, F., Lee, C., Tinta, T., Pendergraft, M. A., Celussi, M., Zhou, Y., Sultana, C. M., Rotter, A., Axson, J. L., Collins, D. B., Santander, M. V., Anides Morales, A. L., Aluwihare, L. I., Riemer, N., Grassian, V. H., Azam, F., and Prather, K. A.: Detection of Active Microbial Enzymes in Nascent Sea Spray Aerosol: Implications for Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 6, 171–177, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00699, 2019. 

Manders, A. M. M., Schaap, M., Querol, X., Albert, M. F. M. A., Vercauteren, J., Kuhlbusch, T. A. J., and Hoogerbrugge, R.: Sea salt concentrations across the European continent, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2434–2442, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.028, 2010. 

Matulová, M., Husárová, S., Capek, P., Sancelme, M., and Delort, A.-M.: Biotransformation of Various Saccharides and Production of Exopolymeric Substances by Cloud-Borne Bacillus sp. 3B6, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 14238–14247, https://doi.org/10.1021/es501350s, 2014. 

Maturilli, M.: Continuous meteorological observations at station Ny-Ålesund (2011-08 et seq), Alfred Wegener Institute – Research Unit Potsdam, PANGAEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.914979, 2020. 

Maturilli, M., Herber, A., and König-Langlo, G.: Climatology and time series of surface meteorology in Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 155–163, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-155-2013, 2013. 

Maturilli, M., Herber, A., and König-Langlo, G.: Surface radiation climatology for Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard (78.9° N), basic observations for trend detection, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 120, 331–339, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-014-1173-4, 2015. 

Mayot, N., Matrai, P., Ellingsen, I. H., Steele, M., Johnson, K., Riser, S. C., and Swift, D.: Assessing Phytoplankton Activities in the Seasonal Ice Zone of the Greenland Sea Over an Annual Cycle, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 8004–8025, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014271, 2018. 

McNeill, V. F.: Aqueous Organic Chemistry in the Atmosphere: Sources and Chemical Processing of Organic Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 1237–1244, https://doi.org/10.1021/es5043707, 2015. 

Mirrielees, J. A., Kirpes, R. M., Costa, E. J., Porter, G. C. E., Murray, B. J., Lata, N. N., Boschi, V., China, S., Grannas, A. M., Ault, A. P., Matrai, P. A., and Pratt, K. A.: Marine aerosol generation experiments in the High Arctic during summertime, Elementa: Sci. Anthropocene, 12, 00134, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2023.00134, 2024. 

Müller, K., Lehmann, S., van Pinxteren, D., Gnauk, T., Niedermeier, N., Wiedensohler, A., and Herrmann, H.: Particle characterization at the Cape Verde atmospheric observatory during the 2007 RHaMBLe intensive, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2709–2721, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2709-2010, 2010. 

Neuwirth, E.: RColorBrewer: ColorBrewer Palettes, R package version 1.1-3, CRAN, https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.RColorBrewer, 2022. 

Nomokonova, T., Ebell, K., Löhnert, U., Maturilli, M., Ritter, C., and O'Connor, E.: Statistics on clouds and their relation to thermodynamic conditions at Ny-Ålesund using ground-based sensor synergy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4105–4126, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4105-2019, 2019. 

O'Dowd, C. D. and de Leeuw, G.: Marine aerosol production: a review of the current knowledge, Philos. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 365, 1753–1774, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2043, 2007. 

O'Dowd, C. D., Smith, M. H., Consterdine, I. E., and Lowe, J. A.: Marine aerosol, sea-salt, and the marine sulphur cycle: a short review, Atmos. Environ., 31, 73–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00106-9, 1997. 

Ooki, A., Uematsu, M., Miura, K., and Nakae, S.: Sources of sodium in atmospheric fine particles, Atmos. Environ., 36, 4367–4374, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00341-2, 2002. 

Orellana, M. V. and Leck, C.: Chapter 9 – Marine Microgels, in: Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved Organic Matter (Second Edition), edited by: Hansell, D. A. and Carlson, C. A., Academic Press, Boston, 451–480, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-405940-5.00009-1, 2015. 

Orellana, M. V., Matrai, P. A., Leck, C., Rauschenberg, C. D., Lee, A. M., and Coz, E.: Marine microgels as a source of cloud condensation nuclei in the high Arctic, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 108, 13612–13617, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102457108, 2011. 

Oziel, L., Schourup-Kristensen, V., Wekerle, C., and Hauck, J.: The Pan-Arctic Continental Slope as an Intensifying Conveyer Belt for Nutrients in the Central Arctic Ocean (1985–2015), Global Biogeochem. Cy., 36, e2021GB007268, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GB007268, 2022. 

Panagiotopoulos, C. and Sempéré, R.: Analytical methods for the determination of sugars in marine samples: A historical perspective and future directions, Limnol. Oceanograph.-Meth., 3, 419–454, https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2005.3.419, 2005. 

Penner, J. E., Andreae, M. O., Annegarn, H., Barrie, L., Feichter, J., Hegg, D., Jayaraman, A., Leaitch, R., Murphy, D., Nganga, J., and Pitari, G.: Aerosols, their Direct and Indirect Effects, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 289–348, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/TAR-05.pdf ((last access: 10 January 2025), 2001. 

Pierce, D.: ncdf4: Interface to Unidata netCDF (Version 4 or Earlier) Format Data, R package version 1.22, CRAN, https://cirrus.ucsd.edu/~pierce/ncdf/ (last access: 22 April 2025), 2023. 

Pilinis, C., Pandis, S. N., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Sensitivity of direct climate forcing by atmospheric aerosols to aerosol size and composition, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 18739–18754, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02119, 1995. 

Pilz, C., Düsing, S., Wehner, B., Müller, T., Siebert, H., Voigtländer, J., and Lonardi, M.: CAMP: an instrumented platform for balloon-borne aerosol particle studies in the lower atmosphere, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6889–6905, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6889-2022, 2022. 

Pilz, C., Lonardi, M., Egerer, U., Siebert, H., Ehrlich, A., Heymsfield, A. J., Schmitt, C. G., Shupe, M. D., Wehner, B., and Wendisch, M.: Profile observations of the Arctic atmospheric boundary layer with the BELUGA tethered balloon during MOSAiC, Sci. Data, 10, 534, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02423-5, 2023. 

Pilz, C., Cassano, J. J., de Boer, G., Kirbus, B., Lonardi, M., Pöhlker, M., Shupe, M. D., Siebert, H., Wendisch, M., and Wehner, B.: Tethered balloon measurements reveal enhanced aerosol occurrence aloft interacting with Arctic low-level clouds, Elementa: Sci. Anthropocene, 12, 00120, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2023.00120, 2024. 

Platt, S. M., Hov, Ø., Berg, T., Breivik, K., Eckhardt, S., Eleftheriadis, K., Evangeliou, N., Fiebig, M., Fisher, R., Hansen, G., Hansson, H.-C., Heintzenberg, J., Hermansen, O., Heslin-Rees, D., Holmén, K., Hudson, S., Kallenborn, R., Krejci, R., Krognes, T., Larssen, S., Lowry, D., Lund Myhre, C., Lunder, C., Nisbet, E., Nizzetto, P. B., Park, K.-T., Pedersen, C. A., Aspmo Pfaffhuber, K., Röckmann, T., Schmidbauer, N., Solberg, S., Stohl, A., Ström, J., Svendby, T., Tunved, P., Tørnkvist, K., van der Veen, C., Vratolis, S., Yoon, Y. J., Yttri, K. E., Zieger, P., Aas, W., and Tørseth, K.: Atmospheric composition in the European Arctic and 30 years of the Zeppelin Observatory, Ny-Ålesund, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3321–3369, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3321-2022, 2022. 

Porter, G. C. E., Adams, M. P., Brooks, I. M., Ickes, L., Karlsson, L., Leck, C., Salter, M. E., Schmale, J., Siegel, K., Sikora, S. N. F., Tarn, M. D., Vüllers, J., Wernli, H., Zieger, P., Zinke, J., and Murray, B. J.: Highly Active Ice-Nucleating Particles at the Summer North Pole, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD036059, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036059, 2022. 

Quinn, P. K., Collins, D. B., Grassian, V. H., Prather, K. A., and Bates, T. S.: Chemistry and Related Properties of Freshly Emitted Sea Spray Aerosol, Chem. Rev., 115, 4383–4399, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500713g, 2015. 

Ramasamy, K. P., Mahawar, L., Rajasabapathy, R., Rajeshwari, K., Miceli, C., and Pucciarelli, S.: Comprehensive insights on environmental adaptation strategies in Antarctic bacteria and biotechnological applications of cold adapted molecules, Front. Microbiol., 14, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1197797, 2023. 

Rinaldi, M., Decesari, S., Carbone, C., Finessi, E., Fuzzi, S., Ceburnis, D., O'Dowd, C. D., Sciare, J., Burrows, J. P., Vrekoussis, M., Ervens, B., Tsigaridis, K., and Facchini, M. C.: Evidence of a natural marine source of oxalic acid and a possible link to glyoxal, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015659, 2011. 

Robinson, T.-B., Stolle, C., and Wurl, O.: Depth is relative: the importance of depth for transparent exopolymer particles in the near-surface environment, Ocean Sci., 15, 1653–1666, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1653-2019, 2019a. 

Robinson, T.-B., Wurl, O., Bahlmann, E., Jürgens, K., and Stolle, C.: Rising bubbles enhance the gelatinous nature of the air–sea interface, Limnol. Oceanogr., 64, 2358–2372, https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11188, 2019b. 

Rocchi, A., von Jackowski, A., Welti, A., Li, G., Kanji, Z. A., Povazhnyy, V., Engel, A., Schmale, J., Nenes, A., Berdalet, E., Simó, R., and Dall'Osto, M.: Glucose Enhances Salinity-Driven Sea Spray Aerosol Production in Eastern Arctic Waters, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 8748–8759, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c02826, 2024. 

Russell, L. M., Hawkins, L. N., Frossard, A. A., Quinn, P. K., and Bates, T. S.: Carbohydrate-like composition of submicron atmospheric particles and their production from ocean bubble bursting, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6652–6657, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908905107, 2010. 

Sander, R., Keene, W. C., Pszenny, A. A. P., Arimoto, R., Ayers, G. P., Baboukas, E., Cainey, J. M., Crutzen, P. J., Duce, R. A., Hönninger, G., Huebert, B. J., Maenhaut, W., Mihalopoulos, N., Turekian, V. C., and Van Dingenen, R.: Inorganic bromine in the marine boundary layer: a critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1301–1336, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1301-2003, 2003. 

Šantl-Temkiv, T., Gosewinkel, U., Starnawski, P., Lever, M., and Finster, K.: Aeolian dispersal of bacteria in southwest Greenland: their sources, abundance, diversity and physiological states, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 94, https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy031, 2018. 

Šantl-Temkiv, T., Amato, P., Casamayor, E. O., Lee, P. K. H., and Pointing, S. B.: Microbial ecology of the atmosphere, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 46, fuac009, https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuac009, 2022. 

Schartau, M., Engel, A., Schröter, J., Thoms, S., Völker, C., and Wolf-Gladrow, D.: Modelling carbon overconsumption and the formation of extracellular particulate organic carbon, Biogeosciences, 4, 433–454, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-433-2007, 2007. 

Schill, S. R., Burrows, S. M., Hasenecz, E. S., Stone, E. A., and Bertram, T. H.: The Impact of Divalent Cations on the Enrichment of Soluble Saccharides in Primary Sea Spray Aerosol, Atmosphere, 9, 476, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9120476, 2018. 

Schmale, J., Zieger, P., and Ekman, A. M. L.: Aerosols in current and future Arctic climate, Nat. Clim. Change, 11, 95–105, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00969-5, 2021. 

Schmale, J., Sharma, S., Decesari, S., Pernov, J., Massling, A., Hansson, H.-C., von Salzen, K., Skov, H., Andrews, E., Quinn, P. K., Upchurch, L. M., Eleftheriadis, K., Traversi, R., Gilardoni, S., Mazzola, M., Laing, J., and Hopke, P.: Pan-Arctic seasonal cycles and long-term trends of aerosol properties from 10 observatories, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3067–3096, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3067-2022, 2022. 

Sharma, S., Barrie, L. a., Magnusson, E., Brattström, G., Leaitch, W. R., Steffen, A., and Landsberger, S.: A Factor and Trends Analysis of Multidecadal Lower Tropospheric Observations of Arctic Aerosol Composition, Black Carbon, Ozone, and Mercury at Alert, Canada, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 14133–14161, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030844, 2019. 

Shestakova, A. A., Chechin, D. G., Lüpkes, C., Hartmann, J., and Maturilli, M.: The foehn effect during easterly flow over Svalbard, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1529–1548, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1529-2022, 2022. 

Simon, D. J., Hartmann, J., Schaefer, J., Zeppenfeld, S., Lüpkes, C., Hartmann, M., Wetzel, B., Heinold, B., Jurányi, Z., Schulz, A., Köhler, L., Jörss, A.-M., Herber, A., Henning, S., Pöhlker, M. L., Roberts, G. C., and Stratmann, F.: Turbulent aerosol fluxes from airborne measurements over the Arctic Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 52, e2025GL117094, https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL117094, 2025 

Sinreich, R., Coburn, S., Dix, B., and Volkamer, R.: Ship-based detection of glyoxal over the remote tropical Pacific Ocean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11359–11371, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11359-2010, 2010. 

Sorooshian, A., Lu, M.-L., Brechtel, F. J., Jonsson, H., Feingold, G., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: On the Source of Organic Acid Aerosol Layers above Clouds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 4647–4654, https://doi.org/10.1021/es0630442, 2007. 

Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D., and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling System, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 96, 2059–2077, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1, 2015. 

Struthers, H., Ekman, A. M. L., Glantz, P., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Mårtensson, E. M., Seland, Ø., and Nilsson, E. D.: The effect of sea ice loss on sea salt aerosol concentrations and the radiative balance in the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3459–3477, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3459-2011, 2011. 

Su, B., Bi, X., Zhang, Z., Liang, Y., Song, C., Wang, T., Hu, Y., Li, L., Zhou, Z., Yan, J., Wang, X., and Zhang, G.: Enrichment of calcium in sea spray aerosol: insights from bulk measurements and individual particle analysis during the R/V Xuelong cruise in the summertime in Ross Sea, Antarctica, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10697–10711, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10697-2023, 2023. 

Theodosi, C., Im, U., Bougiatioti, A., Zarmpas, P., Yenigun, O., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Aerosol chemical composition over Istanbul, Sci. Total Environ., 408, 2482–2491, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.039, 2010. 

Thyng, K., Greene, C. A., Hetland, R. D., Zimmerle, H. M., and DiMarco, S.: True colors of oceanography: Guidelines for effective and accurate colormap selection, Oceanography, 3, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2016.66, 2016. 

Tilgner, A. and Herrmann, H.: Radical-driven carbonyl-to-acid conversion and acid degradation in tropospheric aqueous systems studied by CAPRAM, Atmos. Environ., 44, 5415–5422, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.07.050, 2010. 

Tørseth, K., Aas, W., Breivik, K., Fjæraa, A. M., Fiebig, M., Hjellbrekke, A. G., Lund Myhre, C., Solberg, S., and Yttri, K. E.: Introduction to the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and observed atmospheric composition change during 1972–2009, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5447–5481, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5447-2012, 2012. 

Trainic, M., Koren, I., Sharoni, S., Frada, M., Segev, L., Rudich, Y., and Vardi, A.: Infection Dynamics of a Bloom-Forming Alga and Its Virus Determine Airborne Coccolith Emission from Seawater, iScience, 6, 327–335, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2018.07.017, 2018. 

Triesch, N., van Pinxteren, M., Engel, A., and Herrmann, H.: Concerted measurements of free amino acids at the Cabo Verde islands: high enrichments in submicron sea spray aerosol particles and cloud droplets, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 163–181, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-163-2021, 2021. 

Turekian, V. C., Macko, S. A., and Keene, W. C.: Concentrations, isotopic compositions, and sources of size-resolved, particulate organic carbon and oxalate in near-surface marine air at Bermuda during spring, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002053, 2003. 

van de Poll, W. H., Maat, D. S., Fischer, P., Visser, R. J. W., Brussaard, C. P. D., and Buma, A. G. J.: Solar radiation and solar radiation driven cycles in warming and freshwater discharge control seasonal and inter-annual phytoplankton chlorophyll a and taxonomic composition in a high Arctic fjord (Kongsfjorden, Spitsbergen), Limnol. Oceanogr., 66, 1221–1236, https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11677, 2021. 

van Pinxteren, M., Müller, C., Iinuma, Y., Stolle, C., and Herrmann, H.: Chemical Characterization of Dissolved Organic Compounds from Coastal Sea Surface Microlayers (Baltic Sea, Germany), Environ. Sci. Technology, 46, 10455–10462, https://doi.org/10.1021/es204492b, 2012. 

van Pinxteren, M., Barthel, S., Fomba, K. W., Müller, K., Von Tümpling, W., and Herrmann, H.: The influence of environmental drivers on the enrichment of organic carbon in the sea surface microlayer and in submicron aerosol particles – measurements from the Atlantic Ocean, Elem. Sci. Anth., 5, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.225, 2017. 

van Pinxteren, M., Robinson, T.-B., Zeppenfeld, S., Gong, X., Bahlmann, E., Fomba, K. W., Triesch, N., Stratmann, F., Wurl, O., Engel, A., Wex, H., and Herrmann, H.: High number concentrations of transparent exopolymer particles in ambient aerosol particles and cloud water – a case study at the tropical Atlantic Ocean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5725–5742, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5725-2022, 2022. 

van Pinxteren, M., Zeppenfeld, S., Fomba, K. W., Triesch, N., Frka, S., and Herrmann, H.: Amino acids, carbohydrates, and lipids in the tropical oligotrophic Atlantic Ocean: sea-to-air transfer and atmospheric in situ formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 6571–6590, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6571-2023, 2023. 

Veron, F.: Ocean Spray, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 47, 507–538, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010814-014651, 2015. 

Vihtakari, M.: PlotSvalbard: PlotSvalbard – Plot research data from Svalbard on maps, R package version 0.9 2, GitHub, https://github.com/MikkoVihtakari/PlotSvalbard (last access: 14 August 2024), 2020. 

Warneck, P.: In-cloud chemistry opens pathway to the formation of oxalic acid in the marine atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 37, 2423–2427, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00136-5, 2003. 

Wendisch, M., Brückner, M., Burrows, J. P., Crewell, S., Dethloff, K., Ebell, K., Lüpkes, C., Macke, A., Notholt, J., and Quaas, J.: Understanding causes and effects of rapid warming in the Arctic, Eos, 98, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017EO064803, 2017. 

Wendisch, M., Macke, A., Ehrlich, A., Lüpkes, C., Mech, M., Chechin, D., Dethloff, K., Barientos, C., Bozem, H., Brückner, M., Clemen, H.-C., Crewell, S., Donth, T., Dupuy, R., Ebell, K., Egerer, U., Engelmann, R., Engler, C., Eppers, O., Gehrmann, M., Gong, X., Gottschalk, M., Gourbeyre, C., Griesche, H., Hartmann, J., Hartmann, M., Heinold, B., Herber, A., Herrmann, H., Heygster, G., Hoor, P., Jafariserajehlou, S., Jäkel, E., Järvinen, E., Jourdan, O., Kästner, U., Kecorius, S., Knudsen, E. M., Köllner, F., Kretzschmar, J., Lelli, L., Leroy, D., Maturilli, M., Mei, L., Mertes, S., Mioche, G., Neuber, R., Nicolaus, M., Nomokonova, T., Notholt, J., Palm, M., van Pinxteren, M., Quaas, J., Richter, P., Ruiz-Donoso, E., Schäfer, M., Schmieder, K., Schnaiter, M., Schneider, J., Schwarzenböck, A., Seifert, P., Shupe, M. D., Siebert, H., Spreen, G., Stapf, J., Stratmann, F., Vogl, T., Welti, A., Wex, H., Wiedensohler, A., Zanatta, M., and Zeppenfeld, S.: The Arctic Cloud Puzzle: Using ACLOUD/PASCAL Multi-Platform Observations to Unravel the Role of Clouds and Aerosol Particles in Arctic Amplification, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0072.1, 2018. 

Wendisch, M., Brückner, M., Crewell, S., et al.: Atmospheric and Surface Processes, and Feedback Mechanisms Determining Arctic Amplification: A Review of First Results and Prospects of the (AC)3 Project, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 104, E208–E242, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0218.1, 2023. 

White, W. H.: Chemical markers for sea salt in IMPROVE aerosol data, Atmos. Environ., 42, 261–274, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.040, 2008. 

Wickham, H.: Reshaping Data with the reshape Package, J. Stat. Softw., 21, 1–20, 2007. 

Wickham, H.: ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, Springer-Verlag, New York, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_2, 2016. 

Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K., and Vaughan, D.: dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation, R package version 1.1.4, CRAN, https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.dplyr, 2023a. 

Wickham, H., Pedersen, T. L., and Seidel, D.: scales: Scale Functions for Visualization, R package version 1.3.0, 2023b. 

Wietz, M., Engel, A., Ramondenc, S., Niwano, M., von Appen, W.-J., Priest, T., von Jackowski, A., Metfies, K., Bienhold, C., and Boetius, A.: The Arctic summer microbiome across Fram Strait: Depth, longitude, and substrate concentrations structure microbial diversity in the euphotic zone, Environ. Microbiol., 26, e16568, https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.16568, 2024. 

Wietz, M., van Pinxteren, M., Freese, H. M., Spröer, C., and Zeppenfeld, S.: Seasonal connectivity of microbes and carbohydrates between ocean, atmosphere, and cryosphere in Kongsfjorden (Svalbard, Arctic Ocean), bioRxiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.01.691664, 2025. 

Willis, M. D., Leaitch, W. R., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Processes Controlling the Composition and Abundance of Arctic Aerosol, Rev. Geophys., 56, 621–671, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000602, 2018. 

Wong, J. P. S., Tsagkaraki, M., Tsiodra, I., Mihalopoulos, N., Violaki, K., Kanakidou, M., Sciare, J., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Effects of Atmospheric Processing on the Oxidative Potential of Biomass Burning Organic Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 6747–6756, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01034, 2019. 

Wurl, O. and Holmes, M.: The gelatinous nature of the sea-surface microlayer, Mar. Chem., 110, 89–97, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2008.02.009, 2008. 

Xu, W., Ovadnevaite, J., Fossum, K. N., Lin, C., Huang, R.-J., Ceburnis, D., and O'Dowd, C.: Sea spray as an obscured source for marine cloud nuclei, Nat. Geosci., 15, 282–286, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00917-2, 2022. 

Yang, C., Zhou, S., Zhang, C., Yu, M., Cao, F., and Zhang, Y.: Atmospheric Chemistry of Oxalate: Insight Into the Role of Relative Humidity and Aerosol Acidity From High-Resolution Observation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD035364, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035364, 2022. 

Yttri, K. E., Bäcklund, A., Conen, F., Eckhardt, S., Evangeliou, N., Fiebig, M., Kasper-Giebl, A., Gold, A., Gundersen, H., Myhre, C. L., Platt, S. M., Simpson, D., Surratt, J. D., Szidat, S., Rauber, M., Tørseth, K., Ytre-Eide, M. A., Zhang, Z., and Aas, W.: Composition and sources of carbonaceous aerosol in the European Arctic at Zeppelin Observatory, Svalbard (2017 to 2020), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2731–2758, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2731-2024, 2024. 

Yu, H., Kaufman, Y. J., Chin, M., Feingold, G., Remer, L. A., Anderson, T. L., Balkanski, Y., Bellouin, N., Boucher, O., Christopher, S., DeCola, P., Kahn, R., Koch, D., Loeb, N., Reddy, M. S., Schulz, M., Takemura, T., and Zhou, M.: A review of measurement-based assessments of the aerosol direct radiative effect and forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 613–666, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-613-2006, 2006. 

Zäncker, B., Cunliffe, M., and Engel, A.: Eukaryotic community composition in the sea surface microlayer across an east–west transect in the Mediterranean Sea, Biogeosciences, 18, 2107–2118, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2107-2021, 2021. 

Zeising, M., Oziel, L., Thoms, S., Gürses, Ö., Hauck, J., Heinold, B., Losa, S. N., van Pinxteren, M., Völker, C., Zeppenfeld, S., and Bracher, A.: Assessment of transparent exopolymer particles in the Arctic Ocean implemented into the coupled ocean–sea ice–biogeochemistry model FESOM2.1–REcoM3, Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 2077–2109, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2077-2026, 2026. 

Zeppenfeld, S. and Schmidt, L.: Dissolved and particulate carbohydrates and inorganic ions in the sea surface microlayer and bulk water of Kongsfjorden (Autumn 2021/Spring 2022), PANGAEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.982606, 2025. 

Zeppenfeld, S., van Pinxteren, M., Engel, A., and Herrmann, H.: A protocol for quantifying mono- and polysaccharides in seawater and related saline matrices by electro-dialysis (ED) – combined with HPAEC-PAD, Ocean Sci., 16, 817–830, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-817-2020, 2020. 

Zeppenfeld, S., van Pinxteren, M., van Pinxteren, D., Wex, H., Berdalet, E., Vaqué, D., Dall'Osto, M., and Herrmann, H.: Aerosol Marine Primary Carbohydrates and Atmospheric Transformation in the Western Antarctic Peninsula, ACS Earth Space Chem., 5, 1032–1047, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00351, 2021. 

Zeppenfeld, S., van Pinxteren, M., Hartmann, M., Zeising, M., Bracher, A., and Herrmann, H.: Marine carbohydrates in Arctic aerosol particles and fog – diversity of oceanic sources and atmospheric transformations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15561–15587, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15561-2023, 2023. 

Zeppenfeld, S., Schaefer, J., van Pinxteren, M., and Schmidt, L.: Marine combined carbohydrates and inorganic ions in atmospheric total suspended particles across altitudes in the lower troposphere of Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard, PANGAEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.982703, 2025. 

Zhou, S., Gonzalez, L., Leithead, A., Finewax, Z., Thalman, R., Vlasenko, A., Vagle, S., Miller, L. A., Li, S.-M., Bureekul, S., Furutani, H., Uematsu, M., Volkamer, R., and Abbatt, J.: Formation of gas-phase carbonyls from heterogeneous oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids at the air–water interface and of the sea surface microlayer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1371–1384, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1371-2014, 2014.  

Zhu, B., Sun-Waterhouse, D., and You, L.: Insights into the mechanisms underlying the degradation of xylooligosaccharides in UV/H2O2 system, Carbohyd. Polym., 317, 121091, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121091, 2023. 

Zhu, Y.-S., Connolly, A., Guyon, A., and FitzGerald, R. J.: Solubilisation of calcium and magnesium from the marine red algae Lithothamnion calcareum, Int. J. Food Sci. Tech., 49, 1600–1606, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12459, 2014. 

Download
Short summary
Sea spray aerosol transports inorganic salts and carbohydrates from the ocean into the atmosphere. In this field study conducted in Svalbard, we found that carbohydrates reach elevated altitudes that are relevant for cloud formation and properties.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint