Articles | Volume 26, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-3669-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-3669-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Historical and future changes of surface ozone over China from CMIP6 models, including an assessment of present-day uncertainties in model prediction
Shuai Li
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather Meteorological Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry of CMA, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather Meteorological Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Qi Chen
State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather Meteorological Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry of CMA, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
CMA Earth System Modeling and Prediction Center, Beijing 100081, China
Yonghang Chen
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
Meteorological Service Center for the Core Areas of the Capital, Beijing 100097, China
Zhili Wang
State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather Meteorological Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry of CMA, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Xinping Wu
Tazhong Meteorological Station, Qiemo, Xinjiang 841900, China
Related authors
Shuai Li, Hua Zhang, Yonghang Chen, Zhili Wang, Xiangyu Li, Yuan Li, and Yuanyuan Xue
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2011–2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2011-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, Xinjiang was the test area, and nine evaluation indexes of FY-2F/CTA, including precision rate, false rate, missing rate, consistency rate, strong rate, weak rate, bias, AE, and RMSE, were calculated and analyzed under complex underlying surface (subsurface types, temperature and altitude conditions) and different weather conditions (dust effects and different cloud cover levels). The precision, consistency, and error indexes of FY-2F/CTA were tested and evaluated.
Kai Wang, Xiaocong Wang, Qianshan He, Hong Nie, Yanyu Wang, and Yonghang Chen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4514, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4514, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed ten years of satellite data to study ice particle numbers in cirrus clouds over the Tibetan Plateau. The north has fewer particles than the south due to weaker convection and differences in dust and smoke. Ice particles form through freezing, producing a “V” shaped profile, but weak upward winds in the north shift this peak lower. These findings help understand climate in high mountain regions.
Chenrui Diao, Yangyang Xu, Aixue Hu, and Zhili Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2167–2180, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2167-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2167-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Industrial aerosol increases in Asia and reductions in North America and Europe in 1980–2020 influenced climate changes over the Pacific Ocean differently. Asian aerosols caused El Niño-like temperature patterns and slightly weakened the natural variation in the North Pacific, while reduced emissions of western countries led to extensive warming in middle–high latitudes of the North Pacific. Human impacts on the Pacific climate may change when emission reduction occurs over Asia in the future.
Shuai Li, Hua Zhang, Yonghang Chen, Zhili Wang, Xiangyu Li, Yuan Li, and Yuanyuan Xue
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2011–2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2011-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, Xinjiang was the test area, and nine evaluation indexes of FY-2F/CTA, including precision rate, false rate, missing rate, consistency rate, strong rate, weak rate, bias, AE, and RMSE, were calculated and analyzed under complex underlying surface (subsurface types, temperature and altitude conditions) and different weather conditions (dust effects and different cloud cover levels). The precision, consistency, and error indexes of FY-2F/CTA were tested and evaluated.
Yingfang Li, Zhili Wang, Yadong Lei, Huizheng Che, and Xiaoye Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2499–2523, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2499-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2499-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Since few studies have assessed the impacts of future combined reductions in aerosols, ozone, and their precursors on future climate change, we use models with an interactive representation of tropospheric aerosols and atmospheric chemistry schemes to quantify the impact of their reductions on the Asian climate. Our results suggest that their reductions will exacerbate the warming effect caused by greenhouse gases, increasing future climate extremes and associated population exposure risk.
Qiuyan Wang, Hua Zhang, Su Yang, Qi Chen, Xixun Zhou, Bing Xie, Yuying Wang, Guangyu Shi, and Martin Wild
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15867–15886, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15867-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15867-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The present-day land energy balance over East Asia is estimated for the first time. Results indicate that high aerosol loadings, clouds, and the Tibet Plateau (TP) over East Asia play vital roles in the shortwave budgets, while the TP is responsible for the longwave budgets during this regional energy budget assessment. This study provides a perspective to understand fully how the potential factors influence the diversifying regional energy budget assessments.
Tongqiang Liu, Qianshan He, Yonghang Chen, Jie Liu, Qiong Liu, Wei Gao, Guan Huang, Wenhao Shi, and Xiaohong Yu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5377–5391, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5377-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5377-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The variation in aerosol 355 nm lidar ratio and its influence factors were analyzed in Shanghai. About 90 % of the lidar ratio was distributed in 10 sr–80 sr, with an average of 41.0±22.5 sr, and the lidar ratio decreased with the increase in height. Due to aerosol radiative effects, the vertical slope of the lidar ratio presented a decreasing trend with increasing atmospheric turbidity. A large lidar ratio above 1 km was related to biomass burning aerosols and high relative humidity.
Cited articles
Allen, R. J., Turnock, S., Nabat, P., Neubauer, D., Lohmann, U., Olivié, D., Oshima, N., Michou, M., Wu, T., Zhang, J., Takemura, T., Schulz, M., Tsigaridis, K., Bauer, S. E., Emmons, L., Horowitz, L., Naik, V., van Noije, T., Bergman, T., Lamarque, J.-F., Zanis, P., Tegen, I., Westervelt, D. M., Le Sager, P., Good, P., Shim, S., O'Connor, F., Akritidis, D., Georgoulias, A. K., Deushi, M., Sentman, L. T., John, J. G., Fujimori, S., and Collins, W. J.: Climate and air quality impacts due to mitigation of non-methane near-term climate forcers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9641–9663, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9641-2020, 2020.
An, Q. , Zhang, H., Zhao, S. ,Wang, T., Liu, Q., Wang, Z., Gong, S., Xie, B., and Liu, Y.: Updated Simulation of Tropospheric Ozone and Its Radiative Forcing over the Globe and China Based on a Newly Developed Chemistry-Climate Model, J. Meteorol. Res., 36, 553–573, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-022-1187-2, 2022.
Ashworth, K., Folberth, G., Hewitt, C. N., and Wild, O.: Impacts of near-future cultivation of biofuel feedstocks on atmospheric composition and local air quality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 919–939, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-919-2012, 2012.
Avnery, S., Mauzerall, D. L., Liu, J., and Horowitz, L. W.: Global crop yield reductions due to surface ozone exposure: 1. Year 2000 crop production losses and economic damage, Atmos Environ., 45, 2284–2296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.045, 2011.
Chen, Y., Beig, G., Archer-Nicholls, S., Monks, S. A., Archibald, A. T., Shallcross, D. E., Lee, J. D., Heinold, B., Brühl, C., Telford, P. J., Abraham, N. L., and Pyle, J. A.: Avoiding high ozone pollution in Delhi, India, Faraday Discuss., 226, 502–514, https://doi.org/10.1039/D0FD00079E, 2021.
Coates, J., Mar, K. A., Ojha, N., and Butler, T. M.: The influence of temperature on ozone production under varying NOx conditions – a modelling study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11601–11615, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11601-2016, 2016.
Collins, W. J., Lamarque, J.-F., Schulz, M., Boucher, O., Eyring, V., Hegglin, M. I., Maycock, A., Myhre, G., Prather, M., Shindell, D., and Smith, S. J.: AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 585–607, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-585-2017, 2017.
Dai, H. B., Zhu, J., Liao, H., Li, J. D., Liang, M. X., Yang, Y., and Yue, X.: Co-occurrence of ozone and PM2.5 pollution in the Yangtze River Delta over 2013–2019: spatiotemporal distribution and meteorological conditions, Atmos. Res., 249, 105363, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105363, 2020.
Emmons, L. K., Schwantes, R. H., Orlando, J. J., Tyndall, G., Kinnison, D., Lamarque, J., Marsh, D., Mills, M. J., Tilmes, S., Bardeen, C., Buchholz, R. R., Conley, A., Gettelman, A., Garcia, R., Simpson, I., Blake, D. R., Meinardi, S., and Pétron, G.: The Chemistry Mechanism in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2), J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019ms001882, 2020.
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016, 2016.
Feng, Z. Z., Calatayud V., Zhu J. G., and Kobayashi, K.: Ozone exposure-and flux-based response relationships with photosynthesis of winter wheat under fully open air condition, Sci. Total Environ., 619/620, 1538–1544, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.089, 2018.
Fiore, A. M., Dolwick, P. D., Hogrefe, C., Lefohn, A. S., West, J. J., Gilliland, A. B., Rosenzweig, C., Racherla, P. N., Avise, J., Faluvegi, G., Hess, P., Sanderson, M. G., Schultz, M. G., and Zuber, A.: Multimodel Estimates of Intercontinental Source–Receptor Relationships for Ozone Pollution. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D04301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010816, 2009.
Gidden, M. J., Riahi, K., Smith, S. J., Fujimori, S., Luderer, G., Kriegler, E., van Vuuren, D. P., van den Berg, M., Feng, L., Klein, D., Calvin, K., Doelman, J. C., Frank, S., Fricko, O., Harmsen, M., Hasegawa, T., Havlik, P., Hilaire, J., Hoesly, R., Horing, J., Popp, A., Stehfest, E., and Takahashi, K.: Global emissions pathways under different socioeconomic scenarios for use in CMIP6: a dataset of harmonized emissions trajectories through the end of the century, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1443–1475, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1443-2019, 2019.
Griffiths, P. T., Murray, L. T., Zeng, G., Shin, Y. M., Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Deushi, M., Emmons, L. K., Galbally, I. E., Hassler, B., Horowitz, L. W., Keeble, J., Liu, J., Moeini, O., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Oshima, N., Tarasick, D., Tilmes, S., Turnock, S. T., Wild, O., Young, P. J., and Zanis, P.: Tropospheric ozone in CMIP6 simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4187–4218, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4187-2021, 2021.
Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012, 2012.
Haase, S. and Matthes, K.: The importance of interactive chemistry for stratosphere–troposphere coupling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3417–3432, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3417-2019, 2019.
Hajima, T., Watanabe, M., Yamamoto, A., Tatebe, H., Noguchi, M. A., Abe, M., Ohgaito, R., Ito, A., Yamazaki, D., Okajima, H., Ito, A., Takata, K., Ogochi, K., Watanabe, S., and Kawamiya, M.: Development of the MIROC-ES2L Earth system model and the evaluation of biogeochemical processes and feedbacks, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2197–2244, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2197-2020, 2020.
Han, Y. Q. and Cong, C. H.: Analysis and validation of FY-2E total cloud amount productions in north China and Huanghuai area, J. Meteor. Environ., 31, 153–158, http://www.jme1984.net.cn/article/id/qxyhjxb_3404 (last access: 1 December 2024), 2015 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Helmig, D., Ganzeveld, L., Butler, T., and Oltmans, S. J.: The role of ozone atmosphere-snow gas exchange on polar, boundary-layer tropospheric ozone – a review and sensitivity analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 15–30, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-15-2007, 2007.
Horowitz, L. W., Naik, V., Paulot, F., Ginoux, P. A., Dunne, J. P., Mao, J., Schnell, J., Chen, X., He, J., John, J. G., Lin, M., Lin, P., Malyshev, S., Paynter, D., Shevliakova, E., and Zhao, M.: The GFDL Global Atmospheric ChemistryClimate Model AM4.1: Model Description and Simulation Characteristics, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS002032, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002032, 2020.
Hubert, D., Heue, K.-P., Lambert, J.-C., Verhoelst, T., Allaart, M., Compernolle, S., Cullis, P. D., Dehn, A., Félix, C., Johnson, B. J., Keppens, A., Kollonige, D. E., Lerot, C., Loyola, D., Maata, M., Mitro, S., Mohamad, M., Piters, A., Romahn, F., Selkirk, H. B., da Silva, F. R., Stauffer, R. M., Thompson, A. M., Veefkind, J. P., Vömel, H., Witte, J. C., and Zehner, C.: TROPOMI tropospheric ozone column data: geophysical assessment and comparison to ozonesondes, GOME-2B and OMI, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7405–7433, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7405-2021, 2021.
Ivanciu, I., Matthes, K., Wahl, S., Harlaß, J., and Biastoch, A.: Effects of prescribed CMIP6 ozone on simulating the Southern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation response to ozone depletion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5777–5806, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5777-2021, 2021.
Jacob, D. J. and Winner, D. A.: Effect of climate change on air quality, Atmos. Environ., 43, 51–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.051, 2009.
Jiménez, P. and Baldasano, J. M.: Ozone response to precursor controls in very complex terrains: Use of photochemical indicators to assess O3–NOx-VOC sensitivity in the northeastern Iberian Peninsula, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D20309, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004985, 2004.
Lelieveld, J. and Dentener, F. J.: What controls tropospheric ozone? J. Geophys. Res., 105, 3531–3551, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901011, 2000.
Levy, H.: Normal atmosphere: large radical and formaldehyde concentrations predicted, Science, 173, 141–143, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.173.3992.141, 1971.
Li, C., Chen, X., Wang, H., Zhai, T., Ma, X., Yang, X., Chen, S., Zhou, M., Lou, S., Li, X., Zeng, L., and Lu, K.: The impact of organic nitrates on summer ozone formation in Shanghai, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3905–3918, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3905-2025, 2025.
Li, J., Chen, X. S., Wang, Z. F., Du, H. Y., Yang, W. Y., Sun, Y. L., Hu, B., Li, J. J., Wang, W., Wang, T., Fu, P. Q., and Huang, H. L.: Radiative and heterogeneous chemical effects of aerosols on ozone and inorganic aerosols over East Asia, Sci. Total Environ., 622–623, 1327–1342, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.041, 2018.
Li, J., Nagashima, T., Kong, L., Ge, B., Yamaji, K., Fu, J. S., Wang, X., Fan, Q., Itahashi, S., Lee, H.-J., Kim, C.-H., Lin, C.-Y., Zhang, M., Tao, Z., Kajino, M., Liao, H., Li, M., Woo, J.-H., Kurokawa, J., Wang, Z., Wu, Q., Akimoto, H., Carmichael, G. R., and Wang, Z.: Model evaluation and intercomparison of surface-level ozone and relevant species in East Asia in the context of MICS-Asia Phase III – Part 1: Overview, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12993–13015, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12993-2019, 2019.
Li, K., Jacob, D. J., Liao, H., Shen, L., Zhang, Q., and Bates, K. H.: Anthropogenic drivers of 2013–2017 trends in summer surface ozone in China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 422–427, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812168116, 2019.
Li, M. G., Wang, L. L., Liu, J. D., Gao, W. K., Song, T., Sun, Y., Li, L., Li, X. R., Wang, Y. H., Liu, L. L., Daellenbach, K. R., Paasonen, P. J., Kerminen,V., Kulmala, M., and Wang, Y. S.: Exploring the regional pollution characteristics and meteorological formation mechanism of PM2.5 in North China during 2013–2017, Environ. Int., 134, 105283, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105283, 2020.
Lin, P. and Ming, Y.: Enhanced climate response to ozone depletion from ozone-circulation coupling, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jd034286, 2021.
Li, X., Liu, J., Mauzerall, D. L., Emmons, L. K., Walters, S., Horowitz, L. W., and Tao, S.: Effects of trans-Eurasian transport of air pollutants on surface ozone concentrations over Western China. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 12338–12354, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021936, 2014.
Lin, Y. Y., Jiang, F., Zhao, J., Zhu, G., He, X. J., Ma, X. L., Li, S., Sabel, C. E., and Wang, H. K.: Impacts of O3 on premature mortality and crop yield loss across China, Atmos. Environ., 194, 41–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.024, 2018.
Liu, N. W., Ma, J. Z., An, X. Q., Lin, W. L., Xu, W. Y., Xu, X. B., Li, D. Q., and Li, R. P.: Source contributions and regional representativeness of surface ozone at atmospheric background stations in China, Trans. Atmos. Sci., 45, 728–733, http://dqkxxb.cnjournals.org/dqkxxb/article/abstract/20220507?st=search (last access: 1 December 2024), 2022 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Liu, Q., Liu, T. Q., Chen, Y. H., Xu, J. M., Gao, W., Zhang, H., and Yao, Y. F.: Effects of aerosols on the surface ozone generation via a study of the interaction of ozone and its precursors during the summer in Shanghai, China, Sci. Total Environ., 675, 235–246, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.121, 2019.
Liu, Z., Doherty, R. M., Wild, O., O'Connor, F. M., and Turnock, S. T.: Correcting ozone biases in a global chemistry–climate model: implications for future ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 12543–12557, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12543-2022, 2022.
Lou, S. J., Liao, H., and Zhu, B.: Impacts of aerosols on surface-layer ozone concentrations in China through heterogeneous reactions and changes in photolysis rates, Atmos Environ., 85, 123–138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.004, 2014.
Lu, X., Hong, J. Y., Zhang, L., Cooper, O. R., Schultz, M. G., Xu, X .B., Wang, T., Gao, M., Zhao, Y. H., and Zhang, Y. H.: Severe surface ozone pollution in China: a global perspective, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 5, 487–494, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00366, 2018.
Lu, X., Zhang, L., Wu, T., Long, M. S., Wang, J., Jacob, D. J., Zhang, F., Zhang, J., Eastham, S. D., Hu, L., Zhu, L., Liu, X., and Wei, M.: Development of the global atmospheric chemistry general circulation model BCC-GEOS-Chem v1.0: model description and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3817–3838, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3817-2020, 2020.
Maji, K. J., Ye, W. F., Arora, M., and Shiva Nagendra, S. M.: PM2.5 related health and economic loss assessment for 338 Chinese cities, Environ. Int., 121, 392–403, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.024, 2018.
Monks, P. S., Archibald, A. T., Colette, A., Cooper, O., Coyle, M., Derwent, R., Fowler, D., Granier, C., Law, K. S., Mills, G. E., Stevenson, D. S., Tarasova, O., Thouret, V., von Schneidemesser, E., Sommariva, R., Wild, O., and Williams, M. L.: Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8889–8973, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015, 2015.
Morgenstern, O.: The Southern Annular Mode in 6th Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Model., J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD034161, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034161, 2021.
Mulcahy, J. P., Jones, C. G., Rumbold, S. T., Kuhlbrodt, T., Dittus, A. J., Blockley, E. W., Yool, A., Walton, J., Hardacre, C., Andrews, T., Bodas-Salcedo, A., Stringer, M., de Mora, L., Harris, P., Hill, R., Kelley, D., Robertson, E., and Tang, Y.: UKESM1.1: development and evaluation of an updated configuration of the UK Earth System Model, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1569–1600, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1569-2023, 2023.
Neal, L. S., Dalvi, M., Folberth, G., McInnes, R. N., Agnew, P., O'Connor, F. M., Savage, N. H., and Tilbee, M.: A description and evaluation of an air quality model nested within global and regional composition-climate models using MetUM, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3941–3962, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3941-2017, 2017.
O'Neill, B. C., Tebaldi, C., van Vuuren, D. P., Eyring, V., Friedlingstein, P., Hurtt, G., Knutti, R., Kriegler, E., Lamarque, J.-F., Lowe, J., Meehl, G. A., Moss, R., Riahi, K., and Sanderson, B. M.: The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3461–3482, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016, 2016.
Qin, Y., Li, J. Y., Gong, K. J., Wu, Z. J., Chen, M. D., Qin, M. M., Huang, L., and Hu, J. L.: Double high pollution events in the Yangtze River Delta from 2015 to 2019: Characteristics, trends, and meteorological situations, Sci. Total Environ., 792, 148349, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148349, 2021.
Qiu, X. H., Duan, L., Chai, F. H., Wang, S. X., Yu, Q., and Wang, S. L.: Deriving high-resolution emission inventory of open biomass burning in China based on satellite observations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 11779–11786, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02705, 2016.
Qu, Y., Voulgarakis, A., Wang, T., Kasoar, M., Wells, C., Yuan, C., Varma, S., and Mansfield, L.: A study of the effect of aerosols on surface ozone through meteorology feedbacks over China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5705–5718, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5705-2021, 2021.
Rao, S., Klimont, Z., Smith, S. J., Van Dingenen, R., Dentener, F., Bouwman, L., Riahi, K., Amann, M., Leon Bodirsky, B., van Vuuren, D. P., Reis, L. A., Calvin, K., Drouet, L., Fricko, O., Fujimori, S., Gernaat, D., Havlik, P., Harmsen, M., Hasegawa, T., Heyes, C., and Tavoni, M.: Future air pollution in the Shared Socio-economic Pathways, Global Environ. Chang., 42, 346–358, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.012, 2017.
Sahu, S. K., Liu, S. C., Liu, S., Ding, D., and Xing, J.: Ozone pollution in China: Background and transboundary contributions to ozone concentration & related health effects across the country, Sci. Total Environ., 761, 144131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144131, 2021.
Sellar, A. A., Jones, C. G., Mulcahy, J., Tang, Y., Yool, A., Wiltshire, A., Connor, F. M., Stringer, M., Hill, R., Palmieri, J., Woodward, S., Mora, L., Kuhlbrodt, T., Rumbold, S., Kelley, D. I., Ellis, R., Johnson, C. E., Walton, J., Abraham, N. L., Andrews, M. B., Andrews, T., Archibald, A. T., Berthou, S., Burke, E., Blockley, E., Carslaw, K., Dalvi, M., Edwards, J., Folberth, G. A., Gedney, N., Griffiths, P. T., Harper, A. B., Hendry, M. A., Hewitt, A. J., Johnson, B., Jones, A., Jones, C. D., Keeble, J., Liddicoat, S., Morgenstern, O., Parker, R. J., Predoi, V., Robertson, E., Siahaan, A., Smith, R. S., Swaminathan, R., Woodhouse, M. T., Zeng, G., and Zerroukat, M.: UKESM1: Description and evaluation of the UK Earth System Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 4513–4558, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001739, 2019.
Sepulchre, P., Caubel, A., Ladant, J.-B., Bopp, L., Boucher, O., Braconnot, P., Brockmann, P., Cozic, A., Donnadieu, Y., Dufresne, J.-L., Estella-Perez, V., Ethé, C., Fluteau, F., Foujols, M.-A., Gastineau, G., Ghattas, J., Hauglustaine, D., Hourdin, F., Kageyama, M., Khodri, M., Marti, O., Meurdesoif, Y., Mignot, J., Sarr, A.-C., Servonnat, J., Swingedouw, D., Szopa, S., and Tardif, D.: IPSL-CM5A2 – an Earth system model designed for multi-millennial climate simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3011–3053, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3011-2020, 2020.
Shang, L., Luo, J. L., and Wang, C. X.: Ozone Variation Trends under Different CMIP6 Scenarios, Atmosphere, 12, 112, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12010112, 2021.
Shindell, D., Kuylenstierna, J. C. I., Vignati, E., Dingenen, R. V., Amann, M., Klimont, Z., Anenberg, S. C., Muller, N., Janssens-maenhout, G., Raes, Schwartz, J., Faluvegi, G., Pozzoli, L., Kupiainen, K., Höglund-isaksson, L., Emberson, L., Streets, D., Ramanathan, V., Hicks, K., Oath, N. T. K., Milly, G., Williams, M., Demkine, V., and Fowler, D.: Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security, Science, 335, 183–189, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210026, 2012.
Su, X. L., Wu, T. W., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Jin, J. L., Zhou, Q., Zhang, F., Liu, Y .M., Zhou, Y. M., Zhang, L., Turnock, S. T., and Furtado, K.: Present-day PM2.5 over Asia: Simulation and uncertainty in CMIP6 ESMs, J. Meteorol. Res., 36, 429–449, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-022-1202-7, 2022.
Sun, Z. and Archibald, A. T.: Multi-stage Ensemble-learning-based Model Fusion for Surface Ozone Simulations: A Focus on CMIP6 Models, Environ. Sci. Technol., 8, 100124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2021.100124, 2021.
Turnock, S. T., Allen, R. J., Andrews, M., Bauer, S. E., Deushi, M., Emmons, L., Good, P., Horowitz, L., John, J. G., Michou, M., Nabat, P., Naik, V., Neubauer, D., O'Connor, F. M., Olivié, D., Oshima, N., Schulz, M., Sellar, A., Shim, S., Takemura, T., Tilmes, S., Tsigaridis, K., Wu, T., and Zhang, J.: Historical and future changes in air pollutants from CMIP6 models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14547–14579, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14547-2020, 2020.
Val Martin, M., Heald, C. L., and Arnold, S. R.: Coupling dry deposition to vegetation phenology in the Community Earth System Model: Implications for the simulation of surface O3, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 2988–2996, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059651, 2014.
van Noije, T., Bergman, T., Le Sager, P., O'Donnell, D., Makkonen, R., Gonçalves-Ageitos, M., Döscher, R., Fladrich, U., von Hardenberg, J., Keskinen, J.-P., Korhonen, H., Laakso, A., Myriokefalitakis, S., Ollinaho, P., Pérez García-Pando, C., Reerink, T., Schrödner, R., Wyser, K., and Yang, S.: EC-Earth3-AerChem: a global climate model with interactive aerosols and atmospheric chemistry participating in CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5637–5668, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5637-2021, 2021.
Wang, C. L., Wang, Y. Y., Shi, Z. H., Sun, J. J, Gong, K. J., and Hu, J. L.: Assessment of surface ozone pollution change and its health effect in China from 2014 to 2018 based on multi-source fusion data, Trans. Atmos. Sci., 44, 737–745, 2021, http://dqkxxb.cnjournals.org/dqkxxb/article/abstract/20210511?st=search (last access: 1 December 2024), 2021 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Wang, F. Y, Qiu X. H, Cao J. Y, Peng, L., Zhang, N. N., Yan ,Y. L., and Li, R. M.: Policy-driven changes in the health risk of PM2.5 and O3 exposure in China during 2013–2018, Sci. Total Environ., 757, 143775, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143775, 2020.
Weichenthal, S., Pinault, L. L., and Burnett, R. T.: Impact of oxidant gases on the relationship between outdoor fine particulate air pollution and nonaccidental, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality, Sci. Rep., 7, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16770-y, 2017.
Wang, W., Li, X., Shao, M., Hu, M., Zeng, L., Wu, Y., and Tan, T.: The impact of aerosols on photolysis frequencies and ozone production in Beijing during the 4-year period 2012–2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9413–9429, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9413-2019, 2019.
Wesely, M. L., Cook, D. R., and Williams, R. M.: Field measurement of small ozone fluxes to snow, wet bare soil, and lake water, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 20, 459–471, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122295, 1981.
Wild, O., Voulgarakis, A., O'Connor, F., Lamarque, J.-F., Ryan, E. M., and Lee, L.: Global sensitivity analysis of chemistry–climate model budgets of tropospheric ozone and OH: exploring model diversity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4047–4058, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4047-2020, 2020.
Wu, H., Xu, X., Luo, T., Yang, Y., Xiong, Z., and Wang, Y.: Variation and comparison of cloud cover in MODIS and four reanalysis datasets of ERA-interim, ERA5, MERRA-2 and NCEP, Atmos. Res., 281, 106477, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106477, 2023.
Wu, T., Zhang, F., Zhang, J., Jie, W., Zhang, Y., Wu, F., Li, L., Yan, J., Liu, X., Lu, X., Tan, H., Zhang, L., Wang, J., and Hu, A.: Beijing Climate Center Earth System Model version 1 (BCC-ESM1): model description and evaluation of aerosol simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 977–1005, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-977-2020, 2020.
Xiao, Q., Geng, G., Xue, T., Liu, S., Cai, C., He, K., and Zhang, Q.: Tracking PM2.5 and O3 Pollution and the Related Health Burden in China 2013–2020, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 6922–6932, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c04548, 2022.
Xie, B. and Zhang, H.: Main progresses in the research on Ozone, Sci. Tech. Eng., 14, 106–114, http://www.stae.com.cn/jsygc/article/abstract/1308589?st=advanced_search (last access: 1 December 2024), 2014 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Xie, F., Li, J. P., Zhang, J. K., Tian, W. S., Hu,Y. Y., Zhao, S., Sun, C., Ding, R. Q., Feng, J., and Yang, Y.: Variations in North Pacific sea surface temperature caused by Arctic stratospheric ozone anomalies, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 114023, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9005, 2017.
Xing, J., Wang, S. X., Jang, C., Zhu, Y., and Hao, J. M.: Nonlinear response of ozone to precursor emission changes in China: a modeling study using response surface methodology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5027–5044, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5027-2011, 2011.
Xue, T., Zheng, Y. X., Geng, G. N., Xiao, Q. Y., Meng, X., Wang, M., Li, X., Wu, N. N., Zhang, Q., and Zhu, T.: Estimating Spatiotemporal Variation in Ambient Ozone Exposure during 2013–2017 Using a Data-Fusion Model, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 14877–14888, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03098, 2020.
Yang, X. Y., Zeng, G., Iyakaremye, V., and Zhu, B.: Effects of different types of heat wave days on ozone pollution over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and its future projection, Sci. Total Environ., 837, 155762, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155762, 2022.
Yin, X., Rupakheti, D., Zhang, G., Luo, J., Kang, S., de Foy, B., Yang, J., Ji, Z., Cong, Z., Rupakheti, M., Li, P., Hu, Y., and Zhang, Q.: Surface ozone over the Tibetan Plateau controlled by stratospheric intrusion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10137–10143, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10137-2023, 2023.
Yin, Z., Cao, B., and Wang, H.: Dominant patterns of summer ozone pollution in eastern China and associated atmospheric circulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13933–13943, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13933-2019, 2019.
Young, P. J., Archibald, A. T., Bowman, K. W., Lamarque, J.-F., Naik, V., Stevenson, D. S., Tilmes, S., Voulgarakis, A., Wild, O., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P., Cionni, I., Collins, W. J., Dalsøren, S. B., Doherty, R. M., Eyring, V., Faluvegi, G., Horowitz, L. W., Josse, B., Lee, Y. H., MacKenzie, I. A., Nagashima, T., Plummer, D. A., Righi, M., Rumbold, S. T., Skeie, R. B., Shindell, D. T., Strode, S. A., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., and Zeng, G.: Pre-industrial to end 21st century projections of tropospheric ozone from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2063–2090, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2063-2013, 2013.
Young, P. J., Naik, V., Fiore, A. M., Gaudel, A., Guo, J., Lin, M. Y., Neu, J. L., Parrish, D. D., Rieder, H. E., Schnell, J. L., Tilmes, S., Wild, O., Zhang, L., Ziemke, J. R., Brandt, J., Delcloo, A., Doherty, R. M., Geels, C., Hegglin, M. I., Hu, L., Im, U., Kumar, R., Luhar, A., Murray, L., Plummer, D., Rodriguez, J., Saiz-Lopez, A., Schultz, M. G., Woodhouse, M. T. and Zeng, G.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Assessment of global-scale model performance for global and regional ozone distributions, variability, and trends, Elem. Sci. Anth., 6, 10, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.265, 2018.
Yukimoto, S., Kawai, H., Koshiro, T., Oshima, N., Yoshida, K., Urakawa, S., Tsujino, H., Deushi, M., Tanaka, T., Hosaka, M., Yabu, S., Yoshimura, H., Shindo, E., Mizuta, R., Obata, A., Adachi, Y., and Ishii, M.: The meteorological research institute Earth system model O' version 2.0, MRI-ESM2.0: Description and basic evaluation of the physical component, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 97, 931–965, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2019-051, 2019.
Zeng, G., Morgenstern, O., Williams, J. H. T., O' Connor, F. M., Griffiths, P. T., Keeble, J., Deushi, M., Horowitz, L. W., Naik, V., Emmons, L. K., Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Bauer, S. E., Hassler, B., Michou, M., Mills, M. J., Murray, L. T., Oshima, N., Sentman, L. T., Tilmes, S., Tsigaridis, K., and Young, P. J.: Attribution of stratospheric and tropospheric ozone changes between 1850 and 2014 in CMIP6 models. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD036452, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036452, 2022.
Zhan, C. C., Xie, M., Liu, J., Wang, T. J., Xu, M., Chen, B., Li, S., Zhuang, B. L., and Li, M. M.: Surface ozone in the Yangtze River Delta, China: A synthesis of basic features, meteorological driving factors, and health impacts, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033600, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033600, 2021.
Zhao, S. H., Yang, X. Y., Li, Z. Q., Wang, Z. T., Zhang, Y. H., Wang, Y., Zhou, C. Y., and Ma, P. F.: Advances of ozone satellite remote sensing in 60 years, Nat. Remote Sens. Bull., 26, 817–833, https://doi.org/10.11834/jrs.20221632, 2022 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Zhao, S. P.,Yin, D. Y., Yu, Y., Kang, S. C., Qin, D. H., and Dong, L. X.: PM2.5 and O3 pollution during 2015−2019 over 367 Chinese cities: Spatiotemporal variations, meteorological and topographical impacts, Environ. Pollut., 264, 114694, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114694, 2020.
Zhang, F., Hou, C., Li, J. N., Liu, R. Q., and Liu, C. P.: A simple parameterization for the height of maximum ozone heating rate, Infrared Phys. Techn., 87, 104–112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2017.09.002, 2017.
Zhang, J., Gao, Y., Luo, K., Leung, L. R., Zhang, Y., Wang, K., and Fan, J.: Impacts of compound extreme weather events on ozone in the present and future, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9861–9877, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9861-2018, 2018.
Zhou, T. J., Zou, L. W., and Chen, X. L.: Commentary on the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), Clim. Change Res., 15, 445–456, https://doi.org/10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2019.193, 2019 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Zhu, C., He, Q., Zhao, Z., Liu, X., and Pu, Z.: Comparative analysis of ozone pollution characteristics between urban area and southern mountainous area of Urumqi, China, Atmosphere, 14, 1387, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14091387, 2023.
Short summary
This study evaluates the uncertainties of CMIP6 models in simulating surface O3 over China, using the Tracking Air Pollution in China (TAP) dataset under varying temperature, cloud cover, land-surface types, and pollutant levels. Historical changes are analyzed to provide context, while future O3 projections are assessed under different SSPs. Comparison of CMIP6 models under SSP3-7.0 highlights sources of inter-model differences, providing insights for O3 prediction and control in China.
This study evaluates the uncertainties of CMIP6 models in simulating surface O3 over China,...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint