Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 26, issue 3
Articles | Volume 26, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1889-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1889-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 26, issue 3
Research article
 | 
06 Feb 2026
Research article |  | 06 Feb 2026

Why observed and modelled ozone production rates and sensitives differ, a case study at rural site in China

Jun Zhou, Bin Jiang, Bowen Zhong, Tao Zhang, Duohong Chen, Yuhong Zhai, Li Zhong, Zhijiong Huang, Junqing Luo, Minhui Deng, Mao Xiao, Jianhui Jiang, Jing Li, and Min Shao

Viewed

Total article views: 1,268 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,064 165 39 1,268 93 43 59
  • HTML: 1,064
  • PDF: 165
  • XML: 39
  • Total: 1,268
  • Supplement: 93
  • BibTeX: 43
  • EndNote: 59
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 May 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 May 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,268 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,268 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
We quantitatively assessed the P(O3)net simulation deficits and their impact on O3 formation sensitivity (OFS diagnosis) by comparing the measured and modelled P(O3)net. Unmeasured oxygenated VOCs (OVOCs) were the most effective compensating factor for the discrepancies in both P(O3)net and OFS. OFS exhibiting a diurnal shift dominated by the morning regime; prioritizing VOCs while co-controlling NOx is the most effective strategy for O3 pollution control in the PRD region. 
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint