Articles | Volume 26, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1321-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Emerging Mineral Dust Source in ’A’ą̈y Chù’ Valley, Yukon, Canada Poses Potential Health Risk via Exposure to Metal and Metalloids Enriched in PM10 and PM2.5 Size Fractions
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 27 Jan 2026)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 14 Aug 2025)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3485', Ian Burke, 25 Sep 2025
- RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3485', Pavla Dagsson Waldhauserova, 10 Oct 2025
- AC1: 'Responses to all referee comments', Patrick Hayes, 21 Nov 2025
Peer review completion
AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
AR by Patrick Hayes on behalf of the Authors (24 Nov 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (27 Nov 2025) by Markus Ammann
AR by Patrick Hayes on behalf of the Authors (04 Dec 2025)
This study investigates the emergence of a high-latitude mineral dust source in the ’A’äy Chù’ Valley, Yukon, Canada, following climate-driven glacial recession. The authors focus on the size distribution, elemental composition, and health implications of particulate matter (PM), particularly PM₁₀ and PM₂.₅, enriched with PTEs. The work builds on previous campaigns and expands the scope of elemental analysis. The study addresses a newly intensified dust source in a high-latitude region, which is underrepresented in global dust budgets but disproportionately affects snow albedo and local air quality, linking climate change, glacial recession, and public health. Dual instrumentation (Optical Particle Counter and Coulter Counter) provides cross-validation of particle size distributions. Elemental analysis is well-detailed, including digestion protocols, calibration, and recovery corrections. The study also includes some diurnal variation analysis and comparisons with WHO and Ontario air quality standards.
The study is a nice case study in one valley, it would be interesting to see how the authors would scale up these implications to the wider regional impacts (is this just a health impact in one valley?). how many similar sites have emerged due to glacial recession. Can this data be reflected in dispersion models to elucidate local / regional impacts.
Air quality standards are normally considered for urban and industrial dust sources – do these natural source dusts contain materials that are similarly bioaccessible in e.g. oral or lung fluids.
Minor comments -
L114 – check if ‘Mcmurry’ should be ‘McMurry’. (again at L125 Mctainsh – best check all Scottish names cited).
L275 Typo - ‘respectively.(World Health Organization, 2021)’
L346 Typo ‘and 1.68.(Bachelder et al., 2020; Mukherjee, 2013; Smart and Willis, 1967)’
Fig. 8 – check the units of number, SA and volume, seems odd to me (not an atmospheric scientist), but they don’t match Table1 either.
Table 2 – why is Variance of distribution in brackets
L389 – ‘Shilts et al.’ needs a date.
L447 Typo - basis.(Human Toxicology and Air Standards Section, 2020)
Table 3 - enrichment of PTEs in the fine fraction material is commonly reported – it would be good to see the total enrichment versus the parent material (sediments) so that it could be potentially be predicted the relationship between bulk sediment concentrations and PM concentrations (measurement of sediment concentrations is much easier and much more commonly collected than PM concentrations).