Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 26, issue 2
Articles | Volume 26, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1229-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1229-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 26, issue 2
Research article
 | 
26 Jan 2026
Research article |  | 26 Jan 2026

Methane fluxes from Arctic & boreal North America: comparisons between process-based estimates and atmospheric observations

Hanyu Liu, Misa Ishizawa, Felix R. Vogel, Zhen Zhang, Benjamin Poulter, Leyang Feng, Ao Chen, Anna L. Gagné-Landmann, Deborah N. Huntzinger, Joe R. Melton, Vineet Yadav, Dylan C. Gaeta, Ziting Huang, Douglas E. J. Worthy, Douglas Chan, and Scot M. Miller

Viewed

Total article views: 1,095 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
928 131 36 1,095 149 25 38
  • HTML: 928
  • PDF: 131
  • XML: 36
  • Total: 1,095
  • Supplement: 149
  • BibTeX: 25
  • EndNote: 38
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jun 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jun 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,095 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,065 with geography defined and 30 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
We find that the state-of-the-art process-based methane flux models have both lower flux magnitude and reduced inter-model uncertainty compared to a previous model inter-comparison from over a decade ago. Despite these improvements, methane flux estimates from process-based models are still likely too high compared to atmospheric observations. We also find that models with simpler parameterizations often result in better agreement with atmospheric observations in high-latitude North America.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint