Articles | Volume 26, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-12049-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-12049-2026
Research article
 | 
25 Aug 2026
Research article |  | 25 Aug 2026

Do GEMS geostationary satellite observations of tropospheric NO2 always improve NOx emission estimates and related air quality modelling?

Fei Yao, Paul I. Palmer, Xiaolin Wang, Yi Wang, Gitaek T. Lee, Haolin Wang, Liang Feng, Daven K. Henze, and Rokjin J. Park

Viewed

Total article views: 1,859 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,106 500 253 1,859 305 361 282
  • HTML: 1,106
  • PDF: 500
  • XML: 253
  • Total: 1,859
  • Supplement: 305
  • BibTeX: 361
  • EndNote: 282
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Apr 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Apr 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,859 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,810 with geography defined and 49 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 04 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
The Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS) provides hourly measurements of tropospheric NO2 during sunlight hours. We assess the added value of GEMS geostationary satellite observations of tropospheric NO2 to constrain monthly NOx emissions and subsequent air quality modelling over a full annual cycle across Asia. We observe a clear seasonal divide, with significant benefits outside summer while limited or even detrimental impacts during summer.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint