State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
Key Laboratory for Vehicle Emission Control and Simulation, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing, 100012, China
School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University and Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519082, China
School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University and Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519082, China
Shuyang Xie
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
Shiyi Chen
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
Chunmeng Li
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
National Institute of Metrology, Center for Environmental Metrology, Beijing, 100029, China
Yuanjun Gong
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
Huabin Dong
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
Viewed
Total article views: 1,992 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,501
401
90
1,992
192
66
95
HTML: 1,501
PDF: 401
XML: 90
Total: 1,992
Supplement: 192
BibTeX: 66
EndNote: 95
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Jan 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 14 Jan 2025)
Total article views: 1,662 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,264
329
69
1,662
154
51
74
HTML: 1,264
PDF: 329
XML: 69
Total: 1,662
Supplement: 154
BibTeX: 51
EndNote: 74
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Jun 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 27 Jun 2025)
Total article views: 330 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
237
72
21
330
38
15
21
HTML: 237
PDF: 72
XML: 21
Total: 330
Supplement: 38
BibTeX: 15
EndNote: 21
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Jan 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 14 Jan 2025)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 1,992 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,962 with geography defined
and 30 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,662 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,659 with geography defined
and 3 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 330 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 303 with geography defined
and 27 with unknown origin.
We directly measured the dinitrogen pentoxide (N2O5) uptake coefficient using an aerosol flow tube, which critically impacts the NOx fate and particulate nitrate formation in a typical highland city, Kunming, in China. We found that the performance of current γ (N2O5) parameterizations showed deviations with the varying aerosol liquid water content (ALWC). Such differences would lead to biased estimation of particulate nitrate production potential. We give suggestions for future research directions.
We directly measured the dinitrogen pentoxide (N2O5) uptake coefficient using an aerosol flow...