Articles | Volume 25, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16729-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Quantification and parameterization of snowflake fall speeds in the atmospheric surface-layer
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 25 Nov 2025)
- Preprint (discussion started on 08 Jul 2025)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3060', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Jul 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Dhiraj Kumar Singh, 07 Nov 2025
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Dhiraj Kumar Singh, 07 Nov 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3060', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Oct 2025
- AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Dhiraj Kumar Singh, 07 Nov 2025
Peer review completion
AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
AR by Dhiraj Kumar Singh on behalf of the Authors (08 Nov 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (10 Nov 2025) by Radovan Krejci
AR by Dhiraj Kumar Singh on behalf of the Authors (10 Nov 2025)
This is a well written manuscript which presents valuable measurements of snowflake fall speeds and I agree with the authors that the proposed parameterization is potentially useful to modelers. I have no major concerns about the methods or analysis and have only minor clarification questions.
1. The MASC is mentioned as being present at the site, but is its data used in the analysis? I don't think it was mentioned in sections 2.2 or 2.3 and my apologies if I missed it. If not used, perhaps say so explicitly or remove mention of this instrument.
2. In equation 2, is pi*a*b the same as the previously defined circumscribed projected area A? If so, it may be useful to draw that connection explicitly.
3. Line 241: I believe the authors meant to refer to Figure 7b rather than 7a.