<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-25-16729-2025</article-id><title-group><article-title>Quantification and parameterization of snowflake fall speeds in the atmospheric surface-layer</article-title><alt-title>Snowflake fall speed parameterization</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Donovan</surname><given-names>Spencer</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>Dhiraj K.</given-names></name>
          <email>u6021818@utah.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9149-6432</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Garrett</surname><given-names>Timothy J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9277-8773</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Pardyjak</surname><given-names>Eric R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Dhiraj K. Singh (u6021818@utah.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>25</day><month>November</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>25</volume>
      <issue>22</issue>
      <fpage>16729</fpage><lpage>16746</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>30</day><month>June</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>8</day><month>July</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>November</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day><month>November</month><year>2025</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2025 Spencer Donovan et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e114">The modeled settling speed of frozen hydrometeors has important implications for the prediction of weather and climate. However, it is usually assumed, erroneously, that they fall in still air. Here, we present novel field measurements of individual snowflake microphysical properties and their settling velocities in atmospheric surface-layer turbulence. Individual snowflake motions are tracked in a laser light sheet using particle streak velocimetry (PSV). A hotplate device, the Differential Emissivity Imaging Disdrometer (DEID), is used to obtain precise estimates of snowflake mass, density, and size. Relative to calculated terminal velocities in still air, we present enhancements and reductions of snowflake settling speeds in turbulent air for a broad range of Reynolds and Stokes numbers. Functional forms describing actual snowflake fall speeds are presented and explored. In particular, a promising non-dimensional functional form for the ratio of actual particle fall speed to terminal velocity is presented in terms of turbulence intensity and a new variable called the shape density index or SDI, which is related to an individual hydrometeor's microphysical structure.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Science Foundation</funding-source>
<award-id>PDM‐1841870 and PDM‐2210179</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e126">Predictions of precipitation amount, location, and duration are highly sensitive to parameterized expressions of how precipitation particles fall <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.1"/>. Substantial impacts on predictability have been identified for forecasts of hurricane trajectories <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.2"/>, storm lifetimes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.3"/>, cumulative precipitation at regional scales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.4"/>, precipitation extremes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.5"/>, convective cloud dynamics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.6"/>, and weather and climate modeling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.7"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e151">Particle fall speeds play an important role in determining spatial and temporal variability of snow cover, the surface energy budget of the lower atmosphere, local hydrology, the mass balance of glaciers, and vegetation development  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.8"/>. Existing models of snow-cover distribution, soil moisture, surface runoff, and river discharge use simple parameterizations of surface processes  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.9"/>.  At smaller scales, topographical features modify the flow-field near the surface resulting in preferential deposition and spatial-temporal heterogeneity of snowfall distributions, especially in mountain environments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.10"/>. Surface-layer turbulence is expected to be an important factor influencing the motion and deposition of frozen hydrometeors through their settling velocity.</p>
      <p id="d2e163">In this paper, the ratio of the actual fall speed of a snow particle, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to the calculated terminal velocity of the same snow particle under quiescent (no wind) conditions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is used to evaluate the degree to which the movement of the surrounding fluid modifies hydrometeor settling.  Early experiments studying the effects of turbulence on particles falling in a gravitational field explored heavy spherical particles  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.11"/> and quantified the settling reduction using a normalized parameter we term here the settling enhancement ratio, or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Solid spherical particles with known densities and terminal fall speeds in still fluid were compared to observed average fall speeds of identical particles falling through grid-generated turbulence, that is, turbulence produced by passing a steady flow through a mesh or grid to create nearly isotropic and homogeneous fluctuations.</p>
      <p id="d2e209"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.12"/> conducted laboratory experiments using grid-generated turbulence and found that particle fall speeds were reduced by as much as 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to their terminal velocities in still fluid.</p>
      <p id="d2e223">By contrast, in a theoretical analysis, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.13"/> showed that inertial-particle settling speeds are generally enhanced in simulated flow fields over similar particles in a still fluid.  This enhancement is owing to the “fast-tracking” of heavier particles that tend to sample the downward side of vortex boundaries.  This effect was highlighted in subsequent publications that also showed instances of reductions in particle settling speed  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.14"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e232">Particles that are too fast or too large to be guided along the fast-track periphery of eddies, or if the vortices are short-lived, spend more time sampling upward-moving regions of the flow, resulting in “particle loitering” and a subsequent decrease in fall speed. When the eddy turnover time becomes comparable to the particle response time, however, even relatively large particles can momentarily adjust to the surrounding flow, leading to improved alignment with turbulent motion.</p>
      <p id="d2e235"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.15"/> highlighted that particles with high inertia and densities much greater than the fluid are increasingly unaffected by horizontal velocity fluctuations of the fluid, making them less likely to be fast-tracked, resulting in a reduction of the mean settling velocity.  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.16"/> identified a need for more experimental data due to the variety of flow structures with the same relative turbulence strength.</p>
      <p id="d2e243">Within a random flow field and in the absence of particle inertia, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.17"/> showed the average particle velocity to be the same as the terminal velocity.  In the case of very-high particle inertia, particles display ballistic trajectories decoupled from the fluid flow.</p>
      <p id="d2e249">Generally, an increase or decrease in fall speed only occurs for particles within an intermediate range of inertia values, typically corresponding to Stokes numbers of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">St</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where the particle response time is comparable to the Kolmogorov time scale <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.18"/>. In a review of several published simulations and experimental results indicating enhancement and reduction in relative settling velocity, Nielsen (2007) noted the importance of particle density and inertia in the form of a Stokes number derived from the particle and fluid timescale ratio.</p>
      <p id="d2e271">There is an increased likelihood of a particle having enough inertia to get into regions of fast-tracking with increasing Stokes number. That is, they showed loitering increasing as Stokes number decreases.</p>
      <p id="d2e275">Numerical simulations by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.19"/> of finite-sized particles with densities slightly greater than the fluid, show a reduction in settling velocity for Kolmogorov-scale particles.  As <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases and the streamwise turbulent velocity fluctuations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase, a reduction in the particle settling speed occurs.  A reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also observed for sub-Kolmogorov particles as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases as particles are less likely to sample the regions of downdrafts, similar to the observations made by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.20"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e344">Fewer experiments exist that have measured the settling rate of snowflakes directly.  The lack of experimental data is due to the difficulty of tracking and labeling frozen hydrometeors in their natural airborne state while simultaneously quantifying the microphysical attributes of each differing particle. The need to include the particle mass, density, and shape in fall speed calculations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.21"/>  is highlighted by measurements obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.22"/> in still air that show that natural aggregates, even of similar size, can fall at very different terminal velocities ranging from about 0.4–1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e370">Without measuring the inertial properties of snow, recent field experiments by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.23"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.24"/> observed a substantial increase in the settling velocity of tracked snow particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the atmospheric surface layer with average settling-rate  enhancements of three and seven fold, respectively, over the corresponding still air terminal velocities.  They define <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in terms of a Stokes number timescale relationship as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">St</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Kolmogorov time scale associated with the smallest turbulent eddies in the flow and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the aerodynamic response times. They determined values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the distribution of snowflake accelerations.  The reported increase in settling speed was primarily attributed to surface-layer turbulence and preferential sweeping. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.25"/> observed the largest spread in velocity distributions associated with the narrowest spread in size distributions and visa-versa, suggesting that different densities could contribute to the counterintuitive findings.</p>
      <p id="d2e482">In this paper, we measure Lagrangian settling velocities by tracking snowflakes over a wide range of snowfall conditions. Currently, limited measurements of the fall speed of frozen hydrometeors have been reported in the literature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.26"/> that contain direct measurements of mass and density; most instead use an assumed aerodynamic density, which is an effective density inferred from a particle's drag behavior and depends on its shape, porosity, and orientation rather than its true material density. Our goal is to understand the impacts of turbulence on the fall speed as a function of the actual measured snowflake density and shape characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
      <p id="d2e496">Atmospheric turbulence is generated by two primary components: wind shear and buoyancy driven by temperature gradients.  Our focus is on the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), specifically the surface layer, or the portion of the troposphere that is directly influenced by the surface on a timescale of approximately an hour or less and ranges in depth between hundreds of meters to a few kilometers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.27"/>. The turbulence data presented here were collected during the nighttime snow events when daytime buoyancy effects are weak. While diurnal behaviors are always present, during precipitation events, near-surface turbulence statistics are primarily determined by the wind's interaction with terrain complexities and vegetative-canopy structures.  Turbulence statistics for each event are utilized to identify and segment cases into periods of high and low turbulence.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Field site</title>
      <p id="d2e509">Field experiments were performed at the Mid-Collins (CLN) snow study plot in Alta, Utah, USA (40°34<sup>′</sup>33.66<sup>′′</sup> N, 111°38<sup>′</sup>19.93<sup>′′</sup> W, elevation 2945 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the 2020–2021 winter season. The site averages 1300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of snowfall annually and has 17.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with at least 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of snow per winter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.28"/>. The Alta study plot is located in a clearing surrounded by an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tall tree canopy surrounded by  complex mountainous terrain.  This site was chosen in-part to avoid the additional measurement of windblown snow that is typically lifted from exposed terrain features.</p>
      <p id="d2e608">The instrumentation deployed for this work was collocated with existing operation instruments operated by Alta Ski Area as well as manual snow measurements conducted twice daily. Data collection at Alta consisted of one CSAT3 Campbell Scientific, Inc. sonic anemometer-thermometer that was maintained at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the snow surface that measured all three components of the wind and sonic temperature. These data were logged at 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to capture high frequency measurements of the along-wind component of the wind velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the transverse component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the vertical velocity component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  One high-precision slow-response Vaisala HMP 155 thermometer/hygrometer was located at approximately 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above ground and sampled at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The CSAT3 and HMP 155 data were logged using a Campbell Scientific CR1000.  A Differential Emissivity Imaging Disdrometer (DEID) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.29"/> was maintained at the same height as the sonic anemometer to measure individual snowflake mass, density, and geometric characteristics. Collocated with the DEID was a particle tracking system for measuring individual snowflake positions and velocities. A photograph of the main tower is presented in  Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/> was adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="altparen.30"/> with the permission of AIP Publishing. © 2023 AIP Publishing.). Detailed descriptions of the DEID and particle tracking system are given below.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e700">Field deployment installation overview at the Alta-Collins snow study plot including the DEID, PSV system, sonic anemometer, and hygrometer. The entire assembly is raised and lowered with a manual pulley system to maintain an approximately constant height above the snow surface throughout the winter. (This figure is adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="altparen.31"/> with the permission of AIP Publishing. © 2023 AIP Publishing).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e713">In addition to the instruments on the main tower, a Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera (MASC) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.32"/> was deployed at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the snow surface on a mast located within 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the main tower. The MASC captures high-resolution photographs of individual snowflakes; however, its data were not used in the present analysis. We have also used temperature data from Alta Ski Area's high-elevation Mt. Baldy observation station located at an elevation of 3373 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (40°34<sup>′</sup>3.72<sup>′′</sup> N, 111°38<sup>′</sup>14.64<sup>′′</sup> W)</p>
      <p id="d2e796">Intensive Observation Periods (IOPs) were performed during most nighttime snowfall events throughout the 2020–2021 season and comprised millions of snowflake settling velocities and physical properties measurements. This paper focuses on four cases conducted during snow-event IOPs on 12 December 2020 (Case 1), 4 January 2021 (Case 2), 16 March 2021 (Case 3), and 26 March 2021 (Case 4). Details about the meteorology condition, observation time intervals, and microphysical parameters are provided in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Snowflake imaging and tracking to measure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d2e820">The motions of settling individual snowflakes  were imaged using a particle tracking system consisting of a laser sheet with a sampling volume (or region of interest, ROI) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.6</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.8</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oriented normal to the viewing angle of a Nikon D850 SLR camera with a single focal length Nikon AF-S VR  Micro  –  Nikkor 105 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>G IF-ED lens. The SLR camera recorded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3840</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pixel</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2160</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pixel</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> images with a spatial resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pixel</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 30 fps within a vertical laser sheet created using three 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 520 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diode lasers and a collimator lens. The collimator lens creates a spread angle of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°, which yielded a laser light sheet with a nearly constant thickness of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout the ROI.  The camera arrangement and settings ensured that all particle images captured within the thickness of the laser sheet were well-focused (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>). Recordings were performed at night so that only well-focused snowflake motions within the thickness of the light sheet were captured.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e970">Snowflake tracking system overview schematic. (1a) Three 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lasers form a light sheet located 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the leading edge of the region of interest (ROI). (1b) SLR camera, 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> normal to the center of the 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ROI. (2a) Thermal camera, located <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>normal to the hotplate with a slight offset to avoid shadowing. (2b) Hotplate, with laser light sheet running through the thermal camera recording region.  The bottom of the ROI was located 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the hotplate surface. (3a) CSAT3 sonic anemometer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the ROI.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1053">Snowflake tracking was performed using the Particle Streak Velocimetry (PSV) technique <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.33"/> to measure Lagrangian velocities of individual particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the laser sheet for concentrations up to 3400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the vertical component, which is positive when falling toward the ground. Typically, PSV is used for speed measurements, but we used the PSV technique to measure fall velocity using the fall angle and streamwise particle speed; details of the calculations are given in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1098">Observed snowflakes moved both downward and upward depending on turbulence levels and the characteristic sizes of turbulent eddies (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA1"/>). Positive downward and negative upward values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are determined by segmenting the analysis into periods where the bulk particle motion or streamwise air flow is exclusively from left to right or vice-versa in the images as discussed in detail in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Microphysical measurement of hydrometeors</title>
      <p id="d2e1124">Hydrometeors that exit the bottom of the laser viewing plane of the SLR camera are then captured by the hotplate surface of the DEID situated directed below. The DEID consists of an infrared camera pointed at a low-emissivity heated metal plate as described in detail in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.34"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.35"/>. The DEID makes use of the contrasting thermal emissivities of water (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and aluminum (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the same temperature. A piece of Kapton tape (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is maintained on one side of  the hotplate to provide a reference length scale as to provide the temperature of the plate. Images from the thermal camera were recorded with a resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">531</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pixels</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">362</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pixels</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a sampling rate of 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Hydrometeors are imaged within  a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> section of the hotplate located at its center appearing  to the thermal camera due to the contrasting emissivity of water and metal  imagery as bright images on a dark background. The hotplate is powered by a 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> supply and uses a digital proportional integral derivative (PID) feedback control mechanism to maintain a constant plate temperature. Binarized images were used to determine the contact area of each individual hydrometeor by counting the white pixels. The contact area of each snowflake was obtained from its melted imprint on the aluminum hotplate. As demonstrated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.36"/>, the difference between pre- and post-melting equivalent diameters is approximately 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that the melt footprint reliably preserves the original two-dimensional geometry owing to the plate's near-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contact angle.</p>
      <p id="d2e1256">The DEID provides accurate measurements of the mass of individual hydrometeors <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, along with the density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the circumscribed ellipse area <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the actual contact areas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx52" id="text.37"/> and illustrated in Fig. 3. Detailed calculations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, along with the complexity, are provided in the following paragraph and in Appendix A, following the approach of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.38"/>. The circumscribed ellipse area (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is obtained from an ellipse constructed using the bounding-box width and height, representing the smallest ellipse that fully encloses the projected shape of the hydrometeor.</p>
      <p id="d2e1345">From these parameters, individual snowflake-equivalent still-air terminal velocities can be estimated using an aerodynamic formula <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.39"/> namely, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Details of the calculation are provided in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx51" id="text.40"/>. The estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.41"/> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> smaller than that calculated using  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.42"/>. Note that we estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.43"/> in this analysis, following the method described therein, with detailed calculation steps provided in Appendix B..  Also, size distributions are expressed here in terms of the effective diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is the diameter of the equivalent circle of area <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> given by  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1485">The density of individual snowflakes is determined based a new method that exploits the rate of heat transfer during the melting of a hydrometeor on the hotplate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.44"/>. Combining microphysical measurements of the snowflakes with turbulence parameters of the surrounding air allows for the computation of frozen-particle Stokes numbers using the timescale ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">St</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  The turbulence Kolmogorov (micro)timescale, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the kinematic viscosity of air and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Kolmogorov micro(length)scale, which is the characteristic length scale of the smallest turbulent eddies in the flow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.45"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the timescale associated with these small-scale eddies and is calculated from 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of turbulence data, and individual particle response times are given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  The density ratio parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>   <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.46"/> is calculated for each snowflake as,

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M104" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          A value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to heavy particles that are perceived as having infinite inertia and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> implies particles that match the surrounding fluid density and behave as idealized fluid tracers.  A density of air at approximately 2945 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is used here.</p>
      <p id="d2e1750">The combination of snowflake shape and density is characterized here with two newly introduced non-dimensional parameters we term the complexity and the shape-density index (SDI). Hydrometeor <italic>complexity</italic> is defined as the ratio of the area of a circumscribed ellipse, constructed using the bounding-box width and height, to the actual cross-sectional area (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) measured on the DEID hotplate. The corresponding ellipse area is given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the semi-axes derived from the bounding-box dimensions using <monospace>MATLAB</monospace>'s <monospace>Regionprops</monospace> function, consistent with the definition used previously.</p>
      <p id="d2e1804">The complexity is then given by:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M114" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Complexity</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the semi-major and semi-minor axes of the ellipse, respectively. A perfectly circular particle has a complexity of unity, with higher values indicating increasingly irregular or elongated shapes.</p>
      <p id="d2e1848">The SDI accounts for the shape of the snowflake relative to a spherical water droplet, defined as

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M117" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SDI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the projected area of the equivalent spherical water droplet formed once the snowflake has melted, as given by

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M119" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mel</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the density of liquid water and 1.2 is a dimensionless geometric constant.  An  SDI value of unity corresponds to a liquid water sphere.  Large, aggregate-type snowflakes with low densities have high SDI. As illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>, small, dense snowflakes such as graupel have lower values of SDI <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.47"/>. Note that SDI is a dimensionless version of the specific surface area (SSA) per unit mass, which is widely used in the snow science literature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.48"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1948"><bold>(a)</bold> Illustration of the shape density index (SDI).  Increasing SDI is shown in the figure.  For a fixed actual area of a snowflake, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, at time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (when the snowflake lands on the DEID hotplate), the density of the sampled snowflakes decreases, shown as melted water circles, resulting in a decreased equivalent area of the melted water, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, from the snowflake.   <bold>(b)</bold> The Complexity of the snowflake is determined from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as used in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.49"/>. The circumscribed ellipse area, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, is measured by the ellipse shown that completely encompasses the actual area, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, of the red colored snowflake.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Turbulence statistics</title>
      <p id="d2e2040">High-frequency wind velocity data were collected using a sonic anemometer situated at the same height and 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> adjacent to the location of the DEID and SLR region of interest (ROI).   To analyze the velocity data, the raw velocity signals are decomposed into a time averaged component (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a fluctuating component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Specifically, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the along-wind, transverse, and vertical velocity components of the wind velocity. To ensure that the anemometer is rotated into the streamwise coordinate system, two rotations are applied to each 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averaging period.  This procedure follows methods outlined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.50"/> where the first rotation aligns the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis about the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis so that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 0, aligning with the horizontal component of the flow.  Calculation of turbulence parameters using sonic anemometer data is outlined in  Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/>. The integral time scale (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the integral length scale (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) are calculated using the temporal autocorrelation function of the horizontal-wind fluctuation. The turbulent Reynolds number  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the root mean square (r.m.s.) of along-wind velocity fluctuation and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Taylor microscale length scale of turbulence. We compute the commonly used non-dimensional turbulence intensity TI from the sonic anemometry data as

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M143" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>TI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>TKE</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          TKE is used in place of the streamwise velocity fluctuations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to account for the chaotic multi-directional turbulence observed at the CLN field site.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e2383">To quantify the broader impacts of turbulence and microphysical properties on snowflake fall speed, data collected from all IOPs are evaluated using different averaging periods.  Averaging alleviates much of the synchronization discrepancies due the spatial separation of the three measurement systems (i.e. the DEID, sonic anemometer, and laser sheet).  By averaging over longer periods, trends in the particle-turbulence interactions are more readily identifiable.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Turbulence</title>
      <p id="d2e2393">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> shows a time series, using a 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> moving average of the vertical wind velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and streamwise velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, that highlights differences in the mean and fluctuating velocity components during periods of relatively high turbulence and low turbulence associated with Cases 1 and 3, respectively. Turbulence statistics for each 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> case are summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/> and are used to identify and segment cases into periods of high and low turbulence. For all cases, the winds are generally light (less than about 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), however, clear differences can be seen between the turbulence characteristics of Cases 1 and 2 (high turbulence) vs. Cases 3 and 4 (low turbulence).</p>

      <fig id="F4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e2466">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series of rotated sonic anemometer data from the Case 1 high-turbulence dataset, indicated by the solid black lines, and the low-turbulence dataset from Case 3, indicated by the red dashed lines.  A 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> moving average is applied to the time series data. <bold>(a)</bold> Streamwise wind velocity. <bold>(b)</bold> Vertical wind velocity.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2500">30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> turbulence statistics, collected from the sonic anemometer 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the snow surface from the CLN site. See Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/> for calculation details. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean wind speed, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the standard deviation of the vertical velocity fluctuations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the integral length scale of turbulence, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Monin–Obukhov lengthscale,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Kolmogorov lengthscale,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is the is the Kolmogorov time scale, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Taylor lengthscale, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Reynolds number based on the Taylor lengthscale, and TKE is turbulent kinetic energy.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Period</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">TKE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(MST)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">00:40–01:10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">160.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">151.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">91.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.045</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">351.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">13187</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.453</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19:57–20:27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">70.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">53.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">41.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.066</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">341.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">10 163</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.414</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">00:48–01:18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">152.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">32.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.420</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">67.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">467</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.019</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23:57–00:27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">262.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">42.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.885</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">81.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">416</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.004</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Snowflake characterization</title>
      <p id="d2e3100">Snowflake characteristics such as complexity and density are determinants of hydrometeor drag and hence the terminal fall speed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.51"/>. Thus, we expect that understanding the microphysical characteristics of snowflakes is important for determining actual fall speeds. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/> shows probability density functions or PDFs of effective diameter,  mass, complexity, density, terminal fall speed, Stokes number, density ratio, SDI, and SSA obtained from DEID measurements of 86 086 individual snowflakes for a low-turbulence situation, Case 3. Datasets like these are unique and illustrate the wide range of values that microphysical variables take on during a single storm leading to large variability in fall speeds. The following are median values with corresponding lower and upper quartiles for the measured parameters: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Mass <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Complexity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">54</mml:mn><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">72</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">St</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; SDI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; SSA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Furthermore, we also found that the mass distribution of the snowflakes follows a power-law function, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>b, departing from the more familiar negative exponential distribution observed for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.52"/>. This discrepancy arises because our measurements directly capture particle mass, whereas previous studies inferred it from mass–diameter relations in which the exponent varies between 1–3 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.53"/>, leading to deviations from a pure power-law distribution.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e3378">PDFs of snowflake characteristics collected using the DEID, measured from a 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> continuous dataset comprised of 86 086 snowflakes at the CLN field site for Case 3.  <bold>(a)</bold> Effective circular diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> Mass, <bold>(c)</bold> Complexity,   <bold>(d)</bold> density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(e)</bold> terminal velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(f)</bold> Stokes number (<italic>St</italic>), <bold>(g)</bold> density ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(h)</bold> shape density index (SDI), <bold>(i)</bold> specific surface area (SSA).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3467">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/> presents relationships that are also not typically available in the analysis of complex snow-storm events but are extremely useful for modeling. In particular, mass-diameter, density-diameter, and terminal settling speed-diameter parameterizations are shown for all four cases studied. While some of the parameterizations characterize the snowflakes well, most do not. This emphasizes the complexity of the distributions. Specifically, these distributions include different types of snowflakes which are expected to have their own relationships <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.54"/>.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3479">Mass diameter, density-diameter, and terminal-velocity-diameter relations, as well as average Mt. Baldy site temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), average CLN site temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), relative humidity (RH), average wind speed (WS), and number of snowflakes measured by the DEID (N) are summarized for four cases. Mass is in milligrams (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is in millimeters, density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and terminal velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">RH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">WS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">N</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(#)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[0.017, 2.77, 0.55]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[76, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.41, 0.19]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[0.33, 0.83,  0.25]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1452</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[0.025, 2.69, 0.61]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[75, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.77, 0.40]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[0.46, 0.64, 0.23]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8537</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[0.018, 2.80, 0.61]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[64, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.84, 0.40]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[0.37, 0.68, 0.18]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">12 595</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[0.010, 2.74, 0.38]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[54, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.60, 0.16]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[0.24, 0.81, 0.14]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8287</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e4063">The distributions of snowflake effective diameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and particle densities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) under high and low turbulence conditions are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>. High-turbulence cases (Case 1 and Case 2) exhibit broader <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> PDFs with slightly larger densities and almost identical mean sizes.   These trends underscore the influence of turbulence on snowflake size and density variability. This may be a result of increased snowflake collisions that occur during higher turbulence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.55"/>. These observations highlight the significant role of turbulence intensity in modulating snowflake microphysical properties.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e4118">PDFs of individual snowflake <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data collected using the DEID. The dashed lines indicate the mean value for each dataset. PDFs of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are given in plots <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>, and PDFs of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are given in plots <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>. <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold> are high-turbulence datasets for Case 1 and Case 2 while <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> are low-turbulence data sets for Case 3 and Case 4.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4197">The distributions of snowflake effective diameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and particle densities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) under high and low turbulence conditions are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>. High-turbulence cases (Case 1 and Case 2) exhibit broader <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> PDFs with slightly larger densities and nearly identical mean sizes. This indicates that turbulence primarily affects the spread rather than the mean value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Increased turbulent fluctuations enhance relative motion, orientation variability, and collision or fragmentation frequency, leading to broader distributions even when the mean remains unchanged <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.56"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Snowflake fall speeds</title>
      <p id="d2e4269">Direct measurements of individual snowflake settling velocities, obtained using PSV, and their terminal velocities <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained from the DEID are presented in this section.  Snowflake fall speeds, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are compared to concurrent measurements of the snowflakes' terminal velocities <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to identify settling reduction and enhancement periods and to understand the mechanisms governing the behavior.</p>
      <p id="d2e4305">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/> shows how fall-speed enhancement and reduction correlate with Stokes number for 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averages. An enhancement in settling speed is noted when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">St</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while a reduction is observed when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">St</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Evidently, higher <italic>St</italic> values are associated with reductions in the average fall speeds <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as snowflake trajectories become more horizontal. This is a rather surprising result that was discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.57"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.58"/>. It is important to note that in this case, the elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">St</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results from increased turbulence intensity, which reduces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, rather than from greater particle inertia or increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  As illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>, individual particles with Stokes numbers less than 1 also tend to exhibit enhancement, while those with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">St</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show a reduction, similar to the 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averages shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/>. The extent of both effects is closely linked to the SDI. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>a, representing a low-turbulence case, shows that particles with low <italic>St</italic> exhibit enhanced settling, with enhancement factors reaching up to 6 for particles with high SDI and values close to unity for particles with low SDI. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/> also shows an inverse relationship between SDI and <italic>St</italic>.</p>

<table-wrap id="T3" specific-use="star"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e4446">30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged snowflake fall speed and microphysical property data from the experiments conducted at CLN field site collected using the DEID and PSV during the four IOPs.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">SDI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Complexity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><italic>St</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">77.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.021</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">68.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.025</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">56.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.226</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.031</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">55.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">15.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.034</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.028</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e4865">0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged data showing the fall speed ratio relative to Stokes number, and colored by SDI.  The maximum enhancement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurs as <italic>St</italic> approaches zero and SDI is high.  Also, fall speeds of particles with low SDI are not as impacted by turbulence  <bold>(a)</bold> Case 4 low turbulence dataset.  <bold>(b)</bold> Case 1 high turbulence dataset.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4902">By looking at individual snowflakes and analyzing their orientation dynamics during free fall under varying turbulence conditions, our observations reveal that orientation is not fixed but evolves continuously as the particle descends <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.59"/>. Interestingly, the rate of change in orientation exhibits distinct statistical behaviors depending on the turbulence intensity. These orientation dynamics have direct implications for drag force estimation and terminal velocity prediction. Since drag is strongly dependent on the projected area normal to the direction of motion, variations in particle orientation lead to corresponding fluctuations in the instantaneous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Specifically, we observe that terminal velocity estimates can vary significantly depending on whether the minimum or maximum projected area is used in the drag calculation. The maximum terminal velocity corresponds to the configuration with the smallest frontal area, while the minimum terminal velocity is associated with the largest area given with respect to the gravitational vector. Analysis of millions of individual snowflake measurements reveals that the ratio of maximum to minimum terminal velocity can be as large as 1.5. This result underscores the importance of accounting for orientation-induced drag variability when modeling particle settling, particularly for irregular, anisotropic particles such as snowflakes.</p>
      <p id="d2e4919">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>, shows fall speeds as a function of particle density across a broad range of turbulence intensities.  Both intuitively and formally (see Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.E8"/> for the terminal velocity), we expect frozen hydrometeors with larger masses to fall at higher speeds in quiescent conditions.  Within all 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  datasets, even for the minimum observed Reynolds number condition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 416), we see that turbulence effects are always present and this is in part why we see a decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as density increases. Under high-turbulence conditions (Cases 1 and 2), settling velocities are significantly reduced, leading to longer atmospheric residence times. Notably, we also observed an increase in snowflake density under these conditions similar to the processes occurring within clouds, suggesting that prolonged suspension in turbulent flow may facilitate the formation of denser snowflakes (i.e. snowflakes with low SDI). These results are observational and emphasize the statistical relationships among turbulence intensity, particle density, and fall speed. A complete physical interpretation would require concurrent measurements of the local flow field and particle-scale forces, which are beyond the scope of this study.</p>

      <fig id="F8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e4958">One-minute averaged snowflake snowflake vertical fall speed as a function of snowflake density for all cases. Fall speeds were measured using PSV and densities were measured using the DEID.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4967">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/> shows the relationship between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and TKE for all cases. Each data point represents a one-minute average collected over a 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observational period. The data exhibit a clear inverse relationship, showing that increased turbulence intensity tends to reduce the fall speed of snowflakes. The observed suppression of fall speed at high TKE suggests that turbulent updrafts and eddies play a significant role in delaying particle settling. This is surprising since both experimentally and numerically, loitering is not expected, except in constrained channels. The observed inverse relationship between turbulence intensity and fall speed is unexpected since previous studies, generally at lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, reported sweeping rather than loitering behavior <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.60"/>. Our results extend into higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> regimes and show that this inverse trend persists even in open, fully developed turbulence, indicating that settling dynamics depend on the turbulent scale and may not be fully captured by existing low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> models. Furthermore, our measured loitering and sweeping is an order of magnitude larger than the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.61"/>. Note that the scatter about the best fit line is largely due to variations in SDI.</p>

      <fig id="F9"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e5041">One-minute averaged data from all four cases (120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> total) showing fall-speed enhancement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function of TKE. Marker color represents SDI.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e5078">Probability density functions (PDFs) comparing actual vertical fall speed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from PSV measurements and terminal fall speed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from DEID measurements using <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.62"/> throughout the four 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cases.  The dotted blue lines denote mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and orange dashed lines mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each event with their associated distributions in the same color. 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mean values are shown in the legends, and the mean turbulence intensity is also shown on the figures.  The shaded regions indicate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values greater than the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each dataset, representing a small portion the total PDF (between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.18</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all cases).  <bold>(a)</bold> Case 1 dataset comprises 288 725 snow particle measurements. <bold>(b)</bold> Case 2 dataset comprises 687 893 snow particle measurements. <bold>(c)</bold> Case 3 dataset comprises 378 395 snow particle measurements <bold>(d)</bold> Case 4 dataset comprises 672 096 snow particle measurements.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F11"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e5214">One-minute averaged data from all four cases (120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> total) showing the empirical fall-speed enhancement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) parameterization.  Marker color represents SDI and marker size scales with turbulence intensity (TI).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5249">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/> shows PDFs of observed hydrometeor fall speeds <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and terminal velocities <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determined using DEID measurements and Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.E8"/>). During the high-turbulence intensity Case 1 and Case 2 events, many particle streaks had upward trajectories, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.9</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, representing a clear reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the terminal fall speed.  A mean settling speed reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured relative to the mean terminal velocity during a 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> high-turbulence event  (Case 1) with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">187</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">923</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; a mean reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28.3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed during another high-turbulence event  (Case 2) with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">163</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">711</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/> and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>a and b).    Conversely, during periods of lower turbulence (Case 3 and Case 4) with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">467</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">416</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, an enhancement in settling speed of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">155.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>c and d).</p>
      <p id="d2e5460">The results from these cases point to a reduction in fall speed for the case of high turbulence and an enhancement for lower turbulence.  Similar numerical and experimental studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.63"/> primarily find enhancements in settling speed for small inertial particles as turbulence increases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by way of preferential sweeping mechanisms. What distinguishes the measurements presented here is the availability of the DEID to directly measure hydrometeor microphysical snowflake properties for computation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a more precise evaluation of the degree of settling reduction or enhancement.</p>
      <p id="d2e5489">Reductions in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during high-turbulence events are associated with broadening of the settling distribution with an increasing fraction of snow particles that move near horizontally or upwards.  The lowest turbulence event with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 416 and  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>TI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in Case 4 has a much narrower distribution than the other cases.  Interestingly, the two-dimensional speed (in the plane of the laser sheet, see <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>) of the snowflakes is however comparatively similar among each of the four datasets.</p>
      <p id="d2e5539">Also notable in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/> is that,  for all events, the   fall-speed distributions have long tails implying high fall speeds occur more often than expected from calculated values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Secondly, fall-speed distributions during lower-turbulence events are bimodal with peaks near zero fall speed and at higher speeds. High-turbulence cases are unimodal with peaks near zero settling speed. Note that distributions of density and effective diameter during this period do not show any bimodal behavior (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Power-Law fall-speed parameterization</title>
      <p id="d2e5566">By combining the critical variables collected by all components of the experimental setup (i.e. DEID, PSV, and sonic anemometer), we have shown that snowflake fall speed is a function of snowflake density, snowflake shape, and turbulence intensity. Expressed in terms of non-dimensional parameters, we hypothesize this functional form to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SDI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the specific form of the equation given by the following power-law

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M323" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mtext>SDI</mml:mtext><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mtext>TI</mml:mtext><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e5641">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/> shows this power-law along with data points from all of the cases studied, where the constants <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.013</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were determined by multiple linear regression. The resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the fit is 0.75. The data-point markers in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/> are colored by SDI and sized by TI. In these results, TI governs both the enhancement and reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, consistent with the findings in Sects. 3.2 and 3.3. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/> illustrates the inherent coupling that is observed between TI and SDI (i.e. snowflake microphysical characteristics). That is, storms with high levels of turbulence are typically associated with low SDI values, while storms with low-turbulence levels are associated with high SDI values. Thus, we expect to see light, fluffy snowflakes during periods of light winds and low turbulence.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e5730">We present direct measurements of individual snowflake microphysical properties and their fall velocities within surface-layer atmospheric turbulence, obtained using a sonic anemometer, a particle-tracking system, and DEID. The DEID directly measures snowflake size, mass, and density <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.64"/>, enabling coupled characterization of microphysical and dynamical properties under natural turbulent conditions. Four snow events were observed at a high alpine location in Utah, USA, two with relatively high turbulence and two with low turbulence. Measurements were made of the particle terminal velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the DEID and the actual fall speed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the particle tracking system to obtain settling enhancements <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for comparison with turbulence levels and snowflake microphysical properties, including a new microphysical parameter called the shape-density index or SDI that accounts for snowflake density and complexity.</p>
      <p id="d2e5776">We found that the fall speed of frozen hydrometeors is a strong function of both turbulence intensity and SDI, and that SDI and turbulence intensity seem to be coupled. Mean snowflake settling rates can be many times slower than terminal speeds in high turbulence and faster in low turbulence. Enhancements are greatest for low-density snowflakes with high SDI. A power-law functional form is proposed to describe particle settling enhancement as a function of turbulence and SDI.  Including SDI in the fitting significantly improved the model performance, with the coefficient of determination (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) increasing from 0.62 to 0.75. Specifically, the value for vs. TKE alone was 0.62, while the combined fit with SDI and turbulence intensity (TI) yielded 0.75. This new parameterization has the potential to be implemented in numerical models that predict snowfall amount, location, and duration, with some caution that a wider range of turbulence conditions should be considered and that the measurements described here were obtained in a clearing within a dense heterogeneous tree canopy with close proximity to mountainous alpine terrain.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title>Particle Streak Velocimetry methodology</title>
      <p id="d2e5802">This Appendix briefly describes our implementation of Particle Streak Velocimetry (PSV). PSV is a useful method for measuring flow fields filled with particles such as snowflakes. It quantifies two-dimensional Lagrangian velocities from particle trajectories captured by single-frame long-exposure images.   Snow particle motion was captured within the region of interest (ROI), composed of a 24.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.8</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> volume. The captured snowflake images have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3840</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pixels</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2160</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pixels</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a resolution of 0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per pixel. The camera arrangement and settings ensure that all particle images captured within the thickness of the laser sheet are well-focused. Recordings are performed at night so that only the well-focused snowflake motions within the thickness of the light sheet are captured. The Sobel Image edge detection method is applied to distinguish snowflakes from the background, which assumes a steep intensity gradient exists along the edges of the particle streak images. By locating the points where the local intensity gradient slope reaches maximum and minimum, a global threshold is applied to all captured images <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.65"/>. In some instances, a pre-processing step is added to particle streak recordings, where the brightness threshold is adjusted using Adobe Premiere<sup>®</sup> (22.0) to remove lower brightness areas of condensed particle plumes. Snowflake streak image analysis is performed using the MATLAB<sup>®</sup> Image Processing Toolbox. A binary threshold of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">255</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> assigns a value of unity for pixels containing frozen hydrometeors and zero value where no hydrometeors are present. The threshold may be attenuated to remove the occasional presence of image static that results from increased camera temperature during differing IOP conditions (See Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA1"/>). Attenuating the binary threshold to determine the boundaries of the particle streak image may cause uncertainty in the aspect ratio of particle streaks resulting in inaccuracies in streak length and width measurement, and an associated of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5903">The start and end points of streaks provide the extent of the bounding boxes for measuring the streak length and local azimuth angles, assuming that the Lagrangian trajectory of the snowflake within the exposed streak is linear. The individual hydrometer fall speeds are calculated by measuring the streak length, minus the particle dimension minimum width (perpendicular to streak length), of the exposed snowflake streaks relative to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> frame exposure time. This concept is illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA2"/>.  Streaks whose paths intersect with the frame edges of the ROI are removed. During high turbulence, when the turbulence Reynolds number, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≳</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we observe many particles moving with upward and downward velocities. During these periods, the fall angle resolves upward and downward motions (See Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA1"/>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are decoupled by segmenting the analysis into periods where the bulk particle motion is exclusively from left to right or vice-versa. In the images, the horizontal velocity of the streak is greater than vertical velocity. During periods of decreased turbulence, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we observe particle streaks with only downward velocity. We used this method for the first time, to determine both particle speed and direction simultaneously.</p>

      <fig id="FA1"><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d2e5980">Example illustration using particle streak velocimetry (PSV) to determine streak edge and fall direction.  <bold>(a)</bold> Binary streak image conversion from gray scale to black and white based on plotted pixel intensity measurement extending beyond both edges along the minor axis of the streak image.  Pixels with an intensity below the determined threshold indicate the edges of the streak. <bold>(b)</bold> Upward and downward particle motion according to bulk observed particle horizontal trajectory and fall angle, where streaks with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = upward movement <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = downward movement <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025-f12.png"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FA2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure A2</label><caption><p id="d2e6054">PSV methodology for extracting velocity and fall angle of each snowflake trajectory from a single frame.  Image frame was captured during the 4 January 2021 snow event with an exposure time of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025-f13.png"/>

      </fig>

      <fig id="FA3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure A3</label><caption><p id="d2e6085">DEID installation schematic and imaging technique. <bold>(a)</bold> Schematic of the DEID.  The top surface of a roughened heated aluminum plate imaged by a thermal camera is dark due to its low infrared emissivity.  Hydrometeors with a high emissivity that reach a high temperature on the heated plate show as bright regions from which the hydrometeor's size and area can be measured by counting pixels.  <bold>(b)</bold> Black and white binary thermal images of snowflakes in various stages of melting and evaporation on the DEID heated plate observed at Alta.  The emissivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of snow and aluminum are noted.  <bold>(c)</bold> Enlarged image illustrating the definitions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This figure is reproduced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.66"/>, published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0).</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025-f14.png"/>

      </fig>


</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <label>Appendix B</label><title>Terminal velocity estimation from the DEID</title>

      <fig id="FB1"><label>Figure B1</label><caption><p id="d2e6159"><bold>(a)</bold> Comparison of terminal velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values calculated using parameterizations by  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.67"/> (HW10)  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.68"/> (B89). <bold>(b)</bold> Corresponding distributions.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025-f15.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e6192">Enhancements of the settlings speeds of frozen hydrometeors are quantified by comparison to the terminal fall velocity of the same precipitation particles in still air.  Normally, a power-law relationship is used to solve for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of a snow particle, namely

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>B1</label><mml:math id="M355" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the maximum dimension of the particle and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are constants that have been determined empirically for a range of particle types  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.69"/>. Based on fluid dynamical considerations, the terminal velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated assuming non-linear drag forces based on formulae developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.70"/>. Terminal velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is governed by the cross-sectional area normal to the flow. For each hydrometeor, multiple in-flight images are captured in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> plane (where the apparent area varies with rotation), along with one deposition footprint in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> plane on the hotplate. The footprint correlates with the maximum projected area <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.71"/>, and in still air, the mean orientation tends toward broadside, with variance decreasing as turbulence weakens <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.72"/>. Accordingly, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> footprint is used as a proxy for the maximum cross-section to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The DEID instrument enables direct measurement of individual hydrometeor properties, including mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), circumscribed ellipse area (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and contact area on the collection plate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The circumscribed ellipse area (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is determined from an ellipse constructed using the bounding-box width and height, representing the smallest ellipse that fully encloses the projected area (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx52" id="paren.73"/>. Using these parameters, the still-air terminal velocity of individual snowflakes can be estimated via an aerodynamic formulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.74"/>

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>B2</label><mml:math id="M373" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        
        where, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the density of air and the dynamic viscosity of air, respectively, and the particle Reynolds number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>B3</label><mml:math id="M377" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1519</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where the Davies number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>B4</label><mml:math id="M379" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gravitational acceleration.</p>
      <p id="d2e6607">A modification to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.E9"/>) has been proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.75"/> to account for all types of natural ice particles, where

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>B5</label><mml:math id="M381" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e6665">Comparison of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculations using the equations of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.76"/> and  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.77"/> are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB1"/>. Generally, the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.78"/> estimates are lower. Considering a dataset (17 December 2020 from CLN field site) comprised of 85 000 snowflakes measured on 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> duration, the average value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for B89 is 0.59 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) based on the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.79"/>  parameterization and 0.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.80"/> parameterization.</p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S3">
  <label>Appendix C</label><title>Turbulence statistics calculations</title>

      <fig id="FC1"><label>Figure C1</label><caption><p id="d2e6761">30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> turbulence conditions measured at the CLN field site on 4 January 2021. <bold>(a)</bold> Autocorrelation of the streamwise velocity fluctuations.  The integral of the portion of the signal that is correlated with itself is represented by the shaded area and measured by the integral <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.  The Taylor microscale is marked by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> located on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis.  <bold>(b)</bold> 1D energy density spectrum, with the inertial subrange indicated by the portion with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slope.  The region ahead of the inertial subrange shows where energy is being added to the flow by the largest turbulent structures and the related region after represents the smallest dynamically significant scales.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/16729/2025/acp-25-16729-2025-f16.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e6822">Using Taylor's hypothesis, turbulence length scales are derived from temporal sonic anemometry data (see e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="altparen.81"/>). The largest turbulent structures are quantified using the integral time scale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the integral length scale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The integral scales are quantified by integrating the autocorrelation of the streamwise velocity fluctuations following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.82"/>. The Taylor microscale length scale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined by the point where a parabola, fit to the first three data points of the autocorrelation function, crosses the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.83"/>. Following the methods outlined in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.84"/>, the dissipation rate of TKE, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, is estimated from the inertial subrange of the 1D (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) energy density spectrum. Estimates of the energy dissipation rate are used to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> representing the Kolmogorov length scale and time scale respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the kinematic viscosity of air at the corresponding temperature during a given IOP. We used a 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averaging period for turbulence and particle statistics, consistent with standard boundary-layer analyses (Kaimal and Finnigan, 1994; Stull, 1988; Shaw et al., 1998). This duration captures dominant large-eddy motions while avoiding mesoscale non-stationarity. Sensitivity tests using 60- and 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> windows showed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variation in integral scales and Kolmogorov length, confirming stability.</p>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e6996">The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e7004">TJG and ERP conceived of the project. SD and DKS led the experiments and analysis of data in consultation with ERP and TJG. All authors contributed to writing and editing the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e7010">The DEID technology is protected through patent   US20210172855A1 co-authored with Dhiraj K. Singh, Eric R. Pardyjak, and Timothy J. Garrett and is commercially available through Particle Flux Analytics, Inc. Timothy J. Garrett is a co-owner of Particle Flux Analytics, Inc., which has a license from the University of Utah to commercialize the DEID. At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</italic>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e7019">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e7025">We thank Allan Reaburn and his colleagues at Particle Flux Analytics, Inc. for their  contributions to the development of the DEID, Dave Richards, Jonathan Morgan, and the Alta Ski Patrol for field support, as well as Travis Morrison for their contributions to the experimental setup in the field. This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation through the following grants: PDM-1841870 and PDM-2210179).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e7030">This research has been supported by the National Science Foundation, Directorate for Geosciences (grant no. PDM-1841870 and PDM-2210179).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e7036">This paper was edited by Radovan Krejci and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Alcott and Steenburgh(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Alcott, T. I. and Steenburgh, W. J.: Snow-to-liquid ratio variability and prediction at a high-elevation site in Utah's Wasatch Mountains, Weather Forecast., 25, 323–337, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009WAF2222311.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009WAF2222311.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Bao and Windmiller(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Bao, J. and Windmiller, J. M.: Impact of microphysics on tropical precipitation extremes in a global storm-resolving model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL094206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094206" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL094206</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Böhm(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Böhm, H. P.: A general equation for the terminal fall speed of solid hydrometeors, J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 2419–2427, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046&lt;2419:AGEFTT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046&lt;2419:AGEFTT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Cohen and Rind(1991)</label><mixed-citation> Cohen, J. and Rind, D.: The effect of snow cover on the climate, J. Climate, 4, 689–706, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Colle et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Colle, B. A., Garvert, M. F., Wolfe, J. B., Mass, C. F., and Woods, C. P.: The 13–14 December 2001 IMPROVE-2 event. Part III: Simulated microphysical budgets and sensitivity studies, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3535–3558, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3552.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS3552.1</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Dimotakis and Koochesfahani(1981)</label><mixed-citation>Dimotakis, P. E. Debussy, F. D. and Koochesfahani, M. M.: Particle streak velocity field measurements in a two-dimensional mixing layer, Phys. Fluid., 24, 995–999, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.863481" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.863481</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Eidhammer et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Eidhammer, T., Gettelman, A., Thayer-Calder, K., Watson-Parris, D., Elsaesser, G., Morrison, H., van Lier-Walqui, M., Song, C., and McCoy, D.: An Extensible Perturbed Parameter Ensemble (PPE) for the Community Atmosphere Model Version 6, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7835–7853, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7835-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-17-7835-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Fassnacht et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation> Fassnacht, S., Innes, J., Kouwen, N., and Soulis, E.: The specific surface area of fresh dendritic snow crystals, Hydrol. Process., 13, 2945–2962, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Fornari et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation> Fornari, W., Picano, F., Sardina, G., and Brandt, L.: Reduced particle settling speed in turbulence, J. Fluid Mech., 808, 153–167, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Fovell and Su(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Fovell, R. G. and Su, H.: Impact of cloud microphysics on hurricane track forecasts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L24810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031723" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL031723</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Garrett et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Garrett, T. J., Fallgatter, C., Shkurko, K., and Howlett, D.: Fall speed measurement and high-resolution multi-angle photography of hydrometeors in free fall, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 2625–2633, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2625-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-2625-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Garrett et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Garrett, T. J., Singh, D. K., and Pardyjak, E. R.: Settling and rotation of frozen hydrometeors in turbulent air, Geophys. Res. Lett., 52, e2025GL114780, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL114780" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2025GL114780</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Garvert et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Garvert, M. F., Woods, C. P., Colle, B. A., Mass, C. F., Hobbs, P. V., Stoelinga, M. T., and Wolfe, J. B.: The 13–14 December 2001 IMPROVE-2 event. Part II: Comparisons of MM5 model simulations of clouds and precipitation with observations, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3520–3534, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3551.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS3551.1</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Good et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Good, G., Ireland, P., Bewley, G., Bodenschatz, E., Collins, L., and Warhaft, Z.: Settling regimes of inertial particles in isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech., 759, R3–R13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.602" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jfm.2014.602</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Grabowski and Wang(2013)</label><mixed-citation> Grabowski, W. W. and Wang, L.-P.: Growth of cloud droplets in a turbulent environment, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 45, 293–324, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Grzegorczyk et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Grzegorczyk, P., Yadav, S., Zanger, F., Theis, A., Mitra, S. K., Borrmann, S., and Szakáll, M.: Fragmentation of ice particles: laboratory experiments on graupel–graupel and graupel–snowflake collisions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13505–13521, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13505-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-13505-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Gunn and Marshall(1958)</label><mixed-citation>Gunn, K. L. S. and Marshall, J. S.: The distribution with size of aggregate snowflakes, J. Meteorol., 15, 452–461, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1958)015&lt;0452:TDWSOA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1958)015&lt;0452:TDWSOA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1958.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Hagos et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Hagos, S., Ruby Leung, L., Zhao, C., Feng, Z., and Sakaguchi, K.: How do microphysical processes influence large-scale precipitation variability and extremes?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2017GL076375, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076375" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL076375</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Heymsfield and Westbrook(2010)</label><mixed-citation> Heymsfield, A. J. and Westbrook, C.: Advances in the estimation of ice particle fall speeds using laboratory and field measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 2469–2482, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Ireland et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation> Ireland, P. J., Bragg, A. D., and Collins, L. R.: The effect of Reynolds number on inertial particle dynamics in isotropic turbulence. Part 2. Simulations with gravitational effects, J. Fluid. Mech., 796, 659–711, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Jakob(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Jakob, C.: Ice clouds in numerical weather prediction models: progress, problems, and prospects, in: Cirrus, Oxford University Press, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195130720.003.0020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/oso/9780195130720.003.0020</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Legagneux et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Legagneux, L., Cabanes, A., and Dominé, F.: Measurement of the specific surface area of 176 snow samples using methane adsorption at 77 K, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, ACH 5-1–ACH 5-15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001016</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Lehning et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation> Lehning, M., Völksch, I., Gustafsson, D., Nguyen, T. A., Stähli, M., and Zappa, M.: ALPINE3D: a detailed model of mountain surface processes and its application to snow hydrology, Hydrol. Process., 20, 2111–2128, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Lehning et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Lehning, M., Löwe, H., Ryser, M., and Raderschall, N.: Inhomogeneous precipitation distribution and snow transport in steep terrain, Water Resour. Res., 44, W07404, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006545" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007WR006545</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Li et al.(2021a)</label><mixed-citation>Li, C., Lim, K., Berk, T., Abraham, A., Heisel, M., Guala, M., Coletti, F., and Hong, J.: Settling and clustering of snow particles in atmospheric turbulence, J. Fluid Mech., 912, A49, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.1153" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jfm.2020.1153</ext-link>, 2021a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Li et al.(2021b)</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Abraham, A., Guala, M., and Hong, J.: Evidence of preferential sweeping during snow settling in atmospheric turbulence, J. Fluid. Mech., 928, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021.816" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jfm.2021.816</ext-link>, 2021b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Li et al.(2021c)</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Abraham, A., Guala, M., and Hong, J.: Evidence of preferential sweeping during snow settling in atmospheric turbulence, J. Fluid Mech., 928, A8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021.816" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jfm.2021.816</ext-link>, 2021c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Li et al.(2024a)</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Guala, M., and Hong, J.: Field investigation of 3-D snow settling dynamics under weak atmospheric turbulence, J. Fluid Mech., 997, A33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2024.601" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jfm.2024.601</ext-link>, 2024a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Li et al.(2024b)</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Guala, M., and Hong, J.: Field investigation of 3D snow settling dynamics under weak atmospheric turbulence, arXiv [preprint],  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.08737" ext-link-type="DOI">10.48550/arXiv.2406.08737</ext-link>, 13 June 2024b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Li et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Li, S., Bragg, A. D., and Katul, G.: Reduced sediment settling in turbulent flows due to basset history and virtual mass effects, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL105810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105810" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023GL105810</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Locatelli and Hobbs(1974)</label><mixed-citation> Locatelli, J. D. and Hobbs, P. V.: Fall speeds and masses of solid precipitation particles, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 2185–2197, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Maxey(1987)</label><mixed-citation> Maxey, M.: The gravitational settling of aerosol particles in homogeneous turbulence and random flow fields, J. Fluid Mech., 174, 441–465, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Maxey and Corrsin(1986)</label><mixed-citation> Maxey, M. t. and Corrsin, S.: Gravitational settling of aerosol particles in randomly oriented cellular flow fields, J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 1112–1134, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Mercado et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Mercado, J. M., Prakash, V. N., Tagawa, Y., Sun, C., Lohse, D., and for Turbulence Research), I. C.: Lagrangian statistics of light particles in turbulence, Phys. Fluids, 24, 055106, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4719148" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.4719148</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Milbrandt and Morrison(2013)</label><mixed-citation> Milbrandt, J. A. and Morrison, H.: Prediction of graupel density in a bulk microphysics scheme, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 410–429, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Milbrandt et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Milbrandt, J. A., Yau, M. K., Mailhot, J., Bélair, S., and McTaggart-Cowan, R.: Simulation of an orographic precipitation event during IMPROVE-2. Part II: Sensitivity to the number of moments in the bulk microphysics scheme, Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 625–642, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR3121.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009MWR3121.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Mitchell et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Mitchell, D. L., Rasch, P., Ivanova, D., McFarquhar, G., and Nousiainen, T.: Impact of small ice crystal assumptions on ice sedimentation rates in cirrus clouds and GCM simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, 9806–+, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033552" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL033552</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Morrison and Milbrandt(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Morrison, H. and Milbrandt, J. A.: Parameterization of cloud microphysics based on the prediction of bulk ice particle properties. Part I: Scheme description and idealized tests, J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 287–311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0065.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-14-0065.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Morrison et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Morrison, H., van Lier-Walqui, M., Fridlind, A. M., Grabowski, W. W., Harrington, J. Y., Hoose, C., Korolev, A., Kumjian, M. R., Milbrandt, J. A., Pawlowska, H., Posselt, D. J., Prat, O. P., Reimel, K. J., Shima, S.-I., van Diedenhoven, B., and Xue, L.: Confronting the challenge of modeling cloud and precipitation microphysics, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001689, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001689" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019MS001689</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Morrison et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Morrison, T. J., Meisenheimer, T., Garrett, T., Singh, D., Donovan, S., and Pardyjak, E.: Relating storm-snow avalanche instabilities to data collected from the Differential Emissivity Imaging Disdrometer (DEID), Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 210, 103839, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2023.103839" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.coldregions.2023.103839</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Mott and Lehning(2010)</label><mixed-citation> Mott, R. and Lehning, M.: Meteorological modeling of very high-resolution wind fields and snow deposition for mountains, J. Hydrol., 11, 934–949, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Murray(1970)</label><mixed-citation> Murray, S. P.: Settling velocities and vertical diffusion of particles in turbulent water, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 1647–1654, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Nemes et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation> Nemes, A., Dasari, T., Hong, J., Guala, M., and Coletti, F.: Snowflakes in the atmospheric surface layer: observation of particle–turbulence dynamics, J. Fluid Mech., 814, 592–613, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Nielsen(1993)</label><mixed-citation> Nielsen, P.: Turbulence effects on the settling of suspended particles, Journal of Sedimentary Research, 63, 835–838, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Nielsen(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Nielsen, P.: Mean and variance of the velocity of solid particles in turbulence, in: Particle-Laden Flow, Springer, 385–391, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6218-6_30" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-1-4020-6218-6_30</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Parodi and Emanuel(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Parodi, A. and Emanuel, K.: A theory for buoyancy and velocity scales in deep moist convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 3449–3463, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3103.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JAS3103.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Posselt et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Posselt, D. J., He, F., Bukowski, J., and Reid, J. S.: On the relative sensitivity of a tropical deep convective storm to changes in environment and cloud microphysical parameters, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 1163–1185, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0181.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-18-0181.1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Rees et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Rees, K. N., Singh, D. K., Pardyjak, E. R., and Garrett, T. J.: Mass and density of individual frozen hydrometeors, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14235–14250, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14235-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-14235-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Shaw(2003)</label><mixed-citation> Shaw, R. A.: Particle-turbulence interactions in atmospheric clouds, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 35, 183–227, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Singh et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Singh, D. K., Donovan, S., Pardyjak, E. R., and Garrett, T. J.: A differential emissivity imaging technique for measuring hydrometeor mass and type, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6973–6990, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6973-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-6973-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Singh et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Singh, D. K., Pardyjak, E. R., and Garrett, T. J.: A universal scaling law for Lagrangian snowflake accelerations in atmospheric turbulence, Phys. Fluids, 35, 123336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0173359" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/5.0173359</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Singh et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Singh, D. K., Pardyjak, E. R., and Garrett, T. J.: Time-resolved measurements of the densities of individual frozen hydrometeors and fresh snowfall, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4581–4598, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4581-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-17-4581-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Singh and O'Gorman(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Singh, M. S. and O'Gorman, P. A.: Influence of microphysics on the scaling of precipitation extremes with temperature, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061222" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL061222</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Stull(1988)</label><mixed-citation>Stull, R. B.: An introduction to boundary layer meteorology, Vol. 13, Springer Science and Business Media, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Sundaram and Collins(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Sundaram, S. and Collins, L. R.: Collision statistics in an isotropic turbulent suspension. Part 1. Direct numerical simulations, J. Fluid Mech., 335, 75–109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112096004454" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S0022112096004454</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Tennekes and Lumley(1972)</label><mixed-citation> Tennekes, H., and Lumley, J. L.: A first course in turbulence, MIT Press, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Vincent and Folorunso(2009)</label><mixed-citation> Vincent, O. R., and Folorunso, O.: A descriptive algorithm for sobel image edge detection, in: Proceedings of informing science and IT education conference (InSITE), Vol. 40, 97–107, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Wang and Maxey(1993)</label><mixed-citation> Wang, L.-P. and Maxey, M. R.: Settling velocity and concentration distribution of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech., 256, 27–68, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Wilczak et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation> Wilczak, J. M., Oncley, S. P., and Stage, S. A.: Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 99, 127–150, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Yamaguchi et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Yamaguchi, S., Ishizaka, M., Motoyoshi, H., Nakai, S., Vionnet, V., Aoki, T., Yamashita, K., Hashimoto, A., and Hachikubo, A.: Measurement of specific surface area of fresh solid precipitation particles in heavy snowfall regions of Japan, The Cryosphere, 13, 2713–2732, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2713-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-13-2713-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Quantification and parameterization of snowflake fall speeds in the atmospheric surface-layer</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Alcott and Steenburgh(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
       Alcott, T. I. and Steenburgh, W. J.: Snow-to-liquid ratio variability and prediction at a high-elevation site in Utah's Wasatch Mountains, Weather Forecast., 25, 323–337, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009WAF2222311.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009WAF2222311.1</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Bao and Windmiller(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Bao, J. and Windmiller, J. M.: Impact of microphysics on tropical precipitation extremes in a global storm-resolving model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL094206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094206" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094206</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Böhm(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
       Böhm, H. P.: A general equation for
the terminal fall speed of solid hydrometeors, J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 2419–2427,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046&lt;2419:AGEFTT&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046&lt;2419:AGEFTT&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Cohen and Rind(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
       Cohen, J. and Rind, D.: The effect of snow cover on the climate, J. Climate, 4, 689–706, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Colle et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
       Colle, B. A., Garvert, M. F., Wolfe, J. B., Mass, C. F., and Woods, C. P.: The 13–14 December 2001 IMPROVE-2 event. Part III: Simulated microphysical budgets and sensitivity studies, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3535–3558, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3552.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3552.1</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Dimotakis and Koochesfahani(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
       Dimotakis, P. E. Debussy, F. D. and Koochesfahani, M. M.: Particle streak velocity field measurements in a two-dimensional mixing layer, Phys. Fluid., 24, 995–999, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.863481" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.863481</a>, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Eidhammer et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
       Eidhammer, T., Gettelman, A.,
Thayer-Calder, K., Watson-Parris, D., Elsaesser, G., Morrison, H., van
Lier-Walqui, M., Song, C., and McCoy, D.: An Extensible Perturbed Parameter
Ensemble (PPE) for the Community Atmosphere Model Version 6, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7835–7853, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7835-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7835-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Fassnacht et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
       Fassnacht, S., Innes, J., Kouwen, N., and Soulis, E.: The specific surface area of fresh dendritic snow crystals, Hydrol. Process., 13, 2945–2962, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Fornari et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
       Fornari, W., Picano, F., Sardina, G., and Brandt, L.: Reduced particle settling speed in turbulence, J. Fluid Mech., 808, 153–167, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Fovell and Su(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
       Fovell, R. G. and Su, H.: Impact of cloud microphysics on hurricane track forecasts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L24810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031723" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031723</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Garrett et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
       Garrett, T. J., Fallgatter, C., Shkurko, K., and Howlett, D.: Fall speed measurement and high-resolution multi-angle photography of hydrometeors in free fall, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 2625–2633, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2625-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2625-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Garrett et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
       Garrett, T. J., Singh, D. K., and Pardyjak, E. R.: Settling and rotation of frozen hydrometeors in turbulent air, Geophys. Res. Lett., 52, e2025GL114780, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL114780" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL114780</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Garvert et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
       Garvert, M. F., Woods, C. P., Colle, B. A., Mass, C. F., Hobbs, P. V., Stoelinga, M. T., and Wolfe, J. B.: The 13–14 December 2001 IMPROVE-2 event. Part II: Comparisons of MM5 model simulations of clouds and precipitation with observations, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3520–3534, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3551.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3551.1</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Good et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
       Good, G., Ireland, P., Bewley, G., Bodenschatz, E., Collins, L., and Warhaft, Z.: Settling regimes of inertial particles in isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech., 759, R3–R13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.602" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.602</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Grabowski and Wang(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
       Grabowski, W. W. and Wang, L.-P.: Growth of cloud droplets in a turbulent environment, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 45, 293–324, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Grzegorczyk et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
       Grzegorczyk, P., Yadav, S., Zanger, F., Theis, A., Mitra, S. K., Borrmann, S., and Szakáll, M.: Fragmentation of ice particles: laboratory experiments on graupel–graupel and graupel–snowflake collisions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13505–13521, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13505-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13505-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Gunn and Marshall(1958)</label><mixed-citation>
       Gunn, K. L. S. and Marshall, J. S.: The distribution with size of aggregate snowflakes, J. Meteorol., 15, 452–461, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1958)015&lt;0452:TDWSOA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1958)015&lt;0452:TDWSOA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1958.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Hagos et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
       Hagos, S., Ruby Leung, L., Zhao, C., Feng, Z., and Sakaguchi, K.: How do microphysical processes influence large-scale precipitation variability and extremes?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2017GL076375, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076375" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076375</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Heymsfield and Westbrook(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
       Heymsfield, A. J. and Westbrook, C.: Advances in the estimation of ice particle fall speeds using laboratory and field measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 2469–2482, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Ireland et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
       Ireland, P. J., Bragg, A. D., and Collins, L. R.: The effect of Reynolds number on inertial particle dynamics in isotropic turbulence. Part 2. Simulations with gravitational effects, J. Fluid. Mech., 796, 659–711, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Jakob(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
       Jakob, C.: Ice clouds in numerical weather prediction models: progress, problems, and prospects, in: Cirrus, Oxford University Press, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195130720.003.0020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195130720.003.0020</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Legagneux et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
       Legagneux, L., Cabanes, A., and Dominé, F.: Measurement of the specific surface area of 176 snow samples using methane adsorption at 77 K, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, ACH 5-1–ACH 5-15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001016</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Lehning et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
       Lehning, M., Völksch, I., Gustafsson, D., Nguyen, T. A., Stähli, M., and Zappa, M.: ALPINE3D: a detailed model of mountain surface processes and its application to snow hydrology, Hydrol. Process., 20, 2111–2128, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Lehning et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
       Lehning, M., Löwe, H., Ryser, M., and Raderschall, N.: Inhomogeneous precipitation distribution and snow transport in steep terrain, Water Resour. Res., 44, W07404, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006545" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006545</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Li et al.(2021a)</label><mixed-citation>
       Li, C., Lim, K., Berk, T., Abraham, A., Heisel, M., Guala, M., Coletti, F., and Hong, J.: Settling and clustering of snow particles in atmospheric turbulence, J. Fluid Mech., 912, A49, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.1153" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.1153</a>, 2021a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Li et al.(2021b)</label><mixed-citation>
       Li, J., Abraham, A., Guala, M., and Hong, J.: Evidence of preferential sweeping during snow settling in atmospheric turbulence, J. Fluid. Mech., 928, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021.816" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021.816</a>, 2021b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Li et al.(2021c)</label><mixed-citation>
       Li, J., Abraham, A., Guala, M., and Hong, J.: Evidence of preferential sweeping during snow settling in atmospheric turbulence, J. Fluid Mech., 928, A8, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021.816" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021.816</a>, 2021c.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Li et al.(2024a)</label><mixed-citation>
       Li, J., Guala, M., and Hong, J.: Field investigation of 3-D snow settling dynamics under weak atmospheric turbulence, J. Fluid Mech., 997, A33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2024.601" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2024.601</a>, 2024a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Li et al.(2024b)</label><mixed-citation>
       Li, J., Guala, M., and Hong, J.: Field investigation of 3D snow settling dynamics under weak atmospheric turbulence, arXiv [preprint],  <a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.08737" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.08737</a>, 13 June 2024b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Li et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
       Li, S., Bragg, A. D., and Katul, G.: Reduced sediment settling in turbulent flows due to basset history and virtual mass effects, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL105810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105810" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105810</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Locatelli and Hobbs(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
       Locatelli, J. D. and Hobbs, P. V.: Fall speeds and masses of solid precipitation particles, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 2185–2197, 1974.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Maxey(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
       Maxey, M.: The gravitational settling of aerosol particles in homogeneous turbulence and random flow fields, J. Fluid Mech., 174, 441–465, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Maxey and Corrsin(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
       Maxey, M. t. and Corrsin, S.: Gravitational settling of aerosol particles in randomly oriented cellular flow fields, J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 1112–1134, 1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Mercado et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
       Mercado, J. M., Prakash, V. N., Tagawa, Y., Sun, C., Lohse, D., and for Turbulence Research), I. C.: Lagrangian statistics of light particles in turbulence, Phys. Fluids, 24, 055106, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4719148" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4719148</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Milbrandt and Morrison(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
       Milbrandt, J. A. and Morrison, H.: Prediction of graupel density in a bulk microphysics scheme, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 410–429, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Milbrandt et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
       Milbrandt, J. A., Yau, M. K., Mailhot, J., Bélair, S., and McTaggart-Cowan, R.: Simulation of an orographic precipitation event during IMPROVE-2. Part II: Sensitivity to the number of moments in the bulk microphysics scheme, Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 625–642, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR3121.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR3121.1</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Mitchell et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
       Mitchell, D. L., Rasch, P., Ivanova, D., McFarquhar, G., and Nousiainen, T.: Impact of small ice crystal assumptions on ice sedimentation rates in cirrus clouds and GCM simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, 9806–+, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033552" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033552</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Morrison and Milbrandt(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
       Morrison, H. and Milbrandt, J. A.: Parameterization of cloud microphysics based on the prediction of bulk ice particle properties. Part I: Scheme description and idealized tests, J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 287–311, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0065.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0065.1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Morrison et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
       Morrison, H., van Lier-Walqui, M., Fridlind, A. M., Grabowski, W. W., Harrington, J. Y., Hoose, C., Korolev, A., Kumjian, M. R., Milbrandt, J. A., Pawlowska, H., Posselt, D. J., Prat, O. P., Reimel, K. J., Shima, S.-I., van Diedenhoven, B., and Xue, L.: Confronting the challenge of modeling cloud and precipitation microphysics, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001689, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001689" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001689</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Morrison et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
       Morrison, T. J., Meisenheimer, T., Garrett, T., Singh, D., Donovan, S., and Pardyjak, E.: Relating storm-snow avalanche instabilities to data collected from the Differential Emissivity Imaging Disdrometer (DEID), Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 210, 103839, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2023.103839" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2023.103839</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Mott and Lehning(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
       Mott, R. and Lehning, M.: Meteorological modeling of very high-resolution wind fields and snow deposition for mountains, J. Hydrol., 11, 934–949, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Murray(1970)</label><mixed-citation>
       Murray, S. P.: Settling velocities and vertical diffusion of particles in turbulent water, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 1647–1654, 1970.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Nemes et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
       Nemes, A., Dasari, T., Hong, J., Guala, M., and Coletti, F.: Snowflakes in the atmospheric surface layer: observation of particle–turbulence dynamics, J. Fluid Mech., 814, 592–613, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Nielsen(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
       Nielsen, P.: Turbulence effects on the settling of suspended particles, Journal of Sedimentary Research, 63, 835–838, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Nielsen(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
       Nielsen, P.: Mean and variance of the velocity of solid particles in turbulence, in: Particle-Laden Flow, Springer, 385–391, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6218-6_30" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6218-6_30</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Parodi and Emanuel(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
       Parodi, A. and Emanuel, K.: A theory for buoyancy and velocity scales in deep moist convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 3449–3463, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3103.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3103.1</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Posselt et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
       Posselt, D. J., He, F., Bukowski, J., and Reid, J. S.: On the relative sensitivity of a tropical deep convective storm to changes in environment and cloud microphysical parameters, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 1163–1185, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0181.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0181.1</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Rees et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Rees, K. N., Singh, D. K., Pardyjak, E. R., and Garrett, T. J.: Mass and density of individual frozen hydrometeors, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14235–14250, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14235-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14235-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Shaw(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shaw, R. A.: Particle-turbulence interactions in atmospheric clouds, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 35, 183–227, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Singh et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Singh, D. K., Donovan, S., Pardyjak, E. R., and Garrett, T. J.: A differential emissivity imaging technique for measuring hydrometeor mass and type, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6973–6990, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6973-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6973-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Singh et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Singh, D. K., Pardyjak, E. R., and Garrett, T. J.: A universal scaling law for Lagrangian snowflake accelerations in atmospheric turbulence, Phys. Fluids, 35, 123336, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0173359" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0173359</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Singh et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Singh, D. K., Pardyjak, E. R., and Garrett, T. J.: Time-resolved measurements of the densities of individual frozen hydrometeors and fresh snowfall, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4581–4598, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4581-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4581-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Singh and O'Gorman(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Singh, M. S. and O'Gorman, P. A.: Influence of microphysics on the scaling of precipitation extremes with temperature, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061222" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061222</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Stull(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
       Stull, R. B.: An introduction to boundary layer meteorology, Vol. 13, Springer Science and Business Media, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8</a>, 1988.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Sundaram and Collins(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
       Sundaram, S. and
Collins, L. R.: Collision statistics in an isotropic turbulent
suspension. Part 1. Direct numerical simulations, J. Fluid Mech., 335,
75–109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112096004454" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112096004454</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Tennekes and Lumley(1972)</label><mixed-citation>
       Tennekes, H., and Lumley, J. L.: A first course in turbulence, MIT Press, 1972.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Vincent and Folorunso(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
       Vincent, O. R., and Folorunso, O.: A descriptive algorithm for sobel image edge detection, in: Proceedings of informing science and IT education conference (InSITE), Vol. 40, 97–107, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Wang and Maxey(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, L.-P. and Maxey, M. R.: Settling velocity and concentration distribution of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech., 256, 27–68, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Wilczak et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
       Wilczak, J. M., Oncley, S. P., and Stage, S. A.: Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 99, 127–150, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Yamaguchi et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
       Yamaguchi, S., Ishizaka, M., Motoyoshi, H., Nakai, S., Vionnet, V., Aoki, T., Yamashita, K., Hashimoto, A., and Hachikubo, A.: Measurement of specific surface area of fresh solid precipitation particles in heavy snowfall regions of Japan, The Cryosphere, 13, 2713–2732, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2713-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2713-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
