Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 25, issue 22
Articles | Volume 25, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15969-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15969-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 25, issue 22
Research article
 | 
18 Nov 2025
Research article |  | 18 Nov 2025

Intercomparison of global ground-level ozone datasets for health-relevant metrics

Hantao Wang, Kazuyuki Miyazaki, Haitong Zhe Sun, Zhen Qu, Xiang Liu, Antje Inness, Martin Schultz, Sabine Schröder, Marc Serre, and J. Jason West

Viewed

Total article views: 1,460 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,133 283 44 1,460 110 38 47
  • HTML: 1,133
  • PDF: 283
  • XML: 44
  • Total: 1,460
  • Supplement: 110
  • BibTeX: 38
  • EndNote: 47
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jan 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jan 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,460 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,415 with geography defined and 45 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
We compare six datasets of global ground-level ozone, developed using geostatistical, machine learning, or reanalysis methods. The datasets show important differences from one another in ozone magnitude, greater than 5 ppb, and trends, globally and regionally. Compared with measurements, performance varies among datasets, and most overestimate ozone, particularly at lower concentrations. These differences among datasets highlight uncertainties for applications to health and other impacts.
Read more
Share
Special issue
Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report Phase II (TOAR-II) Community...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint